This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ethnic groups Start‑class High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks: Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks: Meta-tasks: Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project. Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution: Category:Unassessed Ethnic groups articles Category:Ethnic groups articles needing merge action Category:Ethnic groups articles needing infoboxes Category:Ethnic groups articles needing reassessment Category:Ethnic groups articles needing attention Iyer Peruvian people Start an article: Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks. Kosovo Start‑class High‑importance Albanians is part of WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.KosovoWikipedia:WikiProject KosovoTemplate:WikiProject KosovoKosovo articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Europe Start‑class High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

```` Can someone explain where the alleged terms "Arbanios, Arbanitai" appear in Polybius. and then hasn't anyone noticed that Polybius' Arbona is too far North to have any relation to Ptolemy's Albanopolis. The text (2.11) is refering to the islands of the Adriatic (the blockading of Issa) hence the reference to Rhizon (today known as Rizan which is situated in Montenegro) and Pharon (the Adriatic island known as Hvar).. one wouldn't go too far to suggest that his (Polybius') Arbona is the island of Arba mentioned by Pliny (John Bostock and Henry Thomas Riley in their notes suggest that Arba and Crexa were ancient Cherso)

hasn't anyone noticed that the Olbonenses in Pliny (3.21) are too far North to have any connection to the later Albanopolis since he mentions that they belong to the jurisdiction of Scardona, (today Skradin located in Croatia)?

So where's the connection to Albanians, where were they originally settled ?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phallanx (talk • contribs) 13:38, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone PLEASE cite some reliable sources for the Albanian population figures. I think that by now, it's quite obvious that that table is full of POV and propaganda. You can't "pretend" that 99% of the earth's population is Albanian. I'm going to try and find sources (some of you may want to look up that word) regarding the number of Albanians. Any help is welcome. Rex<sup>(talk)</sup> 18:43, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Two recent academic papers which give some quotable figures are Migration and Development in Albania and Migration and Ethnicity in Albania. For the number in Greece, the second is more accurate, but you can cite my survey for the Greek Interior Ministry -- although I did not give a precise figure in the publication. My estimate is 650.000 for 2004 (cf Barjaba at 600.000). If you need more help, email me through our website address. Martin Baldwin-Edwards Mediterranean Migration Observatory

For the US figure (the 115,000 figure that sometimes appears on this page seems to be about right) you can refer to the US Census tabulation from 2000: US Census Ancestry 2000 (PDF) CarbonCopy 13:45, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Changed data Do not change numbers or analysis of the data concerning Albania and Greece without discussion in this page. Someone changed the total of Albanians in Greece to 1m [without any datasource, because it is a lie] and also the analysis in the text, linking Arvanites with recent Albanian emigrations. THIS NATIONALIST ALTERATION OF DATA IS UNACCEPTABLE FOR WIKIPEDIA. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 02:54, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above comments apply to the entire Table which I have reverted. There is no justification for putting any number at all for Turkey, without evidence of Albanian ethnic identity of those in Turkey. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 11:53, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Martin. Please cite your sources on Albanian immigration into Greeve. As for the issue of Albanians in Turkey, albanians deported to Turkey arent really "Albanians" anymore but rather "Turks with Albanian roots". Turkey did take in some Kosovare Albanians as refugees recently because the Kosova War. Im sure you could add them into the article as they self identify as Albanians and should also speak Albanian, as opposed to Turkish albanians who are mostly integrated into mainstream Turkish society.

Here's a CNN article that says 26,000 Albanian refugees have moved into Turkey as a cosequence of the turmoil in Kosova http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/europe/9904/05/kosovo.refugees.04/ —the preceding unsigned comment is by Enter sandman (talk • contribs)

I dont believe that there are only 30000 albanians in Britain, this is either 10 years out of date or an extreme under estimate, the figure is closer to 1 million or at least in the hundreds of thousands, according to the table there are as many Albanians in Britain as there are in Sweden! And no source is stated! Angryafghan 14:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TURKEY SECTION I would like to know why the Turkey section says "Albanians considered themselves Turks before Albanians". That was the single most disturbing tatement I had ever heard and a "youtube journalist" is not a good citation. Please Lord Jesus Christ someone change the Turkey section...I'm a Catholic-Albanian I got no problems with Muslims most Albanians are muslim, but NOT TURKISH and Don't consider themselves turkish...I'm very disgusted —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.85.123.58 (talk) 22:45, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(albananians of kosovo)

what a hell is that???!! 70% of albanians in kosovo are muslims?!!!!! how would that be possible or u meant 70% of albanians in albania???? and 90% of albanians in macedonia are muslims??!!! it is well known info that 99% of albanians in macedonia,95% of kosova and 70% of albania are muslims ................ idont know from where u get this informations do u people invent it???!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spike monotheist (talk • contribs) 06:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dr. Muu prefers this version of the section:

Today, majority of Albanians are Muslims. Most of them are Sunni-Muslims but a smaller part are Bektashi. Also smaller parts of Albanians are Albanian Orthodoxes and Catholics. In the albanian comunity, religion is a personal thing and belief, while everybody are Albanians.

For most of its history, Albania has had a noticeable Jewish community. Most of this community was saved by the Albanian people during the Nazi occupation [3]. The majority of Albanian Jews have left to settle in Israel, but a small number still remains [4].

The existing section is:

Today, the majority of Albanians are Muslims. Most of them are Sunni Muslims but a minority are Bektashi. Significant numbers of other Albanians are Albanian Orthodox or Roman Catholic.

Starting with the occupation by the Ottomans, the majority of Albanians have been Muslim. During the Ottoman occupation, the shared religion of Islam created a tendency for Muslim Albanians to side with their occupiers and thus become considered enemies by the Catholic Albanians. Gradually over time this changed as Muslim Albanians decided that their ethnicity and Albanian identity outweighed the religion they acquired from their occupiers. Although at times in the past religious differences caused hostility and tensions amongst the Albanian people, in the 21st century this has become less of an issue.

For most of its history, Albania has had a noticeable Jewish community. Most of this community was saved by the Albanian people during the Nazi occupation [5]. The majority of Albanian Jews have left to settle in Israel, but a small number still remains [6].

His objections, as stated in the edit summary are: "Revert POV. This ain´t history so give me the situation today and not 500 years ago, specilly when it´s no proof."

My problems with the changes he wants (besides the grammar errors which are easily fixable with a bit of copy editing - and understandable as he is apparently not a native English speaker) are:

• for some reason, he keeps unwikilinking Sunni and Bektashi, and changing Roman Catholic to just Catholic.
• the history is very relevant to the article. The legacy of Ottoman occupation has impacts to this day on the entire Balkan region. I can't see any serious dispute that the Ottoman occupation is the reason Islam took root in Albania, but if challenged I'll go dig up sources.
• The sentence "In the albanian comunity, religion is a personal thing and belief, while everybody are Albanians" is inaccurately POV, in that relgious tensions do persist to this day although much reduced. For example, here is a project aimed at increasing religous harmony in Albania: Religious Harmony Project in Albania I'm sure more sources could be found.
