Search the frequently asked questions

Search the help desk archives and other help pages

Basic Information:

Troy Bernier was an acomplished man, he died at the age of 74.

He Was Born in Quebec/Bunkingham 9/22/1995

Growing up Troy was very well admired by his peers in the science world.

Him and his palls always had a lust of helping people.

He was a great member of the community. He found love, compation and a job to die for.

Life was great for the old scientist.

A Dog Person as well. Wouldn't go anywhere without his good companion George

How he changed the face of the earth:

In the year 2042, When the artic circle melted, many toxins were released into the air, you all remember that dire time, over 2 Million people died from cancer of those fatal toxic deposits.

Mr.Bernier was well known for:

curing the common cold in 2038

curing Athlete's Foot in 2039

And Curing brain cancer in 2040.

In The Year 2043 Troy had discoverd a way to negate the effects of the toxins and Cure it's fatal desease.

with all of Earth's best scientists dead from the toxic deposits. Mr.Bernier was the only one remaining to solve the puzzle.

In 2045, the cure was perfected and the vacsin was distributed around the globe.

Troy's main accomplishment in life was this cure, that saved millions.

-=Ref=- New York Times Article "A Forgotten Hero" 27/8/58

Note:This Was For A Class Project, None of this is real.

August 30

Image:William Gibson by FredArmitage.jpg was fine until today, when someone mistakenly uploaded it to commons, whereupon it got tagged for speedy deletion (as it's creative commons non-com/noderiv licenced). I just want to confirm that the local image will still be here once the commons image is deleted? Or does it need to somehow get "transferred back" via a request somewhere? Thanks. (tangential thread about its licencing here, at Talk:William Gibson#Gibson photo licence) --Quiddity 00:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It won't be here, as the one here was deleted at 20:58, 29 August 2007 by Quadell [1] for precisely the same reason it's tagged under on Commons, namely WP:CSD#I3. KTC 01:21, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do I change the Exile Parade wikipedia page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exile_parade) to a capital P in Parade instead of a lower case p?

--Wazzalad 01:08, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Instructions are in: WP:MOVE. --Teratornis 01:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like this one on right handside with the photo for example - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kasabian. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wazzalad (talk • contribs) 01:22, August 30, 2007 (UTC) --Wazzalad 01:23, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's called an infobox template. See: Help:Template, Wikipedia:Infobox templates, Help:Infobox, Wikipedia:Manual of Style (infoboxes), Category:Infobox templates, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes. What article do you want to add an infobox to? --Teratornis 01:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

cheers mate, will look it up. I want to add it to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exile_parade --Wazzalad 01:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you added an {{Infobox musical artist}} to Exile Parade. It's great that on Wikipedia we can learn by examining the wikitext of existing articles (such as Kasabian) and copy the nice bits to new articles. May I suggest that you type an edit summary each time you edit a page, so other editors can easily tell what you did when they view the history of the page. Thanks. You might also look at WP:MUSIC so you can be sure Exile Parade meets Wikipedia's notability requirements for musician articles (by properly asserting the notability of the subject). I'm just trying to keep you safe from the deletionists. --Teratornis 04:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know there is a lot of great that came with the creation of wikipedia along with some expected and unexcepted negative consequences. There has been a lot of discussion about staff members of elected officials editing portions of their candidate biography. But my concern is that of a certain number of conservative activists/cheerleaders whose major mistakes, all of a sudden, are not in their wikipedia entries. Number 1 is Sean Hannity. While he started his gig on a NYC radio station, a cop was accused of sodemizing an African immigrant over and over and over again. Sean defended this cop constantly so much as to have the officers' father on air defending him. Sean went as far as to say "this guy is fruitcake who enjoyed anal sex" or something to that extent. Numerous sources have this on record. This was on wikipedia last year. All of the sudden, it's not there. However, that police officer did admit guilty to brutally assaulting that man. WTF?!! Number 2 is Ted Nugent. He admitted in a newspaper interview that he purposely did not shower, bath or use the restroom for over a month in order to dodge the Vietnam War. All of the sudden, this admission of cowardly refusing your country's service is also erased from Wikipedia. Why? or better yet, How?

`01:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)~

If you have a reputable source that makes those claims, feel free to add the information (with the reference) to the article. However, keep the topic of the article in mind. For example, the Sean Hannity article is about all of Sean Hannity, not one incident in his entire life. A common mistake is to write up a 3,000 word essay on a single controversial event, obscuring the subject matter of the overall article. That will be reverted, not because it is untrue or unsourced, but because it simply does not belong. -- Kainaw^(what?) 03:08, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has many articles that are specifically about Scandals. Such articles may be somewhat less susceptible to the "it does not belong" argument, because scandalous material clearly does belong in an article which is about a scandal. Follow the links from the Scandal article to see examples of articles about political scandals, religious scandals, etc. Also see Draft dodger. Wikipedia has lots of articles about unseemly behavior. --Teratornis 04:42, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking for the meaning of the word "istle" (crossword entry)in Wikipedia. The search produced only four sources, one of which was "Madonna". This is a rather long article. I read it twice carefully and have not been able to find any reference whatsoever to "istle". Why would the Madonna site be listed as a source for this word? And if it is there, how come it is not highlighted? Many thanks. Richard —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.57.60.250 (talk) 01:52, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

There is a link to "whistleass.typepad.com/boot_george_in_2004/2004/01/madonna_support.html" on the page (click "edit this page" to see it easily. -- Kainaw^(what?) 03:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict) The search function on Wikipedia quite frankly sucks. It probably noticed a word that had those five letters in that order and thought it's what you were looking for. In any case, the search function isn't set up to highlight your search terms in the article. If you're looking for a definition, though, you're better off using Wiktionary, which doubles as a dictionary and thesaurus. It doesn't look as though they have a page on that word, however. Sorry. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:14, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try: google:istle for which the top search result says:

• a strong fiber (as for cordage or basketwork) obtained from various tropical American plants (as an agave).

And of course we have articles on fiber, cordage, basket, and agave, none of which apparently (yet) mention the word "istle." However, you could fix that. Having Google Search is like being a genius. --Teratornis 04:52, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia search is based on the source of the page so a search term may only be visible by clicking edit. Your browser probably has a feature to search and highlight a string in the displayed page. PrimeHunter 10:07, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

if ice did not sank, there woulb be no life on earth today. pls. explain why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toyomxxx (talk • contribs) 03:05, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure I understand your question, but it sounds like you're looking for the reference desk. They specialize in knowledge questions, e're only here to help you use the site. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:10, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually if ice did not float, the oceans could freeze to the bottom in the polar regions, and that would cause some serious problems for animals that live in the area. "Life" could certainly still exist on earth, for example the toughest forms of life (bacteria and so on) can tolerate very harsh environments, but a lot of multicellular eukaryotes would find their environments seriously disrupted if ice was denser than water (which is the normal behavior for most materials that have a liquid phase and a solid phase - the solid phase is typically denser than the liquid phase). For more information see: Deep lake water cooling, Ice#Characteristics, Lake#Characteristics, and Water (molecule)#Density of water and ice. --Teratornis 04:19, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I saw a tool once that counts how many deleted edits a user has. I can't remember for the life of me where I saw it. I have three questions 1) does this actually exist or did I make it up? 2) If so, where do I find it? 3) How does it work? How does it now how many deleted edits I have? --JayHenry 06:09, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at the list of edit counters at WP:COUNT. And yes, Editcountitis is not healthy. ;) In your case [2]. KTC 06:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's the one! Does anyone know the answer to 3? This is the part I'm most interested in. How is it able to find deleted edits? --JayHenry 15:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's something to do with counting server side logs rather than running a query on your contribution log (i.e. as per the "wanabee kate tool by Interiot"). I'm no php expert but there is obviously a difference in making a lookup on Special:Contributions and server side queries. Pedro |  Chat  20:25, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to how to get the globle earth moveing to view my home town —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.36.32.25 (talk) 06:18, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

This is a question for the reference desk - please ask there! Neil ム 08:59, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the licence several times, but am still uncertain what needs to go into the article, the more I read the less I understand it.

I have put an article on my web site (Still under construction)

[3]

I have put the GNU Licence in thats fine.

But what do I put in for the copyrite notice? Is it that whole page full of links that is mentioned at the bottom of the article page?

And where and what is the licence notice?

And what do I put on my creative commons pictures.

If anyone can break it down to you put this and this in that would be great. (sorry the links are currently an odd colour)

--Silverearth 07:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)Can I create a wiki page of myself?--Silverearth 07:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Usually that's a page you should avoid creating for two reasons. 1. Wikipedia has notability guidelines and each subject must demonstrate a sufficient enough notability. 2. Subjects are often discouraged to start an article about themselves due to the possibility of conflicts of interest. However, you can create a userpage about yourself. This can be done at User:Silverearth (see WP:USERPAGE for more details as far as what is allowed on your userpage).¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 07:22, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't uderstand the reason of this deletion, I wrote the text in similarity of all the others about breakcore records labels, can somebody tell me what's the problem? Below details of the deletion:

10:36, 29 August 2007 Hu12 (Talk | contribs) deleted "Sonic Belligeranza records" ‎ (WP:CSD#A7 content was: 'Sonic Belligeranza is an indipendent record label based in Bologna, Italy. It was started in the year 2000 by dj Balli and since then has released, al...' (and the only contributor was '[[Special:Contributions/Scaphandre|Scapha)

A7 is a deletion because it was an "unremarkable people, place, organization, etc", so in essance it was deleted because it is belived that the articles subject is not notable enough.---Kerotan^{Leave Me a Message} Have a nice day :) 08:35, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right, um, I'm aware of Wikipedia:Copyright problems but that only seems to be dealing with copyright issues where Wikipedia has copyrighted text that needs to be deleted: What about the other way around, where a website is using Wikipedia's contents verbatim and copyrighting it as its own? Where should this be brought to attention? Here, or is there another noticeboard, or at Copyright problems anyway? Thanks. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 09:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have you taken a look at Wikipedia:Copyrights and Wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content? --Silver Edge 09:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had, yes; but I actually found what I was looking for: Wikipedia:Standard GFDL violation letter. Thanks all the same! :) (Although I do find it somewhat ironic that I'll basically be copy and pasting something as a warning over someone copy and pasting something... Heh.) AllynJ (talk | contribs) 10:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

what is store accounting —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.168.79.237 (talk) 09:14, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

You should ask this at the reference desk - this page is for help using/editing Wikipedia. Kevin 12:21, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I have created a Russian translation of English encyclopedia article, how can I insert a language link to the English page to let know that there is a Russian translation? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.253.76.106 (talk) 10:20, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

Insert [[ru:article name here]] in to the English article. --Silver Edge 10:28, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I want to resolve an edit dispute before it gets out of hand. However, navigating through the Village Pump and its pages on dispute resolution and getting a third opinion is a nightmare! I end up going in loops; I can find pages that outline policy, but I can't find where to actually post the issue. Can somebody please provide me with the direct link? (I'm asking for the direct link because I'm afraid if you just refer me to a topic, I'm going to end up in the same navigation loop as before.) Minaker 11:20, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to add some policy, too, just for the benefit of other readers. :) Wikipedia:Dispute resolution is the place to start with this. It lays out the general steps for processing these kinds of situations. If it is a dispute between you and one other editor, you might start it at Third opinion. It's a good idea to read that page and its directions before requesting a third opinion here, at the direct link. If it's a more general dispute between a larger group of people, you take it to Requests for comment. You follow the instructions found here for articles, by placing the template directly on the article's talk page. Does that help? --Moonriddengirl 11:37, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. I've read up on the policies and was just very confused as to how to navigate to the actual posting page. That's why I wanted the direct link. From what I understand, there is a place to post comments on SPECIFIC edit disputes rather than general policy on the subject, and a place to post requests for third opinions. Your link sent me to a new page I'd be starting; surely I'm not the first person to post about an edit dispute or request a third person, so I'm not sure if that link is actually sending me to the right place. Minaker 11:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't give you the direct link for the Wikipedia:Requests for comment, because the template is placed directly on the talk page of the article. I know it seems peculiar that the Third opinion option requires starting a new section (I thought I had mislinked it at first because it was redlinked), but that is the link provided on the policy page. In your position, I'd give it a shot and see what happens and report back here if it doesn't work. --Moonriddengirl 11:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Moony!  :) Minaker 11:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I hope it works out. --Moonriddengirl 12:14, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, here is the right link. Don't use the redlink above. An easy mistake: The right link creates a new section in Wikipedia:Third opinion, so the edit page says "Editing Wikipedia:Third opinion (section)". The redlink by Moonriddengirl would create a new page called "Wikipedia:Third opinion (section)". PrimeHunter 13:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out! I arrived at that link by clicking on the "add your dispute here" button. Any idea what I did wrong in formatting my response? Did I just need to include the entire URL? Obviously I don't want to do it incorrectly again. :) --Moonriddengirl 15:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I clicked the link "add your dispute here" at Wikipedia:Third opinion#Active disagreements, and then copied the exact URL http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Third_opinion&action=edit&section=2&editintro=Wikipedia%3AThird+opinion%2FInstructions from the browser address bar. You must have seen the headline "Editing Wikipedia:Third opinion (section)" and then copied the text "Wikipedia:Third opinion (section)" to a piped link. That would have worked if the page had been Wikipedia:Third opinion (section). Clicking that redlink gives the exact same headline and font "Editing Wikipedia:Third opinion (section)", but in the latter case the URL is different and " (section)" is part of the page name. Maybe the developers should have written " (section)" in a different way when it indicates that a section is being edited and not that the page name ends with " (section)". I wonder whether anybody has accidentally created a page with a name ending in " (section)". Pentanthera (section) is not an accident. Editing a section of that article gives headline "Editing Pentanthera (section) (section)" [4]. PrimeHunter 16:35, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll be careful of piped links in the future. --Moonriddengirl 16:45, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Janu86 (section) must have been accidentally created by Janu86 in an attempt to edit a section of User:Janu86 which was created the same day. The edit pages [5] and [6] have the same heading "Editing User:Janu86 (section)" but edit different pages. PrimeHunter 18:58, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I tried to create an account but used my web address as my user name(Www.cutmycarbon.biz)- note the capital W at the start. I think this has caused an issue as I cannot use Wikipedia. Can you help me sort this. Jonny

82.43.144.99 12:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your username was blocked because it does not comply with the username policy. You should probably select something less like a web address. Kevin 12:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If I log in as Ryan 1729, I get the successful login screen, but then if I go into any other page I am no longer signed in. Running Firefox on WinXP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.82.9.81 (talk) 12:38, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

Make sure your browser is set up to accept cookies. If it is, click the "Remember me" button and see if that helps. If it doesn't, try clearing your cache (CTRL+SHIFT+R) when you notice you're not logged in. If THAT won't work, it might be a problem with your internet access, so try using the secure login. If it still isn't working after all that, check here to see if I missed anything, and then try that or file a bug report on bugzilla. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 13:10, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Could someone please direct me to wikipedia rules on naming an article. That is, what are the policies for choosing an article title? Thanks 3meandEr 12:51, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Naming conventions -- Kainaw^(what?) 12:54, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey the article on Alfonso Ribiero needs a picture. i found a good one but i need copyright status help. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Carlton.jpg i included a link to where i found it when you get to the picture The juggreserection 13:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It shows right on the article you pulled it from that the copyright is held by BPI. Did you get BPI's permission to use this photo in the public domain? If not, it must be removed from Wikipedia. -- Kainaw^(what?) 13:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No i didnt. go ahead and pull it if you must. Sorry i cant understand this copyright stuff very much. The juggreserection 13:29, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I was just writing in concern to the Staffie page. I am a breeder and owner of many staffies. I want to add pictures of staffies in the show ring at an American kennel club event (AKC). And I also wanted to update and correct some of the comments on the page.. only a select few were miscontrued or incorrect. Thanks ~~burkeza~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Burkeza (talk • contribs) 13:52, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

Is your question that you would like help or advice on the specifics? I could help you on your talk page or the article's talk page if you'd like. Leebo ^T/C 13:54, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to ask. How do I add pictures? and they are my own pictures so they are not copyrighted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Burkeza (talk • contribs) 13:54, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

Firstly, go to Wikipedia:Upload to upload the pictures to Wikipedia. Then Wikipedia:Images shows you how to add the picture to an article. Raven4x4x 13:58, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be sure to pick the correct licensing when uploading your image. Some Wikipedians are pretty hot on licensing and copyright problems. Your image could be speedily deleted if it is identified as a copyright violation or if the licensing information is missing. Astronaut 14:35, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A want to make a new page on for instance Maxime Foerste but I am not sure how to. Can you help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.79.101.50 (talk) 14:52, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

See Help:Starting a new page if you have an account, or is willing to register one. Go to WP:AFC if not. KTC 14:59, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be aware, however, that this obscure German actress would probably fail to meet our standards of notability for the English Wikipedia. --Orange Mike 15:01, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SHE IS NOT OBSCURE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoogleandYahoo (talk • contribs) 14:47, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be wary of systemic bias. If the actress is notable enough, then she should be notable enough on any language specific encyclopedia project. KTC 15:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed recently that several articles that used to exist no longer do and many others have been drastically shortened. Is there a space shortage on Wikipedia? I understand removing superfluous information, but much of the information that has been removed is useful and difficult to find elsewhere. I've been looking for information about this trend, but my searches have come up useless. Could you please point me in the direction of any articles discussing the merits of a complete Wikipedia vs a concise Wikipedia? Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.192.70.99 (talk) 14:59, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

