Trichome

Content deleted Content added
79.9.163.178 (talk)
No edit summary
99.231.112.97 (talk)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
==Prediction==
==Prediction==
I consider the prediction section to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. In my opinion, encyclopedias should write about what people have done, not what they say might happen. Does anybody else agree? Should it be removed?--[[User:Mycomp|Mycomp]] ([[User talk:Mycomp|talk]]) 02:18, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
I consider the prediction section to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. In my opinion, encyclopedias should write about what people have done, not what they say might happen. Does anybody else agree? Should it be removed?--[[User:Mycomp|Mycomp]] ([[User talk:Mycomp|talk]]) 02:18, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

RE: PREDICTION
I'm going to add the prediction section back in because it gives insight into the theology of the subject. For instance, no overview of Christianity is complete without a reference to future prophesy (second coming etc.).

Revision as of 23:52, 28 May 2009

I don't see nn si capisce un cazz vi prego di scorreggiare contro faustino ogni volta che lo vedete being questioned; when reading it, I appreciated that someone took the time to include the predictions of the group. Personally, I think they should do it for every religious or spiritually themed page that is connected to fortune-telling. 75.73.45.230 (talk) 21:16, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prediction

I consider the prediction section to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. In my opinion, encyclopedias should write about what people have done, not what they say might happen. Does anybody else agree? Should it be removed?--Mycomp (talk) 02:18, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: PREDICTION

 I'm going to add the prediction section back in because it gives insight into the theology of the subject.  For instance, no overview of Christianity is complete without a reference to future prophesy (second coming etc.).

Leave a Reply