• as a general matter, history is very appropriate for an article like this, as long as the current conditions are also prominently included

I believe the existing section fairly reflects that there has been religious conflict in Albania, and that it is less of a problem today. But I'm certainly open to discussion and/or changes. CarbonCopy (talk) 20:46, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allright. Yes, I speak Bosnian and not so good English. I´m sorry that Sunni and Bektashi wasn´t linked I didn´t thinh about that. But the thing is that Albanians are ONE nation. And I don´t just mean Albania I mean Kosovo, Macedonia and all other regions to. Shure maybe some smaller parts don´t agree, but so can two Albanians also fight about hows town is best Prishtina or Prizren? Of course this is stupid as religios fights but in some exeptions it happens, but should we write that Albanians from different cities don´t get along? I am a Bosniak and many people in Bosnia fight over hows town is the best but should we write that in the Bosniaks article. Of course not! A man that declaire him self as an Albanian where ever he livs, what ever religion he is, poor or rich is an Albanian and writing about conflicts isn´t that good. Specilly sens most Albanians I know don´t even think about where they are from and what religion they are, the important thing is that they are Albanians. You can change the article how ever you want but please don´t right about some religios conflicts and such things if you ain´t gonna right about city-conflicts, conflicts between rich and poor and al sorts of conflicts. And I have never herd about a war between Albanians of any cause and onastly, writing about problems that ain´t even there can cause them. Specilly when you say that catholic and muslim are enemies even if they are the same people. Thanks... —the preceding unsigned comment is by Dr. Muu (talk • contribs)

How about the following replacement for the second paragarph? Does this address your concerns? In particular, I eliminated the word "enemies". (Note I'm not the original author of this section, but I have contributed some rewriting.)

During the occupation by the Ottomans, the majority of Albanians converted to Islam. The shared religion between Muslim Albanians and their Ottoman occupiers, and their different status under Ottoman law, caused divisions between Muslim and non-Muslim Albanians. Gradually over time these divisions have been reduced as Albanians decided that their ethnicity and Albanian identity outweighed their religious differences. Although at times in the past religious differences caused hostility and tensions amongst the Albanian people, in the 21st century this has become a relatively minor issue in Albania.

CarbonCopy (talk) 23:46, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allright, I agree. As I said i´m not Albanian but i´m interested in Albanian history. Can you give me a link about good history and if you can let it be in Bosnian. And this is just a friendly question, are you Albanian and do you for sure now about times when Albanians have fougt becuse of religion? Most Bosnians thing that religion isn´t an issue in the Albanian people, is that true?User:Dr. Muu

No, I'm not Albanian myself. There was definitely civil conflict in Albania in the 1910-1924 time period, and again during World War II. It's hard to clearly distinguish the causes, as external wars and ordinary economic and political conflicts were undoubtedly significant factors. Italian links to Roman Catholic institutions caused some conflict in the late 1930's, but the problems probably had more to do with Italian Fascist political ambitions than religion. I can't help you with Bosnian resources, since I don't speak/read the language. I'll take what is above and some other edits that have been made and see if we have a better section now. CarbonCopy (talk) 01:33, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The author you're looking for is User:Shqype. See this edit. See also his contributions. --Khoikhoi 01:38, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes CarbonCopy I think you made a god site. I just want to ask if the part about Jews is in place their. Becuse this is an article about Albanians as a nation and people and not about Albania as a country. The Jews in Albania wasn´t/are not Albanians nationally, they only lived in Albania. If somone hase other statments please give them but this way I don´t thnik this is relevant in the article about reiligion in the Albanian people. That´s why I also think you should make a dostens between Greek otrhodoxes(is that how you spell it?) and ALbanian ortothoxes in Albania becuse they are not the same. And I think that the leader of the Albanian Churc hase to be Albanian and not Greek.Dr. Muu

Inanna, here is the main reason why I reverted your edits. Firstly, you replaced many cited numbers with uncited ones. You also replaced "Turkey's public administration and administrative law is a citizenship policy with ideally no ethnic consideration" with "many Albanians, who were deported from their land to Turkey, have been assimilated due to the assimilation policy of Turkish government". These are two very different claims. I'd be nice if you could let us know where you got the latter information.

You also removed "August of 2003 was marked by renewed terrorist attacks by the ANA (Albanian National Army) both against Serb border guards and (allegedly) Serb civilians". Why?

Lastly, you removed the link to Albania and Greece in the "See also" section. You mentioned on your talk page that you "hate Greeks" [7], but I hope that you removed this link for a different reason.

Please explain your edits. Thanks. --Khoikhoi 03:02, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1-) I dont know what articles you are talking about.I didnt remove anything.

2-) You have to expain me where did you get that unfair information at first."In Turkey, Turkish demographers have continuously mentioned numbers up to five million. However, many Albanians, who were deported from their land to Turkey, have been assimilated due to the assimilation policy of Turkish government. Turkey does not compile official census figures for Albanians." This is completly lie.It is only provacation to create enmity between albanians and Turks.The everyone are defined as Turks who lives in Turkey except for three nations who has minorty status (greeks,armenians and jews).

3-) Even i have never seen that article.I think it's one of your insidious plans again.

4-) I understood one more time by your friend's commment why i should hate them [[8]].

-Inanna-

I'm talking about this article. Your claims are POV and uncited. How do you know that Albanians are completely assimilated? Also, I have never heard of User:GreekWarrior before Latinus told me about him, so how could he be my friend? --Khoikhoi 08:31, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have not showed "resources". Just because you have a lot of Albanian friends who speak Turkish doesn't mean that all Albanians are assimilated into the Turkish. What kind of logic is that? You don't have real evidence, because you have not shown your "resources". --Khoikhoi 02:28, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The page has just been protected but there is a grave error on it. The article claims that the Aromanians are an Albanian group in Greece. The Aromanians are Vlachs and speak a Vlach language. I'd imagine the article means Arvanites.--Damac 14:18, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, under the Greece section it should say Arvanites. The Aromanians are an ethnic group who speak a language close to Romanian (Romance language) and are not Albanian. The Arvanites are the Christian Albanians of Greece. So whoever can edit the page please make this fix. Also, although the number of speakers may be 30,000, the number of ethnic Arvanites is much higher than that. Imperial78.

Dear Sir ambassador of Bosnia and Herzegovina,

I was wondering if you could help me, by sending me information on an exact or approximately number of Albanians living in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Many thanks in advance!

Awaits to hear from you!

best regards,

..... .....

answer:

Drear Mr. .....,

first of all I would like to express our sincere thankfulness for your kind e-mail. Having in mind your question which you sent us a few days ago, I would like to inform that we got data regarding how many Albanians are living in Bosnia and Herzegovina, from one of representatives of Albanian population in BH. According to the data in Bosnia and Herzegovina are leaving between 10 and 12 thousand Albanians (approximately). If you have any questions please let us know. Sincerely,

Adnan Hadrovic, Secon Secretary

No one can tell because the last census took place in 1991. Mr. Hadrovic is only guessing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.133.96 (talk) 00:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The section with the Aromanians needs to be removed. Aromanians are not Albanians and therefore needs to be removed from the page. Imperial78

Since editing is closed off - please fix the pop est for Albanians in the US. It is NOT 300 000. US Census (2006) puts its at 113 661. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gkmx (talk • contribs) 22:08, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. Duja► 09:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the person below who said that you cannot just make up all those numbers and publish them on the internet, as far as the population census goes!!!!!8 million Albanians??? Give me a break!!!!!!!! NOt only that the Greek-Albanian population is overestimated (one million people)- which cannot be proved cause Greece doesn't classify people in that way (which clearly leaves a lot of room for the manipulations), but Kosovo population also!!! Where did you get the number of 2,2 million Albanians in that province?!?!It's certainly not according to UNMIK estimates that put the entire population of Kosovo to about 2 million (out of which 1,7 million are Albanians)!!!!!!!I personally see the number of 6,5 million Albanians quite reasonable (that's the number that Wikipedia was using until just a while ago)! You cannot pretend that ALbanians are the largest ethnic group in the Balkans, cause that simply isn't true! 3,5 million in Albania + 1,7 million in Kosovo + 0,5 million in Macedonia= 5,7 million + approximately 1 million worldwide, out of which one half in Greece. Those are the official data that you can check anywhere. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.106.169.155 (talk • contribs) 10:18, 23 February 2006.

