Trichome

Content deleted Content added
JasonnF (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 32: Line 32:
::::What about a simple statement like "The only religious title that is playable is Caliph" or something to that effect and just tossing it in the paragraph above the list of ranks.<span style="border:1px solid;border-radius:1.5em 0em"><span style="background:#000;border-radius:1.5em 0 0">&nbsp;[[User:Dainomite|<span style="color:#FFF">dain</span>]]</span>[[User_talk:Dainomite|<span style="color:#000">talk</span>]] &nbsp;</span> 06:34, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
::::What about a simple statement like "The only religious title that is playable is Caliph" or something to that effect and just tossing it in the paragraph above the list of ranks.<span style="border:1px solid;border-radius:1.5em 0em"><span style="background:#000;border-radius:1.5em 0 0">&nbsp;[[User:Dainomite|<span style="color:#FFF">dain</span>]]</span>[[User_talk:Dainomite|<span style="color:#000">talk</span>]] &nbsp;</span> 06:34, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
:::::Yes, although the Papacy and Orthodox Patriarch are playable too (you have to vassalise and assassinate until you inherit) but you get the game over screen on succession if it becomes your primary title.[[User:JasonnF|JasonnF]] ([[User talk:JasonnF#top|talk]]) 06:59, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
:::::Yes, although the Papacy and Orthodox Patriarch are playable too (you have to vassalise and assassinate until you inherit) but you get the game over screen on succession if it becomes your primary title.[[User:JasonnF|JasonnF]] ([[User talk:JasonnF#top|talk]]) 06:59, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

== Edit warring ==

[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] Your recent editing history at [[:List of libertarian political parties]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[WP:EDITWAR|edit war]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[WP:BLOCK|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[WP:REVERT|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's [[WP:TALK|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. See [[WP:BRD|BRD]] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --[[User:RJFF|RJFF]] ([[User talk:RJFF|talk]]) 06:58, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:39, 11 October 2012

JasonnF (talk) 23:35, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, JasonnF, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! TFD (talk) 03:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

JasonnF, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi JasonnF! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

your undo to my edit

Why did you undo my edit to Crusader Kings II. Caliph is the same authority level as Kings, Sultan, Serene Doge, King Bishop. daintalk   22:56, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the Caliph is now a duke-level title and doesn't function the same as the other authorities. Pope, Caliph and Ecumenical Patriarch are not the same as the others. JasonnF (talk) 01:18, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Heya, what do you think about adding caliphs at the duke level? I think it's weird how Sultans can display as Caliphs over their Sultan title despite Sultans being at the King-level, for instance this might be a bug then. I based my edit off that image from one of my games. daintalk   02:50, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The head of religion titles take precedence over the Kingly titles they are one offs so I don't think they should be listed as they are not cultural specific like the others, maybe there should be a mention that Caliph is playable in another section. JasonnF (talk) 06:18, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What about a simple statement like "The only religious title that is playable is Caliph" or something to that effect and just tossing it in the paragraph above the list of ranks. daintalk   06:34, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, although the Papacy and Orthodox Patriarch are playable too (you have to vassalise and assassinate until you inherit) but you get the game over screen on succession if it becomes your primary title.JasonnF (talk) 06:59, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at List of libertarian political parties shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --RJFF (talk) 06:58, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply