GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 05:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Initial comment
[edit]I plan to review this article. Djmaschek (talk) 05:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Review 1
[edit]@Zawed: Sorry, I got distracted for a few days. Normally, I find numerous errors, but your grammar and syntax are excellent. There is only one issue to fix for GA class. Djmaschek (talk) 19:15, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- In the London Gazette quote, it reads, "and damaged a Heinkel in." Shouldn't this read, "and damaged a Heinkel 111"? If this typo was in the original article, you might want to add "[sic]". Otherwise, please fix.
- Thanks, Djmaschek. Yes, the "in" was a typo (possibly an OCR issue) in the html version of the citation that I cut and pasted. It should be 111, and I have now fixed. Thanks again, Zawed (talk) 21:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- GA class. Djmaschek (talk) 21:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)