Added: Talk:Joe Biden. |
Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
"In March 2022, The New York Times and The Washington Post reported that some of the emails found on the computer were authentic."<br> |
"In March 2022, The New York Times and The Washington Post reported that some of the emails found on the computer were authentic."<br> |
||
Should it be removed? ''[[User:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b>]]''<sup>[[User talk:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b>]]</sup> 11:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)}} |
Should it be removed? ''[[User:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b>]]''<sup>[[User talk:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b>]]</sup> 11:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)}} |
||
'''[[Talk:SpaceX Starship flight tests#rfc_35047A6|Talk:SpaceX Starship flight tests]]''' |
|||
{{rfcquote|text= |
|||
Hi everyone, this RfC is to retrieve consensus regarding the addition of mission outcome to the Orbital/Intergated launch wikitable, as well as adding the associated chart in the same section. |
|||
'''Context:''' IFT-3 has ben the subject of confusion and debate here in Wikipedia. The confusion between Launch outcome and Mission outcome has led editors to think of the two as one, despite those being different things. This article also doesn't show the launch outcome alongside mission outcome, meaning editors and readers alike might see the green "success" entry in the launch column/chart and believe the mission succeded, not reading the other text to learn that the mission wasn't a full success. This factor will lead to confusion among Wikipedia editors, and confused editors can't properly write a wiki. |
|||
'''The question:''' Should we list the mission outcome as clearly as we list the launch outcome? |
|||
If you wish to dispute this RfC, please raise your concerns over at the appropriate [[WP:DRN]] and [[WP:PUMP]] noticeboards. You may also bring this discussion up at [[WP:DfD]] and [[WP:AN]], and if all discussions go wrong or end up with no real result, you can contact the [[Wikipedia Arbitration Committee]]. But bear in mind, contacting the Arbitration Committee is a last resort option that should not be done for minor reasons, so only contact them if the discussions go '''very''' wrong. Thanks, [[Special:Contributions/179.251.80.181|179.251.80.181]] ([[User talk:179.251.80.181|talk]]) 22:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{RFC list footer|soc|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }} |
{{RFC list footer|soc|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }} |
||
Revision as of 06:01, 22 May 2024
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
Should Biden's building of a port to facilitate American aid to Palestinians be mentioned in the lead?
Does it merit inclusion? KlayCax (talk) 20:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC) |
| Should Ben Roberts-Smith be referred to as war criminal in the first sentence of the lede?
05:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC) |
| Should Female finishers be recorded separately for the Barkley Marathons? |
| There is ongoing discussion about how to best present the content of the Insider investigative report on a Russian connection to Havana Syndrome. Two versions have been proposed, and we seek wider community input on which should be included in the article. The discussion has raised concerns about the due weight of content relating to allegations of secret weapons use by Russian military intelligence's GRU Unit 29155.
Version 2.1:
Version 3.1:
Please provide your opinions and rationale for supporting either version 2.1 or 3.1 and please ensure your responses are based on Wikipedia's content policies and guidelines. (FailedMusician (talk) 02:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |
| The fourth paragraph of the lede currently contains the following sentence: "In March 2022, The New York Times and The Washington Post reported that some of the emails found on the computer were authentic." |
Talk:SpaceX Starship flight tests
| Hi everyone, this RfC is to retrieve consensus regarding the addition of mission outcome to the Orbital/Intergated launch wikitable, as well as adding the associated chart in the same section.
Context: IFT-3 has ben the subject of confusion and debate here in Wikipedia. The confusion between Launch outcome and Mission outcome has led editors to think of the two as one, despite those being different things. This article also doesn't show the launch outcome alongside mission outcome, meaning editors and readers alike might see the green "success" entry in the launch column/chart and believe the mission succeded, not reading the other text to learn that the mission wasn't a full success. This factor will lead to confusion among Wikipedia editors, and confused editors can't properly write a wiki. The question: Should we list the mission outcome as clearly as we list the launch outcome? If you wish to dispute this RfC, please raise your concerns over at the appropriate WP:DRN and WP:PUMP noticeboards. You may also bring this discussion up at WP:DfD and WP:AN, and if all discussions go wrong or end up with no real result, you can contact the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee. But bear in mind, contacting the Arbitration Committee is a last resort option that should not be done for minor reasons, so only contact them if the discussions go very wrong. Thanks, 179.251.80.181 (talk) 22:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC) |
- ^ a b c https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/kremlin-dismisses-report-russia-behind-havana-syndrome-2024-04-01/
- ^ a b c "Havana syndrome: Report links mystery illness to Russian intelligence unit". www.bbc.com. Retrieved 2024-04-02.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
guardian-reportwas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
Dobrokhotovwas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
:3was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
SpiegelMarch2024was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
us-not-movedwas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Chasan, Aliza (2024-04-17). "Senators call for renewed Havana Syndrome assessment after 60 Minutes report - CBS News". www.cbsnews.com. Retrieved 2024-04-24.