Hello to everyone. I would like to write some remarks and figures about number of Albanians in the Balkans and the World. First figure; Albanians in Germany 10.500. This figure is quite incorrect because the number of Albanians in Germany is way larger than it appears on the sample. You can check german offically data about numbers of Former Yugoslavia (2), the number there is 381.563 the largest ethnicity among them are Albanians, Serbia Montenegro (3),the number there is 125.765 even from them there are quite big number of Albanians due to the fact that UNMIK Travel Documents issued to K.Albanians are considered as citizens of Serbia and Montenegro. I saw a comment posted in wikipedia where somebody wrote it that there are 1.700.000 million Albanians in Kosovo, because total population of Kosovo numbers 2.000.000 million. This records are old 25 years, because last time population in Kosovo was registered was in 1981, since then there was no official records. Kosovo has the highest growth of population in Europe.Kosovo Government is going to register the Kosovo population next year, so far, they had some tests about registration. According to them Kosovo population numbers 2.550.000, over 91% of them albanians. If I may give you just one interesting figure about Albanians in USA. In 1981 city with largest number of Albanians in the world was Boston, so you can just search for numbers of Albanians in capitol Tirana in year 1981 and you can just compare the number given in USA and the number of Albanians in Boston, and hopefully you can draw a fair and correct conclusion. Regarding Switzerland, number of Kosovar Albanians alone is over 220.000. Switzerland Foreign Minister said: "Kosovar Albanians number in Switzerland is equal to 10 % of Kosovo population".

Unprotected. No talk page comments at all in nearly a week. --Tony Sidaway 01:49, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there most be far more than 10500 albanians in germany.Its impossible for only 10500 albanians to make so much criminality.Maybe the 10500 german count is the albanians sitting in jail there?

Woohookitty restored protection, but has since said that he's bowing out of the page protection business for now. I've applied on WP:RFPP for unprotection again. --Tony Sidaway 12:40, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI, religious harmony in Albania is not as much of an issue as you might think. For the most part, Albanians tend to identify themselves mostly based on their ethnicity (with religion playing a distant second in their identity). As a result of Enver Hoxha's rule in Albania, religion was stifled. Most Albanians who have emerged from under Communism have no real affiliation with organized religion. Some have re-discovered religion, however, any hostilities between Albanians are probably personal in nature and not based on a religious divide.

Thanks,
V.

—This unsigned comment was added by 69.37.0.186 (talk • contribs) 15:32, 16 March 2006.

I think one should make a clear distinction between the Albanians in Kosovo and those in Presheva valley. Not instead include them under SCG Federation. Kosovo has its own population census. Thank you, Ilir pz 22:54, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense, if the have the figures broken down to include them separately. On a more practical side though, it makes the infobox really really long. The Albanian population in S&M is already analyzed in the "Population" section. Until S&M actually break up (pending), they are still one state and should be treated as such. Not to mention that I have a feeling that each state of the USA has its own censi as well. You haven't broken those figures up yet. --NikX 00:15, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to edit the page, please make sure you do not remove relevant information. Asterion 01:24, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pjetër, please explain what specific info is corrupt, so we can fix it. Thanks. --Khoikhoi 01:27, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pjetër, please relaise you are about to go over 3RR. I assume you are not happy with Kosovo being listed as part of Serbia and Montenegro? Well, I am afraid that this is out of discussion at least till the Geneva talks end. As for UN Security Council Resolution S/RES/1244(1999) of 2 June 1999 (S/1999/649, annex 2 to this resolution), The UN reafirms the commitment of all Member States to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the other States of the region. Hence, Kosovo is still formally a province of Serbia and any mention should acknowledge this. Regards, Asterion 01:52, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

some people are determined to vandalize every page that has SOMETHING to do with Albanians. Well, I am more determined to protect them. This IS the relevant information, the current version. As long as Kosova's status is not resolved, the statistics and figures should refer to it as an entity, and not indirectly through any other neighbouring country, and claiming that it is a part of it. It is an entity under UN administration. Talks are taking place in Vienna, not Geneva. Kosova has its constitutional framework, which defines it as an compact entity, and it has its democratically elected government and parliament. Please refer to rather updated sources [9], the statement which determines what is about to happen with Kosva. So there is no return of Kosovo to the pre-1999 situation, no partition of Kosovo, and no union of Kosovo with any or part of another country. Live with it, and stop your nationalist-revert-war and vandalization of wiki pages with Albanian content. That is not wikipedia like. Ilir pz 10:19, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lazy reverts are not allowed as they're immensely unconstructive and disruptive. If you want Kosovo listed separately, there is justification for doing to and can be done - just do it properly, not by eliminating other people's work in the process. While the article should make clear that Kosovo is still part of S&M, the Kosovo population should be listed separately. However, Montenegro, should not (at least not in the infobox - it is already mentioned in the population section and the figures are fully analyzed there). --NikX 10:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not about saying whether Kosovo is a part of any country or not. Your reverts seem to be the "lazy" type, of copy pasting. This article should list Kosovo as separate, and say that it is a disputed region under UN administration. This way you would not fuel the revert war that is going on, unfortunately, in the rest of pages that have to do with Albanians. Some people are just determined (and I could freely guess, that even paid, due to their determination) to change content of any page that has something to do with Albanians. That is sad to see. I will remove any label here that predicts the status of Kosova, as this is not the place to do that. Thank you, Ilir pz 10:34, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No one knows about what will happen, this is not the article to discuss Kosovo. I'm merely suggesting two sets of figured Kosovo and the rest of S&M in the infobox. S&M can then be analysed separately in the population section and that is what is already being done. As much as you don't like it, Kosovo is part of S&M today, so the article cannot be misleading. No one knows what will happen tomorrow and you are welcome to include a footnote to reflect that. However, lengthy explanations of the UN administration do not belong in the infobox and certainly do not belong in the first paragraph. --NikX 10:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now it is fine. It is not mentioning the status or anything, just talking population-wise. Let other pages discuss what part is of what part, ok? great! See? we can reach consensus. Ilir pz 10:53, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK - I have listed Serbia and Montenegro subcategorized into Kosovo, Central Serbia and Montenegro. I have also specified that Kosovo is a UN administrated territory - happy? --NikX 10:53, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, not happy, because you again predict its status, by listing it as a part of SCG. I do NOT agree with it here. It is not a place to talk about the status. Call your reason, please!!!Ilir pz 11:05, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not predicting the status; there's no point in predicting the status. Kosovo is now part of Serbia and Montenegro - that's the reality. You are presenting it as if it's independent when clearly it's not. We can list it separately, but only if we make clear that it is currently part of S&M. According to my version, Kosovo is a UN administrated territory in Serbia and Montenegro - the future is unknown. What is inaccurate? --NikX 11:10, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

and who are you to say what can "only" be acceptable for the article? it surprises me that you even reply to people in "miupafshim". Is that a way to mislead who you really are or what? I am not stating anywhere that Kosova is independent, it will be, soon, but I did not say that in the article. Instead I thought we agreed to have Kosova be represented separately, and suddenly your nationalistic pulse jumped up and you reverted it backing sending me threats what can "only" be acceptable for you. You DO NOT OWN the article, buddy. Take care, Ilir pz 20:01, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry guys, but Mother Teresa cannot be in the infobox. Her image is a fair use only image and cannot be used this way. I don't know why you're objecting; Skanderbeg is Albania's national hero, he certainly belongs in the infobox. I chose the people in the image very carefully (there aren't that many public domain images of really well known Albanians) and I think it's OK. You're welcome to come up with another proposal if you want, just don't like this, just please, don't revert to the last time you edited (I'm talking about User:Pjetër Bogdani). The old image has been deleted as a copyvio. --NikX 10:26, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have you ever wondered what her real name is? let me tell you it is Gonxhe Bojaxhiu. It is a pure Albanian first name and last name. What is wrong with having her in the infobox? of course she belongs there. Ilir pz 10:27, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Using her image is a copyright violation - that is why it was removed!!! Only PD images are allowed in the infobox. If you find a PD image of her, we can use that. --NikX 10:32, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I propose including a text on the Ghegs and the Tosks. How about this one:

There are two major dialect groups, the Ghegs, to the north of the Shkumbin River, and the Tosks, to the south. Kosovar Albanians are Ghegs. The Ghegs, who make up two-thirds of Albanians, are less intermarried with non-Albanians than the Tosks, who throughout history were more often subjected to foreign rule and other foreign influences. In the past, the Ghegs were organized in clans and the Tosks in a semifeudal society. Before World War II the Ghegs dominated Albanian politics, but after the war many Tosks came to power because the new Communist government drew most of its support from Tosks.

During Enver Hoxha’s regime in Albania, the cultural and economic differences between the Ghegs and the Tosks were suppressed. However, Tosk became the official standard dialect under the Communists (1972) and remains so today.

Osli73 08:13, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if this edit [10] by Ilir pz with the comment "(stating real facts, no such state as Serbia and Montenegro exists.)" isn't a bit premature. __meco 10:25, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

why premature? haven't you heard that Montenegro became independent? ilir_pz 13:03, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, no. I have heard there was a referendum in Montenegro, which obviously is a very important element in a secession process, but which hardly could be identified with de facto independence. I could be mistaken as I haven't followed this event very closely. __meco 09:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have some doubts with the images selected 1) the 4 individuals selected are all long dead. At least a living Albanian should be taken, for example Ismail Kadare, one of the greatest Balcanic writers. An image of him should be searched, if possible to take the place of Clement XI, who never put his foot in Albania nor knew the language. Being a distant descendent of an Albanian who settled hiself two centuries earlier in Italy hardly seems enough.--Aldux 16:04, 21 July 2006 (UTC) all ballakan is ALBANIA but someone stole it and gave to us the litle ALbania... this is not fair may god help us and give our land......[reply]

Is it 65 thousand (as said in ethnologue web site) or 5 million as in a BBC news? Both figures are from the article. BBC doesnt give a source for its 5 million estimation, and I doubt if it could be true. Of course, it depends on how you count. I have an Albanian grand-grand mother. None in the family speaks a word of Albanian. Maybe I am one of the 5 million? Filanca 14:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If your father Albanian, you are Albanian too...Ottoman parliamentary have 27 Albanian parlimentarian at 1909. %24 of all 120 parliamentarian.Just this figure show us Turkey have got more Albanian from 65.000...

Ehmm, maybe you've forgot that then Kosovo and Albania were still part of the the Ottoman Empire...--Aldux 16:45, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the remaining of the Nazi occupation in Albania to a more exact date.

Kosovo and METOHIJA are legally part of Serbia. Just like the Serbs saw the end of Nazi occupation, they will see the end of Shiptars' terrorist rule in Kosovo and Metohija. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.133.96 (talk) 00:23, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could the (presumably Serbian) users trying to amalgamate the entry for Kosovo into that for Serbia please explain why. Yes, Kosovo is legally a province of Serbia however is it not within the control of the Serbian government for the time being, and it carries out its own census. The Albanian population in Kosovo is a very significant factor for the region's future, and most people checking the infobox will most likely be wanting to check that. Listing "Kosovo" next to "Serbia (excluding Kosovo)" does not imply that Kosovo is not part of Serbia. All it does is imply that the region requires special treatment, which it does. //Dirak 00:49, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look Serbia is one country, therefore no need to separate data in both cases. --212.200.200.197 21:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is need. Is Russia not one country? Moscow has more control over Chechnya than Belgrade does over Kosovo, yet see Chechen people. //Dirak 13:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Medule, get your butt over here and explain what you're doing NOW ;-) //Dirak 13:24, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Province of Kosovo has not had a census since the Socialist Yugoslavia broke up. When Milosevic's Yugoslavia tried to have a census most of the Albanian population boycoted. So the only information that is available is from the Socialist Yugoslavia. They are all estimates. When Kosovo becomes, if it becomes, an independent state then it can be put under Kosovo. For now the population should be counted as being part of the Republic of Serbia. Would the Republic of Albania approve if the Southern Part of its state was called Epirus and the Greek population that lives there were put under Epirus instead of Albania? (Honesty 05:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC))

Though Yugoslavia was not "Milosevic's" in 1991. He was president of Serbia at the time -- Phildav76 00:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't seem as if he is Albanian, yet his picture is in the Albanian collage. Please read his article for more information. Would someone mind changing the photo? Homagetocatalonia 20:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done!  Best wishes, David Kernow (talk) 05:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you add Ismail Kadare to the three now in the collage, so to reach again four persons and add a man of culture to all these politicians?--Aldux 15:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done!  More best wishes, David (talk) 17:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The 2003 census of Serbia (minus Kosovo) counted 61,647 Albanians. The Kosovo government estimated that the total Kosovo population ranges from 1.9 to 2.2 million of which 88% is Albanian or some where between 1,672,000 & 1,936,000. Taking the mid point of that 1,804,000 and adding a rounded figure of 62,000 I came up with a total of 1,866,000. 2,782,000 seemed very much an over estimation. -- Phildav76 20:36, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What a load of crap!

In Kosovo and Metohija there is not more than 200 thousand legally settled ethnic Albanians. All the rest are illegal immigrants from Albania, and why should they be included in the cencus? They will have to leave Serbia's province of Kosovo and Metohija anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.133.96 (talk) 00:26, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The estimate given here for ethnic Albanians living in Albania is exactly the same, down to the person, as the population of the country listed at Albania. This seems unlikely. -- Beland 12:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The percentage of Albanians in Albania is 95%, since the population of Albanian is just a bit over 3,6 million this means there are about 3,4 Albanians in Albania. Also the sources provided for Turkey and Swiktzerland say 60 and 95 thousands respectively. I came here following a trail of vandalism where one user vandalized this and another article by decreasing numbers and I find that there are people here who do exactly the opposite of that. I find the numbers provided for Italy and especially Germany, United Kingdom and Netherlands very doubtful. What is the pleasure in inflating the numbers, I don't get it? --No.13 07:47, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I semi-protected the article (along with Serbs and Croats) because of that anonymous pest. The Turkish number is grossly overestimated, and is sourced from Arnavut.com, organization of Turkish Albanians, and those tend to grossly overestimate. I can't read Turkish, but it probably refers to the number of Turks with Albanian origins—in other words, it would include every Turk with a trace of Albanian blood. Albanian emigration to Turkey was large in history, but I imagine most of those people are integrated and don't even speak Albanian anymore. Similar situation in Bosniaks was resolved by including actual census data and adding a note about past emigration and large estimates. Do you have a census source? I see that Joshua Project estimates the number at 66,000, but I doubt they're a WP:RS either. Duja► 09:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The outseider term Albanians is meaníng samthing else, als Shqipetare. Beacose of this is more importen to explean the term Shqipetar.

