Trichome

Content deleted Content added
Theserialcomma (talk | contribs)
d
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
*'''Delete unless sourced''' AfD is up for a week. If this is notable and references show it in the week this is at AfD, I'm open to changing. [[User:Miami33139|Miami33139]] ([[User talk:Miami33139|talk]]) 02:34, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete unless sourced''' AfD is up for a week. If this is notable and references show it in the week this is at AfD, I'm open to changing. [[User:Miami33139|Miami33139]] ([[User talk:Miami33139|talk]]) 02:34, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' no significant coverage has been demonstrated. whether it's the best or worst vnc is irrelevant to wikipedia policy. fails WP:N [[User:Theserialcomma|Theserialcomma]] ([[User talk:Theserialcomma|talk]]) 02:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' no significant coverage has been demonstrated. whether it's the best or worst vnc is irrelevant to wikipedia policy. fails WP:N [[User:Theserialcomma|Theserialcomma]] ([[User talk:Theserialcomma|talk]]) 02:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. "Best VNC client" or not, we need some kind of evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable third parties. Do you have any, AshtonBenson? [[User:JBsupreme|JBsupreme]] ([[User talk:JBsupreme|talk]]) 06:00, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:00, 29 September 2009

JollysFastVNC

JollysFastVNC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software product. Haakon (talk) 20:35, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software, but that's because I didn't bother trying. Joe Chill (talk) 00:02, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: You must be nuts. This is the best VNC client for the Mac, bar none. This RfD is a sign of ignorance. AshtonBenson (talk) 01:10, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • This is AFD. This comment is based on you thinking that it's useful and based on no guideline. Read WP:CIVIL. Joe Chill (talk) 02:25, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unless sourced AfD is up for a week. If this is notable and references show it in the week this is at AfD, I'm open to changing. Miami33139 (talk) 02:34, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no significant coverage has been demonstrated. whether it's the best or worst vnc is irrelevant to wikipedia policy. fails WP:N Theserialcomma (talk) 02:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. "Best VNC client" or not, we need some kind of evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable third parties. Do you have any, AshtonBenson? JBsupreme (talk) 06:00, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply