Greetings, I saw that you made 3 edits to Richard Dawkins' article, editing 'atheist' to 'agnostic'. I wanted to notify you that this issue has been discussed thoroughly and a consensus (which you can find in the Talk page of Richard Dawkins) was reached to keep "atheist". Ta-ta! - Epicurus B. ^{(Not my talk page)} 16:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Richard Dawkins shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. - DVdm (talk) 16:22, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 16:36, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]