Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 22:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Coming soon... Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 22:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

• in the 1960s, due to his → remove comma
• both efforts spearheaded by Charters → both efforts being spearheaded by Chaarters
• practitioners of the blues → remove "blues"
• is also highly praised → which was highly acclaimed

Infobox[edit]

• For genres, occupations and instruments, use a flat list.
• 1920s-1945 → 1920s–1945

Biography[edit]

Early life and career[edit]

• instrument: a cigar → instrument—a cigar
• Little else seems to be known about Johnson's childhood but at some point → While few other information is known about the singer's childhood, he met another blind musician at some point named...

Recording sessions[edit]

• evangelist with "remarkable → evangelist with a "remarkable
• most established → most-established
• best exemplifies his unique guitar playing in regular tuning in Open D for slide → place "best" at the end of the sentence
• and according to Harris he → and—according to Harris—he
• according to Johnson biographer → according to Johnson's biographer
• spectating Johnson perform → spectating Johnson performing
• journeyed to Atlanta with Harris → add comma before "with Harris"
• in 1932; however, Johnson → in 1932, but Johnson

Later life and death[edit]

• of that cemetery → of the cemetery

Musical style[edit]

• Sam Charters in the liner notes to the compilation album The Complete Blind Willie Johnson wrote Johnson, in fact, was → Sam Charters wrote in the liner notes of his compilation album The Complete... that, in fact, Johnson was
• Johnson's style: "opposed → Johnson's style as being "opposed
• Johnson also delivered in his → Johnson also delivered vocals in his

Legacy[edit]

• was included because, according to Sagan → was included, as—according to Sagan—

References[edit]

• Please change the style into {{reflist|2}}

Outcome[edit]

AWESOME article!! You did a fantastic job on it ! I've put this  On hold to allow fine-tuning edits on the page before passing to GA. Best regards and good luck, Cartoon network freak (talk) 23:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoon network freak thank you for the review. I made the changes as asked, but I have questions about the last two alterations you suggest in the lead. Shouldn't the "blues" be kept in the sentence so readers know specifically what Johnson was a "practioner" of? Also, could you re-read your fourth recommendation because I read it over and over, and it just does not make sense to me in the sentence. Other than that, I am happy to say I like how the article turned out, especially when I consider the shape it was in not too long ago. Thank you again!TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:43, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TheGracefulSlick Hi there again! In the first case, I just wanted to say that you should remove overfluous "the", but I have made a mistake by writing "blues" instead. My fourth recommendation is meant to be a better solution for saying that his work was "praised", but if you think your is better, then just keep it;) Finally, I'm gladly passing this AWESOME article, and I'm going to fix the problem with "the" before enlisting this. Best regards and congrats, Cartoon network freak (talk) 06:41, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]