Trichome

thcscience_admin
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Hu12 (talk | contribs)
91,877 edits
Hu12 (talk | contribs)
91,877 edits
http://spam.one.org II
Line 594: Line 594:
:'''Accounts'''<br>
:'''Accounts'''<br>
{{vandal|Jstorres}}<br>{{IPvandal|76.167.43.219}}<br>{{vandal|Ileananorton}}<br>{{vandal|Eperez moneylaundering}}<br>{{vandal|Bnrmillward}}<br>--[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] ([[User talk:Hu12|talk]]) 07:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
{{vandal|Jstorres}}<br>{{IPvandal|76.167.43.219}}<br>{{vandal|Ileananorton}}<br>{{vandal|Eperez moneylaundering}}<br>{{vandal|Bnrmillward}}<br>--[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] ([[User talk:Hu12|talk]]) 07:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
== http://spam.one.org II ==
[[ONE Campaign]] <br>
[[ONE Vote '08]]
*{{spamlink|one.org}}
*http://spam.onevote08.org
:*{{spamlink|onevote08.org}}
:'''Spam sock accounts'''<br>
{{vandal|Ilxaau}}<br>{{vandal|PShadzik}}<br>{{vandal|Anish ak}}<br>{{vandal|ONE Campaigner}}<br>{{vandal|Sweettalk}}<br>{{vandal|Mpm78}}<br>{{vandal|Martypantspants}}<br>{{vandal|Seibu1}}<br>{{IPvandal|24.47.78.206}}<br>{{vandal|MaebyMichael}}<br>{{vandal|Ilxaau}}<br>{{vandal|PShadzik}}<br>{{IPvandal|68.77.200.44}}<br>--[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] ([[User talk:Hu12|talk]]) 08:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:57, 31 December 2007


Shortcut


Archive

Archives

List of archives (with sections)

ifood.tv

I've noticed links to ifood.tv popping up here and there. In most cases, by spot checking, I found the links added by IP users mapping to India. (Look for 122. IPs). I'm not entirely convinced that this is spam ... well ... it's spam, but it's borderline useful content as opposed to merely being a link aggregator or trying to push a commercial product. Maybe I'll be more dogmatic tomorrow, but I thought I would post it here first to see if anyone has a strong opinion one way or the other on removing the links. --B 02:33, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's monitor how it gets used. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:00, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dirk - did this get monitored? There doesn't seem to be a COIBot report, but a link was added on October 24 2007 ([1]). -- SiobhanHansa 16:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Curious, the bot missed that one. Maybe the bot was down at the moment...
Let's try again. --Dirk Beetstra T C 17:14, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ATX related additions

Accounts

DerbyOwner (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
76.244.69.201 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
76.233.37.234 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) →Vandilized
75.54.94.144 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) → another Vandilism IP
--Hu12 (talk) 03:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[2]DerbyOwner owns these companies and admits through the ip that is promoting on wikipedia[3]. blocked--Hu12 (talk) 20:42, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

pygmalionbooks.org

Accounts
205.200.228.169 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Articles

This editor continues to re-add a link to this organization's web site, offering a postmodern critique of western society in many, many articles that don't seem to require this addition. For example, International Standard Book Number. For an example of the critique offered see http:// pygmalionbooks.org/isbn.php. Their publishing company objects to the use of the ISBN because it 'symbolically legitimates commercial record keeping.' This editor keeps re-adding the link to articles after they've been removed. I would welcome some advice. There have been 28 edits since 17 December. One possibility is to request a block of this IP as a spam-only account, but I haven't tried that lately so I am not sure of the requirements. The editor has received a final warning on their Talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 15:20, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Spammy" at the very least. I've cleared the straightforward links. I'd be tempted with a block if they take the same sort of actions again? Cheers --Herby talk thyme 15:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the call for a block if this behavior continues. The individual or individuals reponsible have made no attempt to offer a justification for the links he or they have added. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 18:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
cleaned up the remainder and found more:
Pygmalion Books → based in Winnipeg, Canada
142.161.168.141 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Andthelion (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
205.200.243.14 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
207.161.197.108 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
205.200.228.169 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Ipdiptation (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 19:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
dynamic.mts.net IPs so any real blocks would be out. "im" warnings on this last lot then maybe BL? Thanks for the tidy up Hu12. Some seemed to have some valid content & I didn't have the time to deal with them --Herby talk thyme 19:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. Is the ISBN outside of criticism? What exactly is "postmodern" about their criticism of the ISBN? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.200.228.169 (talk) 06:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

