GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: WaitingForConnection (talk · contribs) 18:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
I intend to review this tonight. At worst I'll have a good chunk of the review up within 24 hours. Regards, —WFC— 18:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
On hold I'm putting this on hold per the comments on the talk page. I concur with 4u1e's view that this doesn't currently meet 3a, and there seems little point in reviewing now and potentially reviewing a substantially different article in the near future. Instead, I'll review in a week or so. If there are no improvements I'll fail this nomination, but give constructive feedback on the GA criteria which should help for any future attempt. If improvements do happen I'll review the article with the intention of allowing further time to pass, if necessary. —WFC— 03:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Been a few weeks; will the review continue? Wizardman Operation Big Bear 13:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- Per 4u1e's concerns I'm closing this. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:09, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry for not getting back to this in a timely manner Wizardman, I've been unexpectedly busy in real life. I agree with your close. To the original nominator, if you would like me to go through the article with you, feel free to ping me on my talk page. —WFC— 19:40, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- Per 4u1e's concerns I'm closing this. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:09, 4 March 2012 (UTC)