Trichome

Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reply
"Closing AfD, result was speedy keep (nomination withdrawn)."
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''speedy keep'''. Nomination withdrawn. <small>([[Wikipedia:Non-admin closure|non-admin closure]])</small> [[User:Twinkle1990|Twinkle1990]] ([[User talk:Twinkle1990|talk]]) 07:31, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
===[[:VideoWave]]===
===[[:VideoWave]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}


<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
Line 7: Line 14:
Fails [[WP:SIGCOV]], [[WP:GNG]]. Furthermore an obsolete article. [[User:Twinkle1990|Twinkle1990]] ([[User talk:Twinkle1990|talk]]) 13:18, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails [[WP:SIGCOV]], [[WP:GNG]]. Furthermore an obsolete article. [[User:Twinkle1990|Twinkle1990]] ([[User talk:Twinkle1990|talk]]) 13:18, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Television|Television]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|United States of America]]. [[User:Twinkle1990|Twinkle1990]] ([[User talk:Twinkle1990|talk]]) 13:18, 21 January 2023 (UTC)</small>
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Television|Television]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|United States of America]]. [[User:Twinkle1990|Twinkle1990]] ([[User talk:Twinkle1990|talk]]) 13:18, 21 January 2023 (UTC)</small>
*:'''Keep '''Coverage in Cnet, the Wall Street Journal and tech crunch, seems GNG. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 17:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
*'''Keep '''Coverage in Cnet, the Wall Street Journal and tech crunch, seems GNG. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 17:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - Easily passes [[WP:GNG]]. Adding to the above list of sources by {{u|Oaktree b}}, there is are reviews in [[PCMag|PC Magazine]], [[The Guardian]], [[Popular Science]], and others. {{u|Twinkle1990}}, it is considered best practices to do a [[WP:BEFORE]] search prior to nominating an article for deletion. [[User:Netherzone|Netherzone]] ([[User talk:Netherzone|talk]]) 17:46, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

:'''Keep''' Reviews in WSJ, CNet, techcrunch pass [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Belichickoverbrady|Belichickoverbrady]] ([[User talk:Belichickoverbrady|talk]]) 18:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
:*'''Keep''' Plenty of coverage as listed above. Furthermore, what is an "obsolete article"?
:[[User:Donaldd23|<span style="color: darkblue">Donald</span><span style="color: darkgreen">D23</span>]] [[User talk:Donaldd23|<span style="color: orange">talk to me</span>]] 19:48, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 07:31, 22 January 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Twinkle1990 (talk) 07:31, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

VideoWave[edit]

VideoWave (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:GNG. Furthermore an obsolete article. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:18, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Reviews in WSJ, CNet, techcrunch pass WP:GNG. Belichickoverbrady (talk) 18:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Plenty of coverage as listed above. Furthermore, what is an "obsolete article"?
DonaldD23 talk to me 19:48, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply