Content deleted Content added
2001:4455:364:a800:69ed:98ae:b3b4:fb90 (talk) No edit summary |
Darkknight2149 (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The Onryō claim seems like an assumption and western misunderstanding of the film. But granted, I have only seen ''Ju-on: The Curse 1-2'' and ''Ju-on: The Grudge 1-2'', so maybe there's a retcon I'm not aware of. '''[[User:Darkknight2149|<span style="color:grey;">Dark</span>]][[User talk:Darkknight2149|<span style="color:black;">knight</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Darkknight2149|<span style="color:grey;">2149</span>]]''' 22:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC) |
The Onryō claim seems like an assumption and western misunderstanding of the film. But granted, I have only seen ''Ju-on: The Curse 1-2'' and ''Ju-on: The Grudge 1-2'', so maybe there's a retcon I'm not aware of. '''[[User:Darkknight2149|<span style="color:grey;">Dark</span>]][[User talk:Darkknight2149|<span style="color:black;">knight</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Darkknight2149|<span style="color:grey;">2149</span>]]''' 22:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
::This is why I attempted to redirect. Best thing to do is for a person who is interested on the article to rewrite entirely the page from the draft. The article has was way too many issues, including the sources. [[Special:Contributions/2001:4455:364:A800:69ED:98AE:B3B4:FB90|2001:4455:364:A800:69ED:98AE:B3B4:FB90]] ([[User talk:2001:4455:364:A800:69ED:98AE:B3B4:FB90|talk]]) 06:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC) |
::This is why I attempted to redirect. Best thing to do is for a person who is interested on the article to rewrite entirely the page from the draft. The article has was way too many issues, including the sources. [[Special:Contributions/2001:4455:364:A800:69ED:98AE:B3B4:FB90|2001:4455:364:A800:69ED:98AE:B3B4:FB90]] ([[User talk:2001:4455:364:A800:69ED:98AE:B3B4:FB90|talk]]) 06:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
::: That's not a reason to redirect, per [[WP:NEXIST]], [[WP:ARTN]], and [[WP:PRESERVE]]. Poor quality of a current revision of an article isn't a good reason to delete/redirect. '''[[User:Darkknight2149|<span style="color:grey;">Dark</span>]][[User talk:Darkknight2149|<span style="color:black;">knight</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Darkknight2149|<span style="color:grey;">2149</span>]]''' 07:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::: Additionally, if a poorly-written article needs to be rewritten from scratch, the correct template is <nowiki>{{rewrite}}</nowiki>. <nowiki>{{notability}}</nowiki> has no relation to the current quality of an article and refers specifically to [[WP:Notability]]. '''[[User:Darkknight2149|<span style="color:grey;">Dark</span>]][[User talk:Darkknight2149|<span style="color:black;">knight</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Darkknight2149|<span style="color:grey;">2149</span>]]''' 08:33, 16 February 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:33, 16 February 2022
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Onryō?
Does anyone have a source that Kayako is an Onryō? My understanding from the film (and the opening text) was that Kayako isn't any kind of ghost or spirit, but rather a manifestation of the rage left behind when the Saeki family was killed that acts as a curse. The appearance of Kayako, her son, and (at one point) even her husband are all part of the Ju-on curse.
The Onryō claim seems like an assumption and western misunderstanding of the film. But granted, I have only seen Ju-on: The Curse 1-2 and Ju-on: The Grudge 1-2, so maybe there's a retcon I'm not aware of. Darkknight2149 22:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- This is why I attempted to redirect. Best thing to do is for a person who is interested on the article to rewrite entirely the page from the draft. The article has was way too many issues, including the sources. 2001:4455:364:A800:69ED:98AE:B3B4:FB90 (talk) 06:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- That's not a reason to redirect, per WP:NEXIST, WP:ARTN, and WP:PRESERVE. Poor quality of a current revision of an article isn't a good reason to delete/redirect. Darkknight2149 07:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Additionally, if a poorly-written article needs to be rewritten from scratch, the correct template is {{rewrite}}. {{notability}} has no relation to the current quality of an article and refers specifically to WP:Notability. Darkknight2149 08:33, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- That's not a reason to redirect, per WP:NEXIST, WP:ARTN, and WP:PRESERVE. Poor quality of a current revision of an article isn't a good reason to delete/redirect. Darkknight2149 07:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- This is why I attempted to redirect. Best thing to do is for a person who is interested on the article to rewrite entirely the page from the draft. The article has was way too many issues, including the sources. 2001:4455:364:A800:69ED:98AE:B3B4:FB90 (talk) 06:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)