Archives

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

2024 Summer Olympics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. A lot of anon editors keep adding unreferenced potential city bids. Xeltran (talk) 11:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That page should be deleted, not protected. Stifle (talk) 11:36, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Countries are already saying that they may bid for the event. D.M.N. (talk) 11:39, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My thoughts exactly :). There was already a discussion for the article to be deleted. But the decision was keep. Xeltran (talk) 11:42, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PeterSymonds (talk) 11:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Bernie Mac Show (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary full protection Dispute, Due to Mac's recent death various non registered users continue to add irrelevant information about the comedian's death. .UniversalBread (talk) 10:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Declined — there is very little activity from non-registered users and insufficient disruption to justify protection at this time. Stifle (talk) 10:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Heroes characters with special abilities‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection - Several anonymous editors, after explanations and warnings by several other editors, continue to place non-factual information on the page. ~QuasiAbstract {talk/contrib} 07:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Stifle (talk) 10:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of characters in Heroes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection - Several anonymous editors, after explanations and warnings by several other editors, continue to place non-factual information on the page. ~QuasiAbstract {talk/contrib} 07:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Stifle (talk) 10:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paper Trail (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary Semi-protection – Edit warring and vandalism. Random IP's adding un-sourced information after it has been deleted multiple times. SE KinG (talk) 07:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Stifle (talk) 10:25, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Isaacs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection – Anonymous editor at 68.9.119.150, despite having been blocked for 24 hours, is continuing to delete referenced information from the article and refuses to provide reasons or to discuss the matter. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 07:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, block the IP instead if necessary. Kusma (talk) 07:57, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1985 Beirut car bombing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary semi-protection IP Vandalism/edit warring continously tries to re-insert allegations as facts, ignores talk page, does so repeatedly. MiS-Saath (talk) 05:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for ten days. Tan ǀ 39 05:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by Teletoon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

indefinite semi-protection Vandalism, the page was semi protected for a week and just recently became unprotected, and vandalism has started again. People keep putting in incorrect information after being warned many times, believed to be from the same person, since the edits are the same, however, the IP Address changes. Kagome 77 (talk) 02:07, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Declined At present, only one IP. Warn, then report to WP:AIV or WP:AN/I if he persists. If more IPs show up, come back here for a semi. -Jéské ^{(v^_^v Bodging WP edit by edit)} 02:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blink-182 discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

indefinite semi-protection Vandalism, Anonymous IP's keep vandalising page... it's getting quite annoying...- -[The Spooky One] | ^{[t c r]} 01:42, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Tiptoety ^talk 03:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orthomolecular medicine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Requesting full protection due to edit war over whether calling the subject a pseudoscience violates the BLP (yes, BLP) policy. Skinwalker (talk) 01:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. TimVickers is active on that page, and he's one of the most level-headed people involved in this project, I think. Feel free to bring back here if Tim gets all crazy and starts throwing down, but I think he'll protect it if absolutely needed. Tan ǀ 39 04:42, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:61.88.131.145 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Requesting full protection until May 6, 2009 to prevent this blocked user from trolling his talk page. John254 01:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected expiration on the day their block expires -- Alexf⁴² 01:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dressage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-Protection High amount of IP vandalism to the page. Multiple IPs are being used, though with the same general vandalism (ie: "Dressage isn't a sport"). Requesting Semi-Protection. Thank You...NeutralHomer • Talk 00:48, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for two weeks. Seems to be stemming from the Olympics. Hopefully it will die back down in a couple weeks. Tan ǀ 39 04:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NBA records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection Heavy IP-hopping disruption from a indef-blocked user. AlexiusHoratius (talk) 00:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Alexf⁴² 00:41, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bermuda Triangle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection: Ever since semi-protection was removed about a month ago, various IPs have still repeatedly been making unconstructive edits. -- Luke4545 (talk) 00:21, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for three months. Tan ǀ 39 04:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PaxEquilibrium socks

