The previous template was about articles, this is about policy. It makes sense that we don't crystal ball articles - we are encyclopaedians not astrologers. However that shouldn't stop us thinking about our own future. ϢereSpielChequers 21:43, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest then, that you make the purpose of the template more clear as to its purpose seeing as it has been used on two articles. The documentation seems to be copied over from Template:Historical. I would suggest that the documentation be modified to more fit the purpose of the tempate. Also, couldn't Template:Proposed be used instead of this one? Rabbitfang (talk) 22:18, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]