This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tampa Bay C‑class (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tampa Bay, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Tampa BayWikipedia:WikiProject Tampa BayTemplate:WikiProject Tampa BayTampa Bay articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Florida Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Primates Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Actually, he's been monkeying about in a variety of place in Pinellas. Hopefully we can find a source. Dlohcierekim 18:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an encyclopedia article?!?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.254.34.82 (talk) 00:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I think this might be an April Fools' joke... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.246.71.240 (talk) 00:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. Follow the links. This is a highly notable monkey, and somethin of a news item here in sunny Pinellas County. Dlohcierekim 00:51, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

lol i lolled my loller off thank u frank spalla:)Anapazapa (talk) 01:42, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, this monkey is very real, I live in the area and they've been trying to catch this thing since early March, so yeah this deserves a place on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.35.147.161 (talk) 13:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is supposed to be an encyclopaedia, how about keeping it as such? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.87.236 (talk) 11:02, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How about you grow a sense of humor? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.79.73.27 (talk) 18:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Guys, this is serious business! Wikipedia has such a good reputation, too. Frankjohnson123 (talk) 23:35, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an encyclopedia with no boundaries. I mean, the Defenestration of Prague objectively meets notability guidelines, no? Just because it's funny doesn't mean it's not notable. 71.137.3.191 (talk) 23:39, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

how about...........damn I have nothing witty to say! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.64.199.65 (talk) 21:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If someone pushes this to AfD, it is obviously mergeable into Rhesus macaque#Feral colonies in the United States, though I think it might be time to create a Feral rhesus macaque article (e.g. by renaming this one) and push those and this into it. But the information should be welcome somewhere. Wnt (talk) 19:48, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, then again, why not just do it? It'll keep the redirect. Wnt (talk) 19:49, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If something needs deleting, that's one thing. If it doesn't meet some standard that's another thing.

But saying something should be deleted because its a hoax without verifiable sources, when several are listed...... smells like vandalism. Though I might be missing something.

If you think something isn't encyclopedic, you don't request deletion based on lack of verifiable sources, when there are clearly sources listed. Unless someone went to the trouble of making realistic looking facsimiles of newspaper websites.

Anonymous user 78.151.87.236 sounds out of line to me, otherwise.

Antelope In Search Of Truth (talk) 11:11, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen more notable articles get drawn into deletion debates - and if there's anything more frustrating than trying to keep your article from being deleted, it's doing it every other month until you miss one and they kill it. So I did the merge you see here. I hope you don't mind. Wnt (talk) 20:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{editsemiprotected}}

Tampa's Mystery Monkey is also taunting his would-be captors on Twitter [@MonkeyOnLoose] and has even started a petition asking Florida Governor Charlie Crist to pardon him.

Jordanraynor (talk) 17:01, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no. A monkey with a Twitter account? Is this a April Fool's joke? If there actually is a campaign, please provide a reliable source. —innotata 17:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LOL you're a retard if you believed that April Fools. Genjix (talk) 14:46, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Feral rhesus macaque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040826195106/http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/local/8961941.htm to http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/local/8961941.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]