Due to your recent disruptive edit-warring at Kosovo (over the infobox, something that has been discussed and dealt with ad nauseam on the talkpage), you are blocked for 96 hours and, per WP:ARBMAC, are banned from Kosovo, Talk:Kosovo, and all articles, talkpages, images, templates etc that, reasonably speaking, closely relate to Kosovo. Thank you. Moreschi (talk) 20:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moreschi, if you read carefully the infobox you will understand that I am right and you and Athenean are wrong. My banning from Kosovo and Talk:Kosovo will make Wikipedia a lying source about Kosovo. You cannot get more antialbanian than User:Alexikoua and User:Athenean, the pursuers of Northern Epirus (see this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alexikoua). These guys give banning stars to one another and promote their Bizantine pro-russian encyclopedia. It is impossible to change wikipedia from their russian view if you, user:dab and other admins fall into their traps and keep banning the albanians and the us-albanians.

E se vuoi ti dico tutto in italiano cosi mi capisci meglio. sulmues (talk) --Sulmues 16:25, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sulmues. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hobartimus (talk) 05:59, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sulmues (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The block, as proposed by Athenean and Cinema C is part of the plan of keeping out of the Albanians from the Albanian related issues. I did not even have a chance to defend myself. These guys keep calling their friends to ban me, and the admins are too busy to read carefully what they write. I made the infobox merge on Kosovo after FOUR MONTHS OF DISCUSSION, where I was mostly ignored and when I make the change hell breaks lose, hence I get banned. Wikipedia is starting to be very similar to a Soviet era progrom.

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM. This does not address the reason for your block.  Sandstein  21:58, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since you have an inexhaustible desire to vent your feelings on this subject, I am placing you on civility supervision. If you make any edit deemed by any administrator to be incivil, a personal attack, or an assumption of bad faith, you may be blocked, initially for any period up to a week: after 3 blocks, for any period up to 3 months.

Seriously, enough with the conspiracy theories, it's enough. Also enough with the random comments on Cyprus and various other matters. Certainly nationalist gang-editing groups have existed, and doubtless some still do - in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CAMERA lobbying I was part of a group of admins that handed out bans to just such a group - but you are not the victim of anything other than your own lack of compliance with policy. Moreschi (talk) 22:14, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]