Criminology and penology
Theory Anomie Biosocial criminology Broken windows Collective efficacy Crime analysis Criminalization Differential association Deviance Expressive function of law Labeling theory Psychopathy Rational choice Risk & actuarial criminology Social control Social disorganization Social learning Strain Subculture Symbolic interactionism Victimology
Types of crime Against Humanity Person State Class Blue-collar White-collar Cold case Perfect Corporate Juvenile International Organized Political Public-order State State-corporate Transnational Victimless War
Methods Comparative Profiling Critical theory Ethnography Uniform Crime Reports Crime mapping Positivist school Qualitative Quantitative BJS NIBRS
Penology Denunciation Deterrence Incapacitation Trial Prison abolition open reform Prisoner Prisoner abuse Prisoners' rights Rehabilitation Recidivism Justice in penology Participatory Restorative Transformative Retributive Solitary confinement
Schools Anarchist Chicago Classical Conflict Critical Environmental Feminist Integrative Italian Marxist Neo-classical Positivist Postmodernist Realism Left Right
Subfields American Anthropological Biosocial criminology Conflict Criminology Critical Culture Cyber Demography Development Environmental Experimental Organizational Political Public Radical criminology
Browse Index Journals Organizations People

Juvenile delinquency refers to criminal acts performed by juveniles. Most legal systems prescribe specific procedures for dealing with juveniles, such as juvenile detention centers.

Nature and causes

A child or adolescent who is capable of being friendly, obedient, and caring -- who would follow the rules and act morally and ethically under normal circumstances -- can be driven to juvenile deliquency if neglected, abandoned or abused{fact}

Definition and specifications

In the United States, a juvenile delinquent is a person who has not yet reached the age of majority, and whose behavior has been labeled delinquent by a court. The specific requirements vary from state to state. In the United States, the federal government enacted legislation to unify the handling of juvenile delinquents, the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Act of 1974.

The act created the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) within the Justice Department to administer grants for juvenile crime-combating programs (currently about only 900,000 dollars a year), gather national statistics on juvenile crime, fund research on youth crime and administer four anticonfinement mandates regarding juvenile custody. Specifically, the act orders:

• Deinstitutionalization: Youths charged with "status" offenses that would not be crimes if committed by adults, such as truancy, running away and being caught with alcohol or tobacco, must be "deinstitutionalized," which in this case really means that, with certain exceptions (e.g., minor in possession of a handgun), status offenders may not be detained by police or confined. Alleged problems with this mandate are that it overrides state and local law,^[1] limits the discretion of law enforcement officers and prevents the authorities' ability to reunify an offender with his family.^[1]

• Segregation: Arrested youths must be strictly segregated from adults in custody. Under this "out of sight and sound" mandate, juveniles cannot be served food by anyone who serves jailed adults nor can a juvenile walk down a corridor past a room where an adult is being interrogated. This requirement forces local authorities to either free juveniles or maintain expensive duplicate facilities and personnel.^[1] Small cities, towns and rural areas are especially hard hit, drastically raising those taxpayers' criminal justice costs. Supporters of the system point to lower sexual assault rates when adults and children are separated.

• Jail and Lockup Removal: As a general rule, youths subject to the original jurisdiction of juvenile courts cannot be held in jails and lockups in which adults may be detained. The act provides for a six-hour exception for identification, processing, interrogation and transfer to juvenile facilities, court or detention pending release to parents. The act also provides an exception of 24 hours for rural areas only.^[1]

• Overrepresentation of minority youths: States must systematically try to reduce confinement of minority youths to the proportion of those groups in the population.

Theoretical Perspectives on Juvenile Delinquency and Crime

Robert Merton

Merton believes that there is a serious relationship between poverty and crime. He feels that there are institutionalized paths to happiness in our society. He believes in a society of equilibrium where goals = means. A society of disequilibrium would be adaptation. Merton's Strain Theory suggests five attributes.

1. Innovation: individuals who accept socially approved goals, but not necessarily the socially approved means.
2. Retreatism: those who reject socially approved goals and the means for acquiring them.
3. Ritualism: those who buy into a system of socially approved means, but lose sight of the goals. Merton believed that drug users are in this category.
4. Conformity: those who conform to the system's means and goals.
5. Rebellion: people who negate socially approved goals and means by creating a new system of acceptable goals and means.