I think this information is wrong...

Also I do not think there is more than 8 million albanians in the world, the 13 seems inflated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.150.77.3 (talk) 03:37, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i think the numbers are overinflated. for example in Hellas according to the census there are 438.036 albanians.part of them are greeks of northern ipiros who came to hellas during the last 20 years. an example is Dimas the 3times olympic winner.there are more examples of popular pesons indicating my view.Such as tzelilis, maniani, mitrou,lika.i gave examples of sport champions because they are known to most people. the majority of albanians in Hellas came after the communist regime collapsed.If you compare the numbers with the those before19991 you will find that there were only a few hundreds albanians in Hellas. the mysterious thing is that with hundreds of thousands emigrating for italy, hellas and other countries the population of albania did not show any decrease. i think i am going to burn my phd.these people seems to know other mathematics than the standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.251.255.231 (talk) 16:51, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed from the article:
|pop5 = 500,036
|ref5 = <sup>[1][2][3]</sup>

References 1 & 2 say absolutely nothing on the issue of Albanians in Greece. The third, apparently reliable, does indeed say (top of page 6) that "Consequently, the number of documented Albanian immigrants in Greece has rapidly increased to four hundred thousand in 2003, compared to ten thousand in 1997." So, there's a catch: all of those are a recent emigration, thus the figure should be subtracted from the Albanians in Albania. I wonder where the creative editors found 500,036? By adding the Barjarba's 500,000 to the previous 36? Duja► 09:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greece missing from table of Albanians

The main body of text refers to 445,000 to 600,000 refugees but Greece is not shown at all in the table of populations on the right top of page. The table of countries is about 1 million short of total shown. Tiddy 03:25, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The reason is right above. The problem is that it's very arguable if they're permanent residents in Greece; it's all recent 10 years immigration. In any way, they shouldn't be counted twice. Duja► 07:15, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(((((your information are wrong))stop lying about the albanians,in swiss alone we are over 300,000)(in U.S.A we are 1,500,000 you cant see that in the albanian gospel resources)(in germany we are 50,000 thousand albanians from macedonia,300.000 from kosovo,serbien and 20 to 40,000 from albania,make to 380,000-400,000 thousand)(in italy were spoken an old dialect of the albanian by 800,000 thousand the tosc dialect,you can se in the albanian-american civic league)(in grecce we are 650,000 emigrated albanians,and the chameria,Arvanitas,to 2,000,000 millions)(in mazedonia 750,000)(Kosvo 1,900,000 To 2,100,000)(and turkye we are 3,000,000 millions,u can se that on the arnavut.com the albanian turkisch site)(albania 3,400,000)(great brittain 300,000)(the rest of eropa 1 million,france,belgi,spain,sweden,e.t.c...)—Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.218.217.52 (talk) 08:21, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the albanian population is closer to 8 million and most live in the Balkans and Europe and in kosovo there is maybe 1,500,000 and in Albania there is 3,600,000 and in other places yes but turkey there is no way there is 5 million albanians these albanians like to make up numbers to make them look like there is a 100 million of them but from what i heard in kosovo they would go town to town to vote twice so there is not even 1,500,000 albanians in kosovo are any where like Macedonia are Greece they exaggerate the numbers the real figures are in kosovo is 1 million and Greece maybe 400,000 and Macedonia closer to 200,000... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Northamerica (talk • contribs) 21:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Albanians People 15 To 20 millions, 9millions in Balkan,the rest around the world. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.218.217.52 (talk) 10:36, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

,,,,,,,,,,, you are liars about albanians,If you already liaer dan not look after or write scheitt not purely what we albaner concerns,We albanians are a proud breed scattered all over the world with other visums,passport, we count as italians, serbs, greccs, macedonians, montenegrins because we with their visums live.we live with theyr passports than we are serbs,greccs,no my friend we are,Albanians.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.218.217.52 (talk) 10:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DAMN PEEPS I WANT PICTURES IN THE INFOBOX! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.162.42.133 (talk) 17:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Without getting into the whole Illyrian debate again, I cannot see why the ancient Illyrian religion is included here. Needless to say, the Albanian-Illyrian link has more evidence against it than for it, yet the authors of the article include the section on Illyrian religion as if it is a matter of fact that Albanians are descended from Illyrians. Hxseek 05:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

there is only around 8 million albanians stop vandilizing the truth you albanians think there is 100 millin of you but reality there is 7 million+ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Big cok (talk • contribs) 19:39, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

27 Million Albanians......and now shut up —Preceding unsigned comment added by Albanco (talk • contribs) 15:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Typical Albanian propaganda, always claiming this and that... Albanians number app. 7 million, depending on which figures one uses. Now get over it! Really quite sad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.78.218.206 (talk) 14:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dont delete again

Here are some quotes from famous Albanian historians;

Quote: "(Dr Kaplan Resuli-Albanologist, academic and Albanian historian):

When the Albanians arrive on the Balkan and today's Albania, there is nothing else they can do except to take those toponyms. A large part of Albania is flooded with Serbian toponyms. Just as an example, I wish to mention the towns of Pogradec, Kor?a (Korcha), (Chorovoda), Berat, Bozigrad, Leskovik, Voskopoja, Kuzova, Kelcira, Bels and others.

Quote: "(Dr Kaplan Resuli-Albanologist, academic and Albanian historian):

After him followed the Albanian scholar Dr. Adrian Qosi who in the middle of Tirana openly opposed the hypothesis about the Illyrian origin of the Albanians. With me agreed, via the printed media, several other younger scholars of whom I would especially mention Fatos Lubonja, Prof. Adrian Vebiu and others." Quote: About the Albanians, Wilkes writes "NOT MUCH RELIANCE SHOULD PERHAPS BE PLACED ON ATTEMPTS TO IDENTIFY AN ILLYRIAN ANTHROPOLOGICAL TYPE AS SHORT AND DARK SKINNED SIMMILAR TO MODERN ALBANIANS."

Wilkes was proven CORRECT by science when the Human Genome Project's Y-chromosome study of European populations, confirmed that the vast majority of contemporary Albanians do not share an Illyrian or any Indo-European lineage. Quote: That's the way it is with our culture, which is mythomaniac, national-communist, romantic, self-glorifying. You can't say anything objective without people getting angry. The Albanians are a people who still dream. That is what they are like in their conversations, their literature...In light of Hoxha and 'pyramid schemes, Albanians are a people who still dream. That's just the way they are..." Fatos Lubojia - Albanian historian Quote: Albanian scholar Dr. Adrian Qosi writes: I can say that today appear a group of new Albanian scholars who do not agree with the false myths (About Illyrian & Epirote descent) and courageously accept the scientific truth that they are not whatsoever connected to these ancient peoples. I am proud that I lead this group and that they took up from me the necessary scholarly courage."

Quote: Ardian Vebiu Famous Albanian historian writes:

My personal opinion is that the issue of Albanians descending or not from Illyrians doesn't deserve the interest it has traditionally aroused. There is absolutely NO Illyrian cultural legacy among Albanians today. In a certain sense, Illyrians (with their less fortunate fellows, the Pelasgians) are a pure creation of Albanian romanticismMegistias (talk) 20:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

send me something like a pn and i show you what for nonsense this is! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Albanco (talk • contribs) 18:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The articles on Albania and illyrians related history should all mention that names were constructed and added. They were added during the communist era and thats why they are unacceptable by historians.

On the Albanian Claim that they have Illyrian names today

ISBN 960-210-279-9 Miranda Vickers, The Albanians Chapter 9. "Albania Isolates itself" page 196 it is stated

From time to time the state gave out lists with pagan ,supposed Illyrian or newly constructed names that would be proper for the new generation of revolutionaries.(see also Also Logoreci "the Albanians" page 157.Megistias (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Albanians Descendants of the Illyrians

Albanians Descendants of the Illyrians

1---the earliest attempt to link the modern Albanians to the ancient Illyrians was made in 1774 by the Swedish historian Hans Erich Thunman in his book Untersuchungen ueber die Geschichte der Oestlichen Europaischen Voelker (Research on the History of Eastern European Peoples). Using Roman and Byzantine historical sources as well as linguistic and onomastic evidence, Thunman was able to conclude that the Albanians were the autochthon descendants of the ancient Illyrian populations who were never Romanized like the Daco-Thracian populations, forefathers of the Romanians.

2---Austrian linguist, Johannes Georges von Hahn further supported the theory of the Illyrian origin of Albanians in his work Albanesische Studien (Albanian Studies) in 1854. In the course of time many other historians, archeologists, and linguists have provided further arguments supporting the theory that the Albanians and their language are modern day descendants of the Illyrians.

3---Albanians live in the territories once inhabited historical sources pointing to the movement become settlers of these territories.There are no historical sources pointing to the movement of Albanians from elsewhere to become settlers of these territories

4---Components of Illyrian linguistic elements such as names of objects, tribes, names of people etc known can be found in the Albanian language.

5---One of the latest attempts in this ongoing effort to establish a link between these civilizations is a book entitled Ancient Illyria recently published in London.It is a study of unpublished documents and includes the book Illyrian Letters, written by the renowned archeologist Sir Arthur Evans. This work sheds light on the society and the culture of these predecessors of Albanians.

6---The relationships of Albanian with ancient Greek and Latin testify that Albanian was formed and developed alongside these two languages along the shores of the Adriatic and the Ionian Seas.<sup>[1]</sup>

7---Even according to the writers of ancient Greece, Illyrians and Epirotes did not differ from each other in any way. they lived and were like the modern Albanians, without any difference;Toskeri is the southern part of Albania. Its northern counterpart is known as Gegeri. they spoke the language which we speak today Ibid p. 11

In antiquity, Herodotus wrote that, Epirus is inhabited by non-Greek peoples who speak a barbarian language<sup>[2]</sup> Indeed it was this non-Greek language which was later going to be one of the distinguishing elements setting the Albanians apart from other nationalities of the Balkan Peninsula.--Taulant23 05:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They were the most ancient and Greek of all Greeks NorthwestGreeksThey were the there since 2000 bc with the othwer Greeks 1000 years before Illyrians came in.Use new sources.prehistoric lingual GreeceMargalit Finkelberg(Greeks and Pre-Greeks, Gambridge, edition 2007). Prehistoric Greece 2000 BC ISBN-13: 9780521852166 | ISBN-10: 0521852161) Megistias 12:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hasn't Albanians related Groups? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.72.125.52 (talk) 10:57, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turkalbanians and Turkalbanian language.These were also the names for 500 years because of the Connection of Albanians with islam and their great roles in the Ottoman empire as lords.Source,Sarandos Kargakos-Albanians,Arvanites & Greeks,The studies.ISBN ISBN: 9789600801729Megistias (talk) 15:54, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone should put a map of modern Albania.The map with the Roman provinces is irrelevant.The only relevant map of illyrians is this.Though no ancient map should be here since no illyrian albanian connection has been established.It is redundant.Megistias (talk) 01:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Epirotes; old term widely used during the Middle Ages by local and foreign authors".This belongs in the misnaming section as epirotes were Ancient Greeks.NW Greeks.Megistias (talk) 01:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In Switzerland live about 200'000 ethnic albanians!

Check out the links:

http://dasmagazin.ch/index.php/ich-bin-jung-ich-bin-erfolgreich-ich-bin-albaner/

http://www.freiheits-partei.ch/?section=news&cmd=details&newsid=18

http://www.sncweb.ch/pressemitteilung/mai-04/04/kt/11.05.04/albaniche%20kulturwoche.htm

http://www.tagblatt.ch/index.php?artikelxml=1479326

http://www.blick.ch/news/ausland/wird-kosovo-der-erste-islamische-eu-staat-83761

For understanding you have to speak german. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.202.1.86 (talk) 13:12, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could anybody sort the lines of this table by nombre of population ? i.e. :

• Albania 3,500,000
• Kosovo 1,800,000
• Rep. Macedonia 509,083 [5][6]
• Greece 443,550 (2001) [7]
• Italy 375,947 [9]
• United Kingdom 200,000
• United States 114,000
• Netherlands 105,706
• .../...
• Russia 1,200

~~Mario, the 11 April 2008 at 0 h 13~~

I'm removing all of the unreferenced population figures per Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information, as discussed at User talk:Ceoil. I've preserved the relevant part of the infobox here in case anyone can find references. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Albanians

Total population
Approximately 8 million
Regions with significant populations
Albania	3,500,000[3]
Kosovo	1,800,000 (est.)[4][5][6]
Rep. Macedonia	509,083[7][8]
Greece	481,663 (2006)[9]
Montenegro	31,163 (2007)[10]
Italy	375,947[11]
United States	114,000[12]
Canada	22,395[13]
Sweden	35,000[14][15]
United Kingdom	200,000
France	20,000
Switzerland	95,000[16]
Germany	100,000[17]
Netherlands	105,706
Russia	1,200
Slovenia	6,200[18]
Croatia	15,082[19]
Romania	10,000
Norway	7,000
Belgium	5,000
Australia	11,815[20]
Austria	20,000
South Africa	2,000
Egypt	5,000
Bosnia/Herz.	15,000
Luxembourg	4,802
Ukraine	3,300
Finland	5,000
Turkey	65,000[21][22]
Serbia	61,647[23]

While I'm not doubting in any way their acting careers,I'm not sure that the Belushi bros and Eliza Dushku fit into that category.Amenifus (talk) 09:43, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what the hell is that?

must change..please... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.16.211.13 (talk) 23:35, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've put back figures for Kosovo. Kosovo being an autonomous country is definitely POV, but the opposite is POV as well. Given that we must choose between two POV's, I'd say we go with the UN's POV because it is more widely supported. (The UN being larger than Servia and Russia)

From a different perspective: Even though the independent status of Kosovo is disputed - the figures can still be relevant. --Koert van der Veer (talk) 09:01, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The source doesn't say 900,000, it says 481,000. It's protected and I can't change it. --Apotetios (talk) 00:22, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone deleted the '5,000,000' upper limit figure for Turkey because they said it was 'absurd'...when clearly the BBC reference puts it at 5 million. The number is even used in the article, "According to a Albanian-Turkish website http://www.arnavut.com/turkiyede.php it estimates that there is around 5 million Albanians or Albanian nationals living in Turkey today." Its interesting how the numbers can vary so wildly...I dont know if this changes the total number of Albanians figure or not.

