I seem to have been mistaken about his notability. However, that article is linkless and un-wikified, so I shall leave those tags there. Good luck finishing it, and happy wikipedia-ing. Cornell Rockey 05:00, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a copyright violation, it seemed like there might be a copyvio so I picked a phrase out of the Wikipedia article at random and there was only one single result returned, and it was from the ClickCommerce website. Citing the article does not give "permission" to copy long phrases from a company's website. Quatloo 14:21, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am fixing on the temp page. Do you find any of that problematic?--Samiharris 14:24, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that some copyright violations are unintentional. Flagging an article as a copyright violation isn't a personal attack, it is just pointing out something that has to be fixed. I hope you didn't see it as anything personal. As to your other question, no, I am not an administrator. Quatloo 14:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I certainly take no umbrage as to your pointing this out. I am comparatively new and still learning the ropes.--Samiharris

What is your opinion of this edit?[1] --Mantanmoreland 00:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is a link to an anonymous website showing a very partisan and biased approached to the issue that does not meet Wikipedia standards as I understand them.--Samiharris 15:35, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[2]--Mantanmoreland 13:53, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]