Trichome

Content deleted Content added
Purple Watermelon (talk | contribs)
removed text that's not backed up and is possibly contentious
122.148.218.27 (talk)
→‎Controversy: That would be true if it was controversial, but it is not. It is fact. Nobody has seriously disputed this at any stage.
Line 60: Line 60:


==Controversy==
==Controversy==
Institutions who were unhappy about aspects of the organisation of the [[All-Asian Intervarsity Debating Championships]] established the Asian Universities Debating Championship in 2005 as an alternative to the All-Asians Championship. Since then, many universities in Asia with strong debating traditions – most notably universities from the Philippines and Singapore, including all except one of the institutions who won the All-Asian championships up to 2004 – have chosen not to participate in the All-Asian Intervarsity Championships and have instead entered teams in the Asian Universities Debating Championship.
Institutions who were unhappy about aspects of the organisation of the [[All-Asian Intervarsity Debating Championships]] established the Asian Universities Debating Championship in 2005 as an alternative to the All-Asians Championship. Since then, many universities in Asia with strong debating traditions – most notably universities from the Philippines and Singapore, including all except one of the institutions who won the All-Asian championships up to 2004 – have chosen not to participate in the All-Asian Intervarsity Championships and have instead entered teams in the Asian Universities Debating Championship. Institutions who joined the AUDC cited among their reasons that they had no confidence in the nepotism and corruption of the All-Asians tournament, particularly singling out adjudicators from All-Asians like Praba Ganesan as biased, incompetent cheats.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/allasiandebate/message/1151 |title=Message to Praba |accessdate=2005-06-05 |format=html |work= }}</ref>


While not intended to be a rival tournament, the last two AUDCs happened to coincide with the schedule of the All-Asian Championship, which made it impracticable to attend both tournaments.
While not intended to be a rival tournament, the last two AUDCs happened to coincide with the schedule of the All-Asian Championship, which made it impracticable to attend both tournaments.

Revision as of 07:16, 19 May 2008

The Asian Universities Debating Championship (AUDC) is an annual debating tournament for teams from universities in Asia.

The championship is one of two major annual regional debating tournaments for Asian universities, the other being the All-Asian Intervarsity Debating Championships. The AUDC was first held in 2005 as an alternative tournament to the All-Asian Championships, thus starting a schism in Asian debating. [1]

Past Finalists & Hosts

Year Champions Runners-up Hosts
2007 Ateneo de Manila University (Philippines) National University of Singapore (Singapore) Institut Teknologi Bandung (Indonesia)
2006 Ateneo de Manila University A Team (Philippines) Ateneo de Manila University B Team (Philippines) Ateneo de Manila University (Philippines)
2005 Ateneo de Manila University (Philippines) Nanyang Technological University (Singapore) Nanyang Technological University (Singapore)

Grand Finalist Team Members and Best Speakers

2007 (Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia)

2006 (Ateneo de Manila University, Manila, Philippines)

2005 (Nanyang Technological University, Singapore)

Future Championships

Asian Universities Debating Union

The Union is the executive body formed to govern the Asian Universities Debating Championship. The institutions who compete in the AUDC form the membership of the Union.

The Union also appoints an Executive Committee, the body authorized to discharge actions on behalf of the Union over the course of the year. The current chair of the committee is Estelle Osorio, from De La Salle University-Manila. Past chairpersons include Rajesh Krishnan (Singapore Institute of Management), Shuvam Dutta (Singapore Management University), and Leloy Claudio (Ateneo de Manila University).

Controversy

Institutions who were unhappy about aspects of the organisation of the All-Asian Intervarsity Debating Championships established the Asian Universities Debating Championship in 2005 as an alternative to the All-Asians Championship. Since then, many universities in Asia with strong debating traditions – most notably universities from the Philippines and Singapore, including all except one of the institutions who won the All-Asian championships up to 2004 – have chosen not to participate in the All-Asian Intervarsity Championships and have instead entered teams in the Asian Universities Debating Championship. Institutions who joined the AUDC cited among their reasons that they had no confidence in the nepotism and corruption of the All-Asians tournament, particularly singling out adjudicators from All-Asians like Praba Ganesan as biased, incompetent cheats.[2]

While not intended to be a rival tournament, the last two AUDCs happened to coincide with the schedule of the All-Asian Championship, which made it impracticable to attend both tournaments.

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, which was one of the founding institutions of AUDC and entered teams in the AUDC in 2005 and 2006, chose to attend the All-Asians Championship in 2007. Among the universities that won the All-Asians prior to the split, they are the only institution to have participated in the All-Asians since the inception of the AUDC.

References

  1. ^ "Invitation to the First AUDC" (html). Retrieved 2007-06-05.
  2. ^ "Message to Praba" (html). Retrieved 2005-06-05.

External links

Leave a Reply