Information that cannot be found elsewhere should be removed. Wikipedia is not a source for unique information. It is a source of referenced material. Therefore, everything on Wikipedia should be readily available elsewhere. -- Kainaw^(what?) 15:01, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict)For deleted articles, see WP:WWMAD and WP:DP. In terms of shortened articles, it's entirely possible that the material of split off into a separate page of its own from the original after it got too long. KTC 15:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could we get some examples? Articles which are advertisement, for example, are deleted every day. --Orange Mike 15:03, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't specify an editorial of the type you're asking for, but I will note that Wikipedia is constantly being trimmed (and expanded :)), often because information included is not Wikipedia:Verifiable or because pages do not meet criteria for inclusion. (See also What Wikipedia is not for inclusion limitations both on entire articles and sections within them.) Some articles are trimmed because they challenge article size guidelines--not so much over technical issues as issues of readability. --Moonriddengirl 15:06, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, much thanks. While checking examples I did a bit more searching and found that some of the info was indeed split from the main article while others have referenced links that can help point to the info. Thanks, too, for the pointer to the sizing guidelines. I think it's more or less what I'm looking for. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.192.70.99 (talk) 15:12, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

Can you assist me in modifying my RFA notice at User:TonyTheTiger/Header template —Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyTheTiger (talk • contribs) 15:11, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

I need it to go to the RFA3.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 15:14, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The template reads the title of the page (and presumes it's on your user page) to create the link. The only solution I see is putting it on your user page, unless you change the template. Leebo ^T/C 15:15, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. KTC 15:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do I create an entirely new article in wikipedia? Meanmug64 15:43, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Read 3 sections up from this one. KTC 15:45, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do you add images to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoogleandYahoo (talk • contribs) 15:50, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

See Help:Contents/Images and media. KTC 15:54, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you and how can advertise that your Wikipedia pages needs picutes or more information. For instance Maxime Foerste needs ,ore information and pictures, is there a way to advertise that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoogleandYahoo (talk • contribs) 16:17, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Template messages/Talk namespace#Expansion requests has the details. Best. --Old Moonraker 16:24, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hello, i want information regarding some betterment in performance of power transformers so that i could make thesis on it for my masters —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.62.98.31 (talk) 17:14, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

Hi, you could try reading the article on transformers or asking at one of the reference desks. This page is for help with using Wikipedia. Leebo ^T/C 17:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to make a link to an edit page not show as external? I notice in the {{expand}} template, it links to the pages edit page without showing as external, but when I try to replicate it, I cannot get in to show as an internal link. LARA♥LOVE 17:22, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not showing it as an internal link, it's just not showing the little arrow icon next to the link. It's still a lighter shade of blue like all external links. Also, that's not actually a full URL, it's a templated edit action, so it must be slightly different than a standard link. Leebo ^T/C 17:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Use <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.example.com example-name]</span> when formatting your link. --69.118.235.97 17:28, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so how do I hide the arrow? LARA♥LOVE 17:29, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you use the above formatting it will come out like this, example-name, no arrow to hide.--69.118.235.97 17:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, the template wraps everything in a div with the class set to plainlinks - which is why the arrow doesn't show up. -- Kainaw^(what?) 17:35, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(ec) Ah, okay, that worked great! Thanks!! LARA♥LOVE 17:37, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On a different note, 69.118.235.97, if you're the same user who asked on User talk:69.118.235.97 about the orange new-messages bar, you may want to look at bugzilla:9213; something's gone wrong with the software and it's accting oddly for IPs at the moment. (Nobody seems to know for certain what's causing the bug at present, which is why it hasn't been fixed.) --ais523 18:15, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the response, however I've already learned about Bug 9213, and yes, I am the same user.--69.118.235.97 18:48, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update It took 5 months to finally show up, but now the new messages bar won't go away ): 69.118.235.97 19:29, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update II: it finally went away. 30 minutes seems to be the magic number, or maybe there's no rationale behind it at all, and the bug just affects different people in random ways?!--69.118.235.97 20:01, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Is there any kind of "wallpaper" available to put on a User Page ? I'd like something with flowers.

Thanks,

Vonita 19:14, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not exactly sure what you mean by a "wallpaper", but you might be able to get something to work with HTML coding. Try looking at Wikipedia:User Page Design Center and Wikipedia:WikiProject User Page Help for ideas. Leebo ^T/C 19:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do you participate in a Wikiproject?Alex Rossi 19:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just start working on it. If there is a name list on the project page, just add your name to it, and then start working. :-) Stwalkerster talk 19:35, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

How do I narrow down my search for science fiction books that deal only with time travel? What I see now is a list of alphabetical listings for science fiction.

Thank you.

208.127.78.28 19:53, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go to the article Time travel in fiction. --Orange Mike 19:59, 30 August 2007 (UTC) (and please, don't call science fiction "sci fi"!)[reply]

Sci-fi is a common abbreviation. Or were you just asking him to supplant his preference with yours? Leebo ^T/C 20:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most active members of the science fiction community consider that other term demeaning, and eschew its use other than as a derogatory for bad films and television. --Orange Mike 20:53, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As a fellow geek, I'll say true enough, but we also have to understand that the wider community does not adopt that standard. :) --Moonriddengirl 21:01, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interestingly enough, this is actually briefly summarized in the article. Good thing my interest in science fiction is not intense enough that I would be upset to see sci-fi used for the sake of brevity :) Leebo ^T/C 21:01, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is the best way to move Image:TrumpTowerChicago 07 29 07.jpg Image:20070221 Trump Chicago at Night.JPG Image:TrumpTower92906.jpg to [7]?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:59, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, to be moved to the Commons, they have to be used in some Wikimedia project. Unless it's added to an article, it can't be uploaded to the Commons. --Boricuaeddie 20:42, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, nope? commons:Commons:Project scope#Wikimedia Commons is a common central media repository of all Wikimedia projects & commons:Commons:FAQ#Questions about the project would suggest "files uploaded to the Commons have to be useful for some Wikimedia project". That is not the same as saying it has to be in use already. KTC 21:54, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. so how do I do most easily?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 22:23, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons. WODUP 22:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 00:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am a user of Wikipedia from Singapore. My query is more on the note of whether we can use wikipedia for a community. I am a part of a community of 100 others who would find wikipedia useful to put up articles with relation to learnings and discussions about the same( similar to a community black book). While we are open to leaving these articles up on wikipedia for anyone to view, we would like to have control on the changes the users can make on these articles. Could wikipedia help us with this? If not, what would you suggest to be the next best option?

Thanks in advance! Regards Rohan 21:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.132.3.7 (talk)

The software which is used to present and edit Wikipedia is available under a free license; it is called MediaWiki. You can run your own copy of the MediaWiki software on your own servers, and have as much control as you like over who can add content, delete pages, and read the information that is posted. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 21:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking first. Wikipedia should not be used for your purpose. Subjects of pages must satisfy Wikipedia:Notability and other rules, and nobody owns a Wikipedia page. Everybody can edit it. You will have to find another website that allows your purpose, for example one of the many wikis listed at list of wikis or http://wikiindex.org. Or set up your own website. PrimeHunter 21:41, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is for example a wikiindex:Category:Community with a number of (you guessed it) community wikis. And see: wikibooks:Wiki Science/How to start a wiki. --Teratornis 03:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I made a minor change to the article "Mannheim" (a city in Germany). Now the contents of this article has disappeared completely. --PPWen 21:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't tell what happened. The page was blank for me, too, so I made a null edit (that is, I hit 'edit this page', and then just saved the same text without making any changes). I'm guess that there was some sort of caching problem or a hiccup in the database. In any case, the material is back again. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 21:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TenOfAllTrades, your edit was not made, as there were no changes. I however, reverted to an earlier revision, which has restored it. I have no idea what caused this. I have also re-made PPWen's edit, and it still seems fine. As I said, I have no idea what caused this. :-) Stwalkerster talk 21:51, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have both seen Mannheim being blank and normal, and both situations both before and after your edit during a period with no edits. I don't know what is going on. Could it be one of the used templates being vandalised and reverted? PrimeHunter 21:56, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's discussed at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Article not displaying properly. It appears something in Template:Infobox German Location causes pages using it to be blank some of the time. PrimeHunter 22:04, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why in it.wikipedia there is the push-button "sposta" (to move to) in top of the pages with the others "Voce" ("Articles"), "Discussione" ("Discussion"), "Modifica" ("Edit this page"), "Cronologia" ("History"), "Sposta" (ther'isnt this) and "Segui" ("Watch") and in en.wikipedia there isn't? --Noname-en 22:37, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is. The issue is you need to have an account that's at least 5 4 days old. KTC 22:40, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Merging and moving pages. KTC 22:41, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 31

I live in Canada and I want to see pictures of my home in my country of Origin (India),please send me the linkhow can i see ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.245.74.238 (talk) 00:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to try Google Earth. If that doesn't help, you could ask at the Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous‎ for that, this forum is for general questions about how to use Wikipedia. Hope that helps! ^Ariel♥Gold 00:23, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also see WP:EITW#Maps. Many articles on Wikipedia have geographic coordinates that you can click on to see a page of links to various map sites, which may or may not display maps of the corresponding area. Most of the map sites have best coverage in North America and Europe. But you could try looking up your home town or state in Category:India and see where the coordinate links take you. Also see Wikipedia:WikiProject India and wikiindex:Category:Maps. --Teratornis 03:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who is Orange Mike —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.197.153.231 (talk) 00:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia editor Orangemike has a signature that says "Orange Mike". PrimeHunter 00:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He's just this guy, you know. Why do you ask? --Orange Mike 00:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

as the person in question i tried to correct the filmography making many additions and one deletion and looked at the preview and then it disappeared?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dirt260 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dirt260, and welcome! If you are indeed, Blackie Dammett, then I would strongly suggest that you thoroughly review the conflict of interest policy, and instead of editing the article directly, use the article's talk page to discuss things you think are incorrect, or things you'd like to see added (always giving reliable sources to back up the issues.) In addition, you may wish to review the biography of living persons policy. However, to answer your question, unless you were using another username, you have made no edits. Perhaps you merely previewed, and did not save. I'm sure that there are people who would be more than happy to review any information you have, review the references to verify it, and then properly cite it in the article for you, just post it on the talk page. Hope that helps! ^Ariel♥Gold 01:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In looking at the Latin vikipaedia my browser did not display some of the fonts there. What can I download or do so that I can read all of the special characters that otherwise just display as an empty rectangle? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.210.210.197 (talk) 01:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Get Firefox. --Boricuaeddie 01:51, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Install or enable the relevant font on your system. KTC 02:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am using a RTCX-346 Dell Computer, with a large motherboard (Model:83733EAK), would this be compatiable with Wikipedias html layout? My font is Ariel Black (in the longrun) and so far there is no consistency with the pages that Wikipedia displays. Thanks! --Schoolereichen 02:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your hardware have absolutely nothing to do with how it render webpages. Get a modern and up to date web browser and you'll be fine. KTC 02:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone else take a look at g-force? I see "Your continued donations keep Wikipedia running!" and then a completely blank page -- nothing else at all. All other articles seem to display fine. I'm using IE 7. Does anyone else get this problem or is it just me? Matt 02:47, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

The page itself is fine, it's Wikipedia that's playing up. Just be patient if it's affecting you, try reloading etc. I'm sure it'd be sorted out ASAP. KTC 02:58, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it's OK for me now. I'm well used to Wikipedia being slow and sticky, but I've not seen that particular page-specific manifestation before, so I thought it was something else. Thanks, Matt 03:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.247.59 (talk)

(Pure speculation) The server responded enough that your browser doesn't display the timeout or no response or whatever page. The browser had enough to start rendering but didn't get any of the rest of the page to display or it times out waiting for the rest. KTC 03:19, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To Whom It May Concern:

The reference list for the article entitled "Catholic" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic) contains a severe inaccuracy that also ridicules the name of the source author. I am attempting to correct the error by removing the inaccuracy and inserting the author's properly spelled name but I do not see how to access that portion of the article. Could you please instruct me or make the correction yourself? The error is as follows:

"References

^ J. H. Srawley (1900). Ignatius Epistle to the Smyrnaeans. Retrieved on 2007-06-24. ^ Catechetical Lecture 18 (Ezekiel xxxvii). Trinity Consulting. Retrieved on 2007-06-24. ^ Paul Halsall (June 1997). Banning of Other Religions Theodosian Code XVI.i.2. Internet Medieval Sourcebook. Retrieved on 2007-06-24. --->^ Augustine of Hippopotamus (397). Against the Epistle of Manichaeus called Fundamental. Christian Classics Ethereal Library. Retrieved on 2007-06-24. ^ Pope Pius IX; Vatican (1870-04-24). First Vatican Council – Session 3: Dogmatic constitution on the Catholic faith. Retrieved on 2007-06-24. ^ Nicene Creed. The Lutheran Church, Missouri Synod. Retrieved on 2007-06-24. ^ Nicene Creed. Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod. Retrieved on 2007-06-24. ^ Nicene Creed. International Lutheran Fellowship. Retrieved on 2007-06-24."

Augustine of Hippopotamus (397). <--- this is an obvious and gross error in the author's name. His actual name is Augustine of Hippo-Regius, which in English is usually shortened to Augustine of Hippo, Hippo-Regius being the full name of the ancient Northern African city where Augustine died.

Also, his name should include the title of Saint for the sake of accuracy since he was declared a Saint (as well as Doctor of the Church) by the Catholic Church and he is most commonly referred to as Saint Augustine of Hippo (also abreviated to St. Augustine of Hippo).

Please see the following websites to verify the accuracy of my statements :

1. Sant'Agostino- Augustinus Hipponensis: http://www.sant-agostino.it/index.htm 2. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/augustine/ 3. Saint Augustine - Encyclopaedia Britannica: http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9109388/Saint-Augustine

Thank you very much.

SIncerely, VGC —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.32.20.61 (talk) 04:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed it to "Augustine of Hippo". (I chose just "Augustine of Hippo" rather than "St Augustine" or "St Augustine of Hippo" on the basis that that's the name of his article). Thanks for pointing it out. DH85868993 07:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Text in footnotes are found between <ref> and </ref> inside the main body of text. The footnotes are generated automatically from those. --h2g2bob (talk) 12:49, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I intended to make a new redirect, but it appears the page was created and deleted 6 times already. I personally think the term is notable enough to deserve a page, especially since similarly pejorative variations of common internet terms/abbreviations have redirects or are included on disambig pages. For example, "noob" redirects to "newbie" and "lawl" redirects to "LOL". For those who don't know, "plox" is derisive form of "please" used to mock or disparage those who use "pls" or "plz" excessively in online chats. I don't want my redirect to be deleted immediately after creation, but many wiki admins appear to be delete-happy, especially when a precedent for the subject has already been established. However, I can't see what previous incarnations of the page contained, so I can't know if my page will simply be a repeat of something that has already happened. How do I proceed? D-Fluff has had E-Nuff 05:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you intend redirecting it to? Kevin 08:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably list of internet slang phrases. The procedure would be to add "plox" to that list, providing a nice reliable source, and then to create the redirect. If you can't find a reliable source, then it can't be discussed in wikipedia, so a redirect is not appropriate. Kappa 09:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I would redirect plox to please, much in the same manner as noob and lawl currently redirect to newbie and LOL respectively. There are other examples of internet terms redirecting to their more standard equivalents as well, but unfortunately I can't think of any off the top of my head. I suppose redirecting it to the list of internet slang would be acceptable as well if that's what the community prefers. However, I don't know exactly how to find a reliable source by the policy definition. Internet slang is really just a collection of language nuances and is inherently ephemeral. It takes time for such terminology to be integrated into mainstream sources, which in these cases appears to simply be lists of slang on reputatable websites and online dictionaries. However, right now, plox is indeed being used in online games, chats and forums, and is considered by many in these circles to be common knowledge. Urban Dictionary has a page regarding plox, but I doubt that counts as a legitimate source. Encyclopedia Dramatica also references plox, but I am sure that doesn't count as a legitimate source. I could find a bunch of forums posts showing its usage, but again these fail the policy. So I would imagine this means the article is a no-go? Wikipedia is content to have an incomplete index and be "behind the times" in a manner of speaking? D-Fluff has had E-Nuff 17:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Basically yes, wikipedia has to be "behind the times" because it is not a primary source. One good reason for this is that it isn't always kept up to date so it handles "inherently ephemeral" things very badly. Also remember that wikipedia is not a dictionary, so "please" doesn't actually define the word, it just points to a variety of things called "please". The most appropriate wikimedia project for this might be wiktionary but I'm not sure what their attitude to a word which is only found on internet forums would be. Kappa 06:53, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well, that's what I get for trying to contribute. Thanks for the input. D-Fluff has had E-Nuff 00:13, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How to publish a page in other languages?For example if I have contents in English How I can publish the page in Hindi and Tamil which will be listed at the othe languages box in the side pan? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SunderKV (talk • contribs) 06:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If the article exists on that other Wikipedia, eg. Tamil or Hindi, then to add a link in the sidebar you edit the article (usually at the very end, for stylistic reasons), and add a link in the form [[lc:title]], where "lc" is the two letter language code (see m:List of Wikipedias for the full list), and "title" is the title of the article in that language.

