- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was Support I-355. --Rschen7754 (T C) 00:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008
- Interstate 355 - one of our best interstate highway articles. —JA10 Talk • Contribs 20:21, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support, high-quality GA, passed its ACR, might be a featured article in the future. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 03:42, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Strong support extremely well-written, possibly brilliant. 哦，是吗？(review O) 04:00, 17 December 2007 (GMT)
- U.S. Route 99 - a great U.S. Route page with very good details. -ComputerGuy890100 (talk) 04:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose, woefully under-referenced and is tagged for cleanup. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 04:50, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose List-box in route description, needs more references. Pepper6181 (talk) 23:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was Support OK-74. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
February 2008
- Oklahoma State Highway 74, a solid GA. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support, no reservations here. Gotta love the retro infobox, too. ;) --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 04:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support it could use a few more pics, otherwise very well written article. Pepper6181 (talk) 23:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support very interesting article, it has enough pics in my opinion. —JA10 Talk • Contribs 17:21, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was Support I-70 CO. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
March 2008
- Interstate 70 in Colorado - If you live in the USA you can't call yourself a true roadgeek until you've driven this =-) Davemeistermoab (talk) 02:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
April 2008
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the poll. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the poll was U.S. Route 50 in Nevada chosen (apparently). --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 02:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- U.S. Route 491 - Given its history, it has appeal outside the roadgeek community. Davemeistermoab (talk) 01:47, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- New York State Route 22 - recently promoted to A-Class. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 01:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- U.S. Route 50 in Nevada The Loneliest Road in America, with a program to get a certificate to prove you've clinched it. Davemeistermoab (talk) 05:54, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the poll. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
May 2008
- The following is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was NY-22 since it's been up there for a while. --Rschen7754 (T C) 01:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- M-28 (Michigan highway) — recently promoted to A-Class and a future FAC someday. Can be pushed back to another month if it goes FAC. Imzadi1979 (talk) 23:41, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- New York State Route 22 again... --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 02:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.
June 2008
- The following is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was M-35 to maintain regional balance --Imzadi1979 (talk) 03:05, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- New York State Route 174 - First SR to be a Featured Article, certain deserves a spot here.Mitch32contribs 11:00, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support FAs are welcome. — ComputerGuy890100Talk to meWhat I've done to help Wikipedia 02:58, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose — only because NY 22 is the May SA. We should try for regional balance. Imzadi1979 (talk) 03:24, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. I would support rolling this nom to next month as certainly the FA status makes it worth considering.
- M-35 (Michigan highway) — the first MI trunkline article to go up to FAC. would provide some regional balance to the western and eastern states. Imzadi1979 (talk) 22:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Update, M-35 has passed FA tonight. Imzadi1979 (talk) 03:10, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.
July 2008
- The following is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was U.S. Route 12 in Washington because it was the only nominee. --CG was here. (T - C - S - E) 00:39, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- U.S. Route 12 in Washington - The only A-class article for WP:WASH (see here) and a future FAC. — ComputerGuy890100Talk to meWhat I've done to help Wikipedia 01:46, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was Support Chickasaw Turnpike. --CG was here. (T - C - S - E) 04:00, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
August 2008
- Chickasaw Turnpike, a Featured Article. Helps to prep it for a potential Main Page day in September. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 20:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comment If the article is nominated by you to go on the Main Page on September 1, according to the criteria, Chickasaw Turnpike would have 3 points. --CG was here. (T - C - S - E) 00:53, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:26, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 07:45, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- It's settled, Chickasaw Turnpike is August's selected article. --CG was here. (T - C - S - E) 03:59, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was support. ~~ ĈőмρǖтέŗĠύʎ890100 (t ↔ Ĕ ↔ ώ) 22:03, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
September 2008
Utah State Route 128 - An A class article, hopefully FA by the time this comes up. A unique highway with a unique history. Dave (talk) 21:35, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 23:54, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support as well - CL — 00:17, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support - Nicely done. ~~ ĈőмρǖтέŗĠύʎ890100 (t ↔ Ĕ ↔ ώ) 21:51, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
- The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was support Vermont Route 17. ~~ ĈőмρǖтέŗĠύʎ890100 (t ↔ Ĕ ↔ ώ) Review me! 16:22, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
October 2008
Vermont Route 17 - A GA and to maintain regional balance. ~~ ĈőмρǖтέŗĠύʎ890100 (t ↔ Ĕ ↔ ώ) Review me! 01:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support - CL — 01:57, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Support – Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 03:43, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
- The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was support MD 36. ~~ ComputerGuy 18:08, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
November 2008
Interstate 82 – GA with a pretty long lead. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 01:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Support – As nominator. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 01:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC)- Oppose - has some issues - and we have higher class articles. --Rschen7754 (T C) 01:42, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Washington State Route 527 – Fifth Washington GA. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 16:56, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Support – As nominator. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 16:56, 11 October 2008 (UTC)- Oppose we have higher class articles... --Rschen7754 (T C) 17:59, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Maryland State Route 36 - new FA - and we've never had a MD article on the portal before. --Rschen7754 (T C) 18:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support as nominator. --Rschen7754 (T C) 18:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)'
- Support - Good. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 18:57, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was support U.S. Route 491. ~~ ComputerGuy 18:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
December 2008
- Tentative support, I have nominated this to be TFA for December 5th. If this gets approved and on the main page, I would rather find a different article (overkill). However, if the nomination fails, the article has December relevance, so would be a good fit. Dave (talk) 16:30, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.