DYKUpdateBot (talk | contribs) Giving DYK credit for ORP Huragan and ORP Orkan |
DYKUpdateBot (talk | contribs) Giving DYK credit for Rzeczpospolita Polska (magazine) on behalf of Panyd |
||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#26 July 2011|26 July 2011]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[ORP Huragan and ORP Orkan]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that '''[[ORP Huragan and ORP Orkan|the first two destroyers]]''' due to be constructed by domestic shipyards for the Polish Navy were never completed due to the [[German invasion of Poland]]?'' You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201107/ORP_Huragan_and_ORP_Orkan quick check])</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]]. |
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#26 July 2011|26 July 2011]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[ORP Huragan and ORP Orkan]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that '''[[ORP Huragan and ORP Orkan|the first two destroyers]]''' due to be constructed by domestic shipyards for the Polish Navy were never completed due to the [[German invasion of Poland]]?'' You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201107/ORP_Huragan_and_ORP_Orkan quick check])</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]]. |
||
}} [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 12:58, 26 July 2011 (UTC) |
}} [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 12:58, 26 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
==DYK for Rzeczpospolita Polska (magazine)== |
|||
{{tmbox |
|||
|style = notice |
|||
|small = |
|||
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]] |
|||
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#27 July 2011|27 July 2011]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Rzeczpospolita Polska (magazine)]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that '''[[Rzeczpospolita Polska (magazine)|the official magazine]]''' of the [[Polish Underground State]] published 80 issues in the dangerous conditions of occupied Poland?'' You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201107/Rzeczpospolita_Polska_(magazine) quick check])</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]]. |
|||
}} [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 21:10, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 05:27, 27 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:27, 27 July 2011
![]() |
"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you. |
---|
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance. |
---|
![Archive](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c2/Vista-file-manager.png/50px-Vista-file-manager.png)
Talk archives:
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
![]() Some general observations on Wikipedia governance being broken and good editors trampled by the system ![]()
Current RfAdminship
Looking for your help :DHi Piotr, hope you still remember me. We met at the Pittsburgh Wicnic not too long ago. I'm one of Professor Kraut's research assistant currently conducting research on Wikipedia. I remember that we didn't get a chance to talk about the research last time, but if you're up for it, I'd like to talk to you a little about the experiment we're hoping to conduct and solicit some of your opinions and suggestions. Since we're all still rather new to Wikipedia, we could use some advice from an experienced Wikipedian like you! If you're willing to talk, send me an email at jipingh@andrew.cmu.edu so we can further this discussion off-site. Thanks! Jipinghe (talk) 20:21, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Some ThoughtsPiotr, I didn't know where else to take this so I decided to bring it to your attention, as you're the only seemingly unbiased wiki admin I can find. RE: Deletion of Lawyers in Hell and the subsequent merging of other novels: I am of the opinion that the only solution is well written pages with links to all the named writers and synopses of the books and stories as well as commentaries and reviews. However, it seems that the Lawyers in Hell was unfairly targeted for speedy deletion while others with similar pages across wiki have stayed up for upwards of five years. Other than the discussion for AfD, which seemed to reach no consensus (and then all of the pages were merged when I was on vacation), is there a way where a mutual consensus could be reached without contributors and admins grabbing for their nearest hammers to beat each other with? Cordova829 (talk) 17:20, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Homo sapiens (novel)Hej. W plWiki pojawiła się prośba o przetłumaczenie tego hasła. Problem w tym, że poszukałam trochę w necie i nie ma żadnych wzmianek o tym, by Józef Serczuk był dowódcą partyzanckiego oddziału żydowskiego czy kimś podobnym (a tu np. wielu biorących udział w takim czy innym ruchu oporu jest wymienianych). Jedyna wzmianka, jaka się pojawia, to taka, że Józef i Dawid Serczukowie byli wśród uciekinierów z Sobiboru [1], [2], pierwszy link sugeruje ponadto, że prawdopodobnie zostali zabici przez jakichś bandytów (nie wnikając w ew. przynależność organizacyjną tychże bandytów). Hasło nie ma źródeł, imię i nazwisko nie gugluje się poza Wikipedią w kontekście "holocaust", "resistance" czy "Nuremberg Trials", nie ma nic w Google Books. Dziwne to bardzo... Jak wiesz, ja angielskim nie władam ;-), mogę liczyć na Twoje zajęcie się tą sprawą bądź przekazanie komuś z "naszych"? Pozdrawiam serdecznie. Gytha (talk) 19:54, 21 July 2011 (UTC) DYK for May 3rd Constitution DayDYK for 1989 Polish prison riots
Source code for ReftagHello. Back in December you asked me about the source code of the Wikipedia citation tool for Google Books. If you are still interested, it is now available at https://github.com/Apoc2400/Reftag It is written in Python. If you want to run it yourself you will need the Google App Engine SDK, and API keys for Google Books and other data sources. --Apoc2400 (talk) 18:13, 25 July 2011 (UTC) The Signpost: 25 July 2011
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:26, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for ORP Huragan and ORP OrkanDYK for Rzeczpospolita Polska (magazine) |