• Slavonia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Prebilovci (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Jasenovac i Gradiška Stara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Petar Brzica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Ljubo Miloš (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protectfor 1 month because of banned User:PaxEquilibrium socks. See article history and semi-protection from 3 August.--Rjecina (talk) 23:25, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merged several very similar sections into this one. All five pages originally listed are Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Luna Santin (talk) 23:45, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism and spamming. - Icewedge (talk) 22:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 23:05, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MI5 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary semi-protection Vandalism, Frequent IP vandalism in the past few days, all of the vandal edits are similar to each other..TheLetterM (talk) 21:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Only one instance of vandalism today. Before that, the last one was on the 8th August. John Sloan (talk) 21:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. _Gb^T/c 21:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:KhoiKURČINA (edit | [[Talk:User:KhoiKURČINA|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

full protection - banned User:PaxEquilibrium is writing again and again on user page of his puppet (checkuser Thatcher report about KhoiKURČINA) that I am puppeteer. Because of that I am asking full protection of KhoiKURČINA user page and Pax puppet tag.--Rjecina (talk) 21:08, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected _Gb^T/c 21:51, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary semi-protection Vandalism, Constant vandalism. Protection requested to prevent this issue.Chaldor (talk) 20:43, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one IP in recent weeks - take it to WP:AIV if needs be. _Gb^T/c 21:50, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Summer Olympics medal count (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

full protection. Ongoing unconstructive edits. I'll just c/p from what I wrote on the talk page with slight edits: Given the events of last night, in which everyone was adding and subtracting medals due to mass confusion, perhaps we should ask the admins to create designated editors to update the medal count and put the page on full protect. Rationale:

• This page should only be updated a few times each day. There are 13 medal events on Day 3 of the Games; therefore, there should be 13 edits to the medal table. Any other edits are not constructive and, depending on the severity, could be considered vandalism. (Obviously, page formatting and stuff would be different; however, that stuff should be discussed on the talk page anyway.)
• The need to reliably disseminate accurate information is more important than letting any user edit in what they think is correct based on tape-delayed coverage, late reports, etc. A messed-up Olympic medal table reflects poorly on Wikipedia.

Feel free to contact me on my talk page if you have any questions. Kingnavland (talk) 20:43, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While I doubt it will happen, I certainly wouldn't mind if it was protected. Last night editors were updating the count without checking to see if it had been updated already, so we were having the same set of medals included 2 or 3 times. This is currently a high profile page and having so many errors on it has drawn complaints on the talk page and makes wikipedia look bad. On the other hand, full protection would mean that only admins would be able to edit it, and that would prevent the page's regular editors (such as myself) from tweaking it. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 20:50, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, based on content volatility, redundant coverage, and the propensity for multiple counting based on same (at least until the Olympic Games have ended and updates are much less frequent). Dirc (talk) 21:00, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is a wiki. Full protection would be punitive and accomplish little. It's a current event, so it will have high traffic, but nothing in the history suggests it's deserving of full protection. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:05, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of God (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect for one week — persistent IP vandalism. ~ Troy (talk) 20:41, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Happyme22 (talk) 20:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fergie (singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

