Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 16:01, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: One found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 16:06, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The game showed well at the 1998 E3. What is E3? I tweaked your fix.

   Otherwise the prose is reasonably well written.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Ref #85[2] doesn't metion E3, whatever it is. I am happy that the manual supports this, in good faith.

   I assume good faith for off-line sources.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Meets the criteria

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Captioned and with suitable non-free use rationales.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed.

   OK, good to go. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 21:21, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1a: I have add a piped link to Electronic Entertainment Expo, but have kept the "E3". Tell me if you prefer that I expand that.

2a: This one's a little trickier. User:Vyeh was the one who added most of the sources, and he owned the manual, but hasn't been on in months. I removed the link in question, and I can remove the sentence as well, if need be. Your thoughts? Nolelover ^{It's almost football season!} 20:55, 20 March 2011 (UTC) 2a:[reply]