Trichome

Content deleted Content added
Bedford (talk | contribs)
Line 477: Line 477:
:::::: ''ZOMG!'' --[[Special:Contributions/74.14.18.205|74.14.18.205]] ([[User talk:74.14.18.205|talk]]) 01:50, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
:::::: ''ZOMG!'' --[[Special:Contributions/74.14.18.205|74.14.18.205]] ([[User talk:74.14.18.205|talk]]) 01:50, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
::::Suggest: "in" --> "to win". --[[Special:Contributions/74.14.18.205|74.14.18.205]] ([[User talk:74.14.18.205|talk]]) 13:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
::::Suggest: "in" --> "to win". --[[Special:Contributions/74.14.18.205|74.14.18.205]] ([[User talk:74.14.18.205|talk]]) 13:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

==Expiring noms==
<!--NOTE that hooks should only be deleted if more than five days have elapsed from the date that the hook was first reviewed. This is to ensure that article submitters get sufficient time to respond to the problems raised. Please retain this message when moving the "Expiring noms" section header, thanks. -->


===Articles created/expanded on July 18===
===Articles created/expanded on July 18===

Revision as of 00:02, 25 July 2008

2nd-century BC fortified gate at Horvat 'Eqed
2nd-century BC fortified gate at Horvat 'Eqed

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page. Eligible articles may only be up to 5 days old; for details see these rules.

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Instructions

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or expanded (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If a suitable image is available, place it immediately before the suggestion. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should:
    • not be marked as stubs;
    • contain more than 1,500 characters (around 1.5 kilobytes) in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
    • cite their sources (these sources should be properly labelled; that is, not under an "External links" header); and
    • be no more than five days old (former redirects, stubs, or other short articles whose number of characters have been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are acceptable).
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Articles with good references and citations are preferred.
  • To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a JavaScript extension like User:Dr pda/prosesize.js (instructions on the talk page), a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. (The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.)
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    • interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    • short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    • neutral,
    • definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    • always cited in the article with an inline citation.
Please note that hooks are subject without notice to copyediting as they move to the main page. The nature of the DYK process makes it impractical to consult users over every such edit. In particular, hooks will be shortened if they are deemed too long: the 200-character limit is an outside limit not a recommended length. Also, watch the suggestions page to ensure that no issues have been raised about your hook, because if you do not respond to issues raised your hook may not be featured at all.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely-licensed pictures;
    • attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px-wide) resolution;
    • already in the article; and
    • relevant to the article.
    • formatted as [[Image:image name |right|100x100px| Description]] and placed directly above the suggested fact.
  • Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • Please sign the nomination, giving due credit to other editors if relevant. For example:
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]] and ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]] and ~~~~
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|May 21}} Thanks, ~~~~
  • For more details see the previously Unwritten Rules.
  • If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol Code Ready for DYK? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query An issue needs to be clarified before the article's eligibility can be determined
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe Article is currently ineligible but may only need some minor work to fix
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

2024-05-21T00:00:00Z

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on July 24

Length okay, hook fact supported by source okay, looks great to me. Perhaps different emphasis in the hook, e.g. "was NOT engaged to marry", would be better (credit a version revised along these lines to the original nominator). doncram (talk) 22:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, but it's a quotation, so I've made it "Not Engaged". Xn4 (talk) 23:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and date verified. Ref is fine as well: although article submissions to this website from "outsiders" are invited, the article used as a ref was written by one of the website's research team and is properly sourced with a bibliography. Also, it's a striking building; I'll put an image request template on the talk page. Do we have any DYK regulars living in or near NW2 who could take a pic? :) Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 18:25, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Entrance to Buffalo Gap Historic Village in Buffalo Gap, Texas, south of Abilene
Entrance to Buffalo Gap Historic Village in Buffalo Gap, Texas, south of Abilene
Woodlawn Farm main house
Woodlawn Farm main house
  • ... that the dark purple-brown mushroom Russula caerulea is edible and mild-tasing, although the cap skin is bitter if chewed? Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on July 23

The Right Excellent Samuel Jackman Prescod
The Right Excellent Samuel Jackman Prescod
  • ... that Karnataka state has banned the use of convocation caps – the "mortarboard" – and students have now the option to wear the State's traditional Mysore Peta?--Nvvchar (talk) 00:44, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Which one of the 3 in the pic is Francisco de Borja? --74.14.18.205 (talk) 02:08, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I assume you're joking? It's the baby Jesus and the Virgin Mary, to say (pictured, right) would seem like a bad joke. Lampman (talk) 20:21, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to construct better wording. - Darwinek (talk) 22:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT:... that Aksel Hennie won an Amanda Award for "Best Actor" for his effort in the Norwegian film Jonny Vang, playing the title role for which he was at first deemed to young to play? (a little more context for the general audience of the main page, many of which are not familiar with Norwegian films.) --74.14.18.205 (talk) 13:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
SS Yankee
SS Yankee
  • Pleae not that whilst I haven't got a cite right after the sentence that mentions the hook fact in either the lead, or the body text (the natural place to put the cite falls a sentence later), the titles of both the two main sources clearly mention it. David Underdown (talk) 12:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues As I understand, article length excludes quotes, so this one clocks in at less than 1,200. Lampman (talk) 23:01, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nice pic. Hook is a bit awkward, as it pretty clearly implies that the pictured building was itself within a farmhouse. Why not include the available picture of the prior courthouse, the farmhouse? Or reword. doncram (talk) 15:08, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for suggestion - switched pictures. Also thanks for improvements to article. --Doug talk 15:38, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
split from other article? Where? Is this a 5x expansion? --74.14.16.88 (talk) 09:21, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Much of the content came from the article NHL Rivalries. I split it off to its own article, cleaned it up, sourced it, and removed POV and un-encyclopedic statements. I think this still qualifies for DYK, but correct me if I'm wrong. Random89 19:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article is currently in AfD. --John Nagle (talk) 05:21, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Bao Jinghowlal's middle name, Davis, was the last name of an American solider that befriended his family during the US occupation of Yap? Soccahdude1122 (talk) 05:48, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Flag of Azerbaijan
  • I know that it doesn't explicitly say this anywhere in the article; it's the kind of coincidence that isn't really encyclopaedic, but makes a good hook. :) FiggyBee (talk) 02:48, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Art Deco stamps were issued in a number of countries in the twenties and thirties, including Mexico, Brazil and Chile (pictured)? (new article; self nom). Ecphora (talk) 01:54, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Picture was removed by BJBot. --74.14.16.88 (talk) 09:21, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure we really need to include the style for Tutu, but if we're going to, as Archbishop Emeritus, he is correctly Most Revd. David Underdown (talk) 13:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Boletus rubellus
Boletus rubellus
Isn't this common? -74.14.18.205 (talk) 02:08, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Yes, it is very common. Length and date verified. The hook? Not so much. The hook is about something too common and it is overall not interesting. Please try to find a different hook. Regards, RyRy (talk) 10:14, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date, and hook verified. But could you find an appropriate category before this moves to the next update? Thanks, RyRy (talk) 00:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Moved back from next update; too new. We need to use older ones first.--Bedford Pray 02:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Taylor playing in a summer Mexican league
Taylor playing in a summer Mexican league
  • ... that Reggie Taylor (pictured), two games after he came back from his injury in 2000, became the second Scranton baseball player ever to collect five hits in a game? Self-nom. -- RyRy (talk) 23:59, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, hook and date verified. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OR:
OR:

Articles created/expanded on July 22

Bolded for ya' --74.14.16.88 (talk) 03:35, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
St Helen's Church, Hangleton
St Helen's Church, Hangleton
stout whiting
stout whiting
  • (alternate) ... that the residents of Kasungu, Malawi, live in houses made from handmade bricks and straw roofing? (self-nom, over 5x prose expansion) EJF (talk) 15:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sphodromantis viridis
Sphodromantis viridis
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues I get it to be 1,369 characters. Lampman (talk) 18:17, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oops, sorry about that. I've added text and hope it's long enough now. - House of Scandal (talk) 16:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, the length is ok now, but the sources are pet shops. Are there no non-commercial sources available (memory fails me, was there recently a similar issue?) Also, I believe the main picture in the article would look much better at 100x100. Lampman (talk) 19:03, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, it's the breeders of mantises that provide the most info whether it's from their own sites or from postings at mantidforum.net but there are several non-breeder sources used for this article too: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] - House of Scandal (talk) 03:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sphodromantis viridis
Sphodromantis viridis
  • Yeah, but none of those provide the hook fact. But if the "bug safari"-site is the only one that does I guess it will do, it looks reliable enough. I still say a different pic would be better though; yours is fine in a close-up, but looks dark and jumbled in stamp-size. Lampman (talk) 13:33, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks, Lampman! The hook fact is mentioned close to verbatim at the Seattle Bug Safari site and I am pretty sure they are an NPO. And yeah, the other pic looks prettier at wee size. I am spacing out my mantis-related DYK submissions so there's a 5 day gap between each one; I hope that's less tedious for the public. - House of Scandal (talk) 16:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is Borovansky the nomination? Though it's relatively new, it wasn't significantly expanded on the 22nd. Lampman (talk) 18:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on July 21

  • The article says "... the only non-American whose work has been acquired as reference material by the Government of the United States of America." (emphasis added) Its reference says "He was the only non-American historian whose work was acquired by the US Govt." (emphasis added) I don't see how any of the 3 versions can be correct. For instance, the Library of Congress presumably has a copy of the non-American historian Herodotus. Art LaPella (talk) 03:38, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • can we move "in 30 minutes" to after "captured", to make it clear which verb the phrase refers to (and that they didn't spend 30 minutes "describing it as a hog pen"...)? FiggyBee (talk) 02:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes—amendment made. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 08:01, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mysore mallige
Mysore mallige
  • ... that Mysore mallige is one of the three varieties of Jasmine, the other two jasmines being the Hadagali Mallige (Jasminum auriculatum Vahl) and Udupi Mallige (Jasmine sambak), which have been patented under the Intellectual Property Right (IPR) and given a Geographical Indication (GI) tag that provides exclusive rights to the local community to cultivate the crop for 10 years?--Nvvchar (talk) 01:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Raptors have had a few coaches before and after Wilkens, and Wilkens' coaching in Toronto has nothing to do with his induction to the Basketball Hall of Fame. Why not focus on the one and only Raptor head coach who has won the NBA Coach of the Year award? --74.14.16.88 (talk) 00:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text .... Please keep typing. --74.14.16.88 (talk) 01:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! Don't change things up after comments have been posted. Leave the old one there and post a new one underneath. Otherwise, comments will look silly, and other readers will be confused! --74.14.16.88 (talk) 01:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
About the new hook: Lenny does not have a winning record as the Raptors' coach. --74.14.16.88 (talk) 01:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I mean: *... that no head coach of the Toronto Raptors has ever had a winning record all-time with the Raptors? Annoyomous24 01:30, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text .... Please keep typing. --74.14.16.88 (talk) 01:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that while the Norwegian movie Buddy was described as "simple" in the Norwegian press, a U.S. reviewer called it "overly plotted"? -- new article, self-nom -- Lampman (talk) 22:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Jack De Garis faked his own suicide by drowning before being the subject of an Australia-wide search in 1925? Moondyne 08:16, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I'm uncomfortable with this hook on the grounds that "may have been" gives a semblance of conjecture. --Rosiestep (talk) 06:07, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hook changed. He was definitely a relative. Some say a son, some say just a relative. Savidan 04:24, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What does "modern" mean? Is there sth known as "ancient chromatography"? --74.14.16.88 (talk) 01:13, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Modern" in this case means contemporary, as in chromatography as practiced today. I think it sounds better than "many of today's chromatography techniques", although if you think "modern" is too ambiguous I'm open to suggestions. In this context, it seems pretty clear to me.--ragesoss (talk) 20:09, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You mean "current"? --74.14.16.88 (talk) 13:12, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Current" would be fine, too, but I think "modern" is the better choice.--ragesoss (talk) 16:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd guess the problem with "modern" is that in a strict sense, the term refers to developments from the 16th century onwards. Some people see it as a synonym of "recent", others see it as referring to an era. Would "recent" work for both of you? Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 18:30, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've changed it to "current", which I think sounds just a bit better than "recent" (although that would be ok as well).--ragesoss (talk) 00:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mikhail Tsvet
Mikhail Tsvet
  • ... that Mark Christensen was a dancer, a pilot, a skateboarder, and a musician before making his filmmaking debut with Box Head Revolution in 2002? (self-nom) Ecoleetage (talk) 03:27, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What is "pictured at right"? "2002?"? --74.14.16.88 (talk) 01:11, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