indefinite semi-protection, Content deletion i continue to write about fergie in particular section "Fashion Designer & Model" and there is some user that continue to delete the part i've written. gio88 22:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Declined They appear to have issues with your failure to cite sources, and you appear to be in the minotiry. I suggest that you take it to the article's talk page. _Gb^T/c 20:23, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mel Gibson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection Heavy anon vandalism today; I just found many pretty serious vandal additions that had been sitting in the article for several hours. AlexiusHoratius (talk) 19:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks. After 2 weeks the page will be automatically unprotected. WilliamH (talk) 19:58, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nun Kun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. Ongoing vandalsim by anon ip user who has been blocked for ban evasion, see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Nangparbat. Knowledgeum :  Talk  19:26, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Sock blocked - if it's only one editor or IP, it's generally better to take it to WP:AIV. _Gb^T/c 19:34, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Call of Duty: World at War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary semi-protection Vandalism, Has been seeing a lot of vandalism this week from IPs..RedThunder 19:05, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck _° is not used to being the voice of reason 19:22, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hovhannes Katchaznouni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Full protection Continuous edit war, modifications by revisionists, and ip vandalism. --Vitilsky (talk) 12:45, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is fine; no need for censorship. The above editor is confused, and we are trying to work it out in the talk page. Feel free to participate in the debate. --Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 17:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the above, I would like to add that vitilsky is stooping to defacing this page too, repeatedly. --Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 18:12, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Both of you stop it - edit warring over an article is bad enough, but if you continue to edit war over this page, of all places, then you'll both be blocked for disruption. Take it to the article's talk page. _Gb^T/c 21:13, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the message, thanks. I did not touch anything the other editor wrote; I simply don't want my objections expunged. Should I assume that page protection editors reading this page will be vigilant to this sort of attack? It seems easy to miss, to me. --Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 21:17, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You might know that Adoniscik changed the request from the top to down, look at the date of my request, it does not match... --Vitilsky (talk) 21:16, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not true, Erik; you bumped it to the top - the edit history speaks for itself. --Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 21:18, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, both of you, take it to the article's talk page, and not this page. Incidentally, Vitil, you moved it back to the top, and removed Adon's comments (twice). The only thing moving it to the bottom was other, unrelated, editors posting their requests at the top of the page, as they should have done. _Gb^T/c 21:23, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lier...watch the history of this page... --Vitilsky (talk) 11:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Water fluoridation opposition (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Consensus has formed on the talk page to move the article to Opposition to water fluoridation. The admin who protected the page against moving has been notified. JPG-GR (talk) 23:22, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, that is I've moved the page but the move protection is still in place for now. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 00:07, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Hayes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Administrator has protected page even though there is proof of his death.please unprotect page.CMJMEM (talk) 20:04, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Already unprotected by the admin in question. 20:07, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Template:Film (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Adding support for a new task force. Many thanks in advance! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 23:10, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I'm sorry, what? Please use {{editprotected}} on the talk page. - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:40, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Name-dropping (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Please insert names: Angelique Carrington, Tamara Harrington. --58.178.140.39 (talk) 03:55, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No. —[DeadEyeArrow – Talk – Contribs] 12:19, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Masherbrum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism made by anon ip user. Anon ip user has been banned and continues making the same edits under a new ip address. Knowledgeum :  Talk  18:55, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 18:58, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary semi-protection Vandalism, Constant repeated vandalism. Requesting temporary semi-protection to protect from vandals..Chaldor (talk) 17:34, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck _° is not used to being the voice of reason 18:58, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carrot Top (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

indefinite semi-protection Vandalism, constant historical ip vandalism.emerson7 16:39, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite protection is only granted in very extreme circumstances. caknuck _° is not used to being the voice of reason 18:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of characters in Heroes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary semi-protection Vandalism, Various anonymous IPs keep adding unsourced/false information..Magioladitis (talk) 14:56, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. User:91.108.135.8 has been blocked for 31 hours. Please resubmit this if the vandalism continues. caknuck _° is not used to being the voice of reason 18:51, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:JohnTBoy (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

indefinite full protection Vandalism, This user is indef blocked for being a vandalism only account. I suggest putting a indef blocked template on the page once its protected. Thanks :-).John Sloan (talk) 14:56, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. caknuck _° is not used to being the voice of reason 18:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Luka Modrić (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Semi-protection - persistent IP vandalism. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:11, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck _° is not used to being the voice of reason 18:45, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 11, 2001 attacks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotect. Transcribed from WP:ANI: I would like a review of the full-protection of September 11, 2001 attacks. User:El C protected it after User:Presumptive went on a spree of five reversions. He was finally blocked for 12 hours to cool off. Then, another user, User:Fancy-cats-are-happy-cats reverted an old edit by User:Aude and El C protected it, citing 10 reversions (including 3 by me). The issue, though, is these users claimed to be upholding "consensus" single-handedly in cases where they have not made a suitable argument. For example, Presumptive claims I never engaged in discussion and, so, his revisions were consensus by silence. But, I did ask him how his versions could supercede WP:LEAD and he never responded. Fancy Cats never engaged in discussion on the talk page. Instead, he claimed to have 'consensus' somehow. As written in WP:PPOL, Isolated incidents of edit warring, and persistent edit warring by particular users, may be better addressed by blocking (which it has in the case of Presumptive), so as not to prevent normal editing of the page by others. Please help me with this. Also see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Official_Notice_of_Blocking and Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Please_issue_warnings_for_improper_reverts_to_9.2F11. Thanks-- Veggy (talk) 17:37, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There were several people edit warring, not just User:Presumptive. Protection is not an endorsement of the protected version. Please seek resolution of the disputed areas by discussing them on the articles talk page. - Rjd0060 (talk) 18:30, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mind letting me know who those people were? Because if you're referring to the group of editors that countered Presumptive and Fancy cats' edits, we have discussed these issues constantly and have established a consensus based on the arbitration decision to prevent the promotion of factually-questionable wording or material. There are over forty-two talk page archives of discussions regarding these issues. Can two editors come in and disrupt the work of others and then have this work be denied from all? -- Veggy (talk) 18:53, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Veggy, you are very aggressive. This does not help. Look to yourself as a partial cause of the page protection. I favor full protection for a little while longer even though the current version has flaws. Presumptive (talk) 03:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleveland, Ohio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

indefinite semi-protection, Content deletion and spam, various anonymous IPs periodically either add spam or delete cited/referenced sections on this Featured Article. When caught in time, such are easy enough to undo, but when missed before subsequent contributions, require substantial effort to either merge deleted sections back in or find and remove spam/unsourced materials. LeheckaG (talk) 16:24, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. EdJohnston (talk) 16:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Wadsworth Longfellow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection A previous request was denied (understandably) a couple days ago, but I'm requesting again. An editor using several different IPs keeps adding information before a footnote that is not supported by the footnote and is, frankly, irrelevant. Multiple reverts (I'd guess about 9 by now) and the editor is not reachable by talk pages (including the article's). Note that the article is at GA status and I'm worried about its quality being compromised. Thanks for considering. --Midnightdreary (talk) 12:12, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected one month. EdJohnston (talk) 16:36, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic view of anal sex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full protection This article shows the view of different scholars in Islam, so people tends to simply remove any text that contradicts their thought, they remove the Ahadith that allows it, and insists that anal sex is disallowed but actually the topic of anal sex in islam is unclear and some has Ahadith that allows it, and others have Ahadith that disallow it. so this topic needs to be locked from anonymously unspecialized editings. 2:40, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Actually there were a lot of edits since 10 july but I've restored it back to 10 july.

please consider protecting it, rather rolling back changes every time. 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Masters of Horror (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

unprotect. The Masters of Horror collection of articles is undergoing significant work (see the various talk pages) and having this article protected hampers that significantly. I do not believe that User:Collectonian had sufficient cause for requesting protection. Artw (talk) 08:17, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I endorse this request. This cluster of articles is quite active now and it is not helpful to have full protection on the main article. Colonel Warden (talk) 08:47, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UnprotectedJerry talk ¤ count/logs 14:22, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Howard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Full protection or an extended a 3rd edit war has developed involving multiple editors, 2 editors have met the requirements for 3RR blocks. Gnangarra 10:54, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected due to ongoing edit warring. Sarah 11:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:99.145.216.62 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

temporary semi-protection User talk of blocked user, Blocked user removes IP sock tags from his page (multiple times already).E Wing (talk) 08:17, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - as long as block. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 09:04, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 11, 2001 attacks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary full-protection Edit-warring. Enigma ^message 06:34, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There was a talk page discussion for 13-14 days with limited participation but 1 of 7 versions picked for the lead. There is edit warring to use a non-consensus version that other say has style, WP:LEAD violations, and bad prose. If protected, the version of the 13 day consensus (recently added and reverted away) should be used, not the aggressive changing to the non-consensus view. Either that or leave the warning template there. Presumptive (talk) 06:45, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The edit-warring is the result of disruptive editing by the above user. Please see the report at WP:AN3RR. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 06:58, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — I just blocked someone for 3RR at that article; but I notice that reverting continues. El_C 08:06, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't see how one user's flagrant violation of 3RR and another's word changes qualify the article for full protection. -- Veggy (talk) 08:26, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing there were about 10 reverts in the last day or two (including 3 reverts by yourself), I thought it reasonable to grant the request. El_C 08:33, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas Cruikshank (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary semi protection Vandalism, repeated vadalism from anon ips.Rtphokie (talk) 06:42, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Aude (talk) 07:15, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]