Hello Akshadev! Your additions to Draft:Rakuten Mobile have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:57, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Akshadev, I noticed that you recently copied the formatting of my signature to yours, copying not only colours, shading and typeface, but even macrons over vowels. The similarity may be confusing to other editors and may run afoul of WP:SIGFORGE. Would you mind using different sig formatting? Thank you. — kashmīrī ^TALK 15:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - Sorry for the inconvenience! I still have a lot to learn about Wikipedia's policies. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 16:11, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, there's a good deal of them. Thanks and good luck! — kashmīrī ^TALK 16:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kashmiri: sorry to bother you again! I didn't find anything useful at WP:CUSTOMSIG regarding how to make signatures cool like yours so how do we do that? I mean can anyone do it for me! If yes then who? Again, sorry I'm bothering you! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 04:24, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's basic CSS, you can learn it e.g. from here. — kashmīrī ^TALK 06:39, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:East Bengal Club, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. It's up to editors if they want to use the "support"/"oppose" formatting, and their comments are clear enough anyway. And changing the hyphen style on other people's comments is pointless too Joseph2302 (talk) 07:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseph2302: Have a look at this and this – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 08:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leave the same message at those users talk pages as you leaved on mine. Also, your point noted. Cheers! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 08:04, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do notify me (here) when you're done with the suggestions stuff (on those users talk pages). – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 08:15, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not involved in that discussion, but the point is still relevant. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:22, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, and being a responsible editor, you should get involved if the Wikipedia guidelines are being compromised by anyone. because the rules are made for everyone, right! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 08:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've been watching what seems to have turned into an edit war between you and one or two other editors on this article. I'm going to suggest that you start a discussion on the talk page about that contentious edit, rather than continue to play tug-of-war with the contested statement. Joyous! Noise! 04:01, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 04:16, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Joyous! Noise! 04:24, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to mention it. Have a good day! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 04:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lectonar: Sorry to bother you but would you mind explaining me that procedure again like you did at the requests for page protection. It would be a very big help for me to deal with IP vandals. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 07:53, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, Wikipedia has a steep learning curve. I will leave this here for starters: Help:Simple guide to vandalism cleanup and Wikipedia:Vandalism. If you've got a quiet minute, read it thoroughly, especially in regard to what constitutes vandalism. Keep in mind that other people having a different opinion than yourself mustn't necessarily mean they are vandals. Regards. Lectonar (talk) 08:44, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help sir/madam, have a great time! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 08:49, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may use WP:Twinkle for faster responses. Happy editing. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:35, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why did you remove rocket name from Chandrayaan-6 even when it was cited by you Mr Unknown233 (talk) 07:43, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Mr Unknown233: I'm assuming you're talking about this. There is still a lot of time in the 'Chandrayaan-6' mission and as of now, there is no concrete information about the mission in the public domain, i.e. when will it launch or which rocket is going to carryout the mission. And this source has no information related to the mission either. That's why I thought it appropriate to remove the rocket info. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 08:20, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Akshadev,

Thank you for creating Venus Orbiter Mission.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please run a c/e and change the phrasing to avoid copyvio.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|The Herald}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since, you withdraw the proposal, you can close the discussion following any of the closing procedure here WP:CLOSE. Drat8sub (talk) 06:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 06:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing in WP:CLOSE applies. It massively fails WP:WHENCLOSE, as there isn't a clear consensus, the discussion isn't stable (people are still giving opinions, and you changing your mind doesn't make it a consensus), and When further contributions are unlikely to be helpful is not true either. If you're allowed to suddenly change your mind, other people are definitely allowed to add/change their opinion. Drat8sub you should not be recommending a close in this case. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:18, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph, the close is not premature at all. It has been there for more than 2 weeks, and already a conclusion was drawn that the article should be structured well, only thing changed here is not splitting. It's stable as seems for discussion. I don't see any counter argument from the two users who just said "per nomination". Three of the users including me and the nominator Akshadev changed opinion on the subject seeing the valid argument given by ArnabSaha at EB talk page and an edit summary by another user. Two of users are discussing a different topic that was already dicussed before and concluded. There are 5-6 users given their reason clearly for not splitting, if that's not consensus what esle. But if you insist, we can keep the discussion open for few more days to see if any other arguments by other users. Drat8sub (talk) 08:43, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is not a clear consensus in my opinion, especially when you remove a couple of single-purpose accounts with poor arguments like search engine optimisation. Also, best for someone uninvolved with the discussion to close it if it does need closing, as per WP:NACINV/WP:INVOLVED: In general, editors should not act as administrators in disputes in which they have been involved.. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:49, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Drat8sub and Akshadev- do not try and close this again, if you do, I will seek administrative action at WP:ANI. This comment by Drat8sub seems like Wikipedia:Tag teaming to me, to get the outcome that you (currently) support. One person opposes the move, and then tells someone else to withdraw it, even though there's some clear support for the split. Totally inappropriate behaviour. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would only ask you to stay civil, not to false accuse other fellow editors of tag teaming and threatening them with ANI action. Drat8sub (talk) 09:26, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I said "it looks like"- if that wasn't the intention, then I apologise. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:26, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly that wasn't the intention. You often "look too far away" sometimes. I humbly request you to add some sincerity in your vision. Have a good time! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 10:32, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 11:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]