Hi WoofersSCW! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm El C. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. El_C 21:16, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you undo this [1] edit please? The reason I've said killed was because it was specifically claimed in a source [2] that the number was for the killed, rather than the usual neutralized. The source is already included in the article. KasimMejia (talk) 14:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Responding to your message. Not used to Wikipedia. This is a misunderstanding of what the Turkish MOD means. The MOD uses the phrase "Neutralized" in all of it's operations, which means killed, captured, and wounded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WoofersSCW (talk • contribs) 16:17, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, if you're new let me start by saying you can respond to the message here. And regarding the Neutralized and Killed announcements, I know that neutralized doesn't mean killed, however in the particular source at the article, the Turkish MoD actually claims that number was killed rather than neutralized.. KasimMejia (talk) 16:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I thought this as well and was going to revert but then I read in the article "'Nine more PKK/PYD-YPG terrorists neutralized in air operation within the scope of Operation Peace Spring. A total of 228 terrorists neutralized so far since Turkey started Operation Peace Spring in northern Syria," the ministry said on Twitter.'" Which is why I will not be reverting my change. TRT is misunderstanding what "neutralized" means.

Alright sure, welcome to Wikipedia!KasimMejia (talk) 16:43, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at WP:TWITTER. N°2 No use for claims regarding a third party. Hope you understand. This are guidelines. Other drones entries in the List have non Twitter - RS too.Mr.User200 (talk) 16:50, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I answered you about Ababil-3 and Yasir all of them are syrian. Syria operates those drones since 2013. And these drones were naturally was given by Iran (for free perhaps). But the are syrian drones, iranian made but syrian drones; — Preceding unsigned comment added by HarimauFury (talk • contribs) 21:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NO ! Hezbollah were not dominating in Qalamoun ! At all ! https://www.syrianperspective.com/2014/04/map-of-qalamoun-offensive-updated.html

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
This template is a warning before being reported to the ANI for 3RR. 1)Here 2)Here 3) Here 4) Here Mr.User200 (talk) 18:11, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]