Extended cycle combined hormonal contraceptives | |
---|---|
Background | |
Type | Hormonal |
First use | 1993 (first randomized study)[1] |
Pregnancy rates (first year) | |
Perfect use | ? |
Typical use | 0.9% |
Usage | |
Duration effect | varies |
Reversibility | Yes |
User reminders | varies |
Advantages and disadvantages | |
STI protection | No |
Periods | Eliminates or reduces frequency |
Benefits | Reduce menstruation related symptoms, reduce risk of anemia |
Extended or continuous cycle combined oral contraceptive pills are a packaging of combined oral contraceptive pills (COCPs) that reduce or eliminate the withdrawal bleeding that would occur once every 28 days in traditionally packaged COCPs. It works by reducing the frequency of the pill-free or placebo days. Extended cycle use of COCPs may also be called menstrual suppression,[2] although other hormonal medications or medication delivery systems (hormonal intrauterine devices—IUDs) may also be used to suppress menses. Any brand of combined oral contraceptive pills can be used in an extended or continuous manner by simply discarding the placebo pills; this is most commonly done with monophasic pills in which all of the pills in a package contain the same fixed dosing of a synthetic estrogen and a progestin in each active pill.[3]
Other combined hormonal contraceptives (those containing both an estrogen and a progestin) may also be used in an extended or continuous cycle. For example, the NuvaRing vaginal ring[4] and the contraceptive patch[5] have been studied for extended cycle use, and the monthly combined injectable contraceptive may similarly eliminate bleeding.[6]
History
[edit]Contraception means prevention of reproduction by artificial means. Before the advent of modern contraceptives, reproductive age women spent most of their time either pregnant or nursing. In modern Western society, women typically have about 450 periods during their lives, as compared to about 160 formerly.[7]
Although it was evident that the pill could be used to suppress menstruation for arbitrary lengths of time, the original regimen was designed to produce withdrawal bleeding every four weeks to mimic the menstrual cycle.[8]
There are three types of oral contraceptive pills—combined estrogen-progesterone, progesterone-only, and continuous or extended use pill.[9]
Usage
[edit]When a woman takes COCP, the hormones in the pills prevent both ovulation and shedding of the endometrium (menstruation). Traditionally, COCPs are packaged with 21 active (hormone-containing) pills and 7 placebo pills. During the week of placebo pills, withdrawal bleeding occurs and simulates an average 28-day menstrual cycle. The placebo pills are not required for pregnancy protection, and with any monophasic COCP the placebo pills may be discarded, and the next pack of active pills may be started to prevent the withdrawal bleeding.[10] With bi- and tri-phasic pills, skipping the placebo week results in a sudden change in hormone levels, which may cause irregular spotting or flow. (Monophasic pills offer the same dose of estrogen and progestogen whereas multiphasic pills have varying doses from day to day; see formulations for details.)[citation needed]
Recently, several pharmaceutical companies have gained FDA approval to package COCPs for the intended use of reducing the frequency of or eliminating withdrawal bleeding.[citation needed]
The use of COCP is dependent on desirable effects and risk of adverse events with progestin component and dose of estrogen and progestin component.
- Estrogen component: Estradiol, Ethinylestradiol, or Estetrol
- First-generation progestin: Norethindrone acetate, Ethynodiol diacetate, Lynestrenol, Norethynodrel
- Second generation progestin: Levonorgestrel,dl-Norgestrel
- Third generation progestin: Norgestimate, Gestodene, Desogestrel
- Unclassified progestin: Drospirenone, Cyproterone acetate
Clinical indications
[edit]Extended or continuous use of COCPs has been used for many years to treat endometriosis, dysmenorrhea, and menstruation-associated symptoms.[11] Some studies have suggested that women who experience premenstrual-type symptoms during the placebo (hormone-free) week of traditionally packaged COCPs may experience significantly fewer symptoms when placed on extended cycle COCP regimens.[12]
More recently, personal preference to avoid menstruation has also become a common reason for use.[11] Personal preference is the most common reason extended cycle or continuous use COCPs are prescribed to adolescents.[13] The Society for Menstrual Cycle Research holds that this use of COCPs does not have sufficient safety studies to justify promotion as a lifestyle choice (as opposed to medical indications), and criticizes what it perceives as negative portrayals of normal menstrual cycles in promotional literature for extended and continuous COCP use.[14]
Women's satisfaction with their contraception, compliance in taking the pills on time, and discontinuation rates are not significantly different between traditional and extended cycle regimens.[11] FDA has also formally approved combined pills for acne for specific brands.[15]
Oral Contraceptive Pills are also effective in Hidradenitis Suppurativa.[16] There is also limited evidence for benefit of Combined oral contraceptive pill (OCP) as treatment for primary dysmenorrhoea. The evidence from four RCTs is that combined OCPs with medium dose oestrogen and 1st/2nd generation progestogens are more effective than placebo, however the studies were small,[17]
Side effects
[edit]With all extended-cycle COCPs, breakthrough bleeding is the most common side effect, although it tends to decrease over time.[18] In a 12-month study of a continuous COCP regimen, 59% of women experienced no bleeding in months six through twelve and 79% of women experienced no bleeding in month twelve.[19] Extended or continuous use of COCPs or other combined hormonal contraceptives carries the same risk of side effects and medical risks as traditional COCP use. [citation needed]
Pill Failure can happen with contraceptive pills and inadvertent pregnancies happen.[20]
Use of oral contraceptive can impair muscle gains in young women.[21] The metabolic impact of oral contraceptives are significant and contraceptive pills can increase the risk of heart attacks. Many preclinical and clinical studies reveal that changes in lipoprotein metabolism are a major contributing factor to atherosclerosis.[22]
There was also reported drug interactions between non-rifamycin antibiotics and hormonal contraception but it was not confirmed in a systematic review.[23]
Ad campaign
[edit]One of the early extended-cycle COCPs, Seasonale, was marketed with the campaign, "Fewer periods. More possibilities." In December 2004, Barr Pharmaceuticals was warned by the FDA concerning these television advertisements. As the warning stated, "By omitting and minimizing the risks associated with Seasonale, the TV ad misleadingly suggests that Seasonale is safer than has been demonstrated by substantial evidence or substantial clinical experience."[24] Although clinical studies had proven Seasonale to be effective in preventing pregnancy, the FDA felt the commercial advertisements omitted the common side effects of irregular vaginal bleeding or spotting.[citation needed]
Brands
[edit]Seasonale is produced by Duramed Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Barr Pharmaceuticals; Barr Pharmaceuticals also produces the same medicine as a generic called Jolessa. Quasense is the generic version produced by Watson Pharmaceuticals. Seasonale contains 30 micrograms of ethinylestradiol and 150 micrograms of levonorgestrel in each active pill. Seasonale reduces the frequency of menstrual periods from thirteen per year to four per year by changing the regimen of active pills from 21 to 84. Each package has 84 active pills and seven placebo pills to be taken at the end of the active cycle.[18] It was first developed by Barr Pharmaceuticals, in collaboration with Eastern Virginia Medical School, under an agreement.[25] The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Seasonale in the United States on September 5, 2003.[26] Barr Pharmaceuticals, its manufacturer, claimed at the time of Seasonale's approval that it would cost one dollar per pill.[25] Health Canada approved Seasonale in July 2007, and Paladin Labs began distributing it in Canada on January 4, 2008.[27][28]
Seasonique, also produced by Duramed Pharmaceuticals, has active pills and packaging identical to Seasonale, but replaces the placebo week with a low-dosage week of estrogen.[citation needed]
Lybrel is produced by Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. It contains 90 μg levonorgestrel and 20 μg ethinylestradiol in each pill, and is designed to be taken continuously with no placebos.[29] The FDA approved Lybrel for human consumption on May 22, 2007.[29]
References
[edit]- ^ Wright KP, Johnson JV (October 2008). "Evaluation of extended and continuous use oral contraceptives". Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. 4 (5): 905–11. doi:10.2147/tcrm.s2143. PMC 2621397. PMID 19209272.
- ^ "Health Matters: Understanding Menstrual Suppression". Association of Reproductive Health Professionals. October 2006. Retrieved 2007-11-16.
- ^ Contraceptive technology. Hatcher, Robert A. (Robert Anthony), 1937- (20th rev. ed.). New York, N.Y.: Ardent Media. 2011. p. 257. ISBN 978-1597080026. OCLC 244395421.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: others (link) - ^ Organon (September 15, 2005). "NuvaRing is effective and well tolerated in extended use - Most women would like to decrease their number of periods a year". Archived from the original on December 12, 2007. Retrieved 2008-05-04.
Miller L, Verhoeven CH, Hout J (2005). "Extended regimens of the contraceptive vaginal ring: a randomized trial". Obstet Gynecol. 106 (3): 473–82. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000175144.08035.74. PMID 16135576. S2CID 46164922.
Barreiros FA, Guazzelli CA, de Araujo FF, Barbosa R (2007). "Bleeding patterns of women using extended regimens of the contraceptive vaginal ring". Contraception. 75 (3): 204–8. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.10.009. PMID 17303490. - ^ Stewart FH, Kaunitz AM, Laguardia KD, Karvois DL, Fisher AC, Friedman AJ (June 2005). "Extended use of transdermal norelgestromin/ethinyl estradiol: a randomized trial". Obstet Gynecol. 105 (6): 1389–96. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000160430.61799.f6. PMID 15932834. S2CID 8831803.
- ^ "Lunelle (Monthly Injection)". Feminist Women's Health Center. January 2006. Archived from the original on 2007-05-29. Retrieved 2007-06-17.
- ^ Rowlands S (October 2007). "Contraception and abortion". J R Soc Med. 100 (10): 465–8. doi:10.1177/014107680710001015. PMC 1997258. PMID 17911129.
- ^ Gladwell M (2000-03-10). "John Rock's Error". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on 2013-12-03. Retrieved 2016-02-17.
- ^ Cooper DB, Patel P, Mahdy H (2022), "Oral Contraceptive Pills", StatPearls, Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, PMID 28613632, retrieved 2022-11-15
- ^ Kripke C (2006). "Cyclic vs. continuous or extended-cycle combined contraceptives". American Family Physician. 73 (5): 804. PMID 16529087. Archived from the original on 2007-09-29. Retrieved 2007-06-17.
- ^ a b c Edelman A, Micks E, Gallo MF, Jensen JT, Grimes DA (2014-07-29). "Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined hormonal contraceptives for contraception". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014 (7): CD004695. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004695.pub3. ISSN 1469-493X. PMC 6837850. PMID 25072731.
- ^ Coffee AL, Kuehl TJ, Willis S, Sulak PJ (2006). "Oral contraceptives and premenstrual symptoms: comparison of a 21/7 and extended regimen". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 195 (5): 1311–9. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.012. PMID 16796986.
- ^ Gerschultz KL, Sucato GS, Hennon TR, Murray PJ, Gold MA (2007). "Extended cycling of combined hormonal contraceptives in adolescents: physician views and prescribing practices". The Journal of Adolescent Health. 40 (2): 151–7. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.09.013. PMID 17259055.
- ^ "Menstruation Is Not A Disease". Society for Menstrual Cycle Research. 2007-06-08. Archived from the original on 2007-10-12. Retrieved 2007-11-16.
- ^ Arowojolu AO, Gallo MF, Grimes DA, Garner SE (2004-07-19), Arowojolu A (ed.), "Combined oral contraceptive pills for treatment of acne", Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3), Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: CD004425, doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004425.pub2, PMID 15266533, retrieved 2022-11-15
- ^ Montero-Vilchez T, Valenzuela-Amigo A, Cuenca-Barrales C, Arias-Santiago S, Leyva-García A, Molina-Leyva A (2021-07-15). "The Role of Oral Contraceptive Pills in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Cohort Study". Life. 11 (7): 697. Bibcode:2021Life...11..697M. doi:10.3390/life11070697. ISSN 2075-1729. PMC 8307628. PMID 34357069.
- ^ Wong CL, Farquhar C, Roberts H (2001-04-23), The Cochrane Collaboration (ed.), "Oral contraceptive pills for primary dysmenorrhoea", Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (4), Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: CD002120, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002120, PMID 11687142, retrieved 2022-11-16
- ^ a b Anderson FD, Gibbons W, Portman D (2006). "Long-term safety of an extended-cycle oral contraceptive (Seasonale): a 2-year multicenter open-label extension trial". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 195 (1): 92–6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.12.045. PMID 16813747.
- ^ Archer DF, Jensen JT, Johnson JV, Borisute H, Grubb GS, Constantine GD (2006). "Evaluation of a continuous regimen of levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol: phase 3 study results". Contraception. 74 (6): 439–45. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.07.005. PMID 17157099.
- ^ Fraser IS, Jansen RP (1 June 1983). "Why do inadvertent pregnancies occur in oral contraceptive users?". Contraception. 27 (6): 531–551. doi:10.1016/0010-7824(83)90019-7. PMID 6413129.
- ^ Riechman SE, Lee CW (November 2022). "Oral Contraceptive Use Impairs Muscle Gains in Young Women". Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 36 (11): 3074–3080. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000004059. ISSN 1064-8011. PMID 33993156. S2CID 81112709.
- ^ Krauss RM, Burkman RT (1 October 1992). "The metabolic impact of oral contraceptives". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 167 (4): 1177–1184. doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90408-1. ISSN 0002-9378. PMID 1415443.
- ^ Simmons KB, Haddad LB, Nanda K, Curtis KM (1 January 2018). "Drug interactions between non-rifamycin antibiotics and hormonal contraception: a systematic review". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 218 (1): 88–97.e14. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.003. PMID 28694152. S2CID 36567820.
- ^ "Seasonale (levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol) Tablets MACMIS ID #12748: 2004" (PDF). United States Department of Health & Human Services. December 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-10-14. Retrieved 2006-10-22.
- ^ a b "Seasonale Extended Cycle OC Approved". About.com. February 2003. Archived from the original on 2008-02-03. Retrieved 2006-10-22.
- ^ "FDA Approves Seasonale Oral Contraceptive". United States Food and Drug Administration. September 5, 2003. Archived from the original on 2006-10-07. Retrieved 2006-10-22.
- ^ Magnan, Michelle, 2007-07-06, Health Canada approves Seasonale Archived 2014-05-25 at the Wayback Machine, Calgary Herald.
- ^ "Paladin Labs Announces SEASONALE Launch". Paladin Labs, Inc. 2008-01-04. Archived from the original on 2013-01-19. Retrieved 2008-02-06.
- ^ a b "FDA Approves Lybrel, First Low Dose Combination Oral Contraceptive Offering Women the Opportunity to Be Period-Free Over Time". PR Newswire Association. 2007-05-22. Archived from the original on May 25, 2007. Retrieved 2007-06-17.
Further reading
[edit]- Elsimar M. Coutinho, Sheldon J. Segal (1999). Is menstruation obsolete?. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-513021-9.
- Susan Rako (2006). The Blessings of the Curse: No More Periods?. Lincoln, NE: Backinprint.com. ISBN 978-0-595-38655-0.
- Susan Rako (2003). No More Periods?: The Risks of Menstrual Suppression. Harmony Books. ISBN 1-4000-4503-7.