Whilst the rest of your recent amendment to the article on Bern make sense and is an improvement, I don't understand why you remove the reference to the 2007 elections. This is surely noteworthy, and it is quite normal in an article on a city to include information on the respective strengths of the political parties, though admitedly, I don't understand why this was under Demography. I would have thought a Governance section would be a more appropriate place. Skinsmoke (talk) 22:37, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hello, as far as i see, i did not "remove the reference to the 2007 elections." but you are right, it has to be moved from "Demography" to "Politics".--Ajnem (talk) 17:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ajnem. You're quite right, you didn't remove the reference. Sorry about that. My only excuse was it was late and I clearly couldn't see what was there in front of me. Oops! Skinsmoke (talk) 22:18, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ajnem.

I have amended the passage on Abram Joffe that you recently changed. You'll find the reasons spelled out in detail on the Mileva Maric discussion page.

I've also removed your addition of "male" describing historians of physics who reject the "collaboration" thesis. The rejection is not confined to male historians of physics, as I point out in another item on the Mileva Maric discussion page.

Best regards, Allen Esterson (talk) 15:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is just to let you know I have responded to your and Beeback's comments on the Mileva Maric talk page, and to invite you to reply to the specific points I have made in response to yours.

Esterson (talk) 07:11, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 04:42, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ajnem, please consider that the frequency and nature of your edits at Itamar killings may constitute a violation of the 1RR restriction. While they appear to be in good faith, they are also symptomatic of WP:OWN. Without having warned you first, Administrators are unlikely to take action; so please review Wikipedia policy at WP:1RR and in particular keep in mind the following: An editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Take this message not as a personal insult but as constructive criticism and endeavor to be more careful in the future.—Biosketch (talk) 18:59, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Biosketch, don't know what you are referring to. Maybe you want to explain, what it is you object to? Ajnem (talk) 15:04, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ajnem (talk · contribs), see apology at my Talk page for the extended delay in replying. On to the diffs that prompted the reminder:

1. 16:55, 17 March – Removal of wikilink to Israel's unilateral disengagement plan
2. 15:55, 18 March – Removal of sources from lead

Again, my apologies for replying this late.—Biosketch (talk) 17:03, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos for the great pic you put in Mehadrin Bus lines, though it took me several clicks to see it in high resolution to be able to read the notice for myself. Just between you and me, if women in some communities are considered to be people with 'mugbaluyot', then I guess they are most certainly allowed to sit in the first 2 seats at the front of the bus! lol @Efrat (talk) 18:50, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but you should thank Biosketch; he took the picture, uploaded it and translated the Hebrew text into English. All I did, was move it from Egged, where he put it, to Mehadrin bus lines. But frankly, I don't understand your punch at the disabled, Ajnem (talk) 07:54, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not at the disabled, at women, and it wasn't my comment. I work in a mixed workplace. I showed the photo to a female ultra-Orthodox Jewish co-worker (who, btw, has a very weird sense of humor). Understand that the Hebrew word 'disabled' comes from the root also meaning 'limited'. My co-worker said (in Hebrew) that with all the limitations placed on her (by her community), she should be allowed to sit in the front seat according to the sign!--@Efrat (talk) 10:00, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's a thought, Ajnem (talk) 10:11, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comment on Talk:Efrat in the "Photos" section --@Efrat (talk) 10:28, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NW (Talk) 16:02, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ajnem. You have new messages at Talk:New York's 9th congressional district special election, 2011.
Message added 17:38, 20 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi Ajnem. You can't change the article on Steve Greenberg to say that he's an Orthodox rabbi. That's a matter of dispute, and putting one view in the lede is a violation of WP:NPOV. - Lisa (talk - contribs) 16:14, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So sorry, but all sources say that he is an Orthodox rabbi, or do you have any reliable sources to the contrary? Ajnem (talk) 16:29, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Steven Greenberg (rabbi) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Jewish Journal

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:42, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Beit Shemesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Joel Teitelbaum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Satmar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ajnem. In this omnibus edit you added one {{citation needed}} tag. Would you please give more detail about which part of the text is doubtful to you? Thanks, --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 19:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The whole paragraph, see here, Ajnem (talk) 09:40, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Aharon Roth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yissachar Dov Rokeach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Beit Shemesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yissachar Dov Rokeach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Capitol Punishment (book), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conspiracy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for working on this. Decora (talk) 03:24, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

my pleasure, Ajnem (talk) 14:48, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Ajnem, please accept this barnstar as a token of appreciation for all your contributions, and in honor of recently making your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia. Thanks again for helping improve the encyclopedia! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:46, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please discontinue deleting edits on this article. You are engaging in an editing war and are ignoring sources. An edit from "writer" to "screenwriter & author" was made to reason with your comment but deleting the edits is vandelism. This is your last warning before an admin needs to get involved. 199.209.144.218 (talk) 18:32, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]