::Ha Ha. No, it is a scene from the movie. I switched the hook to avoid confusion. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:05, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A {{Film-screenshot}}? Is that fairuse? We can't use fairuse pics at DYK. --74.14.16.88 (talk) 02:44, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The BJbot has taken the pic away. --74.14.16.88 (talk) 03:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that was fun while it lasted... The hook went back to its original form. :) Ecoleetage (talk) 04:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fine... 1RR is allowed here. ;) --74.14.16.88 (talk) 04:11, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
lol. that reminds me of this edit. :D Thingg 14:37, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
heh. forgot to say that the length, date, and ref are fine. Thingg 15:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Purple-crowned Lorikeet
Purple-crowned Lorikeet
  • Article is 1293 characters. Thingg 14:11, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Everything checks out. However, of the seven references in the article, two give 404s; one is a personal blog; and one opened a popup and started trying to install something claiming to be anti-virus software on my computer. While it may have been benign I really don't feel comfortable linking people to that sort of site; I removed it. If whoever takes this for an update is burdened with free time I'd suggest they check the article and remove the 404ing links if they're still there. Finally, I've moved this from the 20th to the 21st since that's when the article was created. *deep breath* Still, nice hook! Olaf Davis | Talk 22:52, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on July 20

Length, date and ref. verified. Nice hook: I confess I wasn't expecting something that exciting when I started reading "a grist mill built in 1816..." Olaf Davis | Talk 22:25, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date and ref. verified. Nice hook! Olaf Davis | Talk 22:28, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And this is an interesting fact to a general audience of the main page because... --74.14.16.88 (talk) 10:00, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Date and length verified, but the ref on the fact in the article supports that Van Meter was gunned down by police, but not where (in Frogtown). Lvklock (talk) 23:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Date, length and ref. verified. Another good hook - we seem to have a nice batch today. Olaf Davis | Talk 22:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Date and length verified; offline hook reference accepted on good faith. Yet another nice hook - what did you guys have for breakfast this morning? Olaf Davis | Talk 22:34, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not the most exciting hook ever, but date, length and ref verified. Lvklock (talk) 23:06, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issuesThis article has fewer than 1,450 characters by my count (not including infoboxes or templates)
Samuel Johnson
Samuel Johnson
Suggest: Commons:Image:Samuel Johnson by Joshua Reynolds 2.png. --74.14.16.88 (talk) 14:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date, reference and hook all verified. I like the hook reveal in the article--very funny story. Vickser (talk) 20:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Should we mention the story in the hook? I know it's funnier if you go to the article but what proportion of readers actually will? I'm in two minds, but the clincher is that I can't really think of a good way to write it in 200 characters. Olaf Davis | Talk 22:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that the wards in Plymouth will have a new constituency in the next general election? (self-nominated) bsrboy (talk) 12:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • This should really be under July 19 heading. It is a list, so it should (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation. The lead currently is at 1,116 characters. Renata (talk) 19:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why should it be under 19 July? Sorry about the character counting, I was counting it in edit mode, so it included all the other stuff you don't see and was over 1,500. I'll get to work on expanding it. bsrboy (talk) 19:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
July 20 is fine. We go by UTC here. --74.14.17.249 (talk) 20:15, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops, my bad. I forgot I changed UTC with my local time in the preferences. Renata (talk) 21:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
LEAD still too short at 1143 char. Need 1500+. --74.14.16.88 (talk) 10:10, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Should "run" be "ran"? Is "mail coach run" one complex noun? I'm having trouble with the grammar here. Wanna put "(Royal Mail mail coach pictured)" right after that or after 1784? --74.14.16.88 (talk) 03:43, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It was a single experimental run by a mail coach, so run is correct; it is not the mail coach ran. ww2censor (talk) 15:15, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So where's the verb in that middle clause? Should there be one? Not sure. But this hook reads a little awkward to me. Perhaps the main verb ("instigated") comes up a little late and I got confused. --74.14.16.88 (talk) 09:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, there is no verb and it is confusing. Perhaps run should be ran; or perhaps in 16 hours should be took 16 hours? FiggyBee (talk) 09:44, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I like "took". BTW, can the suggested pic be cropped to make the coach appear bigger at 100x100px? We don't need that thick frame on the Main Page. --74.14.16.88 (talk) 12:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Rewrite hook: ... that John Palmer, a theatre owner from Bath, instigated a major reform of the British postal system in 1784, when his experimental mail coach ran from Bristol to London in 16 hours instead of 36 hours? (I will crop the print and upload image asap) ww2censor (talk) 20:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cropped image now uploaded and replaced above. ww2censor (talk) 21:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hook revisited:... that John Palmer instigated a major reform of the British postal system in 1784, when his experimental mail coach run from Bristol to London took only 16 hours instead of 36 hours? ~ It was the run that was experimental, not the coach itself. (The article itself makes this clear). I removed the theatre owner bit as distracting. SilkTork *YES! 07:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Date, length and ref. check out - although both the article and source say 38 hours, not 36. So good to go with the following hook:
... that John Palmer instigated a major reform of the British postal system in 1784, when his experimental mail coach run from Bristol to London took only 16 hours instead of 38 hours? (later example pictured)
Oops! Well spotted. Yeah 38 is correct. I must have been blinded by looking at too many Wikipedia pages and online references. ww2censor (talk) 23:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on July 19

Charles Martin Hall
Charles Martin Hall
"discovered"? Do you mean "developed"? --74.14.16.88 (talk) 01:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, "developed" would be better—I didn't think "discovered" sounded right! Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 11:30, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and newness verified; offline ref accepted on good-faith grounds. Hook reworded per discussion Daniel Case (talk) 15:03, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article is tagged with {{globalize/USA}}. --BorgQueen (talk) 19:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lisa Murkowski
Lisa Murkowski
Length and reference verified. Perhaps an additional footnote to the page of Conroy's book could be put in? Daniel Case (talk) 15:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That last one, in Tappahannock, could use some expansion, so I'm going to try and beef it up a little bit before this can go live. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 19:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I like these articles...cool having them all added from user space together. I verified the length of the hook and the articles. In the Accomac article, there are two spellings of the place Accomac/Accomack. Are both acceptable? If so, I would note that in the opening paragraph somewhere. If not, edit for correct spelling. My only concern is that the hook includes the phrase "have all survived to the present day" which I'm sure is true, but I'm not sure it's supported by the references, especially in the Worsham article where they seem to be NRHP documents from the seventies and one current one about the Tappahannock site. I've never verified a hook before, so if someone else thinks I'm being too picky, I'll bow to greater experience. I guess I'd alter the hook a little, maybe;
Alt. hook *... that the debtors' prisons in Accomac (pictured), Worsham, and Tappahannock, Virginia are all listed on the National Register of Historic Places?Lvklock (talk) 22:50, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Article has 840 characters. (tables, templates, lists, etc. are not counted) Thingg 16:26, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Still kind of short ... text in lists doesn't count. Daniel Case (talk) 15:01, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not counting the text in the list. It should be 1500 characters regardless. sephiroth bcr (converse) 19:24, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with both of you. It's just over 1500, but #Instructions says: "... in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators." Art LaPella (talk) 20:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*shrug* Take it as you like. I would think that 1500+ characters with a non-counted table (that has a big chunk of text in it) would be enough, but that's to the discretion of the DYK admins. sephiroth bcr (converse) 22:35, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Clear POV problems in both the hook and the article, story told entirely from one side's POV. Gatoclass (talk) 14:53, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There are some interesting choices, so here are some other possibilities:
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Serious issues. It's heavily plagiarized from source #2. Source #1 is Wikipedia mirror before the article got expanded. The article needs wikification and copyedit. Renata (talk) 23:42, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please see my reply on Renata's talk page. Truthanado (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article has been rewritten and restructured to address Renata's concerns. Would you please re-assess? Truthanado (talk) 23:59, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
3rd opinion, please? 20:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
My third opinion is that only the second hook is cited clearly enough to be useful. Daniel Case (talk) 16:38, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
EIghth? Surely there's something more notable than that?--Bedford Pray 05:54, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The main page has a general audience who won't understand what this hook is all about. More context, please. --74.14.16.88 (talk) 12:01, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Torrie Wilson
Torrie Wilson
That should draw interest from the general readers of Wikipedia.--Bedford Pray 19:16, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*rolls eyes* The men, at least....but I'm sure you're right, and it will be popular :) Lvklock (talk) 23:31, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good! -- iMatthew T.C. 21:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ZOMG! --74.14.18.205 (talk) 01:50, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest: "in" --> "to win". --74.14.18.205 (talk) 13:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on July 18

  • ... that the Crawford-Gilpin House once changed owners due to being lost as ante in a poker game? (self-nom, 5x expansion)--Bedford Pray 02:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Lenght ok. Expanded from 154 to 1732 characters of readable prose. Else not checked. Renata (talk) 19:15, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Per previous discussions on this Template talk page and at wt:DYK, this article on yet another NRHP suffers from poor referencing and other deficiencies. It is arguably plagiarized, in that the DYK nominator is claiming credit for his DYK medal collection, and yet not giving credit to the author of the main source: the author is not even named in the article. Given the DYK nominator's previous statements of commitments not to respond to new or previous comments on referencing or other matters, and given no one else has stepped in to fix up the references or other deficiencies, I recommend this be withdrawn, cancelled, stricken out. At any rate i am putting a cleanup tag in the article and will replace the tag if the nominator removes it. Discussion perhaps best at Talk page of the article or wt:DYK. doncram (talk) 01:08, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Will you grow up? No one cares what you think; they are beginning to realize you are harassing me.--Bedford Pray 01:14, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • What I don't like is how abusive and bullying you are to me and to others, especially new participants at DYK. And, when I review your contributions and your DYK nominations, I usually don't like what I see. I have only made well-supported, mild observations about your nominations, and you are over-the-top with foul language and irrelevant arguments in response. It would be simple for you, an experienced writer and DYK editor, to make modest improvements in your work, rather than committing not to respond to the cumulative feedback you have been given. Also, by the way, the hook is not supported by the article. Perhaps the following alternative hook is supported:
        • ... that the Crawford-Gilpin House is claimed to have been lost by its owner in a poker game? Note, by the way, the only source for even this revised hook is a promotional piece, the nomination, written by the owners of the house, who sought to make an interesting story. Alt. hook, doncram (talk) 01:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A source you only have problems with as I wrote it, while you require similar forms for any article rlated to a NRHP to be considered B-class. *rolls eyes* Another admin may have to protect this page, to stop Doncram from trying to sabotage this article from DYK consideration.--Bedford Pray 04:01, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, this article is officially subject of an edit war; I have reported Bedford for violating the 3 revert rule at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR#User:Bedford reported by User:Doncram. Labelling your 4th revert as correction of "vandalism" is bogus. I have a valid point, as explained at the Talk page, that better referencing is necessary. In particular, the DYK hook claim is based only on a self-promotional NRHP nomination, authored by the current owners of the property, which is obscured by the bare URL referencing. It would have been easy for you to address the problems in the article noted, and which have been discussed mildly and gradually in relation to previous DYK nominations here on this page, and also at wt:DYK. Instead you have committed to not respond to cumulative feedback that you have received. Currently, the article shows no cleanup tag, as i placed one 4 times and Bedford reverted 4 times, with insubstantial response at the Talk page. I refrain from adding the cleanup a 4th time, which would be a 3RR violation for me. However, i regret to state, the article is obviously subject of an edit war between Bedford and myself, over this matter of referencing and adequacy for DYK listing. doncram (talk) 04:50, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have reported you to RfC, as your harassment of me has to stop. You are trying to vandalize, and I am going to put up a fight about it.--Bedford Pray 05:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it is appropriate for you, while in violation of 3RR edit warring, to delete the leading my comment, which i just restored. I also don't think opening the same discussion elsewhere is helpful, but fine, i will go there and respond also. doncram (talk) 05:10, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And I don't think its appropriate that you insist on harassing me, especially after those like Daniel Case have asked you not to. Get over yourself.--Bedford Pray 05:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, someone tinkered with the references.--Bedford Pray 00:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever. Also for the record, in the 3RR discussion linked above, two administrators concurred that Bedford violated the 3RR restriction, and chastised him, and at least one was rather surprised at Bedford's ignorance and/or disregard for the rules, being that Bedford is an administrator himself. They chose not to block Bedford for 24 hours from Wikipedia editing, as would have been justified in my view, as the second reviewer seemed to feel that i did not show good faith, because i introduced prior experience with Bedford's prior edits in my first edit summary as i placed the first cleanup tag which Bedford began to revert. Fair enough, although in my view, wp:AGF is getting difficult with respect to Bedford's actions which deliberately, by his own admissions, push all limits. I don't know, do the good people of DYK want to allow Bedford to get away with edit warring and explicit 3RR violations and give him his lousy credit for a DYK to add to his total, forgiving all sins, or not. I think the fair thing is for this DYK nomination to be given a graceful death. doncram (talk) 01:34, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Again, the stated hook is not supported by the references. While Bedford declines to answer whether he is a Mason or has other association with Freemasonry or not, he is clearly not a poker player, and his proposal hook seriously mangles the facts. My alternative hook is perhaps okay. doncram (talk) 01:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
They saw you violated good faith, which is why I didn't get it. Give it up. SO far, your efforts to harass me and this page have gone for naught; please leave this page for the grown-ups. Are you jealous that I actually try to help Wikipedia, not hurt it like you've been doing?--Bedford Pray 02:16, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm... we need a ~200-character long hook in the form of a question, with the link to the DYK article in boldface. --74.13.129.166 (talk) 18:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not long enough. Only about a x3 expansion by my estimation. Gatoclass (talk) 13:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on July 17