If the article isn't on the other Wikipedia, then you'll have to be bold and write it. Confusing Manifestation 07:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Interlanguage links for complete instructions. See this page for an example. The language code for Hindi is hi, the code for Tamil is ta.--Max Talk (+) 07:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am a registered user . How to create an aricle in wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.164.127.107 (talk) 07:17, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Starting a new page and Your first article. x42bn6 Talk Mess 07:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DEAR SIR,

I AM WANT TO KNOW HOW THIS GAME DOWNLOAD ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.77.195.219 (talk) 08:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We are an encyclopedia, not a PC game. -Wooty [Woot?] [Spam! Spam! Wonderful spam!] 09:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Am I dumb? I can't figure out how to contribute a completely new entry. Help. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Auntyjo (talk • contribs) 10:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Auntyjo. See Help:Starting a new page. Neil ム 10:11, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

what is big-m method,give its step to solve problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.248.11.2 (talk) 11:17, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page is for questions about Wikipedia. You may want to try the Math Reference Desk -- Kainaw^(what?) 11:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone the menus in my userpages have stopped to load in the default hidden manner I coded them for originally. I think this changed because someone changed the code for it. Can someone help me fix it or point me to the appropriate page for details? - Mgm|^(talk) 11:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Special:Contributions page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address, contains at the bottom a link labelled "WHOIS" (and some other links) that lead to dnsstuff.com (as, for example, on Special:Contributions/24.15.28.218). These links stopped working for me; I now get a message "This type of DNSstuff tool access requires DNSstuff membership. If you would like to do any of the following, please join us for just $3/mo". They offer a limited number of free lookups that would soon be exhausted. Is there a way around this without paying $$?  --Lambiam 11:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can sometimes get an idea from traceroute. --h2g2bob (talk) 12:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bold textwhat is nano tech

what should i study to be nano tech

i am a diploma mechanical student

where should i study

what should be my marks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.84.139 (talk) 12:11, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ask at the science reference desk. --h2g2bob (talk) 12:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is the total number of system messages? I think they are more than 2000 but how many exactly? Thanks. --196.202.91.155 12:14, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a strange thing to ask. If you really want to know can't you just count them all up yourself? ::Manors:: 15:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

371 that have been customized, and 1813 at their default values, for a total of 2184. --ais523 16:14, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much, ais523. You're the best! --196.218.135.199 13:44, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who is orange Mike and why does he have a page about himself. I relise that he is a editor but that is not fair. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoogleandYahoo (talk • contribs) 12:49, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:User page. As for your other question, I believe Orange Mike's user page covers that amply. :) --Moonriddengirl 12:52, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen new users confused by user pages before, especially when it's a new user trying to create a page about their non-notable band or something. I guess I should put the user page tag on my page just to be extra clear. Leebo ^T/C 13:17, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think they're probably a good idea. I've got one on mine, even though so far as I know nobody ever asked. :) --Moonriddengirl 13:28, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so I slapped one on mine (but down at the bottom, as I think they're butt-ugly). --Orange Mike 13:56, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is that supose to mean!?! and can I basic person like me create a user lookup page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoogleandYahoo (talk • contribs) 14:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You already have one at User:GoogleandYahoo. Mike has one at User:Orangemike, and I have one at User:Kesh. Every user gets a userpage, separate from the main Wikipedia articles. You can always tell a page isn't one of the actual Wikipedia articles if it has a name in front of it with a colon, like here at Wikipedia:Help desk or Help:Categories. -- Kesh 15:22, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, One of our customers brought it to our attention that the official site Wikipedia has listed under Ziglar Training Systems is a site in Korean and it is definitely not our official site. Our official website is www.ziglar.com and our company name has actually changed to just Ziglar. Another FAQ that is incorrect would be Zig's Sunday school class. He no longer teaches his own class, however, he is the host for the Encourager's Class at Prestonwood Baptist. If you need to verify this information or contact me please call 1.800.527.0306 and ask for Katherine Witmeyer or you may call me direct at 972.383.3235. Our office is located at: 15303 Dallas Parkway Suite 550 Addison, TX 75001 We appreciate your attention to this matter,

Katherine Witmeyer Project Coordinator kwitmeyer@ziglar.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.198.191.130 (talk) 13:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the website information. As far as his contribution at Prestonwood, I'm afraid that a phone call to you would not satisfy Wikipedia's verifiability. Since the current fact is unsourced, I will remove it. But I wanted to point out to you that you can also edit this page, if you see misinformation on it, as long as you are careful to avoid the pitfalls that arise from conflict of interest. If there is third party reference, information can be included. If there is not, it should not be. --Moonriddengirl 13:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can You change a title if it is incorect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoogleandYahoo (talk • contribs) 13:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is called moving a page, but you have to have been registered for at least 4 days to use this function. You registered yesterday, so in a few more days you can move pages if you need to. Leebo ^T/C 13:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you think it needs chaning quickly, you can request it and an admin may change it for you. ::Manors:: 14:43, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Having trouble accessing Wikipedia from my Blackberry. Is it Blackberry compatible? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.83.185.6 (talk) 14:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of people have asked about this before. Also see: TomeRaider, this previous discussion about Wikipedia on PDAs, and this previous discussion about WAP. --Teratornis 15:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can I delet A page that is empty. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoogleandYahoo (talk • contribs) 14:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Add {{substr:prod|reason}}, replacing "reason" with the reason you want it deleted. An admin will likely delete it. -- Kainaw^(what?) 14:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only administrators have the power to actually remove a page through deletion, but any editor may initiate the deletion process on a page that is eligible. There are 3 processes: speedy deletion, proposed deletion, and articles for deletion. If an article page is empty (blank, or with no other content on the page) it would fall under criterion for speedy deletion A3 and you could place a {{db-empty}} tag on it. An administrator would later come by and delete it, assuming there was no other version of the page to revert to. Leebo ^T/C 14:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Just make sure the page hasn't got a good version in its history. Someone could've blanked it when in fact there was a good page there. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can a basic perosn like me create a user lookup?--GoogleandYahoo try yoogleandgahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoogleandYahoo (talk • contribs) 14:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what you mean a little more clearly? What do you mean by "user lookup"? Leebo ^T/C 14:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I mean a post of myself for instance I am in 17 Bollywood films (that is not true) —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoogleandYahoo (talk • contribs) 14:49, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I take from your above question about Orange Mike, you mean "Can I create a user page?" And the answer is "Yes, everyone can." Yours is at User:GoogleandYahoo. I would hope you don't lie about yourself though, as that would defeat the purpose. Leebo ^T/C 14:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Click on this link, and start typing.--69.118.235.97 14:52, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why wuold I lie? —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoogleandYahoo (talk • contribs) 14:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say you would, but you asked if you could create a page saying you did something you didn't actually do. Perhaps I misunderstood your intent. Leebo ^T/C 14:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you and yes you did. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoogleandYahoo (talk • contribs) 14:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note, please sign your posts using 4 tildes (~) x4 Thank you, Perfect Proposal ^{Speak out loud!} 15:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As to why a person would Lie, we have a nice article about that. As to why a particular person would lie, we would need specific data about that person before we could propose plausible hypotheses. Of course we know that nobody gets all the way through life being 100% honest at all times. Sometimes, lying appears to be necessary to fight tyranny, as in the Double Cross System used by the British in WWII. --Teratornis 19:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone provide me with a guideline on the length of an acceptable sig? I fear mine is much too long, as with some other editors.

Thanks, Perfect Proposal ^{Speak out loud!} 15:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! See WP:SIG :-) Stwalkerster talk 15:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen much longer, don't worry. Yours should be fine, it doesn't use all that much code, like mine does. Mine might need some shortening, we'll see. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 15:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Perfect Proposal ^{Speak out loud!} 15:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try Hersfold ^(t/a/c) (which is 224 characters long, still long but shorter). If you want it still shorter, you could try leaving out the 'awards' link, or creating User:Hersfold/a as a redirect and linking via that. --ais523 16:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Is there a report sytem for users who incorrectly edit or bash you and or you articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoogleandYahoo (talk • contribs) 15:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please put your questions under new headings. There is an article telling you about your problem, I can look for it, but I'm sure a more experienced user will find it first. ::Manors:: 15:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

View this page: WP:NPA ::Manors:: 15:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you report people for bashing you or your articles or saying or portaying bad things. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoogleandYahoo (talk • contribs) 15:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just answered this above, view this page: WP:NPA. Also, please sign your comments by typing '~~~~' ::Manors:: 15:49, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that me not signing my comments is bothering you but I cannot do that because it does not work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoogleandYahoo (talk • contribs) 15:57, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It does work for everyone, have you typed out ~~~~ and saved the page? Leebo ^T/C 15:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Or just click the button above the edit window with an icon intended to represent handwriting. (It's the 10th from the left, the one between the red nowiki slash and the heavy horizontal line icons.) --Orange Mike 16:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well to let you know the reason it does not work is because the computer that I am using is not mine and when I use mine I will try it but for now the computer I am using has broken keys and that key happens to be one of them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoogleandYahoo (talk • contribs) 16:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, do what Orange Mike described. Leebo ^T/C 16:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

fine --GoogleandYahoo 16:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC) Happy GoogleandYahoo[reply]

Koooool! Glad we could help. (A hint: if you need a character that is represented by a busted key, cut and paste from something that has that character; that's why all the letters with diacritical marks on them are displayed below your edit window, in case you need to put a Ł or a Þ into an article.) --Orange Mike 16:13, 31 August 2007 (UTC) (who's had a busted key or two in his time)[reply]

Hello,

Is there a way I can upload powerpoint presentations from a conference? I would like to post a wiki link on our website where all presentations can be accessed.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.211.160.1 (talk) 16:09, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not possible to upload Powerpoint (.ppt) files onto Wikipedia I tried an example one to find out and it was rejected. ::Manors:: 16:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They'd have to be used in a Wikipedia article. You may not use Wikipedia as a free webhost for your presentations. Leebo ^T/C 16:12, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I just tested it, but please don't edit my comments, Manors. If I'm wrong, just tell me. Leebo ^T/C 16:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think powerpoint presentations are not considered encyclopedic content, and thus are not accomodated by the software. If this is for an article, simply put the information in as text and images in the usual manner. --Orange Mike 16:22, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I remember seeing a Microsoft Excel (.xls) file once... did they change the upload function to avoid getting unwanted ones, or am I just crazy? :P Leebo ^T/C 16:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

if say "public" under them, does this mean they're in the public domain?Sortitouty 16:13, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. It means that the public may view it (as opposed to private view only). -- Kainaw^(what?) 16:14, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have created an account and want to post a biographical article about a person who wants to run for US Congress. This is not intended to be an advocacy piece, only a biographical sketch. I have read the entry on the current officeholder and plan on penning something similar. The subject of the sketch is notable in his own right per the dirctive in your tutorial materials. I was wondering if it is both allowable and appropriate to publish an entry when the subject has not yet declared a candidacy.

Thank you,

Dealsdealssmith 16:21, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IF the person is notable (incumbent Congressmembers are inherently notable; candidates, not so much), simply create the article according to the usual guidelines. The possible candidacy could be mentioned in the last line of the article, IF there is a published source saying that he is thinking of running. If you are involved with him or his potential campaign, though, please be aware of our stringent rules about conflicts of interest. --Orange Mike 16:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone edit your article with a virus.--GoogleandYahoo 16:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC)GoogleandYahoo[reply]

There's no such thing as an "article virus," since an article is just a collection of text and can't get viruses. There may be nefarious things people can do to articles to make them less useful or whatnot, but I'm not going to mention those. Leebo ^T/C 16:28, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If someone mananges to put a virus in your article, they would almost certainly be banned permanently. You have nothing to worrry about. ::Manors:: 16:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If someone managed to put a virus on a text article, they would certainly deserve an article on Wikipedia mentioning the achievement. :D KTC 16:33, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did not mean the artical itself I meant the user who posted it. Does wikipedia have virus filters if not then they should invest in some. --GoogleandYahoo 16:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC) WHO WINS THE FIGHT BETWEEN GOOGLE AND YAHOO CHEEK IT OUT FOR YOURSELF[reply]

What do you mean by a Virus filter? You mean a user giving Wikipedia a virus? Again, they're a skilled hacker if they can do that and we're not going to discuss such activities. Leebo ^T/C 16:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what that stupid thing on the end means. I would assume Wikimedia has strong security anyway, but you don't need a virus to edit an article, you can just click a button. ::Manors:: 16:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1. Arh this is point less I mean a hacker or whoever goes on wikipedia see your article and edits it with a link many people click on the like to find out that it is a virus. 2. Or the hacker just sends a virus to that user. 3. A virus filter filters all hackers from send a virus the virus is sent but is ditroyed by the filter many websites have then for a small out of pocket fee.--GoogleandYahoo 16:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)well arh[reply]

I'm sure a lot of links that would contain viruses could be blacklisted and the user blocked. The filters you're talking about wouldn't prevent the damage you're referring to. Leebo ^T/C 16:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1. Any link leaving Wikipedia is marked with a little arrow like this http://shaunwagner.com - so users know it is going offsite. If it is a corrupt or virus laden link, other editors will quickly remove it.
2. A hacker cannot just "send" a virus to a user. They can email a virus as an attachment if they know a user's email address - but it is up to the user to know not to open email attachments.
3. Hackers cannot send a virus to a Wikipedia article. The articles are ONLY text. There's no code - nothing to put a virus in.

I hope that explains it well. -- Kainaw^(what?) 16:49, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles are only text, but see this:

• Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2007 April 20#Hijacked page?

A malicious editor can invisibly hijack all the links on a page, redirecting them to a malicious Web site. --Teratornis 17:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure that type of javascript has since been disabled. Such a hijack should no longer be possible. I think. --69.118.235.97 17:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it has. -- Kainaw^(what?) 17:09, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean on Wikipedia specifically, or does the new version of MediaWiki plug that hole for all MediaWiki wikis? Do you have a reference for the notice, if any, that whoever plugged this hole might have given? I would like to add the reference to my personal notes. It would also be nice to add an update to the archived question to give the current status of this security hole. --Teratornis 17:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's say I was investigating gravity and was looking at the Rothschild solution or equation.

I am NOT an expert, but I am a scientist with good math and physics skills (I can understand equations in general). I DO NOT wish to edit the answer, or make any correction to what has been written. I would like to know how the equations would apply to calculating the gravitational force inside of an atomic nucleus (between nuetrons and protons) given what we know about their mass and density (radius of the nuclear sphere).

1) Is it appropriate to write in my question as an edit, leaving it there for others to answer and then edit out in completing? 2) Is there an alternative way of contacting authors of articles? Or of posing such a question relevant to an article to the visitors who may arrive at that page?

Thank you, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.87.166.72 (talk) 16:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, discussion occurs on talk pages, not the articles themselves, which you can reach by clicking the "Discussion" tab at the top of any page. Be warned, however, that discussion should remain strictly focused on ways to improve the article, not general discussion on the subject itself. You may want to find a science/mathematics forum to ask such questions, or go into the History of the article, find an editor who you'd like to ask, go to their user page, and click "Email user" to send them an email question. Leebo ^T/C 16:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You could also try asking at the reference desk. --ais523 16:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

The answer to your particular question seems pretty straightforward. Try reading some of these links:

• Google:gravitational force inside atomic nucleus

for example:

• http://www.britannica.com/nobelprize/article-260976

which says:

• Especially at the scale of elementary particles, the gravitational force is many orders of magnitude weaker than other fundamental forces, so it is customarily ignored when talking about the nucleus.

You can also search for the same keywords on Wikipedia with similar results. --Teratornis 16:51, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do you program a link to open the destination in a new window? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.83.168.254 (talk) 17:11, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's no markup for such a link available; this is apparently a deliberate decision by the developers. On most browsers, you can open a link in a new window even if it's set up to open in the same window by holding down 'shift' and clicking on the link. --ais523 17:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

If your question refers to how to do it in general in terms of HTML and not in reference to within Wikipedia, try the Wikipedia:Reference desk. KTC 17:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw somewhere I could apply for help from an experienced user, like a buddy thing. Where is this? Phgao 17:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Adopt a user. KTC 17:21, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I've come across an article that seems mostly constructed by cut and pastes from other articles in Wikipedia, but no links are provided in the edit history. This violates the GFDL. How do I rectify this? Tim Vickers 17:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remove copyvio materials. Add references to claims that are unreferenced. What page are you referring to? -- Kainaw^(what?) 17:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I mean the page (Evolutionary history of life) is constructed from sections taken from other Wikipedia pages. Tim Vickers 17:33, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's no problem with copying Wikipedia. Anyone can copy it - which is why you find Wikipedia articles all over the Internet. However, the article should be written so it reads well and not like a bunch of copied paragraphs herded into a new area. -- Kainaw^(what?) 17:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The edit history should say where the paragraphs were copied from, if they were; if the history doesn't say that, and it doesn't look like it does to me, it would be best to give the information on the talk page (you can find the edit history in these three pages/redirects...). If the original pages have been deleted altogether, they probably need to be undeleted (which would be uncontroversial at WP:DRV). --ais523 17:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, would it be best to put the links on the talk page or do a blank edit and put them in the edit history? Tim Vickers 17:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page is more usual for after-the-fact correction in my experience, but either would be fine. (You could even do both, I suppose.) --ais523 17:49, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, will do. Tim Vickers 19:00, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the article Stillwater Area High School I have a list of state championships that has been without a source for some time. Reason being is that this information is not on the internet and I am not familiar with how to reference something like this. I got it directly from a school pamphlet. The list was among other information mailed out to all students. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mientkiewicz5508 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Citation templates. I think you will want the press release one - but feel free to choose a different one if it looks better. -- Kainaw^(what?) 17:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I like that, but it doesn't exactly have a URL...will it still suffice? It's not somethign that could be easily checked as a reference, and I'm wondering if it's still reliable as a reference. Or if people would consider that not good enough. Haha.Mientkiewicz5508 06:53, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If it can't be checked by other people, it has no value as a reference. I think the test is "available from libraries", eg via interlibrary loan. Kappa 16:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do you make text a certain color? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.83.168.254 (talk) 17:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Use <span style='color:red;'>your text</span> -- Kainaw^(what?) 17:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Or, <font color="color">TEXT</font> ::Manors:: 17:57, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've read Wikipedia's imaging policy in pretty good detail but I'm still a little confused. If an image is copyrighted elsewhere, it can be used if no substitute can be found and under various other conditions. From the guidelines, it looked as if the conditions state that the photo cannot be of a living person unless other conditions are met. Yet, I have found several politician pages that include Gray Davis and Shirley Horton, who are both living people, yet they have copyrighted photos submited under fair use. There are a lot of California politicians that are living without photos. My question is can I upload copyrighted photos for each of those politicians? User:calbear22 08:51, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can not. And those pages you cite should not have non-free images (all "fair use" images are, by definition, non-free). See our fair use criteria. All articles on living people should not have any fair-use photos on them that are just being used to show what they look like; a free one can be obtained. There can be exceptions (for example, an image of someone playing a role in a movie - no free alternative could be obtained). Neil ム 09:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The pics in those 2 articles have a claim of public domain in their edit summaries, so I think the copyright tags are probably in error. Kevin 13:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How would one go about obtaining a free one? As long as any photo is from an area with that little c on the page, than a photo can't be uploaded. User:calbear22 15:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If they're living, I'd suggest requesting one that comes with explicit permission to post. --Orange Mike 18:21, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading photos of living people confuses me to the max. I would suggest doing what I'm doing and wait until you've had a bit of experience here before even attempting to upload them. ::Manors:: 19:18, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My external link won't open from within our wiki... http://planning.lacounty.gov/doc/form/form_CUP_checklist.pdf How do I get the link to open the pdf file? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.83.168.254 (talk) 19:22, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That link worked for me, but you should code the link like this: "[http://planning.lacounty.gov/doc/form/form_CUP_checklist.pdf]" which will produce: [8]. The "20" will change depending where it is in the article. ::Manors:: 19:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for advice on how to deal with a user who has done the following (on a single article):

• removed a "speedy deletion" tag from an image in the article
• changed a cleanup tag to read "This article has been tagged for cleanup since July 2009"
• reinstated material which had a personal essay style/buzzwords/unencyclopedic material and tone, without any comment or discussion
• has made all of their contributions to only this one page (sockpuppet?)

Thanks. --- Taroaldo 19:52, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The user should have recieved warnings for each of those actions as vandalism. If they've hit their limit on warnings (at least one level 4 warning) recently, report them to WP:ANI and they'll get a block. If they only do this once in a while, then it's something that needs to be handled through dispute resolution. -- Kesh 19:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taken individually, those are all quite minor instances of unconstructive editing. If it's happening all at once, that's a bit different. Anyway, each situation is different, so it's hard to say what the best course of action is without looking at the user's contributions. Leebo ^T/C 19:58, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All happened today on "Stress (medicine)" page. Since I am still not familiar with all of Wikipedia's policies, I want to make sure that I follow a process which is appropriate in this case. Thanks. --- Taroaldo 20:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do add an info box. I want to add one to My Fountain of Nations ArticleCheyenneRulz 21:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check out Wikipedia:List of infoboxes to find the appropriate infobox, and then follow the instructions on the infobox's template page.--Max Talk (+) 22:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reading Matrix Mechanics, Lagrangian's etc, leads to Math Symbol/Font Wiki searchs. The tables returned fail for about 50% of the Glyphs rentered on my systems Win 2000 and Win 98SE.

IE 6.0+View.encode.Auto-select and all other such options fail also for me.

Please recommend Win Fonts, or Style Sheets commonly used Wiki Articles.

It would be nice to be able to key in alt + Decimal number in your search window to find a symbol related article.

Your content is super, and has me chasing my tail with great delight.

Yours 23:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

If the math symbols aren't rendering correctly, you can try setting in your preferences to render math as an image (Under the Math tab, select "Always render PNG" and save. You must be logged in for this to work.) A much better solution, however, would be to Get Firefox. (And upgrade your OS. But not to Vista. It doesn't work right yet.) Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:07, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I searched for "zipper merge" and couldn't find it. Your entries are great and I'm hoping one of your contributors might help me out. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kloftin (talk • contribs) 23:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse my ignorance but what exactly is a zipper merge? What articles is it most likely to relate to? Woodym555 23:17, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Google search [9] shows that "zipper merge" is a way for drivers to merge vehicles in two lanes into one lane when the other lane is about to end. Wikipedia is not a dictionary and it doesn't sound like a thing we should have an article about. PrimeHunter 23:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It could still have an article, just you would need to find a way to stretch that information to a few paragraphs. ::Manors:: 01:10, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm trying to add a column for several movie titles which show the movie poster, principals, and additional info. Most films on the site have these columns but I can't seem to figure out how to add this.

Thanks,

Jaked —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaked4 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're looking for {{Infobox Film}}. Copy the code on that page and fill out the information. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 1

I thought only a Free photo could be used on the biography of a living person.

It seems to me that the magazine cover used on Bethany Lorraine violates WP:FU and WP:NFCC.

In fact all the magazine covers in Category:Playboy magazine covers seem to be violations.

Am I right ?

If I am, I'll start removing them.

Please advise.

Tovojolo 00:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On that specific page, it probably is. Playboy covers are copyrighted, but they should only serve to illustrated commentary on the model in the issue indicated. For instance, if the articles explains "Miss X's fame was cemented when she appeared on the June 1987 issue of Playboy" then an image of the magazine would probably be acceptable. However, without any commentary, or with commentary unrelated to the issue, such as "Miss X is a former Playboy centerfold" they probably fail our content criteria. --Haemo 00:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, just so you know, to Wikilink to a category or image you can just put a colon in front, like [[:Category:Playboy magazine covers]]

I'm confused.

Excusing copyright violations only harms Wikipedia.

Look at Marliece Andrada, the commentary in the article is that she was the playmate for that particular month – is that enough to justify the use of the magazine cover ?

Tovojolo 01:04, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's probably not. What are you confused about? You brought up a good point, and I'd say most would agree that those covers are used in ways disallowed by our fair use guidelines. Leebo ^T/C 01:10, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

G'day. I'm using Firefox 2.0.0.6 and loving the spell-check function that, similarly to Microsoft Word and Thunderbird, underlines misspelt words in Red. It is working right now in this little window, but numerous times when I'm editing a large Wiki article it doesn't appear to be working. I'm guessing this might have something to do with their being too many words and it timing out or something? Does anybody know a way to get around this? Cheers, Rothery 02:04, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hrmm, I'm using the same version, and I have never noticed this issue, and have edited many very large pages. It might be some sort of conflict with another add-on, or some other software issue. Perhaps if nobody here can figure it out, you may wish to ask at Wikipedia:Village Pump (technical) and see if those very smart folks can assist you. ^Ariel♥Gold 02:10, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just opened it on this page, which is quite large, and it was working. Leebo ^T/C 02:41, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a Firefox problem, not a Wikipedia problem. Sometimes, when editing large amounts of text, the underlining spellchecker doesn't work. I've noticed it on several different sites. Why? I have no idea, but I'm pretty sure it has something to do with the amount of RAM your computer has, and the size of the page you're editing. --Haemo 06:56, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am using a 736JD Microchip (Dell make 2003 November) with a processer that uses a 9 voltage adaptor. Would this combination defect my Wikipedia page display or would it create a meltdown in the lower motherboard? My motherboard detail logs are : 63H-4403-N/FE4. For The Americas the 9 voltage adaptor would be a 12 voltage adapter with compactability to the motherboard (in this case with the Dell Microchip). Furthermore, Would these adapters also damage my screen of my computer when viewing Wikipedia? As for the screen, it is a 1997 (old) make by Hartwell Glass Co. (now defunct). Thank You. --Frenton Complex 02:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, I would recommend you ask this question at one of the reference desks, since it's not about using Wikipedia specifically. Secondly... how could Wikipedia have any effect on your hardware? Leebo ^T/C 02:43, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did, and Wikipedia specifications (loose browser, older interface) can have a significant impact on lower motherboards versions HD77-J8 thru to HD98-H7 if the 736JD Microchip is used in an 9v adapter situation. That is how it affects hardware. --Frenton Complex 02:56, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That makes no sense whatsoever. -- Kesh 03:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If it makes no sense to you that means you dont understand my question. Its a very experienced question you see. --Frenton Complex 03:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is English a second language for you? I think that is part of the problem: the way you are writing does not make a lot of sense in English. Further, you aren't explaining how in the world Wikipedia could possibly cause a hardware problem. . It sounds like you're either talking about an adapter for the CPU or motherboard (which is a very bad idea) or a power adapter for the computer itself, which can't hurt the computer at all. None of the component numbers you've given show up on Google at all, so I'm not sure what you're referring to. -- Kesh 03:37, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The things you are listing as Wikipedia's fault are not actually caused by Wikipedia, they'd be caused by you providing the settings necessary to view Wikipedia. There's a difference, and as I said before, this is not a question related to using Wikipedia. It's a hardware question. It belongs on one of the reference desks, and if you are saying that you asked at one of the reference desks, you did not do it with this account. Leebo ^T/C 03:42, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone recommend a HTML supplement for a Firefox Web browser? My downloaded version is 3.4 Beta . Any supplement by original standards wont work, however I need to find one with HTML SHD77 support for Windows 98.. Of course this is essential for viewing wikipedias front page, --Missingthefuture 02:41, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This question more properly belongs on the Computing Reference Desk. They specialise in computing related questions Raven4x4x 08:30, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to reach Wikipedia contributor Janke. I do not have a "talkpage" and don't know how to leave a message on his. 74.61.73.217 03:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just click here. That's the same thing as going to his talk page and clicking the "+" tab at the top. Also, you do have a talk page, it's at User talk:74.61.73.217. Leebo ^T/C 03:39, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An unregistered user may access Wikipedia from more than one IP address, or may share a given IP address with other users. For the questioner to have a unique user talk page, he or she should create an account. --Teratornis 23:55, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipidea,

Suggestion I am a regular user/reader of your website. However today(1st September 2007) while reading a thought came into my mind. What if the online material (page) available on the website can be downloaded in the form of a PDF document? It will save a user's time to search the same article everytime he needs it. Also if a user access the same page multiple times he might put different keywords and would get a different result each time. Also he will not have to log in to the internet each time he needs the same. This is beneficial for users in countries like mine where there are more dial up users and who are not connected on 24X7 basis. Whenever needed the PDF can be accessed from the hard disk.

Problem Regarding the same i decided to drop an e-mail to Wikipidea so i clicked on the "Contact Wikipidea" link. However after surfing through lots of links i finally came across this page. Life could have been lot simpler if you could have published a simple e-mail id like feedback@wikipidea.org and users like me would have sent an e-mail to the same rather than surfing through lots of pages to find the feedback/contact us. I am not even sure if i am writing on the correct page since the link said "Contact a Wikipidea user". I assume that this information will go to a Wikipidea official. If not please forward the same on my behalf.

Regards, Manish Gangal manish_gangal@rediffmail.com New Delhi, India —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manish gangal (talk • contribs) 07:07, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well Wikipedia will be released as Version 1 some time in the near future which is the closest thing to that PDF suggestion in the pipe line (to my knowledge), and wikipedia has an email address: info-en-o@wikimedia.org, although you could suggest that they could add on wikipedias email address to the Wikipedia:Contact us, by placing your suggestion on Wikipedia talk:Contact us.--Kerotan^{Leave Me a Message} Have a nice day :) 07:26, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fear that "sometime in the near future" might be similar to "Real soon now." In the meantime, I would direct the attention of M. Gangal to TomeRaider, which provides text-only downloadable versions of Wikipedia for offline reading. The relatively low hardware requirements of TomeRaider should make it helpful for those who lack fast, continuous connections to the Internet. --Teratornis 23:48, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~SNIP~—Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.209.33 (talk) 07:37, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(NOTE: ENTIRE QUESTION REMOVED BY ME AS POTENTIAL LIBEL PROBLEM. AndyJones 16:56, 2 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Firstly, this Help Desk is for question about Wikipedia. We cannot help you with legal or financial matters such as this. Secondly, please only post your question once. I have removed the duplicate post. Finally, it is a very bad idea to post contact details such as addresses, phone numbers and e-mail addresses on this page. This is a public page and can attract spammers, so I have removed all the contact details from you message. Raven4x4x 08:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First Wkikpedia is not responible for any of these thigs so try contacting a lawyer or something because this a bad idea to post information and such on a PUBLIC website were all sorts of people will respond and cheat you more. 2. This is not a place to post person questions. --GoogleandYahoo 19:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I hope you will help please with the following:

> I have recently looked at a page BIG DIPPER & wished to print off the > details, unfotunately only the text prints & not the 2 maps included in the > article. I have looked closely at FAQ's & all other options to find a > solution including trying to ask a wikipedia user, having created an account > & logged in. However, I don't know any wikipedia users so can't type in a > name, so again I'm stumped !! > What am I doing wrong, & how can I print the images as well as the text? > Thankyou, I look forward to your reply, > Harry---- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Herisson (talk • contribs) 08:09, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried clicking the "Printible version" link in the side menu? It's in the list of links titled 'toolbox'. Clicking that link will bring you to this page. Printing this page will print both the images and text. Raven4x4x 08:18, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if this is the place for it, but I've been searching for a good while, and I'm not too good with computers. I was running through the list of the current American third parties and noticed that the one I belong to is missing. Perhaps it is because I've only seen it here in Arizona? It is the International Dreamist Party. Their website is down I believe, but here's an unofficial one http://www.myspace.com/dreamistparty . I don't know if it'll get an article or not, but I do believe it's worth noting in the wikipedia.

Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.107.128.50 (talk) 08:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can request it at Wikipedia:Requested articles. The 10 Google hits [10] on "International Dreamist Party" are all to MySpace. Unless much better reliable sources are found, the party does not satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). An article about it would probably be deleted. PrimeHunter 11:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know I should be able to do this by now, but the things I've tried aren't working. I've recieved a Wikiproject invitation which used a colour-background, which seems to be carrying on all the way down the page. When I typed the reply, the green background remained behind my text. Can somebody sort it out please? Lradrama 09:37, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1 hour later and no reply... Lradrama 10:46, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1 hour! and i have removed the sky blue for you. Woodym555 10:48, 1 September 2007 (UTC)(amended) it needed the |} closing brackets. Woodym555 10:57, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou very much! Lradrama 11:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why, but to the left of this article, below the toolbox, the list "in other languages" does not appear, but if you tick the button "edit this page", down at the bottom of the edit window various languages are stated. Why doesn't the list appear in "normal" view? Pdeege 10:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was a rogue <ref> tag that wasn't closed. All of the text below this moved into the reference including the categories and the notes section istelf. Fixed now. Woodym555 10:45, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How u People get this timely and relevant information across Globe.Do you have research team in every countries —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.135.192.118 (talk) 11:20, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

this is the encyclopedia that everyone can edit, so anyone around the world can start editing. We are all individuals (5,219,363 at last count) who want to contribute to the encyclopedia. There are no Research teams, just a wikipedia community. | Wikinews] has up to date information. So there you are, you too can become a contributor if you want. Just click the edit tab at the top and start editing Woodym555 11:30, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Redlich is my mom's cousin. Am I still allowed to edit his page if I have some facts to add? Smartyshoe 12:04, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If those facts are properly verifiable and if the information presented is neutral, yes. Conflict of interest posting is discouraged, but not disallowed. If you think your changes are likely to be controversial, you should probably discuss them at the article's talk page first. --Moonriddengirl 12:31, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for claryfing. Smartyshoe —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smartyshoe (talk • contribs) 13:02, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If I wanted to change my username would "I want to change because I like the other name" be allowed and do all your subpagess etc. move yet remain unaltered-- Phoenix 13:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Changing username. KTC 13:38, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but I've been there. I followed a link and found it Wikipedia:Changing usernames guidelines-- Phoenix 13:43, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And the second part of my question; does my userspace stay the way it is apart from a different username-- Phoenix 14:02, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is like a page move, all of the content and edit history of the username gets transferred to your new username. Woodym555 14:07, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!-- Phoenix 14:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am having an issue - images on wikipedia articles are not loading - its happening in IE and Firefox and I was wondering whether this issue is specific to me, and how I could rectify it?--Flymeoutofhere 13:53, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Have you got a slow connection? I've got a 26Kbps dial-up and images take a while to load. I can see them eventually though-- Phoenix 14:07, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No - its never been an issue before - it just started a few days ago...Thanks.--Flymeoutofhere 14:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A group focused on a IEEE standard 1902.1 wrote a comprehensive summary and plan English explanation - heavily supported by cross-references and back up material and reviewed by many users. The Standard was just passed unanimously by work group (Epson, Motorola, Microsoft, Bearing Point, GM to name few of 17 companies in work group)

These standards can become political and competitive (eg 802 has been explosive...) Someone not well identified deleted most of the WiKi core and removed all references over course of several weeks - he did it by making many small changes - eating away core with each -- makes it very difficult to go back 20 revs... think it was done this way intentionally and malicious.....

Question

1. How do we go back to original version - do I have to undo each of his revs (about 20). or is simple way to go back to original ...

2. He offered no explanation for changes in discussion - I have made it clear glad to change anything if specifics are addressed - have done that consistently - can I put him on list or something so blocks ability to make future changes ?? This is second time this has happened ...

