This user is a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet of Verdict as confirmed by the user's edits, and has been blocked indefinitely.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fusionxking (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Lie

Decline reason:

The way you're talking, you're clearly a sock of somebody. At some point, it doesn't matter to me who of. – Luna Santin (talk) 17:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes, Verdict (talk · contribs) has been caught lying repeatedly. This is no grounds for an unblock of this abusive sockpuppet of a user banned by community consensus, though. --Yamla 17:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This admin is lying. He has no proof i am Verdict and he tryies to keep many people out of Wikipedia by saying they are not welcome and blocking them. If it was not for him. It would not be so many sockpuppets on the pedia. He should not have the right to be an admin. He gives orders thinking he is the boss what he does is not right and i have seen him get many critics on his talk page.

See [1] and WP:BAN. --Yamla 17:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]