  • ... that in 1974, Libya and France signed an agreement whereby Libya exchanged oil for technical assistance and financial support? New article by --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 19:31, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • {{#ifeq: length|length| Article is 1292 characters. Thingg 14:48, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whoa! That's a huge "signature", Thingg. --74.13.129.166 (talk) 18:46, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, most of the above is a template intended to explain the fivefold rule. It didn't work for me, as no amount of clicking anything led to an explanation of that rule. Art LaPella (talk) 23:15, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, just FYI, that was a failed experiment. I thought I had removed the "damage", but apparently I missed a couple. Thingg 14:48, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Marie Curie's birthplace
Marie Curie's birthplace
Created July 2, 2006. Within the last five days expanded from 1,951 char. (July 9) to 2,674 char. (July 17) without infoboxes, cats and refs.[8] --Poeticbent talk 15:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
before expanding: 15 March 2008 Martim33 (talk) 09:01, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does not qualify as fivefold expansion. Renata (talk) 19:41, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Castle Square, Warsaw
Castle Square, Warsaw
Created June 17, 2005. Within the last five days expanded from 3,776 char. (July 8) to 3,798 (July 17) without infoboxes, cats and refs.[9] --Poeticbent talk 15:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
before expanding: 19 November 2007 Martim33 (talk) 09:01, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Too old: main expansion was done on July 1. Renata (talk) 19:36, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
File:Gettysburg Mason Memorial.JPG
Just curious, is it usual to include pictures of oneself in articles? It seems likely to me, judging from the resemblance to the picture on his talk page and the fact that the pic was taken by someone with the same last name, that this picture includes the nominator. Just struck me as odd. Is there a policy on this? Lvklock (talk) 09:37, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I tried cropping myself out, but I didn't like the look. I may have others pictures of it from previous visits, but I have no idea where they are at this time. BorgQueen is known for cropping images to use on DYK. I know of no policy sayin g this is bad or good. It does give the looker some idea how big the monument is, as the handsome guy in question *wink* is 6'4".--Bedford Pray 15:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
About the photo, I think that following BorgQueen's example would be best. Also, Bedford and I are deemed to be engaging in an edit war, in which Bedford opposes DYK for another DYK-nominated article involving Freemasons, see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Grand Lodge of West Virginia - EDIT WAR, and/or July 12 nominations section below. The present nominated article also suffers some of the deficiencies discussed in a current Wikipedia Talk:DYK discussion. Reviewers of the present hook should perhaps consult those discussions. doncram (talk) 15:10, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*Rolls eyes* That Masonic article was a hit piece, written as such. A pure article on any Grand Lodge, discussing its history, would be OK; a piece where the majority of it is recent negative news about the Grand Lodge is not cool. The only reason you got involved in that article was to dis' me, and we both know that.--Bedford Pray 17:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above image is copyrighted. --Poeticbent talk 01:15, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but a copyright that allows its use on Wikipedia however we wish; it just means that someone on another website wants to use it, they must say who the photographer was. Besides, it was probably taken on my camera, and I've dealt with the picture taker longer than I've dealt with anyone else (37 years).