![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I changed the description of Cabrera as one of the best shortstops in baseball. I name Jeter, Nomar, Tejada as certainly better than he is. Carlos Guillen has been as solid as Cabrera, and is playing much better in 2004. Michael Young is at least as good as Cabrera. Omar Vizquel has consistently been a very good SS, Angel Berroa won Rookie of the Year, and Edgar Renteria's statistics are better as well. That means Cabrera is at best the 10th best SS in baseball, which hardly qualifies him as "one of the best". - NYYW im the best shortstop not him
- that lines back, so im removing it again. thats a load of bull. cabreras good, but hes not one of the best. i wouldnt say berroas better than him (nobody even knows wut berroas doing nowadays), and nomar hasnt been a shortstop for 3 years. but cabrera barely cuts the top 10 regardless, maybe top 15. though top 15 isnt good enough to be considered one of the best. reyes, rollins, han-ram, tejada, jeter, guillen, young, renteria, peralta, and quite a few others are just a couple names i would like to have instead of cabrera.
Added in that Sox fans still give him standing ovations whenever he walks up to the plate. Peach freak 03:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
I have edited Cabrera's statistics into his current ones.
Dec. 3, 2007.
Possible copyright problem
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/46px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 21:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 0 external links on Orlando Cabrera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)