This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
How can the voter turnout be more than 95 % when there were not much more than half the votes of the previous election cast in this one? It seems that voter turnout slipped strongly in these elections. --Maxl (talk) 10:12, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'd imagine there may have been a change in the electoral system that disenfranchised a lot of voters that had been able to vote in 1900. I will check the book again this evening. Number5710:35, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, the answer is that the 1900 election was held using a system whereby voters could vote for multiple candidates (the number of registered voters was 1,472,953, but just over 2m votes were cast). This election was held using a one vote per voter system, so the number of votes cast fell to just over 1m. Number5708:27, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]