Im not Albanian or Turkish so I wouldnt know if the BBC figure is accurate-I have no reason to believe it's 'absurd'...I was thinking the 65,000 number in Turkey was unusually low, considering the warm relations and cultural and ethnic ties between the the two Muslim countries...I bet the Albanian nation will be half Turk by the next century since they love eachother so much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.121.247.116 (talk) 07:26, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I figured out why there was such a HUGE discrepency between the BBC figure and the Ethnologue figure--its because the Ethnologue figure only includes EUROPEAN Turkey. I have now thrown out the Ethnologue figure since it doesnt represent an accurate figure regarding Albanians in Turkey as A WHOLE in favor of the BBC figure of 5 million. Ive heard that figure other in other sources and it seems accurate. I have made the appropriate changes and rearranged the data to display the population figures in descending order.

...Also, the new more accurate figure no doubt changes the total Albanians figure...I will leave it to others maybe more knowledgeable to edit that figure. It seems like it would be a pretty straight forward edit, but I dont know what went into the calculation of the original 'approximately 8 million figure.'

134.121.247.116 (talk) 03:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone explain where the alleged terms "Arbanios, Arbanitai" appear in Polybius. and then hasn't anyone noticed that Polybius' Arbona is too far North to have any relation to Ptolemy's Albanopolis. The text (2.11) is refering to the islands of the Adriatic (the blockading of Issa) hence the reference to Rhizon (today known as Rizan which is situated in Montenegro) and Pharon (the Adriatic island known as Hvar).. one wouldn't go too far to suggest that his (Polybius') Arbona is the island of Arba mentioned by Pliny (John Bostock and Henry Thomas Riley in their notes suggest that Arba and Crexa were ancient Cherso)

hasn't anyone noticed that the Olbonenses in Pliny (3.21) are too far North to have any connection to the later Albanopolis since he mentions that they belong to the jurisdiction of Scardona, (today Skradin located in Croatia)?

So where's the connection to Albanians, where were they originally settled ??

• • sorry bout the original post that appears in the top, if someone can, please do modify it since I don't know how. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.202.131.157 (talk) 10:35, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to the UN and the majority of the countries of the world, Kosovo is still a province of Serbia. Wikipedia does not represent views of the Albanian or United States government, but rather an unbiased POV. Wikipedia does not represent views of a minority of countries, but the overall view on a situation. I suggest the following:

"About half of Albanians live in Albania, with other large groups residing in Serbia (mostly the self-declared independent region of Kosovo, recognized by a minority of UN states), Montenegro and the Republic of Macedonia."

and in the infobox, Kosovo can be listed right below Serbia, and written like "Kosovo only:", while the Serbia number remain Kosovo + Central Serbia + Vojvodina.

Also, refrain from Albanian nationalist comments such as "KOSOVA IS ALBANIA, ACCEPT THE REALITY, YOU SERB NATIONALIST".. mainly because I'm not a Serb ;) --GOD OF JUSTICE 18:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you, this is not the page for WP:POV sentences, but there is a difference. We have a WP:NPOV article in Kosovo which states that Kosovo is a de facto independent, partially recognised state, which Serbia claims that is part of it. WP:NPOV is not UN`s position, but a consensus between users. So, for wiki Kosovo is not an independent state, neither a part of Serbia, but a disputed territory. In this case, if we use "Kosovo only" under Serbia, it means that Kosovo is still part of Serbia, which for wiki consensus is not true. If we use Republic of Kosovo means that Kosovo is an independet state, which for wiki consensus is not true. So, we should use just Kosovo neither under Serbia, nor as "Republic of", which does not state neither of states position. When we use Kosovo, every reader may click on it and see that for consensus, Kosovo is neither independent, nor part of Serbia, but an ambigous position. I propose that in the infobox to add after Kosovo an reference, which would explain that Kosovo is is a de facto independent, partially recognised state, which Serbia claims that is part of it.balkanian (talk) 12:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You use the flag of the Republic of Kosovo. Also, nobody writes "Republic of" for any of the other countries. I'm sorry, but your logic is seriously flawed and your views are very pro-Albanian. --GOD OF JUSTICE 19:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your views are nationalistic and not only pro-Serbian but also pro-Milosveic, Mladic and Seselj, all those being war criminals. --NOAH (talk) 13:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha. Such nonsense. I'm not even a Serb. I could make absurd accusations that your views are pro-WWII Croatia, pro-WWII Albania (you know, when they annexed Kosovo to Albania), pro-Hitler and pro-Nazi, but I won't. Besides, what the hell does Mladic have to do with Kosovo? :P --GOD OF JUSTICE 16:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are not Serbian? Stop kidding...You can sell this kind of lies to some teenagers but not me. You nick is the title of the Serbian anthem and all your edits smell Serbian revisionism. I hope you don't get offended by this.--NOAH (talk) 15:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am Serbian in the sense that I'm a citizen of Serbia and have lived in Belgrade for most of my life, but I'm not of Serbian ethnicity. I didn't know edits could smell. --GOD OF JUSTICE 19:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He was being sarcastic, smart one, on the first note. On the second note, you guys are ALL ridiculous. Can you try to be neutral for God's sake?! None of this Serbian and Albanian nationalistic nonsense, please. Kosovo is de-facto independent, just deal with it. That doesn't necessarily mean it is officially independent until Serbia says otherwise. <-- Example of neutrality, no? And yes, Balkanian/Arditbido or whatever you prefer to be called, just using the term "Kosovo" for Kosovo is probably the most neutral you can get with Kosovo. End of discussion. --Prevalis (talk) 22:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Then of what ethnicity are you then if you claim you aren't Serbian? --Prevalis (talk) 22:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.P.S Oh and people, REFRAIN FROM THE PERSONAL ATTACKS! They are cruel, unnecessary and in some cases, if not all, hurtful. Take this as warning, all of you, because if not, I will report you for uncivil behavior and we all now how mean and nasty Wikipedia can get for those who are uncivil, now don't we? --Prevalis (talk) 22:13, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Montenegro, if you're interested in my ethnicity (which you shouldn't be), it's on my user page. I take offense in you calling me ridiculous and if you do that one more time, I'll report you for personal attacks. Also, you can't tell me to deal with Kosovo being "independent", when it really isn't - not according to the majority of the world. Besides, one has to define Kosovo - would you dare to go to North Mitrovica and yell "Kosova Republika"? I doubt it. Seems to me your lil' use of "de facto" can't really work here. But nice try at making yourself look neutral here. Highly doubt that your opinion on Kosovo can have any merit, when you're currently claiming that Montenegrin is a language, even though probably no non-Montenegrin linguists in the world would agree - but rather claim it's a dialect of Serbian or Serbo-Croatian. But thanks for your attempts, you've pretty much proved why my arguments are valid :-) --GOD OF JUSTICE 03:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think you cant go to northern Mitrovia and yell that? I'll tel you: there is no freedom of speech or rule of law in north Mitrovica, and why is that? because your beloved country can't deal with reality and gets stuck in history, dreaming for a Greater Serbia, but Yougoslavia (or Greater Serbia) belongs to history, get over it, you dont always get what you want, just do the best with what you have, also, Serbia claims kosovo is theirs because of the monasteries ans stuff, well "Manastir", the place where the Albanian alphabet was decided is located in the Republic of Macedonia, get the point? -- CD 10:59, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I never said I speak Montenegrin. You might've gotten that impression for my previous account, which was used in 2007, back when Montenegrin nationalism was still huge. Now, I've given up on all forms of nationalism, I even declare my official language as Serbian because honestly, I've come to the conclusion that the Montenegrin that I, and as many others, called it will not be the official Montenegrin but rather Serbian as it was even before. And mate, you, as well the others, were acting ridiculous, I never meant that you were actually ridiculous. I never said Kosovo was independent, but that doesn't mean it isn't independent, do you follow? And why not, I'd go to Mitrovica and shout "Kosova Republika", and I'd do the same in the middle of Pristina except I'd shout "Kosovo je Srbija!". See, frankly I don't care because I'm not from Kosovo and honestly hate the fact that Serbs and Albanians are fighting over a measly piece of territory that is practically worthless in the economic sense. Religiously speaking, most of it is Serbian by amount of monasteries but these monasteries were defended by Albanians for centuries, so think about that for a second and then you tell me...