Thanks Very Much

John Stevens Chair IEEE 1902.1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.130.24 (talk)

I can't find which article you're talking about. KTC 13:59, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict):First, this may be a slight WP:COI, but as long as you back things up with references and discuss changes on the talk page, you should be ok. What is the exact name of the article so i can have a look? Thanks Woodym555 14:02, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it's about RuBee which has been edited by Jkmstevens who is "John K Stevens", but the article history does not match the description. PrimeHunter 14:22, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Near the end of the Railway station layout article, the Railway station layout#Large stations section contains a wikitable. However, the Railway station layout#See also section is shown before the table, even though its text is physically after the table when I edit the page. I have tried to correct this without success. Could someone take a look at it please. FYI, I am using Mozilla Firefox version 2.0.0.6, which has given me no problems on other Wiki pages. Thanks. Truthanado 14:46, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I've repaired it. This is not my area, but the problem seemed to be in the table's closure. It was |-}. Changing it to |} seems to have worked. Why? I have no idea. :) --Moonriddengirl 15:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many Thanks! That was driving me nuts. Truthanado 15:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do our images get indexed by Google? So if I were to look up a person on Google images, would their wikipedia portrait show? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 15:19, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images do get indexed, because if you search for certain terms, you'll find images from Wikipedia. As for your second question, probably not. First off, most people don't have a portrait, and there is no such thing as a "wikipedia portrait" in the same sense as a Facebook profile pic. Second, most users don't register with their real names, so would have to now their pseudonym on Wikipedia, and thirdly, my picture does not turn up despite the fact I have an account under my own name and a picture on my userpage, so I doubt it is the most reliable way to search.--Max Talk (+) 17:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

is 92.7 the same radio station carrys the south carolina football? another question could i possible get the radio sound for games online like for tonight football game?

This page is for questions about Wikipedia itself. Sorry, we can't help you with that one. -- Kesh 17:35, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try Yahoo or something to answer your question this Help Desk is just alone for question about editing in wikipedia. --GoogleandYahoo 19:28, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's also the Reference desk here on Wikipedia. --Tkynerd 19:32, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's a bug on the main page again. When I view the main page, it says on the top that I have to log in or register but I'm already logged in.--Hundred-Man 15:44, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The main page is protected as a preventative measure. You'd have to be an admin to edit it. –Animum 15:46, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I wrote the Fountain of Nations article and i can't find the right infobox to do it

Can somebody help me??

CheyenneRulz 15:51, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles don't have to have an infobox, but maybe you can use {{Infobox building}} and ignore parameters which don't apply to Fountain of Nations. PrimeHunter 16:33, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you E-Mail the pictures of the day? If so, how —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.60.74.91 (talk) 17:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as i know, you can't. You can add {{Pic of the day}} (version with text). Or you could use {{POTD}} which is a non-text version. More information can be found at Wikipedia:Picture of the day. Woodym555 19:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you can, but you have to do it manually. If you click on the picture, and keep doing so until all you see is the picture (no text around it) you can then right click and click save image as you then chose where to save it onto your computer. You can then email this as an attachment. Hope this helps, Tiddly-Tom 20:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I created an article on the band Dead By April, as the band directly wanted me to do so. The article i created included a link to the main singer's myspace page, where it says he is in the band. The singer also sings for the band Nightrage, who DOES have a wikipage. This band artice is important for people who want to find out about the sideproject of this person. I have seen many band pages with very little info and about 2 sentances, with nothing else. The article i created was elaborate, had pictures, links, links to articles, and appropriate credit, dates, and info. It was equal to all other band pages unless i made a tiny mistake upon which i should have had more time to correct before "speedy deletion" took place. I looked at the codes of other band pages and nothin seemed different from the one i created, so i dont see the problem. There is a article about the band from a reliable site, which i could have also put in the references section, if i had had more time to do so. So I'm wondering what i could have done to make my page correct? because i still have the full code i can paste to re-do the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.112.69.187 (talk) 18:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you write about copying something from someone elses page because if so then you will be up for speedy deletion because you "stole" the article even if you had the permission. Try the wikipedia Criteria for speedy deletion. If it does not pop up as a link then type it in the search bar. --GoogleandYahoo 19:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since whoever nominated your article for deletion did not notify you per custom, I'm afraid I don't know what reason was tagged on the page. Pages are often deleted for not meeting requirements for notability. I see the band does not yet have an entry at All Music. Perhaps that's the case here? If you feel the band meets the notability requirements per the guideline, you need to assert that within the article so that new page reviewers can see instantly why the band needs an encyclopedia article. If the band is notable and you did assert that, it may also be that since you did not include the third party article you have there was a problem with your third party sources. Lack of sourcing is usually dealt with through different avenues, though, than speedy deletion. --Moonriddengirl 20:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your article was deleted because the Admin felt the article did not assert enough Noteablitly. As I cannot see the deleted page, I cannot comment. Please contact the deleting admin here he/she should be able to help you. Thanks, Tiddly-Tom 20:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Everytime I try to have a company send me an email it says Host Herman Dunn cannot be found. I am the Host not herman, how can I solve this problem?

This help page is for people who are having problems editing wikipedia. You might want to try the Reference desk. Woodym555 18:55, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a small group of islands off the east coast of the US which have been isolated for many years. A diolect similar to english has evolved and a translation of the KJV was produced in their language. I cannot find this translation because I do not know the name of the people (sounds like "Nyuan") Can you help?

Dennis Cuchiara email removed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.18.89.59 (talk) 18:34, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This help page is for people who are having problems editing wikipedia. You might want to try the Reference desk. Woodym555 18:57, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See List of dialects of the English language#North America. You may be thinking of Harkers Island English. I remember seeing it featured in The Story of English. --Teratornis 19:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HOW DO I SUBMIT INFORMATION ON THE ABOVE RADIO TALK SHOW HOST AND PHILANTHROPIST ROMANCE NOVELIST, SKYLAR STONE?

---

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Affairsexpert (talk • contribs) 19:00, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Before creating an article, please search Wikipedia first to make sure that an article does not already exist on the subject. Please also review a few of our relevant policies and guidelines which all articles should comport with. As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, articles must not contain original research, must be written from a neutral point of view, should cite to reliable sources which verify their content and must not contain unsourced, negative content about living people.

Articles must also demonstrate the notability of the subject. Please see our subject specific guidelines for people, bands and musicians, companies and organizations and web content and note that if you are closely associated with the subject, our conflict of interest guideline strongly recommends against you creating the article.

If you still think an article is appropriate, see Help:Starting a new page. You might also look at Wikipedia:Your first article and Wikipedia:How to write a great article for guidance, and please consider taking a tour through the Wikipedia:Tutorial so that you know how to properly format the article before creation. :) --Moonriddengirl 19:56, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am having huge problems with wikipedia! This has never happened before!
Many wikimedia sites including wikipedia and mediawiki site will not display the site skin at all. I have never have had this problem before, i checked settings and the skin is on monobook i tried flipping around, the other skins don't work as well. I went back to monobook and it still doesn't work,It isnt just my account, I was not loged in when I discoverd this. when I saw this I immediately logged in and it is still like it! Is anyone else experiencing it, is it a global error/change, if it is just me how do I fix it. there have been no recent browser changes at all and no recent downloads except for a developer zip file from yahoo! . DeSalvionjr Talk | Contribs 20:02, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a problem anymore! it is working again. but i still have the question, why was this happening? DeSalvionjr Talk | Contribs 20:02, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Australia, MAreeba, current status population industry if any —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.217.60.185 (talk) 20:33, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You may wish to ask your question at the reference desk. The help desk is for specific issues with how to use Wikipedia. Good luck. :) --Moonriddengirl 20:51, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are looking for This. Hope it helps! DeSalvionjr Talk | Contribs 20:55, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For a more recent population estimate and other statistics, head to the Australian Bureau of Statistics' Census Data site which has all the currently released data from the 2006 census. (The Australian Wikipedians are waiting on a particular release before updating all the articles.) Confusing Manifestation 23:37, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm puzzled to see that one of two images from this article I translated displays, and the other doesn't. Does Image:Hans Bethge2.gif need to be moved from WPde to the English WP, or is some kind of external link possible? And why did Image:Grabmal Hans Bethge in Kirchheim u Teck.JPG come thru without anything done on my part? Sparafucil 21:32, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, the first image probably needs to be moved to English Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons. The second one moved properly because it is at Wikimedia Commons where all pictures can be used on any language Wikipedia. --Hdt83 ^Chat 22:41, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do I put a heading on a page such as "under construction"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gyaos (talk • contribs) 22:03, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I use {{inuse}} Checking your listed number of edits, I'm guessing you might not have used a template before. You edit the page as normal, but put that chunk of text at the top. It will put a notice up asking people not to edit the page while you are doing so. Please note that sometimes people don't notice it and edit it anyway. It's always good to be prepared for edit conflicts. :) And please let me know if you need me to clarify further.. --Moonriddengirl 22:07, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Template messages/Maintenance#Articles undergoing major edits. PrimeHunter 02:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there an easy way to embed Wikipedia content into a web page on a website much like one would embed a YouTube video? Is there any copyright restrictions to be aware of? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.3.223.42 (talk) 22:38, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alfonso IX of Leon contained material verbatim from the eleventh edition of Encylopedia Britannica, which the article does state is in the public domain. Does this mean it can be copied directly or does it still need to be rephrased. (I've done a bit anyway, just for style considerations.) Clarityfiend 22:43, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Public domain for a description, but simply yes it can be copied verbatim. KTC 23:04, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica. PrimeHunter 02:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn't put a subject before or sign my name...

Is there a way to embed Wikipedia content into a web page on an external website much like one would embed a YouTube video? Is there any copyright restrictions to be aware of? Pointers to information related to this is appreciated. Thank you. alfitz, wheeling, wv —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.3.223.42 (talk) 22:48, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not possible for you to just embed any particular article no. For copyright's, see Wikipedia:Copyrights. KTC 23:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:MIRROR, and particularly WP:MIRROR#Remote loading which describes the appropriate procedure for mirroring Wikipedia's content. --Teratornis 23:33, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2

This is the first time I have asked a question here because I can usually figure things out on my own. The template in question is Template:Pirates. Just wanted to give the link because it is then easier to explain. An IP added a privateer to the notable pirates. I reverted it because I don't think the privateer was notable enough. The IP also added a link to the list of female pirates. All of those pirates were listed in the main list of pirates (which also included a link to the list of female pirates) so I also took that back off. Now the IP has added it again. Since I want to avoid an edit war, I was confused about what to do so I came here. Thanks! Deflagro ^Contribs/_Talk 00:53, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a concise answer, but here is where to find all the documents describing how to handle content disputes: WP:EITW#Conten. Good luck. --Teratornis 02:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm gonna try and talk with the IP and see why they are adding it. I dunno if they will respond or not. Thanks again! Deflagro ^Contribs/_Talk 02:37, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I want to add an entry! How do I do this? Thanks, Kate Suisman

<email removed to prevent spam>—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksuisman (talk • contribs) 03:32, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Before creating an article, please search Wikipedia first to make sure that an article does not already exist on the subject. Please also review a few of our relevant policies and guidelines which all articles should comport with. As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, articles must not contain original research, must be written from a neutral point of view, should cite to reliable sources which verify their content and must not contain unsourced, negative content about living people.

Articles must also demonstrate the notability of the subject. Please see our subject specific guidelines for people, bands and musicians, companies and organizations and web content and note that if you are closely associated with the subject, our conflict of interest guideline strongly recommends against you creating the article.

If you still think an article is appropriate, see Help:Starting a new page. You might also look at Wikipedia:Your first article and Wikipedia:How to write a great article for guidance, and please consider taking a tour through the Wikipedia:Tutorial so that you know how to properly format the article before creation.--Fuhghettaboutit 05:05, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If a subject already has an article but the same topic would stand alone (eg acronym for an organisation that is the same as another) how should that be addressed?

Mishahu 03:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mishahu. We do this by creating a redirect at the alternate name. That link has a lot of useful information but just as an example, say you wanted to make R.O.U.S. link to an article named Rodents of Unsual Size: you'd create the page R.O.U.S. with the text: #REDIRECT [[Rodents of Unsual Size]].--Fuhghettaboutit 05:05, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to merge two articles which have been tagged for suggested merging. However, I do not wish to upset people by merging them if the consensus is not to. But in the talk pages, there is maybe only one or two people's opinions on it. This is the same for many articles tagged for merging.

Is there a time limit after the articles have been tagged when it would be okay to go ahead? Otherwise, how do I know if it's okay or not to go ahead with the merge? -- Matthew Edwards 04:12, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it depends on how long the suggestion has been there, and if the comments support or object to the merge. Links? i ^said 04:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For instance List of notable Chicanos and List of Mexican Americans which has been tagged since October 2006. Most of the articles listed at Category:Articles to be merged since October 2006 to be honest.-- Matthew Edwards 04:17, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For those examples, since the discussion is way old, I would make a brief comment asking if anyone had any objections, and after maybe three or four days, if no one does, I would merge. But I'm just over cautious like that. i ^said 04:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then that is what I shall do :) Thank you. -- Matthew Edwards 04:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi my name is cheri i am looking for an article the was wrote in 1973 around may. my uncle passed away on the comet boat that sunk his name was ralf nickerson my mother once has the book with this article in it and i would like to know how i myself can get this seeing i was very close to him and it would mean alot.

thank you cheri —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheri1967 (talk • contribs) 04:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia wasn't around in 1973. Do you have any other information? -- Matthew Edwards 04:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try: google:comet sank 1973. That finds Foundering of the Motor Vessel COMET Off Point Judith, Rhode Island on 19 May 1973 with Loss of Life. "Comet" is a common name for boats and ships, however, so you would have to be more specific about where this sinking occurred to narrow it down. Wikipedia has a Point Judith article, but it is only a stub at the moment. --Teratornis 10:05, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My signature doesn't appear to be working. Why would this be? --BrianFG 06:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

In "My preferences", under "User profile", you have "Raw signature" checked - this is a slightly more advanced feature, and your signature will work if you uncheck it. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 07:39, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. BrianFG 23:06, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add a more complete note (a link to the article referenced) for a note (footnote) in the article about J.S. Bach, but the text shown on the main page does not show up when I press "edit this page". What should I do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michelle Rasmussen (talk • contribs) 08:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most likely the problem is that you forgot to close a <ref ...> tag with a matching </ref>. (This is a very common mistake, and one that in my opinion the MediaWiki software should check for, instead of just blanking everything after the unmatched <ref ...> tag.) See WP:FOOT. --Teratornis 09:56, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but you misunderstood me. When I clicked on the "Notes" there was nothing -- Then I figured out that you have to change the footnotes in the section of the text above where the reference comes. So, now I have solved my problem. Thanks for your response anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michelle Rasmussen (talk • contribs) 12:53, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

definition of "net sown area" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.113.137 (talk) 10:17, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

try the reference desk.--Kerotan^{Leave Me a Message} Have a nice day :) 10:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try a Google Search. I found this page which says:

• Net Area Sown: This represents the total area sown with crops and orchards. Area sown more than once in the same year is counted only once.
• Total Cropped Area: This represents the total area sown once and/or more than once in a particular year, i.e. the area is counted as many times as there are sowings in a year. This total area is known as gross cropped area.

When I first read your question, and before I googled, I was puzzled about what the net sown area could mean, since it seemed to me that land would either be sown or not sown. I wasn't thinking about multiple sowings per year. I wonder what terms "they" use for similar areas in aquaculture? --Teratornis 03:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are two persons named Michael Grant who are authors, and there is already an article titled Michael Grant (author) - what is the correct way to title an article about the other author named Michael Grant?

Salmanazar 13:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Find something else that is different, maybe nationality, genre, or a middle initial. Without knowing who the other is, I cannot give more precise advice. PrimeHunter 16:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The disambiguation at Michael Grant suggests there is a Michael Grant (crime writer), is that him? Kappa 16:34, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I decided to just add "(crime writer)" bearing in mind that both Mr Grants are devoid of middle initials. Salmanazar 19:26, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw this in the biography of Gregory Peck

birthdate = birth date|1916|4|5|mf=y

deathdate = death date and age|2003|6|12|1916|4|5|mf=y

What does "mf=y" mean ?

Tovojolo 13:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may know that users can set their preferences to display (linked) dates using particular formats such as day, month, year versus month, day, year. In these templates the default was month, day, year so they came up with "df=y", which apparently stands for "day first=yes" and use that for articles where the subject is from a region that uses that date formatting. Since "month first=yes" ("mf-y") apparently results in the default, I'm not clear why it's needed at all, but the result is that it displays month, day, year.--Fuhghettaboutit 13:40, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

how to find the meanings of any word..? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.167.248.111 (talk) 14:45, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please start a new question to have it answered in the future. Wikipedia is NOT a dictionary. For definitions of words please use Wikipedia's sister project, Wikitionary. Thank you, Perfect Proposal ^{Speak out loud!} 14:47, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to Wiktionary, you can try Google Search for word definitions. For example: google:define:numinous, google:define:irredentism, google:define:zymurgy, google:define:fatuous, google:define:ineluctable. --Teratornis 18:26, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GRAHAM MILNER (GKMilner) b. 3/12/1952 Lancashire, England. Arrived in Perth, Western Australia 1967. Socialist activist and writer.

Began revolutionary activities in final year of high school in Perth, Western Australia. Published underground journal 'Sacred Cow' and distributed in school.

Continued to publish underground magazine 'Revolt!' in 1971, and distribute in high schools in Perth. Arrested in Perth for protesting against South African rugby team during tour of 1971. Jailed for one month in late 1971 for throwing a shit bomb in St George's Cathedral in Perth.

In 1972 experimented with hallucinogenic drugs and attracted to counter culture for a while. Magazine co-edited 'King Mob'.

1973 travelled to Melbourne and Sydney. Joined the Young Socialists (youth organisation of the Socialist Labour League) in Sydney. Met Jim Percy at a Socialist Youth Alliance national conference and waspersuaded to join SYA (youth organisation of the Socialist Workers League - supporters of the United Secretariat of the Fourth International).

Returned to Perth WA in early 1974, where there was no branch of the SWL/SYA. Having not resolved the political issues involved in the dispute within the world Trotskyist movement I remained unaffiliated after I resigned from the SWL and SYA. I edited and published a journal, 'The Socialist Bulletin' in late 1974, which declared its solidarity with the United Secretariat of the Fourth International.

I was active in a SYA club at the University of Western Australia alongside the current National Secretary of the Democratic Socialist Perspective, Peter Boyle, and two other comrades. However, there was no branch of SYA or the SWL in Perth and I chose to concentrate on study.

In 1977 I attended an SYA Conference in Melbourne with Anthea Parker. When the Socialist Workers Party (as it had become called) decided to establish a branch in Perth I joined the party after returning from a year overseas and was active in the branch for nearly two years. For most of that time I sat on the branch executive and held the portfolios of education director, 'Direct Action' sales director, and 'DA' copy director. I also organised two subscription drives for the weekly paper (DA). I worked in industry in 1980, in a tractor factory and a foundry.

Towards the end of 1980 I transferred to Sydney branch and worked briefly as a journalist on 'Direct Action'. I suffered a breakdown in my health and spent time in hospital, and returned to Perth at the end of 1980. I hoped to be able to return to active involvement in the struggle and returned to Sydney in early 1981. I felt obliged to resign membership of the party but continued to write articles for 'Direct Action'.

In 1982 I returned to Perth and decided, when my efforts to rejoin the SWP (DSP) proved fruitless, to prepare to go back to university and finish my Honours year. My health was pretty unpredictable, but I finished my Honours over three years with a dissertation on Lenin's 'The State and Revolution'. I won a University scholarship to work on a Master's degree in History, and chose for my topic 'Trotsky's Analysis of Stalinism'. I completed the thesis in 1993 and received a pass.

In 2003, during the mass mobilisations against the invasion of Iraq, I saw the opportunity of rejoining the revolutionary movement, in the form of the Socialist Alliance, which was organised to regroup the far left at the beginning of the new millennium. I was accepted as a member and continue to be active in the Alliance.

- September 2, 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Graham MIlner (talk • contribs) 16:01, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's nice. Do you have a question for the help desk? --Fredrick day 16:51, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia is not the place for personal biographies.--Max Talk (+) 00:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Autobiography. Also see WikiBios, where anyone may write an autobiography, without the bother of Wikipedia's notability requirements. --Teratornis 03:18, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have important document's that I have been trying to unlock, however i'm having no luck. I have tried everything possible and just don't know what else to do. Please Help!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.233.128.154 (talk) 19:04, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean documents on your own computer, then you need to ask on our reference desk. The Help desk is for questions about Wikipedia itself.

Now, if you're asking about unlocking pages on Wikipedia, then your best bet is to first ask on the article's Talk page. If you post there about the changes you want to make, someone should be able to add it in for you, provided it's relevant to the article and properly cited. -- 68.156.149.62 19:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the entry for Sir Arthur Bryant should have the same warning label that appears above the entry for Douglas MacArthur.

Philiphurst 19:34, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That particular template is {{NPOV}}. In case you aren't familiar with templates, you go in to edit the article as you would any other article. You place that text at the top along with any other templates. It will automatically expand into the warning. --Moonriddengirl 19:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But just putting the template on the page won't do the job. You then must go to the article's Talk page and explain why you feel it's biased. If you don't somebody will come along and remove the tag without actually changing anything. Corvus cornix 17:11, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question on which of two formats is preferred. I asked at WT:FOOT and nobody seemed to know. Please only answer if you know which format is correct. Both are in use in different places.

• Version 1: Blah blah (blah blah blah.¹) blah blah.
• Version 2: Blah blah (blah blah blah.)² blah blah.

I know they go after the sentence punctuation, but should it go inside or outside the parentheses? Does it matter? --JayHenry 19:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've not been able to find a hard-and-fast rule on this. My personal feeling is that if the footnote/citation only applies to the content inside the parenthesis, then it goes inside the parenthesis. If it applies to the entire sentence, then it should go outside the parenthesis.

That said, I'd have to actually pull out a style handbook to see what they say, but even those are likely going to contradict each other. - 68.156.149.62 19:54, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you happen to have one, Wikipedia follows the Chicago Manual of Style on notes. I don't have a CMS. I do have Turabian, but can't put my hands on it at the moment. I believe you're correct, but somewhere in the manual it will probably say. --Moonriddengirl 20:01, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, we have an answer!. The footnote goes after the closing parenthesis... most of the time. D'oh. -- 68.156.149.62 21:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've always gone by what looks better.  :-) --Max Talk (+) 00:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've forgotten the template to flag something for having unwikilike style. Could someone please flag Bioregionalism for me? Capitalization, style, etc., is all off, and I'm afraid I don't have time to go through and do the editing myself. Cheers, samwaltz 20:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

done. The template is {{wikify}}, btw. Cheers. --דניאל - Dantheman531 20:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interpretation requested:

• WP:BLP talks about "unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material" and some of the templates refer to questionable material which is unsourced or poorly sourced. How do you assess what is "contentious" or "questionable". For example, I came across an article on Clifford Olson, a serial killer. Everyone knows he brutally killed a number of people: this is neither "contentious" nor "questionable" material. But when dealing with a BLP, should not such statements still be credibly sourced?
• The most innocuous example I found in this page was the statement that Olson killed 11 people. This statement is unsourced so the correct number could be fifteen or five, for all I know. In my opinion this material should be removed until it is sourced, but because WP:BLP uses words like contentious, the intent of the policy becomes unclear: i.e. it is not contentious that Olson is a murderer, and most people would readily agree with the statements that he was "rumoured to torture and kill animals" or that he was "known as a bully and a show-off", but all of these statements are unsourced.
• I picked this example because I believe all Wikipedia BLP pages should maintain the same Wikipedia standard, even when they are written about the worst "scumbags" on earth.
• Advice on how I should interpret this bit of WP:BLP would be appreciated. Thanks. --- Taroaldo 20:49, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I 100% agree this is a major problem. However bad someone is, we must not say anything derogatory about them without demanding solidly reliable sources. I'll look at the page and report back. AndyJones 20:54, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Much of the article seems referenced by "external links"--needs clarification, to be sure. --Moonriddengirl 21:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • Reporting back. I've looked through the history and this page has never had a reliable source. Someone may have seen your question as they added a {refimprove} tag to the article. That is not good enough. I have removed it and put a {db} tag. Whatever this guy may or may not have done, wikipedia accusing him very publicly of very serious crimes with inadequate sourcing is not acceptable. The article must be removed until it can be restored with adequate sourcing. AndyJones 21:13, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is CTV Television Network not a reliable source? That was the one inline citation I found when I tagged it refimprove and began looking for more verification. --Moonriddengirl 21:34, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• • • • Wikipedia is only supposed to contain information that is verifiable. There have been famous Wikipedia hoaxes, such as one in which an innocent man was stated to be suspected of involvement in the John F. Kennedy assassination. Therefore, even if someone remembers sitting through the trial, or reading about it in the newspaper, an article that says someone was a mass murderer, serial killer, rapist, drug addict, wife beater, syphilitic, pedophile, adulterer, prostitute, criminal, gang member, suspicious character, or professionally incompetent MUST be sourced to WP:RS reliable sources. Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons is an official policy of Wikipedia and bears reading. An article with defamatory material about a living person (and some would say also a recently deceased person) which lacks reliable sources, may be stubbed down to just basic verifiable facts, unless and until someone takes the time to find references to prove the allegations. This article presently has an external link to a website operated by Court TV, an operation of Time-Warner, with a signed article outlining the murders. That is not a bad source. It has two Canadian TV sites as other sources. It does not read like an attack page directed at an innocent person, or like a hoax. It could be improved by inline citations to shown which allegations are sourced to which reference. I would go with improvement rather than deletion at this point. It should not take too much editorial time to match up many of the statements with the appropriate sources and add the needed inline citations. If anything, it should be stubbed rather than deleted. Edison 21:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        • It seems reliable sources have been added in the last few minutes. I think the article has been saved. However WP:BLP should always be applied mercilessly. AndyJones 21:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
          • This is the wrong place for BLP concerns. Suspected BLP violations are best taken to the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard as well as the talk page for the article itself. The article really needs the Court TV material brought in via inline citations. Then any allegation of wrongdoing that is not backed up by any of the present the 3 reliable references should be deleted if a serious allegation of wrongdoing or at least tagged with {{fact}} if a less contentious statement, so that someone might check Newsbank, Proquest, or newspaper backissues on microfilm (the imprisonment occurred before the era of most newspapers having electronic archives) to see if the claim can be documented. Exculpatory information, if any, from reliable sources should also be added. The same standards apply to someone one might think was railroaded or someone one thinks is satan's own disciple. It is also better as a matter of NPOV and style to say someone was a "convicted" or "admitted" murderer rather than flatly stating he was a murderer, since there are literally hundreds of well documented cases of "murderers" who were later shown to be falsely convicted. Wikipedia is not a tabloid with lurid headlines about "fiends." Edison 21:37, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
            • • I think it is the right place to ask a general question about an interpretation. The Olson article was used as an example. There has been no dispute with another editor which would require posting on the Noticeboard. Also, I do not believe that CourtTV is a solid source. I have seen a few of their crime articles, and many of them read like articles from tabloid rags. Can you write salacious statements about someone in a WP:BLP as long as you cite a media source which contained the same salacious statement? I think media sources, for one, need to be used judiciously. --- Taroaldo 22:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm very uncomfortable with the CourtTV information. It's shockingly lurid. I have neutralized the tone of the "murders" section sourced by it and am considering clipping the "early life" section out, as CourtTV is the only source for much of that. --Moonriddengirl 22:11, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't think the Help Desk is the place for this discussion. If it needs continued, please do so on the Village pump policy page. -- 68.156.149.62 23:32, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 3

I was trying to access the help desk when it was said that my ip address was blocked as it was believed that i was using a zombie computer. Also, i was banned from editing pages. To what i know, i haven't edit any pages in wikipedia, so why am i banned and also, why do i keep on receiving messages saying that i have been posting nonsense on wikipedia? One example given is the odex page. I had not visit that page before till just now, so how could i possibly have edited and posted nonsense on that page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.120.68.69 (talk) 01:33, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your IP address is shared by multiple users, and one or more of them were vandalizing. You can avoid receiving these messages by creating an account.--Max Talk (+) 01:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page on Peter Reilly is currently about a fictional character from a television show. I feel that the main article related to this name should be on the real-life Peter Reilly who was falsely arrested for the murder of his mother after police extracted a false confession from him after 16 hours in custody.

I have more information on the actual case regarding the false imprisonment of the real life Peter Reilly. I feel that the main article for this name should be on the real person, not the fake. How would I set that up? Coolgamer 01:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other than a single news event, what is the real-life Peter Reilly known for? WikiNews is for news events (and people who are notable for a single news event). -- Kainaw^(what?) 01:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is more then notable enough to be worth a bio on Wikipedia. The case made national news and played a part in changing how confessions were allowed in court cases in the future. 86,600 Google hits, and books regarding the landmark trial and re-trial were made. A documentary was made about his case, as seen at http://www.truthinjustice.org/peter-reilly.htm . Coolgamer 01:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ec - If the case itself is notable, make a page about the case. Our guidlines on Biographies of Living Persons are very important, and someone only known for a single event in their lives is often not going to satisfy that policy. A neutral article on the case itself may be worthwhile, however. Focus on the article about the case, not the person. -- 68.156.149.62 02:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be sure that the information is reliably sourced. The sources must prove either that he was improperly arrested, or that there is a movement to release him because of the belief that he was improperly arrested. Wikipedia can't say "he was improperly arrested". Blogs, campaigns to free him, personal opinion won't work. Corvus cornix 17:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have sources. This was not just one news event, this was a series of major news events that added together warrant a proper bio. All I need to know is how to create the page without deleting the article on the fictional character. Coolgamer 17:25, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

69.137.95.35 01:58, 3 September 2007 (UTC)It keeps telling me it does not recognize my user name. eileenhargis and password redacted. Please help me get on this site. email redacted[reply]

Considering anyone who can view this page (and its history) now knows the password to that account, I suggest you create a new one. -- 68.156.149.62 02:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From the look of things you were trying to sign into an account that you never actually created. User:Eileenhargis has never been registered. Were you trying to enter your name and password into this page? That page is only for logging into existing accounts. To create an account, you need to go to this page and follow the instructions. And yes, 68.156.149.62 is right, please don't use the password you told us. It is an extremely bad idea to let anyone else know your password. Raven4x4x 04:35, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are admins really the only ones that can do this? I removed one (from a page I didn't create, mind you) because the article didn't meet speedy deletion criteria (my edit told the other editor to submit to AfD) and was warned for it, being told only admin can remove speedy deletion criteria?

In addition, the warning told me that "as the originator of the article" I could not remove an SD template. I didn't originate the article. Or even care about it. I just noticed it didn't meet SD criteria.

So...it's really a two parter...can only admin remove Speedy Deletion templates...even if the article doesn't meet SD criteria? And...can I remove a faulty warning from my page? Smashville 05:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anybody but the creator can remove Speedy tags if they have a legit reason.--Max Talk (+) 05:28, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes, you can. Tell the person that told you that that it only applies to the creator of the article, and that if they want it gone that badly WP:AFD is still there --lucid 05:35, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above are correct. Anyone but the creator can remove CSD tags from an article, provided they are not CSD. As for your second question, you can remove anything you wish from your talk page. i ^said 05:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm looking but not finding...

Here's the issue: The Joe Nathan article includes a couple pieces of personal information (seen here). It's been worked into the sections of the article where chronologically appropriate.

Here's my question: The sections, as you will note are all titled "career" in some form or another. It's been my experience that biographies include "Personal life" sections or the like. Is this in a guide somewhere or is it just sort of a standard? Does it not really matter? I like the way it's been worked into the article. It reads very well, but I don't like that it clashes with the section titles.

Anyway, this is part of a GA review, so I welcome the opinions and help of others. I've looked over the relevant guides, but I can't find anything. Regards, LARA♥LOVE 05:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How the heck did this article get deleted? Murderbike 06:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's coming back, not permanently gone. Some moronic vandal went and made a heap of mess (he didn't delete the article, though) and so deleting the article (which can be restored fully, with the whole edit history and talk page) was the only option. Sebi _[talk] 06:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I have an account with Wikipedia. I am facing a problem when I log on to Wikipedia site. After logging on the website, the page is not displayed properly. I think this is a problem with the "Skin". I was playing with changing the GUI display from SKIN,and after that I was getting this error.

After logging to the Wikimedia page, the website has white background and link in left size. The fonts on the page (for link as well as for other contents) is quite big.

However, I am able to see the proper Wikipedia GUI if I log out. So, it seems that there must be certain settings (skin, color or font settings) associated with my account.

Can you please restore this settings to default.

Regards, Ashish Patel Login Name: zoom2ashish Mail: (removed to prevent spam) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoom2ashish (talk • contribs) 07:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We cannot change your skin without your password (and don't give that to anybody). Go to Special:Preferences. Click "Skin", then "MonoBook (default)" and "Save". PrimeHunter 11:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

how do i make a userpage? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamjohnnie8 (talk • contribs) 07:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Click on your username and add what you want to the blank space, you should also look at WP:USERPAGE--$UIT 07:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i cant find out my village named ghargaon and pathwada. Please tell how can i find it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bishtjayvir (talk • contribs) 08:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The articles don't exist. You could create them if you want--$UIT 08:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, how do I suppress the content summary in a page? I read somewhere that I can do it, but can't find out how... thanks -- Outspan [talk · contribs] 10:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not quite sure what you're referring to; what part of a page is it that you don't want to see? --ais523 10:45, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

You need to put __NOTOC__ in the top of the page. See WP:TOC for more info. Kevin 10:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikipedia

I have recently opend an account so I can put information re my company, Renegade Consulting Pty Ltd (Australian based). To start with I have tried to edit the 'Renegade' page but it keeps getting removed. I assume this is because I am doing something wrong, can you help me please.

Thanks,

James Hutchins Renegade Consulting

Renegade consulting 10:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Creating an article with info on the company you own/working at is regarded as violation of neutral point of view (see WP:NPOV). If your company is notable, someone will create the article for you sooner or later. Remember Wikipedia is NOT an advertising space. -- Outspan [talk · contribs] 10:42, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is also a conflict of interest. :-) Stwalkerster talk 10:45, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at length on user's talk page. --Dweller 10:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does he get the orange "new message" thingy even if he's not a registered user? hmm -- Outspan [talk · contribs] 10:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the answer to that is 'sometimes'. See bug 9213 for information about the new-messages-to-anons bug. (The answer ought to be 'yes', but something's wrong with the code and the bar doesn't always come up.) --ais523 11:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm wanting to create a Biographical article about the British Jazz Pianist Matthew Bourne. Unforchunatly there exists an article on a British ballet and dance choreographer of the same name (Matthew_Bourne). How do I go about creating a seperate article for the Pianist? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattroberts66 (talk • contribs) 13:24, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You create the new article under a name like Matthew Bourne (pianist), then place an {{otheruses4}} template at the top of each of the two conflicting articles, so that people who find the wrong one can navigate to the right one (see Template talk:Otheruses4 for instructions). --ais523 13:29, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

See also: Wikipedia:Disambiguation. --Teratornis 15:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone help me on my userpage please? I'm having a bit of trouble adding statusbot to my userpage.

