Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Portal:Kosovo/Selected article/1, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cloudz679 (talk) 12:08, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Priština. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cloudz679 (talk) 12:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Pristina, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Littleteddy (roar!) 12:33, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You claim your changes are logical but you also changed transwiki links to the pages in other languages, which results in lots of broken links. Cloudz679 (talk) 12:38, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to discuss how the spelling should be represented, use the discussion page at Talk:Priština. Cloudz679 (talk) 12:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying not be be biased here. Factually, the transwiki links, link to pages on other language versions of wikipedia. Your recent edits broke these links. Let's not discuss the politics here. You can do that on the talk page I liked above. Cloudz679 (talk) 12:51, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Priština, you will be blocked from editing. Please refer to Talk:Priština. If any editor makes disruptive edits, they may be banned by an administrator from this and related articles, or other reasonably related pages. Cloudz679 (talk) 13:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Vandalism - Kosovo is not Serbia

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Priština, you will be blocked from editing. Cloudz679 (talk) 14:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pristina., and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Priština. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Priština. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Cloudz679 (talk) 23:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I regret to inform you that you have been blocked for 24 hours for edit warring on this article. If you wish to contest this block, you may add {{unblock|your reason here}} to your talk page. Note that I have also blocked Cloudz679 for edit warring. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 03:08, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've unblocked you because the article has been protected, making the block essentially punitive. Be careful not to edit war again in the future or we may end up here again. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 06:06, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles or before discussions about the title have ended, as you did to Priština, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cenarium (talk) 18:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit war at Priština, was blocked before for same issue. Take a short break.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Jayron32.talk.contribs 18:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When your block will be over, you can request a move here as you can't move Priština to Pristana yourself as you have probably found out. And by the way, one of the fundamental principles of WP is consensus. Please don't forget that and sign your comments too.Cenarium (talk) 18:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruption and persistent edit warring at Priština (this is your 3rd block on this account) and disruption at International reaction to the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence‎ (diff. & diff.), as well as gross incivility (diff. diff. & diff. – cf. The Yugoslav lexicon of swear words). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Ev (talk) 04:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. Thank you. - Ev (talk) 04:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]