205.200.244.98 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) resumed work today, putting back the link to pygmalionbooks.org at Citizenship, Arthur (magazine) and Situationist International. I thought of asking for semi-protection, but since so many articles are being targeted, blacklisting may be more appropriate. This is ongoing quirky commentary that constantly inserts links to a self-published web site. The original spammer uses a computer on the network of a school district in Manitoba, Canada. The company seems to issue pamphlets that are not available in the normal way through book stores; they appear to be a sort of collective vanity press. Their postings on Wikipedia are promoting the opinions of their self-published site rather than selling books. EdJohnston (talk) 00:21, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be inclined to consider the local BL at this point, any objections? --Hu12 (talk) 01:42, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you talking about me in the third person? It's a little creepy to be honest. My previous question seems to have gone ignored here. I will try again. Here are some objections: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Freshacconci#Avant-garde_artists I reject the accusation that anything I have been doing is vandalism, and thus far I am not convinced that this rather uncritical mod coalition has been unable to prove otherwise. For each instance where I have been accused of spam, I would like to request a specific run down of why what I posted was spam. Otherwise, your mass censorship would seem to remain entirely unfounded. I have not seen a single good reason provided by any of you yet, in fact. You seem to be unaware of the relevance and notability of this group, which I can attempt to explain if you'd like. However, since you have been extraordinarily uncritical up until now, I would rather you attempt to research the matter on your own first, as I am unconvinced that you're very aware of what you're doing when you make the deletions. I think you should actually have to research the subject a little before you can consider yourself qualified to judge things like notability. There is no evidence that any of you have yet. I have seen EdJohnston make a couple attempts to interpret the group from his somewhat biased standpoint (see below) but both of them are very lacking and miss entirely the substance of what this group really is. To stop at the label of 'vanity press' shows a strong misunderstanding of this group and the associations it has achieved so far. I would suggest a further reading to avoid future bad misinterpretations. Hopefully my objections will not go ignored this time.205.200.244.98 (talk) 22:12, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, there has been another development. I would like to make known the strong personal bias of EdJohnston as pointed out thoroughly in Hu12's message below. 205.200.244.98 (talk) 05:03, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, I'd like to reiterate something mentioned on by Herby on 19:21, 18 December. He mentioned that after doing a clean up, some of the things he removed "seemed to have some valid content" but that he "didn't have the time to deal with" it. In the face of wiping out Pygmalion Books en bloc, I think this is a key point here and further adds to my suggestion for the mods in question to do deeper research on this group before engaging in any hasty future actions. For a starting hint, I notice that Wikipedia describes itself as "a free content encyclopedia project written collaboratively by volunteers." It should be known that this is one of the foremost purposes of Pygmalion Books as well. They are publishers and distributors of libre knowledge. As EdJohnston has already mentioned, they do not sell their books. To my knowledge they are the first significant mass organized endeavor of their kind to emerge in recent years (i.e. the first notable, concerted, widespread volunteer-based attempt to distribute tangible books for free). I am unaware of any other large publishing group that does anything like this. Along with their explicit collaborations with the very well known NOT BORED! journal and the notable Libre Society, this would only seem to add to their notability. 