Hello, I'm Trilletrollet. I noticed that you recently removed content from Template:Theropoda without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 16:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you made two adjustments to the taxobox in Spinosauridae, although I don't think they were, for the lack of a better word, valid. One, you changed the max age from Early Jurassic to Late Jurassic, but still left the numerical value at 180, which is during the Early Jurassic anyways according to the ICS. Also, removed a minor footnote in the subgroups section, although the possibility of synonymity of Sigilmassasaurus and Oxalaia with Spinosaurus is significant enough to at least be addressed there. These edits may have been with good intentions, but only subtracted from, and added contradicting information to, the article. I'll undo the changes, and if you still aren't sure, we can still discuss it. Hiroizmeh (talk) 23:40, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Friedlemon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Lewisuchus—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. — Friedlemon⭐ ^💬 16:18, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ceratosauridae, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. WikiLinuz (talk) 18:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

The filter log is interesting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/30819754 ?! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:20, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Maniraptoriformes, you may be blocked from editing. Robertjamal12 (talk) 14:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lewisuchus, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mad Loux (talk) 17:48, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:03, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to User talk:AManWithNoPlan, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:47, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:AManWithNoPlan, you may be blocked from editing. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:50, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze Wolf: All I was doing was reverting a sock. There is nothing wrong with reverting a sock. 204.209.176.75 (talk) 18:51, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 14:35, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm GummiBear139. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. GummiBear139 (talk) 18:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]