--Bedford Pray 02:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me, but I’d go with the plain {{Copyrighted free use}} instead to be on a safe side. --Poeticbent talk 02:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So other than determining whether or not to use the pic, this article is good to go, and the rest of today's can be deleted. Too bad; the Franco/Libyan would have also made a nice addition.--Bedford Pray 07:51, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm...seems to me that the hook isn't really supported by the article. I was envisioning a midst of the battle "rescue", while it turns out that it happened after the battle, and all that was truly "rescued" were the personal effects of one of the masons. He WAS delivered to a hospital, but he died there two days later. The character counts are ok. I'll leave evaluating the references to someone more experienced....they aren't the type I'm familiar with. Lvklock (talk) 13:48, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think Poeticbent and User:Lvklock are being, perhaps, too polite. Let's be clear: The photo is unacceptable for DYK. This is an encyclopedia and it is unprofessional for DYK to feature pictures of DYK wikipedians or their loved ones. Also, the purpose of wikipedia is to put forth free content and DYK should not put forth photos under non-standard licenses, just as it should not include copyrighted photos under "fair use" arguments. As with use of other copyrighted images, it is inappropriate to use a photo with an idiosyncratic copyright, when it should be possible to obtain a photo that is free content under a standard license. Obviously, it would be possible to obtain a free content photo if the DYK nominator would release it under Creative Commons / GFDL / etc. We are supposed to set a model for free content under standard licenses, not for creating unhelpful variations.
About the hook, i agree with Lvklock that the hook is misleading and not supported by the facts. I suggest:
I prefer the 2nd alternative nomination above as it is brief and to the point, with less suggestion of exaggerated honor. Hopefully this will suffice for someone to clear this DYK off this board. doncram (talk) 14:35, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, i wasn't getting this, Lvklock is being too polite about the references. The references are bare URLs and as such do not lend themselves to evaluation of their quality in DYK review, and they set a bad example. DYK articles are not Good or FA articles, but they do set an example and easy improvements, particularly on referencing, should be incorporated. There needs to be an explicit policy at DYK to make it perfectly clear to the original DYK nominator or others of equivalent DYK experience, that he should not get DYK recognition for poor referencing. I am not sure how this works, but if it is me who is to receive the DYK for one of my alternative nominations above, I am happy to decline receiving the DYK medal if the original DYK nominator or anyone else objects that I also am experienced and should not get credit for a poorly referenced article.
But in the absence of a clear enough policy, and to clear this DYK off the board, I suggest that this particular DYK be posted, with alternative hook #2 above, or deleted, i don't care which. doncram (talk) 14:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, aiding is much better than rescuing. I, however, like alt. option 3 the best. I do think the memorial honors, and I think the mention of Freemasons is important for this site. I do agree that I dislike the bare URL references, but since there is apparently no policy against them and the author doesn't seem to care what anybody else thinks of them, I wasn't gonna bother to mention it. I also agree that I would not use the picture on the Main page. IMHO, it seems inappropriate. Lvklock (talk) 16:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Option 3 is fine with me. doncram (talk) 17:18, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Rescue might be a problematic word. "Honor" suffices.--Bedford Pray 20:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Leave a Reply