Trichome

Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
Line 12: Line 12:


'''I proposed a deletion as the articles content is completely identical to [[History of LGBT characters in animation: 2020s]], and [[List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2020–present]]. The same with the articles [[Animated series with LGBT characters: 2010s]], [[Animated series with LGBT characters: 1990s]], [[Animated series with LGBT characters: 2000s]]. @[[User:Historyday01|Historyday01]]''' [[User:UnkreativeFrog|UnkreativeFrog]] ([[User talk:UnkreativeFrog|talk]]) 16:48, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
'''I proposed a deletion as the articles content is completely identical to [[History of LGBT characters in animation: 2020s]], and [[List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2020–present]]. The same with the articles [[Animated series with LGBT characters: 2010s]], [[Animated series with LGBT characters: 1990s]], [[Animated series with LGBT characters: 2000s]]. @[[User:Historyday01|Historyday01]]''' [[User:UnkreativeFrog|UnkreativeFrog]] ([[User talk:UnkreativeFrog|talk]]) 16:48, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

:[[User:UnkreativeFrog|@UnkreativeFrog]] Ok, but mergers would be MUCH better than a proposed deletion. Deletion is NEVER the substitution for what can be solved through edits. Taking shortcuts with pages like this is NOT good. If you propose a merger rather than a deletion, I would definitely participate in that discussion. [[User:Historyday01|Historyday01]] ([[User talk:Historyday01|talk]]) 16:55, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:55, 11 March 2023

Proposed eletion

I proposed a deletion as the articles content is completely identical to History of LGBT characters in animation: 2020s, and List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2020–present. The same with the articles Animated series with LGBT characters: 2010s, Animated series with LGBT characters: 1990s, Animated series with LGBT characters: 2000s. @Historyday01 UnkreativeFrog (talk) 16:48, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@UnkreativeFrog Ok, but mergers would be MUCH better than a proposed deletion. Deletion is NEVER the substitution for what can be solved through edits. Taking shortcuts with pages like this is NOT good. If you propose a merger rather than a deletion, I would definitely participate in that discussion. Historyday01 (talk) 16:55, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply