List of Worms weapons, tools, crates and objects

List of Worms weapons, tools, crates and objects (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Oh, boy! Another Game-guidish, crufty weapons article. No relevance to outside world; no references, let alone coverage of the weapons. Basically, the guidelines "which warrant that articles and information be verifiable, avoid being original research, and be written from a neutral point of view are held to be non-negotiable and cannot be superseded by any other guidelines or by editors' consensus. It is not veribfiable since it has no sources, has plenty of OR, and isn't written from a neutral point of view. 'Nuff said. See also: Halo 2 weapons, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weapons in Half-Life 2 (2nd nomination), and Weapons in Halo: Combat Evolved. David Fuchs ^(talk) 20:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I think StrategyWiki is a better home for this article--Lenticel ^(talk) 20:53, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NOT. STORMTRACKER 94 21:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NOT is my opinion as well. Pig^man 22:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, lame guide. SolidPlaid 22:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - game guide. Hal peridol 00:12, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. — TKD::Talk 02:46, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.Ridernyc 18:00, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, because it passed an earlier discussion with nearly all keeps, is well-organized, even contains a nice picture, people are willing to edit it, etc., but I do think references would help. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 18:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good point bringing up the earlier discussion. It's important to have a good (and preferably new) reason to renominate something for deletion after an earlier discussion on the subject. However, I think this nomination does that, by bring up several core policies that weren't discussed in the previous AFD. Consensus can change when new arguments are raised. That said, it's possible to clean up the POV problems, but even if sources for this exist, it's pretty close to a game guide already. There is some legitimate debate over whether Wikipedia should remain an encyclopedia or become a knowledge megacompendium with game guides, etc. But its character is still fundamentally an encyclopedia. --chaser - t 20:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Worms or a similar article, or keep as per Le Grand Roi. Stifle (talk) 20:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Wikipedia isn't a game guide. RobJ1981 16:50, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Crufty game guide. --Oscarthecat 06:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]