205.200.244.98 (talk) 23:59, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:No Personal Attacks and Wikipedia:Harassment apply to any kind of attack or harassment in any context. [pygmalionbooks.org/silence.php] & [pygmalionbooks.org/edjohnston/User EdJohnston.htm], Wikipedia:Harassment#Off-wiki_harassment Harassment of other Wikipedians through the use of external links is considered equivalent to the posting of personal attacks on Wikipedia...off-wiki harassment can be grounds for blocking, and in extreme cases, banning. see also WP:NPA#Off-wiki_personal_attacks. We need no longer believe that these individuals on-wiki actions in adding these sites was in good faith. Linking to off-site harassment, attacks, or privacy violations against Wikipedians for the purpose of attacking another Wikipedian is never acceptable. Blacklisting has been implemented, per spamming evidence above. I would propose that this off-site trolling and harassment lead to a posible block for disruption.--Hu12 (talk) 02:31, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I should make it clear that I have no relation to the Pygmalion Books bulletin that you cite as harassment. I only linked to it because it displays the personal bias of EdJohnston as it pertains to this case. I am not making a personal attack by linking to it. I only wanted to display relevant information pertaining to this matter for purposes of a more concise and neutral analysis. In good faith, and to clear things up, I will remove the link I posted to the bulletin in question (you can keep your re-posts of the links up as evidence, fine by me). Instead, I welcome you to observe the user EdJohnston's profile page, which displays evidence of his strong personal bias in this case. Can you please address this bias? I would also appreciate your good faith in addressing the other arguments I've made, which have gone ignored thus far. 205.200.244.98 (talk) 05:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I want to point something else out, because I do not understand the nature of the 'blacklist' that Hu12 is mentioning. In "DIGITAL MAOISM: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism", Jaron Lanier uses a lot of insulting language against the processes of Wikipedia. In fact, I did a count. He uses the word "stupid" 11 times and "idiot" 3 times to describe varying aspects of Wikipedia. I am not at all saying that I agree with him here. I'm only pointing out that it's unlikely that Jaron Lanier has been blacklisted from Wikipedia as a result of writing this highly insulting piece. With this in mind, I don't understand why I am being blacklisted for the actions of Pygmalion Books. I didn't write the bulletin that revealed EdJohnston's bias, I have nothing to do with it. I only pointed it out. Am I being blacklisted for the actions of Pygmalion Books? Or are they being blacklisted for being critical of a lack of neutrality in Wikipedia moderation? I don't understand what is going on here!? 205.200.244.98 (talk) 05:36, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions as with all the related IP's/account from Winnipeg (obviously the same person), consist entirely of promoting Pygmalion Books (based in Winnipeg, Canada). I find it quite improbable for someone not related to pygmalionbooks.org could find and present those harassing links, being they are so new. "..foremost purposes of Pygmalion Books...they are the first significant mass organized endeavor of their kind to emerge in recent years..."[4]. It is quite evident that the account and IP's are only contributing to Wikipedia in order to promote Pygmalion Books. Few people will edit tendentiously or argue ad nauseum topics in which they have no connection. The big picture clearly shows someone who is using Wikipedia to promote their own interests. --Hu12 (talk) 06:00, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
With Hu12 here. It is not the content of the links that interest me by the time it has got to this stage. Links to this site are repeatedly added despite the obvious community disapproval. Your rationale for placing the links becomes quite secondary to the behaviour when you so ignore the wishes of others. I endorse the blacklisting --Herby talk thyme 10:22, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
205.200.244.98[5] blocked for continued use of wikipedia for promotion.--Hu12 (talk) 21:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.tvforpc.com

It appears that Hu12 found some of these on the 18th, only the top IP is from today.

Spamsocks: (the first IP blanked a warning on the second one's talk page in addition to adding links of his own)

The newest of the IP's has been blocked temporarily, however note the additiond with the deceptive edit summary.."rm spam"..[6]..--Hu12 (talk) 06:34, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

spam.dromoz.com

This appears to be cross-wiki. There are ~543 links, primarily on en.wp & ms.wp, with a few scattered elsewhere.

I'm not sure if this is the ID that originally added them, but it appears the links were removed by an IP & he's gone and reverted/undone all of the removals.

--Versageek 07:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user has been blocked by John Reaves, and the domain is now locally blacklisted, he'd been spamming these links for months.. --Versageek 08:20, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There are still some 500+ links to this domain on en.wp, in about 250 articles. Before I started to remove them, I posted a notice on WikiProject Malaysia and it would appear that at least one person thinks the site is useful. It is, however, the same situation we've seen recently on some other domains - "spamming" (the undesirable on-wiki activity) doesn't always involve "low content, advertisement-ridden sites". --Versageek 23:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The nature of this is disturbing, I suspect this will be a reoccuring campaign. perhaps a local Blacklisting would be appropriate?--Hu12 (talk) 00:16, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[7] Already added --Hu12 (talk) 00:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The other thing which concerns me about this site is that the content (and indeed the whole concept of the project).. consists of scanned copies of street maps (most of which are very likely copyvio's, as street maps tend to be under copyright). --Versageek 15:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Links cleaned out 0 mainspace left. βcommand 16:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cross-wiki contributions:
--A. B. (talk) 21:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.bravotecnologia.com.br

Accounts

200.160.70.236 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
201.81.34.237 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
--Hu12 (talk) 01:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

X-wiki:
--A. B. (talk) 22:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.usinglinux.org

Adsense: 9912892835037474

This particular spammer uses and account to insert two links and then abandons the account:

✤ JonHarder talk 21:36, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't seem to be a reliable source, is it time to BL?--Hu12 (talk) 22:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Cross-wiki: 91.121.27.144 cross-wiki
  2. Still spamming after the note above.
  3. Sockpuppetry (see above) indicates bad faith. (If you look at the edit histories, there's a distinctive pattern).
--A. B. (talk) 22:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The website is registered to an individual in Paris; both IPs come from France. Distinct possibility of conflict of interest. ✤ JonHarder talk 23:28, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be enough to warrant a Meta BL..imho--Hu12 (talk) 23:34, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uncontrollable, unwilling to stop and spamming across projects -- definitely merits meta blacklisting. --A. B. (talk) 23:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.deluxecruises.com


Adrienfrance (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
86.73.187.254 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
216.55.160.36 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 00:40, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

nedcruise.info

Accounts

Haco (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
62.195.237.68 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
62.195.219.92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 00:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Previous incidents

Global blacklisting requested. MER-C 02:35, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.cruisecritic.com

Adsense pub-4131962432578484
Cruise Critic

Accounts

Splamo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 01:45, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Potential_Sneaky_spam.3F--Hu12 (talk) 04:42, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mark A Silverman Lawyer spam

Accounts

Depositlaw (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 06:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additions of http://spam.eye-tours.com

Accounts

Robertootrebor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Hoihoihoi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
87.212.33.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 07:28, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.cybercrimes.us

cybercrimes.us: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

See also WP:ANI#Anon Spamming Articles. MER-C 01:54, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.techny.com

Adsense pub-9266941986106918

Articles

Computer link magazine
Rochester wireless hotspots →Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rochester_wireless_hotspots

Accounts

Clmroch (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
72.230.177.97 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 05:45, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Toivonen spam

Accounts

Lilaussieprem (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Rackospacko (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
220.253.40.84 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 06:25, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Large Linkfarms at AFD

These are political poll articles comprised of external polling links. This may be of interest to some, both parties are represented in the AFD. see. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2008 --Hu12 (talk) 07:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


http://spam. trutnee.com

Articles

Commercial Laser Tag Systems
Laser tag
Laser Quest
Darkzone
Worlds of Wonder (toy company)
Tiger Electronics
Hasbro
Lazer Tag
‎ Q-Zar
Photon: The Ultimate Game on Planet Earth
‎ Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System

Accounts

Megaboss (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
193.164.130.30 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
-- Ehheh (talk) 19:35, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another:
193.108.48.66 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)--Hu12 (talk) 23:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
BL'd--Hu12 (talk) 23:22, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

spam Archive Search

http://tools.wikimedia.de/~eagle/spamArchiveSearch.php. Seems it has been not retrieving results in the archives. has something changed in the last week?--Hu12 (talk) 19:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guess I'm bumping this. Our archives are not returning search results...--Hu12 (talk) 14:32, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tekrevolution

Adsense pub-1917267254778100

Accounts

Sporgg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
213.150.228.38 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
82.46.130.20 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 20:12, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vuze, Inc

Articles

Vuze
Vuze, Inc.
Azureus, Inc

Accounts

Gouss (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
83.233.182.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
89.55.144.249 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
128.84.227.54 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
60.50.250.47 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
64.71.5.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
68.126.178.111 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
76.102.0.158 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
84.71.210.134 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
60.50.241.13 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
60.53.40.28 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
60.49.110.214 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
60.49.106.199 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
60.52.74.63 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
60.53.41.204 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 20:28, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.bluerockstation.com

Accounts

72.171.0.142 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
4.224.180.92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 21:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

awesomeengines

Adsense pub-8763663558162945

Accounts

Th3fo0 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
12.219.86.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 21:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carolina related

Adsense pub-9386641920396601

Accounts

24.96.161.157 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
24.96.161.20 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 22:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-wiki:
--A. B. (talk) 23:51, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.extremeturbosystems.com

Accounts

Lyfeworx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
75.100.185.62 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 00:05, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming of http://spam.cyburbia.org

Adsense pub-4980130723156683

Accounts

Elmwood (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
76.241.146.126 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 04:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Long term sneaky spamming of spam.searchindia.com

searchindia.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers - range 1
Range 2

This is a partial list of spammers, there's still 16 mainspace links to be cleaned up (I need some sleep).

The two distinct ranges and the link consistently being added to the top despite {{NoMoreLinks}} gives this away as spam. Blacklisting requested. MER-C 13:35, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

68.246.13.80 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
this one vandalized MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist--Hu12 (talk) 17:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.triporia.com

Adsense pub-3808225134992836

Articles

Triporia Travel Videos

Accounts

Lionleader (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
70.73.150.137 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 16:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

armchairgm.com

See links

This site appears to be just a sports wiki. It's linked from a lot of our sports articles and I don't see any good reason to have it. Any thoughts? --B (talk) 23:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Leadership Development Centre

Domain:


Related domain:


Accounts:

--A. B. (talk) 01:25, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.summitmemory.org

Accounts

66.213.33.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 20:05, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.pdma.org

Adsense pub-3476061534727503

Articles

Product Development and Management Association

Accounts

Nzgabriel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
68.236.56.163 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Davolson (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sitetuners.com Spam

Accounts

TimAsh2008 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) President of SiteTuners.com[9]
--Hu12 (talk) 21:54, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.thesportscritics.com

Accounts

66.27.154.36 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
64.79.164.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 05:14, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.thestudiotour.com

Adsense pub-4232509073418529

Accounts

Thestudiotour (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Lostshark (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
60.234.215.101 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
67.163.203.147 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
62.56.96.223 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 06:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.insideuniversal.net

Adsense pub-4232509073418529

Articles

Special Effects Stages
Lucy: A Tribute

Accounts

Thestudiotour (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Jon Fu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
67.134.140.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Tim Pagan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
62.56.78.146 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
JonF (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) states he is an admin on several sites[10]
--Hu12 (talk) 07:16, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.milaviapress.com

milaviapress.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

MER-C 11:22, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.churchofthephilippines.com

churchofthephilippines.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

MER-C 11:34, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Northeast India Online Market Spamming

Accounts

61.0.151.116 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
61.0.151.102 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
61.0.151.103 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 10:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hardwax.net

Accounts

84.63.63.113 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
84.63.64.148 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
84.63.17.108 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
84.63.10.133 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
84.63.65.219 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
--Hu12 (talk) 12:48, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


megadry.com

Note: I have unarchived this section because they have become active again - if this was not the right thing to do then please snip the old stuff Matt Beard (talk) 13:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have spotted some spamming activity on behalf of megadry.com where user Whynotthestars has been adding links to this site, as has Hyperhidrosis. Hyperhidrosis has also removed a link to a non profit organisation that works in the same field.

