I'm not sure what "respectively" in the first sentence is referring to... usually it's matching two pairs of things... --Galaxiaad 11:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no need for the 'respectively' part

I am confused about what the meaning of "capacitance" is, or what it means in this sentence? All definitions I can find are using it in refernce to electricity? Any help? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Overgele (talk • contribs) 18:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Total peripheral flow resistance seems to be the same topic and should be merged into this article Bhny (talk) 05:00, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I hold the same opinion.--Cuaxdon (talk) 12:28, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very clear case of redundancy. Also, look at vascular resistance. Maybe both total peripheral resistance and total peripheral flow resistance can be merged into vascular resistance. I don't think TPR is a broad enough topic to grow into a good-sized article. Gccwang (talk) 17:47, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I merged them Gccwang (talk) 22:33, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]