Bilqees Khanum

Bilqees Khanum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All references are about the article person's death only. WP:NOTMEMORIAL clearly says " Subjects of encyclopedia articles must satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements." Twinkle1990 (talk) 10:41, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Pakistan. Twinkle1990 (talk) 10:41, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't the issue is a lack of notability, but the article should be speedy deleted as a copyright violation, with very close paraphrasing from here, e.g.

• Article:"However, she continued to perform at private concerts as she begin to support her family financially and funding the education of her younger sisters and brothers. According to Bilqees that she was deprived of education due to her family's financial situation so she wanted her younger siblings to achieved higher education. When television started in Lahore at that time Bilqees was already an established radio singer and didn't have to audition to get an opportunity on television. She started her singing career on Pakistan Television with a Punjabi song, and then went on to sing many national songs during the 1965 war."
• Source:"However, she continued to perform at private concerts as she was supporting her family financially and funding the education of her brothers. She had been deprived of education because of her family’s financial hardship. By the time television started in Lahore, Bilqees, was an established radio singer and didn’t have to audition to get an opportunity on television. She started her singing career on Pakistan Television with a Punjabi song, and then went on to sing many national songs during the 1965 war."

I've tagged the article for speedy deletion as a copyvio. Fram (talk) 10:50, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• But tagging CSD over an AFD is suitable? Twinkle1990 (talk) 11:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Sure, why not? Either it gets speedy deleted, and the AfD closed as no longer applicable: or the speedy gets rejected, and the AfD can continue. The arguments for both are different, the AfD can't overrule the speedy, but a declined speedy wouldn't make the AfD invalid or useless. Fram (talk) 11:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Twinkle1990 (talk) 11:06, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]