Trichome


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

16 May 2024

8 February 2024

15 November 2023

26 October 2023

18 September 2023

9 September 2023

6 September 2023

29 August 2023

28 August 2023

21 August 2023

18 August 2023

  • curprev 20:2020:20, 18 August 2023Isi96 talk contribs 9,263 bytes +193 Undid revision 1171049302 by Horizons 1 (talk) As previously stated, it was agreed to include the descriptor on the Bot Sentinel talk page in a prior discussion, as this article's content was moved from there, and it's adequately sourced. undo Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
  • curprev 18:5618:56, 18 August 2023Horizons 1 talk contribs 9,070 bytes −193 Undid revision 1170576489 by Isi96 (talk) Please move your argument to the appropriate talk page. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

15 August 2023

14 August 2023

10 August 2023

9 August 2023

  • curprev 16:1616:16, 9 August 202372.50.191.3 talk 8,990 bytes −63 Undid revision 1165476260 by Isi96 (talk) "Anti-Amber Heard" is childish and unprofessional. It has no place here. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 16:1216:12, 9 August 202372.50.191.3 talk 9,053 bytes −38 →‎Legal issues: Copy+Paste from Wired is almost certainly not appropriate for Wikipedia, and I doubt Wikipedia should be taking a side on an ongoing case by attacking the plaintiff. State the fact: he is a codefendant in a defamation lawsuit. undo Tag: Reverted

15 July 2023

13 July 2023

4 July 2023

3 July 2023

  • curprev 20:4520:45, 3 July 2023Isi96 talk contribs 9,091 bytes +21 Undid revision 1163252533 by 8.40.61.67 (talk) The descriptor is well sourced. undo Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
  • curprev 20:2820:28, 3 July 20238.40.61.67 talk 9,070 bytes −21 Implying Broughty is "anti-Amber Herd" is needlessly inflammatory and not accurate. While it is true that after hearing the facts of the case and applying his legal analysis, Broughty felt Johnny Depps lawsuit hat more merit and he would likely win (which was ultimately the outcome), his position could be equally be characterized as pro-justice. Neither characterization is pertinent to the discussion of the lawsuit and should be left out. undo Tag: Reverted

25 June 2023

24 June 2023

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Leave a Reply