Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: North8000 (talk · contribs) 13:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm starting a GA review of this article. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 13:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review Discussion[edit]

This was a very easy article to review because it is so well done that it easily meets Good Article criteria.North8000 (talk) 00:01, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Final GA review checklist[edit]

Well-written

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 23:56, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Factually accurate and verifiable

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 23:56, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Broad in its coverage

Meets this criteria. Good scope of coverage for the topic. North8000 (talk) 23:57, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 23:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

Meets this criteria. Article is very stable. North8000 (talk) 23:59, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by images

Meets this criteria. Has three images, all are free, no article-specific rationale required. North8000 (talk) 13:16, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article passes Good Article. It was easy to review because it is so well done that it easily met Good Article criteria. Congratulations on an excellent job! I will execute the passage details within a few hours. North8000 (talk) 00:05, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]