Ongoing debate

One of the most notable causes of juvenile delinquency is fiat, i.e. the declaration that a juvenile is delinquent by the juvenile court system without any trial, and upon finding only probable cause. Many states have laws that presuppose the less harsh treatment of juvenile delinquents than adult counterparts’ treatment. In return, the juvenile surrenders certain constitutional rights, such as a right to trial by jury, the right to cross-examine, and even the right to a speedy trial. Notable writings by reformers such as Jerome G. Miller^[2] show that very few juvenile delinquents actually broke any law. Most were simply rounded up by the police after some event that possibly involved criminal action. They were brought before juvenile court judges who made findings of delinquency, simply because the police action established probable cause.

In 1967, the United States Supreme Court decided the case In re Gault, that established the protection of many, but not all, procedural rights of juveniles in court proceedings, such as the right to counsel and right to refuse self-incrimination.

Delinquency Prevention

Delinquency Prevention is the broad term for all efforts aimed at preventing youth from becoming involved in criminal, or other antisocial, activity. Increasingly, local, state, and federal governments are recognizing the importance of allocating resources for the prevention of delinquency. Because it is often difficult for states to provide the fiscal resources necessary for good prevention, organizations, communities, and governments are working more in collaboration with each other to prevent juvenile delinquency.

With the development of delinquency in youth being influenced by numerous factors, prevention efforts are comprehensive in scope. Prevention services include activities such as substance abuse education and treatment, family counseling, youth mentoring, parenting education, educational support, and youth sheltering.

References

Bibliography

• E. Mulvey, MW Arthur, ND Reppucci, "The prevention and treatment of juvenile delinquency: A review of the research", Clinical Psychology Review, 1993.
• Edward P. Mulvey, Michael W. Arthur, & N. Dickon Reppucci, "Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency: A Review of the Research", The Prevention Researcher, Volume 4, Number 2, 1997, Pages 1-4.
• Regoli, Robert M. and Hewitt, John D. "Delinquency in Society", 6th ed., 2006.
• Siegel, J Larry. "Juvenile Delinquency with Infotrac: theory, practices and law", 2002.
• United Nations, Research Report on Juvenile Delinquency. [1]
• Zigler E, Taussig C, Black K., "Early childhood intervention. A promising preventative for juvenile delinquency", Am Psychol. 1992 Aug;47(8):997-1006.
• Gang Cop: The Words and Ways of Officer Paco Domingo (2004) by Malcolm W.Klein
• The American Street Gang: Its Nature, Prevalence, and Control (1995), by Malcolm W. Klein
• Street Gang Patterns & Policies (2006) by Malcolm Klein and Cheryl Maxson
• American Youth Violence (1998) by Franklin Zimring
• Street Wars: Gangs and the Future of Violence (2004) by Tom Hayden
• Fist, Stick, Knife, Gun 1995() by Geoffrey Canada
• Violence: Reflections on a National Epidemic (1996) by James Gilligan
• Lost Boys: Why Our Sons Turn Violent and How We Can Save Them (1999) by James Gabarino
• Last Chance in Texas: The Redemption of Criminal Youth (2005) by John Hubner
• Breaking Rank: A Top Cop’s Expose of the Dark Side of American Policing (2005) by Norm Stamper

See also

• Teen courts
• Crime
• Status offense
• Youth court
• Hooliganism
• Parenting
• Separatism
• Youth rights
• Revolution
• Youth activism
• Rebellion
• Civic engagement

External links

• Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
• CJCJ.org The Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice
• The Juvenile Justice Role Model Development Program - Florida State University
• Edinburgh Study of Youth Transitions and Crime - major study at Edinburgh Law School
• [2]
• Media takes Juvenile Justice Act 2006 India for a ride in sensationalizing Gurgaon School Shooting
• Media meddles with India's Juvenile Justice Act 2006 in reporting Gurgaon School Shooting
• Juvenile Justice Act 2006 India taken for a ride by media in reporting Gurgaon School Shooting
• Media takes for a ride India's Juvenile Justice Act 2006 in Gurgaon School Shooting News Coverage
• In Gurgaon School Shooting coverage, Media takes for a ride India's Juvenile Justice Act 2006
• In India Juvenile Justice Is At Media's Mercy
• In India Media Takes Juvenile Justice for a Ride
• Juvenile Justice at Media`s Mercy
• Human Rights Nipped in the Bud
• Media Meddles with Juvenile Justice and Human Rights in India
• Human Rights at stake for a Juvenile