Please do not add or change content, as you did to Kirkland Lake, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:57, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kirkland Lake. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your personal site is not a reliable source. Further, please check our conflict of interest policy. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 02:10, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. I am attempting to add the name of a legitimately notable Kirkland Lake resident: Nadine Antoniazzi. It is not my intent to self-promote.

Hi Scott. I see you're trying to add an individual to the "Notable People" section. Please read our policy on notability and realize that, just because she may have been related to someone, she's not eligible for inclusion. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 14:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dusti, thanks so much for you help here. A acknowledge that this connection is a little hard to see, however, all of this information is available will the references I provided. It was reported that Nadine Antoniazzi committed suicide shortly before her husband's company, Opawica Explorations, completed a multi-million dollar Initial Public Offering. These shares have since declined in value over 95%. This is very suspicious; I feel that it makes her very noteworthy and that any reasonable person would agree with me.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Kirkland Lake. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 15:09, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]