--Prevalis (talk) 22:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You think it's easy to correct views and actions? Heck, I'm not perfect, but I stick to my views and actions because I think them through. If you don't, that's your problem. If you were a Montenegrin nationalist, and now you decided that it's not who you are, good for you. If you decided that you didn't mean that we were ridiculous when you said "you guys are ALL ridiculous", but really meant that we were acting ridiculous, good for you. That doesn't change history. When you say that "there is no freedom of speech or rule of law in north Mitrovica", think about it first. Or, better yet, explore for yourself. Go to Mitrovica, like I did. Check the destroyed Serbian graveyard in the South Albanian part of town and enjoy the peaceful tranquility of the untouched Muslim graveyard in the North Serbian part. Count the speck of left Serbs living in South Mitrovica and then count the many Albanians living freely in North Mitrovica. Talk about free speach when you do go to Prishtina and yell "Kosovo je Srbija" (I'm very glad you brought that up, thanks for helping my argument :-)). If you hate the fact that this is happening in Kosovo, think about why it's happening. While you're looking at those destroyed houses, churches and monasteries in Kosovo, tell me that you honestly believe that Albanians a hundred years ago, are the same as they are today. I wish the hate wasn't there, but what do you expect when the local Albanian leaders protect people that destroy all that is Serbian, and then there's the Americans who went ahead and promised them independence. Imagine Vladimir Putin promising the Mexicans in Texas independence from the United States. Who funded the KLA? Even world leaders admit to openly supporting terrorists (CIA 1997) and separatists in Kosovo. Why Kosovo isn't independent? It just isn't. Go there and you'll see. It's occupied by NATO. The Albanians didn't get independence. They never will. Kosovo is not economically unimportant, believe me. I won't go into detail, but I sure wish Albanians and Serbs would unite against NATO and really get independence from them. Within Serbia, with wide autonomy, meaning that everyone in Kosovo has the freedom they deserve. Serbia is democratic now, and aspiring to join the EU. Protect international law, protect Kosovo. --GOD OF JUSTICE 01:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"During the first and second world wars Albanians were discriminated very harshly by its neighbors modern day Serbia and Greece for reasons still debatable today. Both caused ethnic cleaning among Albanian lands in north east Kosovo and northwest Greece. There was around 250,000 Albanians that were numbered leaving the Greek port of Thessalonika between 1912-1914."

The above is included in this article under the subsection entitled "Turkey". These sentences have nothing to do with Albanians living in Turkey. They are also unsourced, and seemingly biased. For that reason, I will be removing them from that section. If someone feels that they belong there, or elsewhere in the article, please bring it up here first, and be prepared with reliable references. Xreebnorq (talk) 03:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This page was recently moved from Albanians to Albanian people, and Albanians was turned into a disambiguation page. Its only function is to distinguish between the ethnic sense of Albanians (independent of citizenship) and the political sense of "citizen of Albania". I believe this disambiguation is unneeded and counter-intuitive, and I suggest we move the page back where it was, as was done with Germans and other similar pages. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:00, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, actually, there is no change between the Albanian People and Albanian Diaspora, which are the tow articles in the disambituation page, the only difference is that "you know, albanians are refered even the minorities in Albania". This can be added as a note in the top of the page.Balkanian`s word (talk) 22:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, move back to Albanians. If someone wants to they can place a disambig at the top of the pages: for other uses see Albanian (disambiguation) etc. The main use by far is Albanians and that is Wiki standard and practice. A from L.A. (talk) 07:40, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move back, definitely -- CD 13:12, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1,800,000 Kosovar Alb. Muslim + 2,200,000 Albania Alb. Muslim + 1,300,000 Turkey Albanian Muslim + 509,083 Maceodnian Albanians are Muslim + 80,000 Serbia/Montenegro Alb. muslim = Predominantly.Dont ever forget only 1 000 000 Greek and Italian Albanians are Christian.Secularism isn't ateism.And Albania is a poli-religious a country %65 Muslim % 30 Christian and others Ethnologue_Philologue <sup>ileti</sup> —Preceding undated comment was added at 10:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC).[reply]

As you all see there is a edit war about calling Kosovo and Metohia an independent state between me and member Angelo De La Paz. It is not allowed in any article to use Albanian POV and refer to Kosovo as a republic and independent country, why is it allowed it this article? This article insults me and every single Serbian, and promotes nothing but Albanian POV, instead of NPOV. To restore NPOV in this article you cannot refer to Kosovo as a country and state independent from Serbia as it is an insult and violates rules of Wikipedia. I'm waiting for your responses since I'm not allowed to edit any further. If nothing changes soon I will restore NPOV no matter what. --Forsena (talk) 22:19, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not reverting further at this point is a good idea, as is discussing things here (hint hint). If you break WP:3RR you'll get blocked. Ranting about insults me and every single Serbian etc etc does you no good at all and a great deal of harm, so I advise against it. I suggest you take a look at WP:DR for other idea William M. Connolley (talk) 23:15, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this doesn't change I have the full right to use Republic of Srpska with it's flag in the article Serbs, if someone even tries to revert that I will remove all the idiotic stuff like Republic of Kosovo, from this article. --Forsena (talk) 14:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The main Kosovo article describes it as a disputed region. Gerardw (talk) 01:15, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But the POV editor, vandal, and pro-Albanian extremist Angelo De La Paz is trying to call it a republic, independent from Serbia, to promote Albanian POV in this article and no one does anything about him. Since this is not his first time he vandalizes articles, I will remove all of his POV. --Forsena (talk) 14:37, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is only one unreliable and non-English source that supports the claim (I'm not even sure it supports the claim). This claim is absurd, for many reason, first of all it has no other sources, second I couldn't find any other source to support the claim, third the one source we have is unreliable and it's not even in English, fourth does anyone really believe there are more Albanians in Turkey than in FYROM and Greece together? Another thing is that Albanians are not even a recognized minority group in Turkey, which proves the claim is absurd and pathetic. Also the minority group that is recognized - Arabs has 800,000 population in Turkey, I think it is really impossible there are more Albanians than Arabs in Turkey. I'm waiting for response. --Forsena (talk) 22:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]