please reinsate the camp ramah in canada page. PLEASE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.158.4.236 (talk) 01:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Pegasus «C¦T» 02:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind keeping an eye on the Daft Punk article? The subject was recently in the news, which may prompt vandalism. Thank you. Just64helpin (talk) 07:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Pegasus «C¦T» 07:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Pegasus,

I previously messaged you about above the article I was writing. You indicated that I needed to include references to justify putting up the article and so I inserted references and external links within the article. However it is being deleted once more.

I am very confused here as to the exact requirements needed to put up article because I have come across various other articles like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E.P.I.C and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potential_Problem where the persons involved have far less media publicity and zero references.

Please enlighten me on what information could my article be possibly missing and how articles like the ones mentioned above could remain in wikipedia when they have no references at all.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Mohd.mnor (talk) 07:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Pegasus, it seems the article is up again. This is getting rather confusing but I guess in this case, I will not bother you or take up more of your time unnecessarily. Thank You. Mohd.mnor (talk) 07:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind, but I restored History of Dover that you deleted as a copyvio earlier today. My reasons are on its Talk page, I hope you find them compelling. Best,  —SMALLJIM  10:52, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for enlightening me. Pegasus «C¦T» 13:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the Cat Le-Huy page deleted? I think it is very relevant information that belongs to the Wikipedia, a lot of other articles about other living persons are similar and not deleted. Probably some articles will link back to it because it is an interesting case.

He is the head of the internet department of Endemol and gets probably at least 4 years jail for nothing. So there is web campaign web for the release of German citizen and UK resident Cat Le-Huy.

More than 4000 friends and colleagues signed for his release.

Follow the links for more info: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7234786.stm http://freediz.com http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=512815&in_page_id=1811 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/07/endemol_big_brother_smuggling/ http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/newsfeed/2008/02/07/tv-chief-in-dubai-drug-hell-86908-20311283/ http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=5948 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0M8I8ydkq0g http://thetruthaboutdubai.com/ http://dubai.metblogs.com/archives/2008/02/dubais_drug_laws_cat_lehuy.phtml

Cat Le-Huy (aka "Diz") is a German national who has been held without charge in Dubai since January 26th 2008 after being detained at immigration.

Cat was carrying Melatonin, which is legally sold over-the-counter in Dubai, and this is being tested for contraband along with a sample of his urine and 0.01g of what the Dubai authorities believe is hashish which was found in his bag. Cat maintains that the alleged hashish is simply dirt.

If charged and found guilty Cat will face a minimum sentence of 4 years. Friends of Cat have started an online campaign and petition for his release. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.249.118.72 (talk) 11:18, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I concede I overlooked the many reports about him. Pegasus «C¦T» 13:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pegasus, remember to warn newcomers who upload images under i3 or they will re-upload it again as happened on Special:Undelete/Image:Szczesny-Portraitfr.jpg. Cheers. Carlosguitar ^{(ready and willing)} 17:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK... Pegasus «C¦T» 17:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pegasus. What is wrong with the following article I started about Ludovic Hubler? You have many other biographical articles on wikipedia about hitchhikers and explorers like Ludovic Hubler is.

Ludovic Hubler is a French hitchhiker, most famous for his 5 year long tour of the world. One of three sons of Mr. and Mrs. Jacques Hubler, Hubler was born in Bar-le-Duc, France on the 11th of September 1977. He started hitchhiking adventures in college where he hitchhiked 40,000 km in Europe, but his greatest contribution to Hitchhiking includes his 2003-2008 tour of the world by hitchhiking during which he traveled over 170,000 km through 59 countries on 1300 various vehicles - all this while spending 0 (zero) cents on transport to complete the world tour (apart from urban transport and two-way trips with a return to starting point) and an estimated daily budget of $10 USD.[1]— Preceding unsigned comment added by Drazek (talk • contribs)

 Done Restored, sources added. Pegasus «C¦T» 01:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Vkontakte.ru. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:57, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, didn't even give me a day to respond to your warning before speedy deleting Grey thumb society. Anyway, notability is established with the multiple interviews from biota.org on the grey thumb society. Do I need to rewrite the article or can you undelete it? --Numsgil (talk) 20:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To be notable a group needs to be discussed multiple times in independent reliable sources. I would advise you not to re-create the article. Pegasus «C¦T» 01:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I am unclear: it is discussed in the biota.org podcasts. Meaning interviews, which are a reliable source. Biota.org is an independent reliable source (run by Tom Barbalet). Second, the Grey Thumb Society is strongly linked with Breve (software), a screenshot of which is presently being used for the Artificial life page. It's all sort of intertwined with each other. Do you still want to contest notability? Perhaps I can just add a grey thumb section to another article, if that's what your concern is. --Numsgil (talk) 03:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Biota is but one source. Where's another?

Regarding the society's links with breve - am I supposed to take your word for it, without sources? Pegasus «C¦T» 12:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

this should do. Again, if notability is the concern here (only one notable source I can find. What's the minimum? Two? And we can't take a leap of good faith here?), perhaps I can do an article Artificial Life Organizations, with a grey thumb section. --Numsgil (talk) 17:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is on a server run by the grey thumb folks themselves. I am still not convinced of this organisation's notability; please seek consensus at Wikipedia:Deletion review before writing anything on these people. Pegasus «C¦T» 23:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mariposa is a culturally important store in 5 Canadian provinces and 5 western US states. Many women and girls have been sopping there since the early 80's and look to sources like wikipedia to find out more. Any deletion would be in error. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlmcnamara (talk • contribs) 20:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any creation of the article would also be in error, unless it contains references to two or more third-party sources that describe the company. Pegasus «C¦T» 02:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To the best of my knowledge this image come from C:\Users\Transisto\Desktop\Hardware\Esata.jpg and was created by C:\WINDOWS\System32\mspaint.exe on 2004-05-06. I hope this can satisfy your curiosity. --Transisto (talk) 08:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, doesn't look like it. Pegasus «C¦T» 09:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everything was true, as for the claim "to the best of my knowledge" exept the date. I wish to thank you for your contribution to esata picture.

SATA-IO provides the industry with guidance and support for implementing the SATA specification. non-profit organization developed by and for leading industry companies.

THAT WAS STATED IN THE IMAGE DESCRIPTION

I have not integrated your notion of copywrong and hope never will. I will thus avoid uploading any picture to wikipedia. because it just don't work— Preceding unsigned comment added by Transisto (talk • contribs)

This page does not meet the criteria for deletion under CSD A7. This page DID in fact indicate why its subject is important. The page discussed a popular summer camp and its culture, a topic that is of significance to thousands of campers, staff, and alumni. Please un-delete this page. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.210.3.187 (talk) 01:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done "This page DID in fact indicate why its subject is important." But without using reliable sources. So still no undeletion. You could try asking on Wikipedia:Deletion review, though. Pegasus «C¦T» 00:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll check out Deletion review. Could you hit me with the page transcript? walkupwall@hotmail.com thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.210.3.187 (talk) 05:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can see the page using Google's cache. Search for <"Camp Ramah in Canada" Wikipedia>. And be forewarned: Please read WP:ORG before making deletion review request. If you say there exactly the same things you've told me on this page, do not expect your page to be restored. State reasons for undeletion according to WP:ORG criteria only. Pegasus «C¦T» 05:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pegasus, I wrote you about the deletion of the page on Fine Art Registry but cannot now find any answer about what I need to do to revise the page. At the same time, I find a page on a lawyer named Shawn Khorrami that seems to be blatant advertising and am wondering how this slipped through the cracks. Or, if it is a valid page, can you tell me why this would be considered valid, but Fine Art Registry isn't? I am new to Wikipedia and need some help here. Thanks. Dan ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan koon (talk • contribs) 04:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Khorraimi has been the subject of multiple independent, third-party sources. Your organisation has not. Pegasus «C¦T» 00:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you cannot find your message on this page see the most recent link in the "Old messages" section. Pegasus «C¦T» 00:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, two of my creations were deleted. I won't push them again in wikipedia but is it possible to have the creations back so then I can keep it on my computer as personal work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fashionmogul (talk • contribs) 16:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sent to you by email. Pegasus «C¦T» 00:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since when is trying to help clean up nonsense being described as "frivolous?" If anyone is wasting administrative time, it's idiots who post hoax articles, not me. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*****s who don't follow the CSD criteria when tagging waste a not small amount of time as well. Pegasus «C¦T» 01:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. Have a nice day. Clean up your "*****" yourself. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I recently saw that you deleted the article I wrote on The Misshapes. I'm not very wikipedia-savvy but would like to know why you deleted it and how I can get it back. Thanks. 02:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Misshapes article (talk) 02:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted as a substantially similar copy of already-deleted material, but on second look, it isn't, so I've restored it. Pegasus «C¦T» 04:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Misshapes article (talk • contribs) 12:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

edit- do you have a copy of the first article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Misshapes article (talk • contribs) 20:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen that you deleted the article about Heartland Community Church. I understand the need to delete the article due to speedy deletion criterion A7, but I posted my request on the page's talk page that I was unsure of how to satisfy this Wikipedia standard. It appears that you may have deleted the original page, and then the talk page, without first looking at the talk page for my request. I would appreciate any help in satisfying Wikipedia standards while still being able to put my article in the encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazy951842367 (talk • contribs) 04:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There was no assertion of why this church is especially famous or notable. Has it been featured in multiple third-party reports, for instance? Please also see extra guidance here and here. Pegasus «C¦T» 05:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was struggling to fix the formatting there, cheers very much. Joshuarooney2006 (talk) 11:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How was that advertising?

This is not a case of proprietary technologies, these are things things Five Ten invented or contributed to the Outdoor community that are widely used today or are considered 'normal' by today's standards but were revolutionary when introduced.

Certainly not the blatant as found on Nike's page.. if the list i posted was advertising, Nike's page including 'recently introduced' products is surely over the top.

For now, that is the approach I have taken. I have replaced the list, omitting specific product references.

This is a big issue to me, because I do understand the perception, but unless you are very knowledgeable about the outdoor industry you would have no way of knowing how ground breaking these innovations have been.

Todrick (talk) 17:47, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where did the info come from? It should not be from their official website. Pegasus «C¦T» 22:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, OK. I didn't notice that categorization, I was just trying to make sure people didn't think Guywithdress was some other pupeteer, however since it's already categorized that way, my change was pointless.

Anyway, yea, I manage to survive. That reminds me, though, where did we see each other before? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 19:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When you asked me to upload a picture for the autovon article. Pegasus «C¦T» 22:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhhhh! Yes, I remember that!!!! Problem is, its a replaceable image... Anyway, the page is rarely edited anyway that a {{db}} is enough. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 01:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Both you and the previous editor of MediaWiki:Newarticletext introduced an error. You corrected your mistake very quickly but a good way to avoid the error in the first place is to use Special:ExpandTemplates. I enter a context title like "image:My test" to see what the message looks like in a particular namespace. Sbowers3 (talk) 22:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't used it for a long time so I didn't remember to test it there until I messed up. :( Pegasus «C¦T» 22:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the camp ramah page should be reinstated because it truly is significant. Camp Ramah in Canada is a camp that has existed since the 1960's to the present. Thousands of people have gone through that camp and so to see it on Wikipedia, an internet site of such prestige illustrates just how meaningful the camp is.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.158.16.236 (talk • contribs)

Stop asking on this page. Pegasus «C¦T» 00:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been deleted before. Look at the user page of the creator. It was deleted once yesterday I think. Dengero (talk) 11:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can tell from the deletion log of the page. It has enough context and should not have been deleted as CSD A1 in the first place. Also CSD G4 is not to be used unless the article was previously deleted using WP:AFD. Pegasus «C¦T» 11:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Pegasus,

I hope you are doing well.

I am writing to you about your deletion of Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Cumulus_Clouds. I believe that deletion was a well-intentioned mistake. Per the proceedures at Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Principal_purpose_.E2.80.94_challenging_deletion_debates, I am coming here to discuss the matter with you as the deleting admin.

The RFP actually was certified. I certified it myself.

Lawrence acted improperly when he tagged it a speedy deletion.[1] He knows very well that I certified this RFC. He also knows that if he wishes to contest that certification that it is not a matter for speedy deletion.

Your edit summary is in error. You stated, "Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup: Uncertified RFC nearly a week old." It is certainly not an "non-controversial" cleanup matter. In fact, the RFC contains statements from numerous people saying that it should go forward.

Please revert your deletion so that we do not have to go through the time and tedium of a deletion review.

Thanks very much, Johntex\^talk 19:23, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. RFCs must be certified within two days by TWO additional people per the RFC procedures, rules, and templates themselves, not one. Case closed. Lawrence § t/e 21:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The specific language, copied now from the Archtransit RFC:

"In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this sysop and have failed. This must involve the same dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with Lawrence § t/e 21:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC). If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 20:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)}), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 21:13, 15 February 2008 (UTC)."[reply]

The RFC in question was only certified by Johntex. The filer is not a certifier. Lawrence § t/e 21:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ANI to clarify the certification (no offense, Johntex, but as possible partisans in this both your and my opinions are to be immediately devalued here for the community to decide). Neither of us will be making this decision. Period. Lawrence § t/e 21:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]