When the tournament became non mandatory in 2009. 500 only applies if you do not miss a masters event. If you miss a masters then MC is counted as 1000 points go and look in the rule book. I'm not that stupid to have written it in the first place. You are fucking stupid you know that. He got 600 points at the time for finishing RU. However at the end of paris he lost points as his score was changed to 500 series points. Try hard

Read this Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 21:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, good job on creating the articles. I fixed things to make it look like every other tennis article on wikipedia so please take a look and copy/paste it for the next tournaments. Thanks. Kante4 (talk) 12:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I copied/paste it from the original listing, did not change anything. Kante4 (talk) 12:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Was a mistake then, sorry for that. Kante4 (talk) 23:11, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:4minute - Why.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your opinion will be helpful. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
PL Alvarez ^Talk, 10:05, 16 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:4minute - HuH.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:51, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can't you follow wikipedia rules. Pray and you put something in I reverted and no one should revert me until a consensus has been reached. Yet you keep reverting don't discuss and there is no consensus. You didn't moan on the AO page when the stupid round table crap was removed so stop digging in things are changing around here. Sourcing and prose are a must if you don't like it edit something else. 400 not out (talk) 13:24, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you do most of the prose writing for the day-by-day events at the French Open. It's usually a pretty good job too. One thing though is that you are using obsolete tiebreak protocol that others have to keep correcting. In prose the tiebreak score is to be avoided unless it is especially noteworthy where you actually talk about that particular tiebreak in detail. WP:TENSCR. Simply leave it as 7–6 or 6–7. In tables the full tiebreak score is used and in the following format... 6-4, 7–6^(8–6), 6-7^(3–7), 6–2. Thanks and keep up the great work otherwise. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:40, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see [1]. Sharapova may be ranked 8th, but she was the 7th seed at Roland Garros this year. Courcelles 14:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from 2011 Credit Agricole Suisse Open Gstaad. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 07:46, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Kangaroopowah (talk) 23:55, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning the new fomat, I'll believe you but as for the message- well that's a standard anti vandalism template ,and I don't have the authority to change whats on it. --Kangaroopowah (talk) 13:43, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, can´t you add the wildcards to the main article? Kante4 (talk) 16:24, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Dencod16! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to America's Next Top Model, Cycle 17, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Mtking ^(edits) 23:48, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You incorrectly changed 2012 ASB Classic – Singles. Tennis Project guidelines are to keep the qualifying draw on the page with the main draw. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:42, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Australian Open – Men's Singles Qualifying, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Harris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 SAP Open, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donald Young (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2012 PBZ Zagreb Indoors, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 02:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2012 PBZ Zagreb Indoors – Singles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Martin Fischer

2012 VTR Open – Singles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Facundo Argüello

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Running Man Barnstar
		Thanks for creating the new 2012 Sony Ericsson Open article, and improving Wikipedia's coverage of sports-related topics. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:18, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pray tell me where you get your seeding info from. Either there are seeds or there aren't. There is nothing like TBD. That looks plain silly. And the note says "As of March 12, 2012". So are you forecasting the seeds here? - Abhijit Sathe (talk) 04:56, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Check here. This should be the most official info on players. - Abhijit Sathe (talk) 05:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that your edit to 2011 French Open added material that violated WP:NPOV, which states that content added to articles must be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not meant include content involving personal views on subject matters, so please refrain from adding biased information, and please observe WP:NPOV. Thank you. Prayerfortheworld (talk) 04:00, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of programs broadcast by 2nd Avenue, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tease, Trust Me and The Starter Wife (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on List of Tabatha Takes Over episodes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Crakkerjakk (talk) 12:13, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited America's Next Top Model, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nigel Barker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Per WikiProject Tennis, we shouldn't add scores to player articles, such as Agnieszka Radwańska. I also shortened things a bit to keep the article concise. Thanks. -- James26 (talk) 19:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines and click on the Scores section. You can see an example of this in the Roger Federer article (rated GA), which tends to avoid mentioning scores. -- James26 (talk) 01:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't mean to ignore your edits. As I mentioned, I'm trying to make the article concise, including the 2012 section. Also, some of your edits have issues with grammar, punctuation, or run-ons, so I'm cleaning up.

Example: "At the Indian Wells After advancing to the quarterfinals after Jamie Hampton retired when Radwanska was leading 3-0 in the third, she once again lost to Azarenka, however she was able reach a new career-high ranking of world no. 4."

The article doesn't need too many details. If you look at the Federer article, I think that stands as a good example of making things brief. However, if you really, really want to include things like a retirement, and all of the extra words you added, let's try writing some examples here and find a middle ground. -- James26 (talk) 02:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I actually agree with some of the changes you made. I simply built on the latest one, and added some punctuation and a missing "the". -- James26 (talk) 02:59, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, I'm not trying to edit war, but much of the details you keep adding to the article are unsourced and unnecessary IMO. Some of them are also inproper according to WP:Tone ("Agnieszka" istead of "Radwanska") and suggest personal affection. We only need brief summaries of the notable moments of her career, as seen in articles like Federer, and that's what the current version has. This makes it more inviting for a reader. I'm not trying to be vain at all, and I respect your history as an editor. -- James26 (talk) 15:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to request that you stop now before editing again, because you keep adding a bunch of grammatical errors all over the page (one example: "biggest win when in comes to rankings") and comma splices -- all of which are hurting the article, and this qualifies as disruptive editing.

I'm also going to request that you make the spin-off articles you mentioned, because some of your additions are unverified (the ITF and the qualifying matches for example), which means that the burden of evidence is yours.

Wikipedia is not a diary. What you keep including is overly long and unnecessary.

We don't need all of the "heroic" stuff. We don't need to know that she won a bunch of qualifying matches to get into a tournament. We don't need to know that she got far in a bunch of small tournaments before losing, or that she lost a bunch of first-, second-, or third-round matches.

The article should mostly focus on the notable stuff -- meaning titles, upsets, and strong runs at the bigger tournaments (Premiere events and slams). We both want what's best for the article, so please consider just moving your additions to a spin-off page. I'll gladly help. -- James26 (talk) 19:47, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't about the Federer article. Have you noted the more important things I've mentioned? Some of your claims are unverified, making them inappropriate in an article about a living person. Your edits still contain grammatical errors. And Wikipedia is not a diary. We do not need to include all the detail that you keep including; the notable moments of her career are included in my version -- with sources.

I'm planning to take this to admins and let them resolve it if this continues. Please stop changing the article; try creating spin-offs for your edits. And please, in the interests of civility, leave comments such as "stupid" and "crap" out of this. -- James26 (talk) 00:34, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]