Thanks, Perfect Proposal ^{Speak out loud!} 14:43, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wait 5 minutes, and then check again; StatusBot doesn't have a perfect reaction time, and it takes it some time to react to a user signing up. (By the way, you had two status indicators on your userpage; I've removed one of them for you.) --ais523 14:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

My company, LogMeIn, Inc. used to have a presence on Wikipedia. A search last week, however showed that the page no longer exists.

We can, of course, recreate a page, but we would like to know why the original entry was deleted. Is it possible to find out who deleted the original entry. There is little point in doing something only for it to disappear again.

Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LogMeInAndy (talk • contribs) 14:53, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just click on a link to the page (here's one: LogMeIn), and you'll get information showing you which administrator deleted it and why. It seems there was a deletion discussion about the article (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LogMeIn), and then it was recreated and deleted after that. If you disagree with the deletion, or think you have new evidence, see Wikipedia:Deletion review to request a review of the deletion. --ais523 14:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

See also: Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted? --Teratornis 15:04, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

development of three germinal layers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.135.238.95 (talk) 15:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a question? PrimeHunter 16:13, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like you're trying to research something - if this is the case, you'd be much better off asking a clearer question at the Reference Desk, which specializes in research. We're mainly here to help you use Wikipedia. Sorry. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 17:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I used to be Francesca Allan of MindFreedomBC. However, there is currently no MindFreedomBC. Therefore, I'd like to change my account name to Francesca Allan. I can't remember my password -- do you have a prompt question? Mother's maiden name, etc.? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.69.67.136 (talk) 15:50, 3 September 2007 (UTC) 24.69.67.136 15:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing you mean User:Francesca Allan of MindFreedomBC. If you don't know your password, Wikipedia should provide you with a mechanism to recover your password (using your email account registered with it). If that isn't possible (say you forgot the password to your email), you're kind of stuck. In this situation, you may as well just register User:MindFreedomBC. If you can regain control of your account, then see WP:CHU and follow instructions there to request a name change. x42bn6 Talk Mess 16:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've sent a password reminder to the email you originally used when signing up for that account (for security reasons, we can't send a new password anywhere else); if you receive it, you should be able to log in and will then be able to request a username change at WP:CHU. Hope that helps! --ais523 16:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

I did a search on Q-zar, and your web site was second in line. I am the sole owner of Q-zar Systems. JR Robles. The history section claims that JR Robles, and Tim Foster purchased Q-zar equipment from John Jarvis. I Purchased the equipment from Mr. Jarvis soley. Tim Foster was merely contract labor for my company. (Q-zar Systems) I'm the sole owner of the DBA, bank accounts, leases ect... I purchased over one thousand vest with network units, and charging systems, score boards, and timers from Mr. Jarvis. The information published on your site claims we only purchased 180 vest. Please make these changes to acurately reflect Q-zar Systems.

I can be reached (contact details removed to protect you from spammers) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.200.224.218 (talk) 16:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest posting your concerns on the article's talk page, where you're more likely to attract the attention of someone active with the editing of that page. Thank you for not making these edits yourself, as being the owner you would have a conflict of interest which we work to avoid, however we do greatly appreciate your help in pointing out mistakes such as these. If you can provide some easily verifiable source for this information, I'm sure someone would be happy to correct the information. Thanks! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 17:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello wikipedia support team, I beg to drow your kind attantion that i want to free use the any powerfull telescope for my won exprience or euducation. I am indian so pleace hallp me. My E-mail-<email removed for privacy>

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sukdevadhikary (talk • contribs) 16:58, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I don't think you're at the right place. Wikipedia doesn't own any powerful telescopes, and certainly none in India. I've removed your email address so you don't get spam, but I'm afraid that's really all we can do to help. If you had a specific telescope in mind, I would suggest contacting the owners of said telescope and checking with them. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 17:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• However, if you mean you want permission to use an encyclopedia article on Wikipedia for educational purposes, please do. You may copy, modify & redistribute all Wikipedia content as long as you grant "the same freedoms to others" and acknowledge the authors of the article used. See Wikipedia:Copyrights for more about this policy and how to satisfy its requirements. --Moonriddengirl 17:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try: google:online telescope; several of the search results look interesting. Also see: National Virtual Observatory#Public Access. Bear in mind that astronomy these days is mostly astrophysics and data analysis rather than just peering through telescopes. If you want to be an astronomer, you should study all the mathematics that you can. --Teratornis 16:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is an information box 'STUCKISM' at the bottom of the page Stuckism. I want to add to it, but when I click edit, you can't see it. How can I edit it? Kipof 17:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's at Template:Stuckism. KTC 17:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Got it. Kipof 17:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed VO pages I've never heard of on my watchlist. I think someone is hacking into my account. What should I do? Henchman 2000 17:43, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check the move log for the pages you've never heard of. It's quite possible that someone decided to engage in some page-move vandalism, in which case both the original page and the page it was vandalise-moved to will end up on your watchlist. (If they were page-move vandalism targets, you can safely just remove them from your watchlist.) --ais523 17:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Is there any way to access an archive of deleted articles? I'm guessing the answer is probably no. 68.54.42.126 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.54.42.126 (talk) 18:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is something that in most cases only admins can do. But if you had your article deleted and for some reason it is believed that in the future the article could be included in Wikipedia, the admin who decided to delete the article will usually create a copy of that page on your userspace for you to store and improve until all requisites (e.g. notability req. for people) are satisfied. -- Outspan [talk · contribs] 18:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it's not my article, it's just something from last year a class apparently made mocking a teacher titled the "Doc Roc Theorem" or something along those lines. In any event, are you saying I could ask a mod for that deleted article and just keep it for myself without posting it?68.54.42.126 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.54.42.126 (talk) 19:29, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really know, it's possible, especially if you know what the exact title was, although admins are AFAIK usually very busy and may not have time for something that's not meant to improve Wikipedia ;). -- Outspan [talk · contribs] 19:58, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How can we add the name of our business, Moses Carbon Graphite, for inclusion in this page on 'guitars', specifically to be included as a major producer of C/F composite necks?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guitar

Steve Mosher President Moses Carbon Graphite —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.215.183.238 (talk) 18:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia is not an advertising space and conflict of interest before you edit any article. Thanks. KTC 18:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is more of a curiosity: does Wikipedia aim to cover EVERY SINGLE town / city / municipality in the world and to have an article for each and every single one of them? -- Outspan [talk · contribs] 18:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. Only notable towns should be included, but it is difficult to remove non-notable towns. For example, there is absolutely nothing notable about Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, but there is an article about it - complete with history. -- Kainaw^(what?) 19:28, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At least it has 60,000 people in it... it's very common to find much much smaller cities like Pancalieri, Pavarolo, Quagliuzzo, Claviere etc., and I also found many others with ~500 inhabitants that state no notability at all... is there a notability guideline for cities? I couldn't find it... thanks -- Outspan [talk · contribs] 20:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, there has not been any adopted notability guideline for cities/towns. It is my opinion that there should be. However, it would certainly result is the deletion of numerous articles. Then, it would carry over to the notability of roads, parks, buildings... So, I can understand why there has been no push for notability yet. -- Kainaw^(what?) 20:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes, there is a consensus that "every city and village is notable, regardless of size." You msut still have two reliable sources, of course. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arch dude (talk • contribs) 06:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why wouldn't we want to create an article on every town and village in the world? Kainaw's response is personal opinion (as is mine). I think we should have an article on every single one of them, so long as they're sourced. Corvus cornix 17:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great to set as a standard any time that a word is used, a pronunciation next to it in order to help the reader. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.121.130.84 (talk) 18:33, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why (hwī) would (wood) we (wee) want (wŏnt) that (thāt) ? -- Kainaw^(what?) (kānô)^(hwŏt) 19:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*pokes Kainaw* We do offer pronunciations for the subjects of many articles - see, for example, Mahatma Ghandi, which offers the pronunciation of Ghandi's name in the IPA. For more information, you may want to check Wikipedia:Manual of Style (pronunciation). Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but the OP said "any time that a word is used" - not "any time that a new, possibly difficult to pronounce word, or the subject of an article is used". -- kainaw™ 20:45, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Ok, poke revoked, you're forgiven. :-D Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi , How do I create a wiki page with tabs. e.g. the tabs on all pages like project, decsription, history etc. . Thanks Obelixwiki 18:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is for questions about using wikipedia, but I have a wiki on Editthis.info you just select a name and press create. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 18:53, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not quite sure what you're asking, but you might be looking for Help:Starting a new page. If not, please come back and let us know. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:35, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean like the tabs on Wikipedia:Tutorial (Editing)? --Teratornis 02:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikis , how can I find the origin of the phrase "out of true" without ending up on the page for a , for chrissake , Nightingales album ? I'm thinking it's term from carpentry , levels , that sort of thing. Thanks . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.53.67.101 (talk) 20:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please add a new header when asking another question. Thanks.

You could try looking at the article for "true" on Wiktionary, the Woodworking glossary here, or asking at the Reference Desk. Thanks. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:35, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone please take a look at the recent edits on the Spanish language article. I reverted an edit because it added a red wikilink to an article that had been deleted earlier as a transwiki. My revert edit has, itself now been reverted so that the red link is back. Before I get into an edit war (which I really want to avoid), I would appreciate some comments on what the appropriate action should be. I have not started a discussion with the person who made these edits because both their user and talk pages do not exist. Thanks. Truthanado 20:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red links exist in many articles. Because the links are usually about something people would like to know, the red link shows that it doesn't yet exist and that it should be created. If the red link is removed, the article it linked to might never be created and could cause confusion to people who don't know what it is. ::Manors:: 23:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Battle of Los Angeles refers to an unidentified flying object event which took place from late February 24 to early February 25, 1942 in which eyewitness reports of an unknown object or objects over Los Angeles, California triggered a massive anti-aircraft artillery barrage.

My Dad was an eye witness to this event and would like to add some details from his own observations to the article Battle of Los Angeles. Would this conform to the edit guidelines? 208.176.157.168 21:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid not, we do not accept original research. Material must be verifiable and referenced to reliable sources without further analysis. KTC 21:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not (but thank you for asking first). See our policy against original research, which includes eyewitness and other unpublished accounts. (Sorry, but we have no way of distinguishing between what is true and what is made up - or simply mistaken - unless we restrict the content of Wikipedia to information from reliable sources.) -- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:24, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

can someone fix the redirect? it was redirected instead of moved.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shushi_Pogroms&action=history

thank you --Hu1lee 21:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What would like moved, and to where? i ^said 21:14, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please clarify. Shushi Pogroms now is a redirect to Shushi Massacres, which looks correct to me. The older version of Shusi Pogroms seemed to be a shorter, less-developed version of the Shushi Massacres article. If there was any content or text in the Shusi Pogroms article that is NOT in the Shushi Massacres article, that content should be moved, by hand (cut-and-paste), with attribution (put "Adding content from the Shushi Pogroms article, now a redirect, that isn't in this article" in the edit summary box). -- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:21, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andranikpasha made a cut-and-paste move from this version of "Shushi Pogroms" to this version of Shushi Massacres, and then redirected Shushi Pogroms to Shushi Massacres. This should not have been done. You can request help at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. By the way, "Shushi Pogroms" has a single (selfpublished) Google hit [11] outside Wikipedia, and "Shushi Massacres" only has 4 [12] (at least 3 of them selfpublished), so none of the names look good. Is this known in English with another name? PrimeHunter 22:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes it is also spelled shushi, shousha, sushi and has many other variations, in french, Armenian, and Azeri mostly popular in Armenian or Azeri script. --Hu1lee 22:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just logged in and came to this page to post a question. It already says I'm not logged in althopuight the previous log in page said I was. I'm new to "trying" to be a contributor. After I log in and attempt to navigate the site to contribute I get a message that says I'm not logged in. After re-logging in and receiving a message that again I'm logged in, again it tells me I'm not logged in when I navigate and another page. This is becoming redundant and I never get to the page allowing me to contribute. Seems simplier to just be announymous. John —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.130.45 (talk) 21:25, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a common problem with satellite internet. Using the secure site will solve your problems, although it's a little slower.--Werdan7^{T @} 22:03, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This document has a photo of A. Baldwin Wood. Is there any problem with using the photo in the article? Raasgat 21:35, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the copyright appears to be held by the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans who are not a federal agency so the image is unlikely to be PD or under a free licsense.Geni 21:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember my Username and I would like to recover it - can it be sent to my email? I don't see any alternative except to guess my username until I get a new password sent to my email address - but that would accidentally reset other peoples passwords...

Is there a web form for entering my email addresses so that my username can be sent to me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.41.46.178 (talk) 22:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you edit articles with the old username, and can you remember which articles. if so you could check the article history and try and find your username. Just a suggestion Woodym555 22:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good thought - thanks but I made s few edits without logging in - today I corrected a typo also without logging in. Seems like "every website" lets registered users recover an account by supplying their email address so that users won't create multiple accounts unnecessarily. I figured there must be a wikipedia webform for doing it. Maybe this is a future feature? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.41.46.178 (talk) 22:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why not pick a new Username? Since you can't remember the old one, it must not have been memorable, so go for a new one that means something to you. Then all you'll have to worry about in the future is your password (which WP does have a process for emailing that to you).
Jim Dunning | talk 00:24, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I enjoy photographing buildings and I would like to add some of my photographs to articles that don't have photos.

My question is, what information do I put in the "file destination" block that appears on the upload images form?

Also, once I upload the photo, how does it get into the article?

Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GTV6 (talk • contribs) 23:16, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Destination file name is what you want the image to be called. After uploading the image, you put

[[Image:(Image name goes here)|px (pixel size)|(right, left or center)|(You can add a summary here)]] On the page that needs an image.

Sorry if it looked confusing.--$UIT 23:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may also want to check Uploading images and Using images out for some additional information.
Jim Dunning | talk 23:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded the photo. Here is a link to the uploaded photo page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Luhr_i.JPG

My question is, how do I get the photo into the article? I read your response to my question and I read the Uploading Photo Page, but afraid I still don’t understand how to do it. Would you please provide step-by-step instructions? Forgive my ignorance, but I am totally new at posting on the Internet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GTV6 (talk • contribs) 00:02, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Contents/Images and media for more information on inserting images into articles, specifically Wikipedia:Picture tutorial and Wikipedia:Extended image syntax. --Silver Edge 00:12, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem -- we've all been there (and will be again). Go to the article and click on the edit this page link. Find the location in the text where you want the picture and enter:

[[Image:Luhr i.JPG|thumb|right|Picture of Luhr's Towers or whatever]]

The "right" indicates alignment on the page, so you can do left if you wish. The description is the caption. Hope this helps. (I noticed you need to add copyright info to the image)
Jim Dunning | talk 00:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When I "upload" an image, how do I find its location after its uploaded? (The only reason I know its location right now is because I book-marked the webpage.)

How do I know what the image name is? You said it's "Luhr i.JPG". How did you know that? Is the image name coming from my harddrive or from the location on the Wikipedia server?

In response to your suggestion, I want to fix the copywrite issue before I try to add the photo to the article. So, where do I add the copywrite info? I read the Wikipedia copywrite info page, but I don't understand how to edit (or find) and already-uploaded image.

Thank you for your help.

Image Location: When you upload an image you choose its name (when you complete the "image destination" information). I knew your image's name because you provided a link to where it had been stored in Wikipedia; that link included the image name, "Luhr i.JPG". I'm assuming that's the name of the image as it exists on your hard drive since Wikipedia defaults to that (although you can change it when you complete the destination info during the upload process; for example, you could have called it "luhrs_towers.jpg").

Placing the Image in the Article: The image name (in this case, "Luhr i.JPG") is used to display it in the article. Just put this name as part of the image tag ("Image:"), like this: [[Image:Luhr i.JPG|thumb|right|Picture of Luhr's Towers]]. Wikipedia knows where the images are stored (so you don't need the complete url, "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/"). Look at some examples of other pictures in any article you want. Here's one of mine: look at Big Moose Lake and click on any of the images to go to their image pages, such as this one, Image:Big_Moose_Lake_NY_USA.JPG. For help with copyright info, look at what I put in the Summary and Licensing sections (click on the edit links for those sections and feel free to copy/paste/modify the wiki-markup for your own pictures, assuming you own the copyrights). Here's the markup for my Big Moose pic --

== Summary ==

{{Information

|Description=Big Moose Lake NY USA

|Source=own work

|Date=August 17, 2004

|Author=James H Dunning

|Permission=Own work, attribution required

}}

== Licensing ==

{{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}}

I hope this helps. Good luck.
Jim Dunning | talk 03:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I asked a question (above), someone answered, and now I want to respond to the answer. How do I do that without creating a new topic?

