India C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Forged" is probably a more accurate and eloquent term. 2402:E280:230C:594:D950:DF36:AB97:B5F5 (talk) 10:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Variety writes, "The word ‘farzi’ literally means fake and Raj says that beyond the obvious association of the word with counterfeiting, the show looks at the inherent fakeness within people." Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:36, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Krimuk2.0 Moneycontrol has no business putting their nose into film reviews. I don't think their review should be included here — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:54, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? Why not? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now I saw it's not from Moneycontrol, rather than from Sowmya Rajendran. It's all good — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]