Trichome

Content deleted Content added
m Typo fixing , typos fixed: alledging → alleging using AWB
Line 100: Line 100:


==Lawsuits==
==Lawsuits==
Workers at the [[Dow Chemical]] plant producing DBCP were made sterile by exposure to DBCP. These male reproductive effects were consistent with animal experiments showing that DBCP sterilizes rabbits. The workers successfully sued the company, and most domestic uses of the chemical were banned in 1977. Amid growing concerns over DBCP's effects on male workers, Dow ceased production and reclaimed DBCP that had been shipped to its users. Despite warning from the company about its health effects, [[Dole Food Company]], who was using the chemical on its [[banana]] plantations in [[Latin America]], threatened to sue Dow if it stopped DCBP shipments. Dow then shipped half a million gallons of DBCP to Dole, much it reclaimed from other users. Plantation workers who became sterile or were stricken with other maladies subsequently sued Dow and Dole in Latin American courts, alleging their ailments were caused by DCBP exposure. While the courts agreed with the workers and awarded them over $600 million in damages, they have been unable to collect payments from the companies. A group of workers then sued in the United States, and on November 5th, 2007, a Los Angeles jury awarded them 3.2 million dollars. Dole and Dow vowed to appeal the decision.<ref>[http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/california/la-me-dole6nov06,1,2105565.story?coll=la-headlines-pe-california "Dole must pay farmworkers $3.2 million"], John Spano, ''Los Angeles Times,'' November 6th, 2007.</ref>
Workers at the [[Dow Chemical]] plant producing DBCP were made sterile by exposure to DBCP. These male reproductive effects were consistent with animal experiments showing that DBCP sterilizes rabbits. The workers successfully sued the company, and most domestic uses of the chemical were banned in 1977. Amid growing concerns over DBCP's effects on male workers, Dow ceased production and reclaimed DBCP that had been shipped to its users. Despite warning from the company about its health effects, [[Dole Food Company]], who was using the chemical on its [[banana]] plantations in [[Latin America]], threatened to sue Dow if it stopped DCBP shipments. Dow then shipped half a million gallons of DBCP to Dole, much it reclaimed from other users. Plantation workers who became sterile or were stricken with other maladies subsequently sued Dow and Dole in Latin American courts, alleging their ailments were caused by DCBP exposure. While the courts agreed with the workers and awarded them over $600 million in damages, they have been unable to collect payments from the companies. A group of workers then sued in the United States, and on [[November 5]], [[[2007]], a Los Angeles jury awarded them 3.2 million dollars. Dole and Dow vowed to appeal the decision.<ref>[http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/california/la-me-dole6nov06,1,2105565.story "Dole must pay farmworkers $3.2 million"], John Spano, ''Los Angeles Times,'' November 6th, 2007.</ref>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 10:22, 7 December 2007

Template:Chembox new

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane, better known as DBCP, is the active ingredient in the nematicide Nemagon, also known as Fumazone. It is a soil fumigant formerly used in American agriculture. After discovery of its deleterious health effects on humans, the compound was banned from use in 1979.[1] However, the continuing presence of the chemical as a contaminant in ground water remains a problem for many communities.

Uses

  • Until 1977, DBCP was used as a soil fumigant and nematocide on over 40 different crops in the United States. From 1977 to 1979, EPA suspended registration for all DBCP-containing products except for use on pineapples in Hawaii. In 1985, EPA issued an intent to cancel all registrations for DBCP, including use on pineapples. Subsequently, the use of existing stocks of DBCP was prohibited.
  • DBCP is used as an intermediate in the synthesis of organic chemicals.

Sources and potential exposure

  • Human exposure to DBCP could result from the ingestion of contaminated drinking water and food.
  • In the past, release of DBCP to the environment occurred primarily from its fumigant and nematocide uses; because of the cancellation of all DBCP uses, environmental exposure is expected to decline with time.

Examples of persistence

DBCP residues have persisted in contaminated soil and groundwater long after applications have ceased. For example in agricultural areas around Turlock in the Central Valley of California, DBCP was applied to crops in the 1970s. As late as 1989, DBCP persistence was reported in groundwater that was previously used for beneficial purposes, and numerous nearby wells had to be shut down at that time.[2]

Lawsuits

Workers at the Dow Chemical plant producing DBCP were made sterile by exposure to DBCP. These male reproductive effects were consistent with animal experiments showing that DBCP sterilizes rabbits. The workers successfully sued the company, and most domestic uses of the chemical were banned in 1977. Amid growing concerns over DBCP's effects on male workers, Dow ceased production and reclaimed DBCP that had been shipped to its users. Despite warning from the company about its health effects, Dole Food Company, who was using the chemical on its banana plantations in Latin America, threatened to sue Dow if it stopped DCBP shipments. Dow then shipped half a million gallons of DBCP to Dole, much it reclaimed from other users. Plantation workers who became sterile or were stricken with other maladies subsequently sued Dow and Dole in Latin American courts, alleging their ailments were caused by DCBP exposure. While the courts agreed with the workers and awarded them over $600 million in damages, they have been unable to collect payments from the companies. A group of workers then sued in the United States, and on November 5, [[[2007]], a Los Angeles jury awarded them 3.2 million dollars. Dole and Dow vowed to appeal the decision.[3]

References

  1. ^ Hazard Summary at epa.gov
  2. ^ "Environmental Screening Analysis, Tully Road Properties, Turlock, California", Earth Metrics Incorporated, Report 7826, San Mateo, Ca., March, 1989
  3. ^ "Dole must pay farmworkers $3.2 million", John Spano, Los Angeles Times, November 6th, 2007.

External links

Leave a Reply