Accounts

Hyperhidrosis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Whynotthestars (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
--Matt Beard 16:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Add to monitorlist of COIBot. --Dirk Beetstra T C 16:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On the verge of BL here, probably should go on if they are still at it --Herby talk thyme 16:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The link is, for as far as the bots have picked it up, only be used by the above accounts, and by an IP:
--Dirk Beetstra T C 17:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following IP address also seems to be involved:
--Matt Beard (talk) 11:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
User Whynotthestars is still acting in a way that I believe is unhelpful. On 19:21, 4 December 2007 he returned to the Sleep_hyperhidrosis page and again removed a link to a non-profit organisation that is dedicated to this field. I think this may be a case of trying to reduce exposure of alternative sites to the one that he has been spamming. He earlier replaced the link to this non-profit with a spam-link to megadry and this action was regarded by Voyagerfan5761 as vandalism.
--Matt Beard (talk) 10:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The following IP address has been active putting megadry.com links back in:
--Matt Beard (talk) 13:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to request this on the blacklist I'll be happy to do it - I was in two minds last time as they seem to have stopped but as they have come back.... Thanks for catching it, cheers --Herby talk thyme 13:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think that is worth doing - Voyagerfan5761 has also had some run-ins with this too.
Maybe 64.34.168.70 needs to be investigated a little as there seems to be a bit of rubbish coming from that address if you look at it's talk page!
--Matt Beard (talk) 17:56, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a proxy to me but I can't prove it, off to list anyway, cheers --Herby talk thyme 18:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Shall i monitor the IP Address and his/her's contributions. →Yun-Yuuzhan→ 18:16, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That IP (64.34.168.70) traceroutes to raynersoftware.com which looks like a legit outfit. My port scan so far finds ports 22, 25, 53, 80 and 143 open -- possible open proxy or zombie PC. Can someone block (I'm on the run to get on the road.) --A. B. (talk) 18:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I can't block the IP address my new user account is too new according to twinkle, someone else will have to block it. →Yun-Yuuzhan→ 18:39, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked - if I'm wrong anyone can revert me but the contribs aren't what I would call useful by & large --Herby talk thyme 19:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

morethings.com

OK. I have been weeding through these but with 75 more to go I thought I would get assistance. This is a personal website with loads of ads and various other commercial links. There is no real content from this website and all the links have been added by anon user(s). 4.225.5.115, 4.224.219.12, etc. IrishGuy talk 20:48, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

myfavoriteblank.com and trafficattitude.com

Spammed to web services and web traffic related articles..

Transitguru

User:Transitguru appears to have only joined Widipedia in order to generate spam about his own website [11]. He is not very active, restricting himself to a limited number of travel related sites, but it has all been spam;

He has repeatedly reverted the Transit article;

Despite being reverted by many different editors and requests to discuss first;

there is no communication from this individual. Since he will not communicate and produces nothing useful for Wikipedia, I suggest that some administrator blocks him and we can all stop wasting our time with him.

Spinningspark (talk) 01:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely by The undertow for violation of Wikipedia user name policy (promotional company user name) just as I was about to block for spamming. --MCB (talk) 02:24, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism and social engineering of Wikipedia Knol article

67.173.204.223 Talk:Knol [24] 71.226.158.141 Talk:Knol[25] Igor Berger (talk) 02:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both ips registered to Comcast. Can't tell whether it's Google or not. MER-C 03:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

related blog spam

Adsense pub-7238732933643638

Accounts

ModelElaine (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 06:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists

Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists
Adsense pub-4140787070613944

Accounts

Jstorres (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
76.167.43.219 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Ileananorton (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Eperez moneylaundering (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Bnrmillward (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 07:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.one.org II

ONE Campaign
ONE Vote '08

Spam sock accounts

Ilxaau (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
PShadzik (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Anish ak (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
ONE Campaigner (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Sweettalk (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Mpm78 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Martypantspants (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Seibu1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
24.47.78.206 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
MaebyMichael (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Ilxaau (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
PShadzik (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
68.77.200.44 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 08:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam&diff=181158704&oldid=181154258

Leave a Reply