This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Donald Trump, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Donald Trump on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Donald TrumpWikipedia:WikiProject Donald TrumpTemplate:WikiProject Donald TrumpDonald Trump articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
The current infobox image is clear and current, but could we find an image that is more professional and flattering. It seems rather unkind to have the current image represent the page. (Aricmfergie (talk) 05:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly. This just shows the inherent left bias of metawiki. 2605:59C8:1018:AD10:D099:1CA0:9237:E7D1 (talk) 13:59, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aricmfergie & above anon - Any picture of Ms. Sanders used in the WP article about her has to be in the public domain or under a CC-BY-SA license so WP/Commons can then use it. All the photos presently usable are located in the Commons Category of Sarah Huckabee Sanders by year. Maybe find one in that Category that you think is better and propose it for the infobox here on this page? Shearonink (talk) 15:05, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Trillfendi Sanders is not a conventionally-beautiful woman. SO WHAT. The present image - as of this edit is further away from viewers and one can barely *see* her face. Is this *better*?!?. Does WP carefully pussyfoot around on images of male politicians? Is it only because Huckabee is a woman?... yeah what do you think. Shearonink (talk) 03:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Shockingly enough... I'm a woman as well. If the official portrait can be used I will happily add it. If not, it can be deleted. Trillfendi (talk) 19:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This media file is in the public domain in the United States. This applies to U.S. works where the copyright has expired, often because its first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1929, and if not then due to lack of notice or renewal.
but the image wasn't published before 1929 plus individual US states have copyright assertions that differ from official US government images (that are free/public domain). Shearonink (talk) 21:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have just tagged that image on Commons for deletion due to the lack of support for the public domain claim. The front page of the governor's website has a link right to the image, but that's it -- it goes right to the image, and does not include a page ceding rights in any form. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 00:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]