Trichome


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 500 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

30 May 2024

16 May 2024

7 May 2024

20 April 2024

19 April 2024

16 April 2024

15 April 2024

10 April 2024

  • curprev 14:3714:37, 10 April 2024Willondon talk contribs 52,972 bytes −3 Undid revision 1218186766 by 76.78.153.30 (talk); the source says 800, re settlement in the Niger Delta (i.e. not re their earliest identification as a separate ethnic group) undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 07:2707:27, 10 April 202476.78.153.30 talk 52,975 bytes +3 →‎History: Ijaw people have existed as a language group separate from other Niger-Congo group for since 8000 BC, during the time when Niger-Congo groups started to spread. It was roughly around the time various Mande groups began forming. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

31 March 2024

30 March 2024

17 March 2024

15 March 2024

3 March 2024

24 February 2024

18 February 2024

  • curprev 20:5020:50, 18 February 2024ZimZalaBim talk contribs 52,975 bytes +2,060 Reverted good faith edits by 152.170.30.104 (talk): Rather than removing sourced material with a lengthy edit summary (that doesn't provide any evidence), please open a discussion of your concern on the Talk page undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
  • curprev 20:4520:45, 18 February 2024152.170.30.104 talk 50,915 bytes −2,060 Blatant anti scientific Afrocentric propaganda claiming that Ijaw people are the original inhabitants of the Nile and Sudan according to some “genetic” and “linguistic” students. This is blatantly false and easily demonstrated as false, because the haplogroups between Egypt and west Africa are totally different, and so are the linguistic families, Ijaw language is a Niger-Congo while Egyptian is afroasiatic; this 2 families have nothing in common. undo Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

15 February 2024

9 February 2024

8 February 2024

6 February 2024

5 February 2024

17 January 2024

13 January 2024

9 January 2024

8 January 2024

6 January 2024

26 December 2023

14 December 2023

11 December 2023

7 December 2023

6 December 2023

26 November 2023

25 November 2023

12 November 2023

11 November 2023

4 November 2023

31 October 2023

24 October 2023

21 October 2023

15 October 2023

12 October 2023

8 October 2023

3 October 2023

30 September 2023

26 September 2023

20 September 2023

13 September 2023

11 September 2023

3 September 2023

31 August 2023

21 August 2023

10 August 2023

2 August 2023

27 July 2023

25 July 2023

23 July 2023

20 July 2023

16 July 2023

14 July 2023

13 July 2023

10 July 2023

9 July 2023

26 June 2023

24 June 2023

23 June 2023

22 June 2023

21 June 2023

20 June 2023

18 June 2023

11 June 2023

9 June 2023

6 June 2023

29 May 2023

28 May 2023

27 May 2023

1 May 2023

13 April 2023

29 March 2023

12 March 2023

25 February 2023

21 February 2023

17 February 2023

10 February 2023

29 December 2022

20 December 2022

18 December 2022

16 December 2022

10 December 2022

9 December 2022

28 November 2022

18 September 2022

10 September 2022

8 September 2022

1 September 2022

25 August 2022

24 August 2022

23 August 2022

19 August 2022

11 August 2022

9 August 2022

8 August 2022

6 August 2022

1 August 2022

30 July 2022

23 July 2022

22 July 2022

15 July 2022

  • curprev 18:1418:14, 15 July 2022Renato42 talk contribs 33,574 bytes 0 @Izonowei, I don't know what your aim is but you need to stop this nonsense. CIA Factbook say 1.8% which translates to just over 4 million so stop this tribalistic games you are playing undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

13 July 2022

11 July 2022

10 July 2022

  • curprev 01:5101:51, 10 July 2022Izonowei talk contribs 33,574 bytes −2 @Renato42 that doesn't make it right. The same CIA fact book says Nigeria's population is 225,082,083 which would make 1.8% of that 4,051,478. Where did you get 5 million from? undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

8 July 2022

  • curprev 00:2600:26, 8 July 2022Renato42 talk contribs 33,576 bytes +2 @Izonowei, stop putting wrong information here. CIA factbook say 1.8%, where are you getting this 5% from? undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

6 July 2022

5 July 2022

23 June 2022

21 June 2022

12 June 2022

27 May 2022

  • curprev 00:5800:58, 27 May 2022BD2412 talk contribsm 33,664 bytes −1,115 Remove nonsense references added by User:Woka Henry, replaced: <ref>{{Cite web |title=Definition of → @ (6), |website=www.dictionary.com |language=en}}</ref> → @ (5), |website=www.merriam-webster.com |language=en}}</ref> → @, removed: undo Tag: AWB

24 May 2022

21 May 2022

20 May 2022

30 April 2022

14 April 2022

12 April 2022

7 April 2022

23 March 2022

14 March 2022

12 March 2022

11 March 2022

10 March 2022

9 March 2022

6 March 2022

5 March 2022

3 March 2022

2 March 2022

28 February 2022

13 February 2022

11 February 2022

10 February 2022

5 February 2022

3 February 2022

1 February 2022

31 January 2022

26 January 2022

25 January 2022

22 January 2022

21 January 2022

20 January 2022

19 January 2022

18 January 2022

15 January 2022

4 January 2022

1 January 2022

30 December 2021

  • curprev 11:2111:21, 30 December 2021KOSƧIO talk contribs 29,761 bytes −590 The "Ancient ORU tribe" is not attested to in anh paper other than the sited website. In any case, it is information irrelevant to the introductory paragraph. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

13 December 2021

12 December 2021

20 November 2021

29 October 2021

26 October 2021

25 October 2021

20 October 2021

15 October 2021

4 October 2021

29 September 2021

27 September 2021

23 September 2021

22 September 2021

19 September 2021

(newest | oldest) View (newer 500 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Leave a Reply