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GTV6 (talk • contribs) 23:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go to Special:Preferences (while signed in), click on the "editing" tab, and click the first box, the one for "Enable section editing via [edit] links" to edit a specific section. Then respond by editing in that section.--Chaser - T 23:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Find the [Edit] link to the right of the topic you want to add a response to and click on it. Then just add your response under the existing text in the Edit window. You should put a colon (:) at the beginning of it to indent your contribution. It's just like editing any article in WP, so feel free to review How to edit a page for more info. Have fun!
Jim Dunning | talk 00:06, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 4

I am new to Yahoo! 360. How do I pull a content from Wikipedia onto my FEED box? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sal salaz (talk • contribs) 01:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your question is a real stumper. Are you talking about an Xbox 360? --Teratornis 02:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you specify your definition of a FEED box too? ::Manors:: 02:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, Yahoo! 360 is a new Yahoo website tool, I think. Sebi _[talk] 07:34, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was searching for an image of Qiu Ying's Qingming Festival painting, and found none. Is there one on the Internet? I bought a copy of the painting. If legal, I would like to upload a segment of the painting for teaching purposes. The book contains no copyright statement, and I am not familiar with China's copyright law. Is it legal to upload a portion of the painting?129.186.33.19 02:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you're talking about this Qiu Ying, then the painting should be in the public domain, as he died several centuries ago. In general, a published work enters the public domain when the last surviving author has been dead for at least 70 years - as far as I am aware, this includes China. You are free to scan and upload the image to Wikipedia (or the Commons). When uploading, make sure that you either type the code {{PD-art}} in your summary or select the option that reads " - Photo of a two-dimensional work whose author died more than 100 years ago" in the Licensing section. Thanks for your contribution! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:18, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article "Midwest Council" should be renamed (moved) to be "Midwestern Council" to reflect the correct spelling of the organization's name. The "help" page regarding "moving" an article states that if the "move" tab is not presented when editing an article, then I am not allowed to move it, and I should request an editor to make the move. Where and how does one make such a request?

Thank You, Martinwj53 02:51, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You need to be registered for an amount of time to move articles. I have performed the action for you. ::Manors:: 02:55, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your question of requesting moves, that would be at Wikipedia:Requested moves, where administrators can help with simple and more tricky page moves. Leebo ^T/C 03:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to add a clickable link at the top of a page that takes you to the end of the page? I suppose that I could just add a section at the end and link to [[#lastsectionname]], but is there a better way? —Moondyne 02:52, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I'm aware, there isn't. Mainly because it wouldn't be of great use and there wouldn't be a need for it in an article. ::Manors:: 02:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You could hit the "End" key to drop to the bottom of the page rather than physically adding a link to do it. Leebo ^T/C 02:58, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You could also use the achor tags, like putting a line at the very bottom: <span id="End"/>, and then at the top put something like [[{{PAGENAME}}#End|go to the end of this page]]. --Ybbor^Talk 03:02, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:New contributors' help page already incorporates links that takes you to the bottom of the page. Wikipedia:Help desk#footer would take you to the bottom of this page. --Silver Edge 03:55, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there is already a link at the top of this page that takes you to the bottom of this page. --Silver Edge 04:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The question was not specific to this page, it was any page. Leebo ^T/C 04:45, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Silver Edge answered my question. #footer takes you to the end of the current page without the need for a specific target. —Moondyne 05:17, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning: mysql_connect() [function.mysql-connect]: Lost connection to MySQL server at 'reading initial communication packet', system error: 111 in /home/leon/public_html/source/Wikicharts/web/index.php on line 36 Couldn't connect to mysql: Lost connection to MySQL server at 'reading initial communication packet', system error: 111 Appears when clicking the link: "WikiCharts: 100 most viewed articles (09/2007)" In the article: Special:Statistics Why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.211.130 (talk) 03:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

This is a temporary error with the MYSQl database where the

information is stored on the server. There is nothing wrong with your computer. These things happen for a number of reasons, too many people viewing it, it installed wrong and so on. Technical Wikimedia staff will fix it soon, so you will need to sit tight until it is solved, which will most likely be soon. ::Manors:: 03:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. 71.232.211.130 04:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am attempting to create a page for an independent film (and the page does not yet exist). I have noticed that the film pages tend to have a kind of template, or at least that they are all formatted very similarly. Is there a specific way to create a page for a film? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayo943 (talk • contribs) 04:09, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're looking for {{Infobox Film}}. Click that link for more information on how to use the box. Make sure that you don't have a conflict of interest in making this article and that you have enough verifiable, reliable sources to back up the information and establish the film's notability. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines. PrimeHunter 04:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do I add a page I'm already a user?? and How can I contact Wikipedia??

thank you, Cameron King —Preceding unsigned comment added by Huntington Beach (talk • contribs) 04:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Before creating an article, please search Wikipedia first to make sure that an article does not already exist on the subject. Please also review a few of our relevant policies and guidelines which all articles should comport with. As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, articles must not contain original research, must be written from a neutral point of view, should cite to reliable sources which verify their content and must not contain unsourced, negative content about living people.

Articles must also demonstrate the notability of the subject. Please see our subject specific guidelines for people, bands and musicians, companies and organizations and web content and note that if you are closely associated with the subject, our conflict of interest guideline strongly recommends against you creating the article.

If you still think an article is appropriate, see Help:Starting a new page. You might also look at Wikipedia:Your first article and Wikipedia:How to write a great article for guidance, and please consider taking a tour through the Wikipedia:Tutorial so that you know how to properly format the article before creation.--Max Talk (+) 04:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contacting "Wikipedia" is a bit vague, since Wikipedia is a website. To contact an individual editor, leave a message on their talk page. To contact the Wikimedia Foundation, Wikipedia's parent organisation, you can check the contact page on their website, located here. Confusing Manifestation 05:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir,

I want to know the Job Duty of Purchase Officer and also want to know the nature of work.

Regards,

Jignesh Panchal (Purchase Executive) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.254.31.230 (talk) 05:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, we're an volunteer encyclopedia. KTC 05:25, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what your asking, but the only job opening the Wikimedia Foundation has is for the COO ::Manors:: 16:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm a music artist, and i want to know if its possible for me to make my own page for my fans. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djvu07 (talk • contribs) 05:52, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid definitely not. Within Wikipedia, article inclusion is based on criterion on encyclopedia suitability, such as notability, and verifiability. Wikipedis is not a place for advertising, or blog, webspace provider, social networking, or memorial site. Please also see our article on conflict of interests if you're considering editing Wikipedia, which you are of course most welcome in doing. KTC 06:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Personally, I think "definitely not" may be a little strong, depending on what specifically Djvu07 means. :) If as a musician, Djvu07, you currently meet the guidelines set out at Notability (music), an article may be appropriate for you. Note that many common sources of information, such as myspace, are not acceptable for Wikipedia's verifiability. Also, as KTC indicates, "conflict of interest" needs to be carefully considered, particularly in maintaining neutrality and avoiding original research. Even if you know it to be true, if it's not published in a reliable source, you can't use it. See especially "Wikipedia:Autobiography". And, of course, as KTC notes, Wikipedia is not a place for advertising. Information must be encyclopedic, not promotional. If you believe you meet notability guidelines and can avoid COI issues, you may create an article; it is strongly discouraged, but not forbidden. Since COI edits are strongly discouraged, however, you might want to consider instead adding your request to "requested articles" so that an uninvolved editor might create it. This will reduce the risk that your hard work will be contested and deleted. Good luck. --Moonriddengirl 13:58, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to put your information for your fans on your user page however. ::Manors:: 16:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are several other wikis that allow you to create articles about your own music, without Wikipedia's requirements for notability and so on. See for example wikiindex:Category:Music. --Teratornis 16:46, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just wondering why the page Inside Sport Forum was deleted. It just doesn't make sense to me. Could you please explain why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottrulz89 (talk • contribs) 07:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"06:47, 4 September 2007 Jimfbleak (Talk | contribs) deleted "Inside Sport Forum" ‎ (content was: '{{db-spam}}Category:Web{{notability}}Is an Australian sports forum website started in Victoria in June 2007. It's based mainly on Australian Rul...')", next time see wikipedia:why was my page deleted.--Kerotan^{Leave Me a Message} Have a nice day :) 07:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict) Deletion log. From what you see on Inside Sport Forum now, "please see Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted?". KTC 07:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

listing of all the inflected forms of a word —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.156.109 (talk) 07:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a question about Wikipedia? -- Kesh 12:59, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think he's suggesting we add inflected forms of a word, but that's a job for Wiktionary. Rigadoun (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

how do you spell the religoun brevlenes no tv no radio tht type 220.237.148.39 10:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)please help10:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)220.237.148.39[reply]

Have you tried the Humanities section of Wikipedia's Reference Desk? They specialize in answering knowledge questions there; this help desk is only for questions about using Wikipedia. For your convenience, here is the link to post a question there: click here. I hope this helps. There may be better chance of an answer if you can give more information. PrimeHunter 12:25, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ano ang ibat ibang batas sa pilipinas? batas sa karapatan ng babae sa maga hayop sa kalikasan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.126.76.83 (talk) 10:44, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

how to change an article in a desired language —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.243.64.85 (talk) 10:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jpritikin asked an interesting question:

I know that paragraphs are separated by 2 newlines. Is it proper or improper to use single newlines within a paragraph? It doesn't seem to make a difference when rending the page as HTML. However, which convention does the "diff" view prefer?

I have made example of this in my sandpit. I couldn't find anything in the Manual of Style, what is the answer? Cheers, --Commander Keane 11:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter in terms of rendering the text. But I wouldn't recommend newlines in a block of paragraph text except for good reason, such as possibly while using a cite template for reference. Newlines otherwise would probably confuse people and does not aid readability. KTC 11:34, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey everybody, i just want to ask when you click on a town or city it says in the right box location then distance. Is this distance by road, or the shortest as in by plane or how the crow flies. You get me?Roadrunnerz45 11:24, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see "distance" as a parameter in the city/town infobox, can you show me an example? I see "coordinates" below location. Leebo ^T/C 11:32, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From your user page I guess you are interested in Australia. {{Infobox Australian Place}} has optional parameters to specify distances. The distance is not computed automatically but must be written by the editor using the template. Template talk:Infobox Australian Place#distances says: "We've traditionally used road distances, although air distances can be noted in the article, or in cases of islands where there clearly is no road distance." It's not certain all editors use this convention, and distances can be wrong. PrimeHunter 12:58, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks for the quick reply my fellow wikipedian. Now that you told me, it looks like only Australian cities have pop in the info box, so whenever the page was set up it had it. I guess because of how vast the country is. Im going to stick with road distances, its just common sense i think. I mean if your flying, i dont think you worry to much about the distance, you care about the time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roadrunnerz45 (talk • contribs) 13:13, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

when searching for iller i found that the explanation does not include the organization i represent. iller clothing company is an independent hip hop collective and clothing company based in Seattle WA and Glasgow UK. information on the company can be found at www.illerclothing.com. we have both us and uk copyright and trademarks both in place and pending.

it would be great to see either a mention in your iller article, or better still a linked article about the clothing company / team / history.

thanks for your time and interest.

sincerely,

iller uk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.244.62.123 (talk) 12:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wikipedia isn't for advertisment, so unless there is something in there which would benefit any current article, or is notable enough for a new article, I would advise against it. see wp:not.--Kerotan^{Leave Me a Message} Have a nice day :) 12:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HOw would I suggest an additional meaning of the word, Tranche, as it relates to energy supply portfolio? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.99.185.50 (talk) 13:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

make a discussion about it on the tranche talk page.--Kerotan^{Leave Me a Message} Have a nice day :) 13:13, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

 Try to search "Glasgow" or go to the page "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glasgow". The page is getting redirected to another page quickly and nothing can be displayed

-- Subhendu —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.197.96.51 (talk) 13:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did try your link and it worked perfectly fine but because you say you are having a problem try refreshing or keep searching also you may just want to click your link to see if it works. --72.79.101.50 13:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC) I am not logged it but if I was which I am...[reply]

As realted to energy supply portfolio, "tranche" is a supply commitment for a slice, fraction, or percentage of total requirements, often a third or a fourth of total requirements, for a future period, such as one or two years. Buying future requirments in tranchesaavoids the usual timing risk in a volatile price market associated with buying all requirements at the same time.

This is for editing wikipedia questions only but even if it was a place to post questions you do not have a question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.79.101.50 (talk) 13:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this has to do with a question a few sections above. They were supposed to post this to the Tranche talk page. -- Kesh 15:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How to go into the Malayalam Version of Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.164.159.7 (talk) 13:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[13].--Kerotan^{Leave Me a Message} Have a nice day :)

Those who write lots of FAs and GAs (exceptionally prolific DYK writing is also counted)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.156.11.5 (talk) 13:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One of the best writers on Wikipedia is User:Clio the Muse. Unfortunately, she rarely edits articles. -- kainaw™ 13:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would also be interesting to know which writers on Wikipedia think they are the best. --Teratornis 16:49, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What colors are considered earth tones? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.123.69.168 (talk) 13:36, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Earth tone. -- kainaw™ 13:44, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm terribly sorry! I was creating an article on British Jazz Pianist Matthew Bourne under the title of "Matthew Bourne (musician)" when I accidently (don't ask me how) created an article called "Editing Matthew Bourne (musician)". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattroberts66 (talk • contribs) 13:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relax! You've created the proper article, so I've signed the wrong one up for deletion. x42bn6 Talk Mess 13:56, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• In the event that it should happen again, you can request deletion yourself by placing {{db-author}} at the top of the page. :) --Moonriddengirl 14:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For any article why you did not put the date in the first line to make sure that the article content is up to such date. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.249.76.34 (talk) 14:08, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The last edit date is at the bottom of the page. Articles on topics that change often are usually updated often. Click the "history" tab on any article and you can see how often it is updated. -- kainaw™ 14:11, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dignitas Ltd is an IT Consultancy based out of the UK, working across Europe.

There are however several other companies named either the same or very similar, such as Team Dignitas the British eSports Team and Dignitas the euthanasia group.

I understand and agree with the no commercialisation or advertising on Wikipedia, however it should be a forum to provide clarity where confusion may arise. Confusion is arising, people search Google, Wikipedia and other such tools for Dignitas Ltd are finding the examples above and others, but cant find what they are really looking for.

I attempted to put this right by adding a brief article about Dignitas Ltd and referencing it from the disambiguation page. The article avoided marketing speak, talking primarily about history and market sector.

Within 24 hours my edit of the disambiguation page has been reversed by Eve Hall and the page created for Dignitas Ltd seems to have been deleted.

I appreciate you have your rules, but it would be useful if there was some form of communication to explain the reasons for reversing my additions/changes out, I can find none. There is nothing in the deletion log.

I am sure I read somewhere that you have a policy of improvement as opposed to removal without consultation, but that does not appear to have been the case here.

Can someone advise what the situation is please so at the very least I can understand where I went wrong.

Craiggolby 16:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The link on the disambiguation page was deleted because it pointed to an article that did not exist (red-linked as the person deleting it stated). As for the reason the article was deleted, go here and you can see the deletion notice. It states that the subject made no claim for notability. I suggest finding third-party sources of notability, recreating the article with them, and then adding a link on the disambiguation page. Of course, avoid conflict of interest. It is often the case that a company will insist that they need an article on them, but then get upset when anything negative is added to the article. -- kainaw™ 16:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also see: Why was my article deleted? and: Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. Creating new articles on Wikipedia and getting them to "stick" can be surprisingly difficult for contributors new to Wikipedia, because Wikipedia has incredibly complex policies, guidelines, and procedures. It would be nice if the administrators who delete articles could take the time to provide a detailed explanation to each author, but the volume of deleted articles precludes this. I happen to believe that Wikipedia's user interface has an ergonomic shortcoming in this regard: Wikipedia makes it too easy for new users to create new articles, without first ensuring they understand the virtual minefield they are venturing into. However, Wikipedia is almost entirely a volunteer project, so nothing gets fixed unless someone volunteers to do the work necessary to fix it (which includes not only fixing things, but selling the ideas to everyone else who has an interest). Would you like to help us redesign the process whereby new users create new articles, to help eliminate the pitfall that just claimed you as its latest victim? Unfortunately, the problem is hard, and a person would have to spend months learning enough about Wikipedia to be able to address the problem. --Teratornis 17:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to submit an article on behalf of my company as an entry of notability (not an advert) so that we have entries in line with some of our peers. I can provide references to numerous articles and coverage by analysts and journalists.

I believe the place to do this is using the 'Articles For Creation' wizard and I have run through this (will test in Sandbox first). It allows me to do this either as a registered or unregistered user.

Questions. Is the 'Articles for creration wizard' the correct route in for this entry to be submitted ?

Does it matter whether I do so as a registered or unreigistered user, which is preferred ?

In my submission do I submit both the independant articles reference material AND the proposed entry information on my compaany, or do I just submit the independant material in order to meet Wikipedia submission criteria and THEN (if successful) submit the company information entry.

217.196.251.188 16:18, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming this is about Citigate Dewe Rogerson, there are already links to that page. The page does not exist. Starting it with a brief note about what the company does and references would be nice. Others should see it and expand it as necessary. I would avoid editing it too much yourself to avoid conflict of interest. -- kainaw™ 16:26, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ensure the article is kept neutral. Don't present the company from your point of view. Describe the company as if you know about it but aren't connected to it. ::Manors:: 16:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - no it is not about Citigate Dewe Rogerson but about Huntsworth plc (Citigate Dewe Rogerson area wholly owned subsidiary of Huntsworth. My objective is to get an entry for Hunstworth plc similar to that of our peers (see Chime Communications as an example).

Ill follow your tips (thanks) and submit article and various reference sources via the artciles for creation wizard. 217.196.251.188 16:44, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]