Trichome

Content deleted Content added
+my !vote
Line 7: Line 7:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pakistan|list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions]]. '''[[User:Mar4d|<font color="green">Mar4d</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Mar4d|<font color="green">talk</font>]]) 13:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)<!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pakistan|list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions]]. '''[[User:Mar4d|<font color="green">Mar4d</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Mar4d|<font color="green">talk</font>]]) 13:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)<!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small>
* '''Delete''' as nominator. '''[[User:Mar4d|<font color="green">Mar4d</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Mar4d|<font color="green">talk</font>]]) 13:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' as nominator. '''[[User:Mar4d|<font color="green">Mar4d</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Mar4d|<font color="green">talk</font>]]) 13:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

*'''Delete''': - uninvolved from WP:PAK delsort - A single line stub with a dubious source has no place on wikipedia, not to mention notability is not duely established. --<span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:TopGun|<b style="color:#060">lTopGunl</b>]] ([[User talk:TopGun|<b style="color:#000">talk</b>]])</span> 13:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:18, 31 May 2012

Rape of Rawalpindi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One-liner stub about a non-notable neologism/term. Not enough academic sources to verify notability. Mar4d (talk) 12:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Mar4d (talk) 13:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: - uninvolved from WP:PAK delsort - A single line stub with a dubious source has no place on wikipedia, not to mention notability is not duely established. --lTopGunl (talk) 13:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply