Hi! Thank you for your edits of Abkhazia article, it's really great that you have added all those missing sources. FYI, I have removed one of your statements, the rationale is in the edit comment. If you disagree let's discuss this issue at the Abkhazia talk page. Best regards, Alæxis_¿question? 08:47, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of Tskhinvali may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• that while some neighborhoods were intact, "there were patches of terrible destruction".<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/aug/13/georgia.russia3 | location=London | deadurl=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:14, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Occupation of Gori may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• File:Tbilisi-2008-08-14.jpg|Georgian conscripts in [[Tbilisi]] after retreating from Gori]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:13, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks very much for your edits to Russo-Georgian war. They've greatly improved the article so far, and I hope to see more. RGloucester — ☎ 19:44, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am notifying your about the following: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Massive_edit_-_propaganda_us --Wrant (talk) 16:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi UA Victory! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 21:26, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Massive edit - propaganda use. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of Tskhinvali may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 2008/08/12/russiageorgia-investigate-civilian-deaths Russia/Georgia: Investigate Civilian Deaths], [[Human Rights Watch]], 14 August 2008</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of Tskhinvali may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• getresource.axd?AssetID=20268&type=full&servicetype=Attachment |archivedate=2008-10-21}}{{dead link|date=March 2014}}</ref><ref name=spiegel1>[http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,
• War |date=2008-08-10} |accessdate=2014-04-09 |work=The New York Times |first=Anne |last=Barnard}}</ref> Russia claimed to have responded to an attack on the peacekeepers base and in defense of

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I think my changes were correct.
for example:BTR-70,BTR-80 and BMP1/2 are used by the GAF and some of the information in the table are also either incorrect or without a source. Most of the sources a I have are not in English or not on internet(Newspaper articles for example) I kindly ask you to carefully look at the changes I made rather than accusing me of vandalism.

Sincerly,94.226.14.216 (talk) 19:53, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

if you are going to revert people citing "vandalism" in the edit summary, please could you template their user talk pages at the same time - see Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. This has three advantages for you:

• It often leads to these people being blocked as vandals.
• If they are not vandals, it helps them to understand that they need to change their approach, and start explaining themselves on talk pages.
• It protects you from accusations of edit-warring - since it makes it clear that you are reverting vandalism.

--Toddy1 (talk) 14:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have not been templating the IP editor and he/she has reverted again, I strongly recommend using the article talk page instead of blindly reverting. He/she has used the article talk page, so you will be on a "sticky wicket" if you carry on reverting him/her.--Toddy1 (talk) 14:37, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Toddy1 Thanks, I was thinking the same before I saw your message. At first I thought that he/she would reason, but apparently there's no point. --UA Victory (talk) 14:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring--Toddy1 (talk) 17:08, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi UA Victory -- I am strongly encouraging all involved to discuss the content of the article to find points of agreement rather than discussing and questioning the motives and tactics of other editors at Talk:Russo-Georgian_War#Official_Russian_POV_pushers. Instead, "suggest alternative solutions or compromises that may satisfy all concerns" (see Wikipedia:Consensus#Achieving_consensus). For example, if there is not consensus among the editors on which side "fired the first shot," propose a version that states that there is disagreement, cite a soure or two for each position, and work for consensus on that.

I also urge you to review the Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in edit wars essay.

Thanks, BCorr|Брайен 12:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Russo-Georgian_War. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use Talk:Russo-Georgian_War the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--Antonioptg (talk) 16:57, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2013–2014 unrest in Ukraine has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. NickSt (talk) 21:58, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Humanitarian impact of the Russo-Georgian War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gori. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Occupied territories of Georgia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gori. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]