InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) Rescuing 7 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.2.4) |
|||
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
On 19 July 2014,<ref name="SCMP1" /> the Alliance launched a signature campaign for "people who support democracy and universal suffrage, but oppose violence and the Occupy Central Movement" ({{zh|t=「保和平、保普選,反暴力、反佔中」簽名行動}}). According to the Alliance's spokesman [[Robert Chow]], the Alliance aims to collect at least 800,000 signature, likely an attempt to top the nearly 790,000 votes cast in Occupy Central's unofficial referendum held in June 2014.<ref name="TS2">{{cite news|url=http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=11&art_id=147519&sid=42638274&con_type=1&d_str=20140718&fc=8|title=Firms reject anti-Occupy drive |last=Luk|first=Eddie|date=18 July 2014|work=The Standard|accessdate=15 August 2014|location=Hong Kong}}</ref> On 2 August 2014, the Alliance further launched an online platform to collect signatures from people who oppose Occupy Central's campaign.<ref name="RTHK1">{{cite news|url=http://rthk.hk/rthk/news/englishnews/20140802/news_20140802_56_1026751.htm|title=Anti-Occupy Central campaign goes online|date=2 August 2014|publisher=RTHK|accessdate=15 August 2014|location=Hong Kong}}</ref> |
On 19 July 2014,<ref name="SCMP1" /> the Alliance launched a signature campaign for "people who support democracy and universal suffrage, but oppose violence and the Occupy Central Movement" ({{zh|t=「保和平、保普選,反暴力、反佔中」簽名行動}}). According to the Alliance's spokesman [[Robert Chow]], the Alliance aims to collect at least 800,000 signature, likely an attempt to top the nearly 790,000 votes cast in Occupy Central's unofficial referendum held in June 2014.<ref name="TS2">{{cite news|url=http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=11&art_id=147519&sid=42638274&con_type=1&d_str=20140718&fc=8|title=Firms reject anti-Occupy drive |last=Luk|first=Eddie|date=18 July 2014|work=The Standard|accessdate=15 August 2014|location=Hong Kong}}</ref> On 2 August 2014, the Alliance further launched an online platform to collect signatures from people who oppose Occupy Central's campaign.<ref name="RTHK1">{{cite news|url=http://rthk.hk/rthk/news/englishnews/20140802/news_20140802_56_1026751.htm|title=Anti-Occupy Central campaign goes online|date=2 August 2014|publisher=RTHK|accessdate=15 August 2014|location=Hong Kong}}</ref> |
||
The authority official endorsements include chief executive [[CY Leung]] and other top Hong Kong officials, including Chief Secretary for Administration [[Carrie Lam (politician)|Carrie Lam]], Secretary for Food and Health [[Ko Wing-man]], Secretary for Labour and Welfare [[Matthew Cheung]], Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development [[Gregory So]] and Secretary for Development [[Paul Chan (Hong Kong legislator)|Paul Chan]].<ref name="20140818wsj"/><ref name="WWP1">{{cite news|url=http://news.wenweipo.com/2014/08/16/IN1408160002.htm|script-title=zh:梁振英「反佔中」簽名:追求普選不可違法|date=15 August 2014|publisher=Wenweipo|language=Chinese|accessdate=15 August 2014|location=Hong Kong}}</ref><ref name="TS3">{{cite news|url=http://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking_news_detail.asp?id=52758|title=CE signs petition for anti-Occupy|date=15 August 2014|work=The Standard|accessdate=16 August 2014|location=Hong Kong}}</ref><ref name="Chinese1">{{cite news|url=http://news.cnyes.com/20140819/%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E4%BF%9D%E6%99%AE%E9%81%B8-%E5%8F%8D%E4%BD%94%E4%B8%AD%E7%B0%BD%E5%90%8D%E7%A0%B4150%E8%90%AC-%E7%B8%BD%E6%95%B8%E9%81%A0%E8%B6%85%E9%A0%90%E6%9C%9F-155544192189310.shtml?c=EVENT|script-title=zh:香港「保普選 反佔中」簽名破150萬 總數遠超預期|date=19 August 2014|publisher=鉅亨網新聞中心|language=zh|archivedate=20 August 2014 |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6STkECa2S}}</ref> The Alliance claimed it had collected over 1.5 million signatures at the end of the campaign.<ref name="Chinese1" /><ref name="Dai1">{{cite news|url=http://news.stnn.cc/hongkong/2014/0819/126629.shtml|script-title=zh:"反占中"收逾150万签名 25万人参与和平普选日|date=19 August 2014|work=Ta Kung Pao|language=Chinese|accessdate=20 August 2014}}</ref> |
The authority official endorsements include chief executive [[CY Leung]] and other top Hong Kong officials, including Chief Secretary for Administration [[Carrie Lam (politician)|Carrie Lam]], Secretary for Food and Health [[Ko Wing-man]], Secretary for Labour and Welfare [[Matthew Cheung]], Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development [[Gregory So]] and Secretary for Development [[Paul Chan (Hong Kong legislator)|Paul Chan]].<ref name="20140818wsj"/><ref name="WWP1">{{cite news|url=http://news.wenweipo.com/2014/08/16/IN1408160002.htm|script-title=zh:梁振英「反佔中」簽名:追求普選不可違法|date=15 August 2014|publisher=Wenweipo|language=Chinese|accessdate=15 August 2014|location=Hong Kong}}</ref><ref name="TS3">{{cite news|url=http://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking_news_detail.asp?id=52758|title=CE signs petition for anti-Occupy|date=15 August 2014|work=The Standard|accessdate=16 August 2014|location=Hong Kong}}</ref><ref name="Chinese1">{{cite news|url=http://news.cnyes.com/20140819/%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E4%BF%9D%E6%99%AE%E9%81%B8-%E5%8F%8D%E4%BD%94%E4%B8%AD%E7%B0%BD%E5%90%8D%E7%A0%B4150%E8%90%AC-%E7%B8%BD%E6%95%B8%E9%81%A0%E8%B6%85%E9%A0%90%E6%9C%9F-155544192189310.shtml?c=EVENT |script-title=zh:香港「保普選 反佔中」簽名破150萬 總數遠超預期 |date=19 August 2014 |publisher=鉅亨網新聞中心 |language=zh |archivedate=20 August 2014 |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6STkECa2S?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.cnyes.com%2F20140819%2F%25E9%25A6%2599%25E6%25B8%25AF%25E4%25BF%259D%25E6%2599%25AE%25E9%2581%25B8-%25E5%258F%258D%25E4%25BD%2594%25E4%25B8%25AD%25E7%25B0%25BD%25E5%2590%258D%25E7%25A0%25B4150%25E8%2590%25AC-%25E7%25B8%25BD%25E6%2595%25B8%25E9%2581%25A0%25E8%25B6%2585%25E9%25A0%2590%25E6%259C%259F-155544192189310.shtml%3Fc%3DEVENT |deadurl=no |df=dmy }}</ref> The Alliance claimed it had collected over 1.5 million signatures at the end of the campaign.<ref name="Chinese1" /><ref name="Dai1">{{cite news|url=http://news.stnn.cc/hongkong/2014/0819/126629.shtml|script-title=zh:"反占中"收逾150万签名 25万人参与和平普选日|date=19 August 2014|work=Ta Kung Pao|language=Chinese|accessdate=20 August 2014}}</ref> |
||
Media and individuals, especially those support the pro-democracy camp, have questioned the credibility of the signature campaign.<ref name="SCMP2" /> They have noted that no measures were put in place to prevent repeated signatures in the campaign,<ref name="thats">{{cite news|url=http://online.thatsmags.com/post/critics-call-out-million-strong-pro-government-petition-in-hong-kong|title=Critics call out million-strong pro-government petition in Hong Kong|last=Kilpatrick|first=Rya|date=29 July 2014|publisher=online.thatsmags|accessdate=15 August 2014|location=Hong Kong}}</ref> as people who sign will be asked for only the letter and first four digits of their [[HKID]] cards.<ref name="SCMP2" /> According to some press reports, employees might have faced pressure to sign petition forms that were being circulated by department heads in some companies, including [[The Hong Kong and China Gas Company|Town Gas]], a major public utility.<ref>{{cite web|author=China Real Time Report|url=http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2014/07/28/a-million-sign-hong-kong-petition-as-democracy-fight-ratchets-up/ |title=A Million Sign Hong Kong Petition as Democracy Fight Ratchets Up |work=The Wall Street Journal |date=28 July 2014 |accessdate=19 August 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1555515/towngas-backs-down-after-asking-staff-sign-anti-occupy-central|title=Towngas Backs Down After Asking Staff Sign Anti Occupy Central|work=South China Morning Post|accessdate=10 September 2014}}</ref> |
Media and individuals, especially those support the pro-democracy camp, have questioned the credibility of the signature campaign.<ref name="SCMP2" /> They have noted that no measures were put in place to prevent repeated signatures in the campaign,<ref name="thats">{{cite news|url=http://online.thatsmags.com/post/critics-call-out-million-strong-pro-government-petition-in-hong-kong|title=Critics call out million-strong pro-government petition in Hong Kong|last=Kilpatrick|first=Rya|date=29 July 2014|publisher=online.thatsmags|accessdate=15 August 2014|location=Hong Kong}}</ref> as people who sign will be asked for only the letter and first four digits of their [[HKID]] cards.<ref name="SCMP2" /> According to some press reports, employees might have faced pressure to sign petition forms that were being circulated by department heads in some companies, including [[The Hong Kong and China Gas Company|Town Gas]], a major public utility.<ref>{{cite web|author=China Real Time Report|url=http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2014/07/28/a-million-sign-hong-kong-petition-as-democracy-fight-ratchets-up/ |title=A Million Sign Hong Kong Petition as Democracy Fight Ratchets Up |work=The Wall Street Journal |date=28 July 2014 |accessdate=19 August 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1555515/towngas-backs-down-after-asking-staff-sign-anti-occupy-central|title=Towngas Backs Down After Asking Staff Sign Anti Occupy Central|work=South China Morning Post|accessdate=10 September 2014}}</ref> |
||
Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
The Alliance for Peace and Democracy said one of its groups will take legal action against Cable TV. The station had reported some people appeared to have been paid to take part in Sunday's mass anti-Occupy Central march, which was organised by the Alliance. The Alliance said the Hong Kong Youth Association denied the claim and people filmed accepting money were not members. It also accused Cable TV of dishonest editing, a charge the broadcaster has dismissed. |
The Alliance for Peace and Democracy said one of its groups will take legal action against Cable TV. The station had reported some people appeared to have been paid to take part in Sunday's mass anti-Occupy Central march, which was organised by the Alliance. The Alliance said the Hong Kong Youth Association denied the claim and people filmed accepting money were not members. It also accused Cable TV of dishonest editing, a charge the broadcaster has dismissed. |
||
Chow said it had found that a subsidiary of another group, the Hong Kong Hakka Associations, had paid people to join the march. He said the 200 people involved had been deleted from the Alliance's estimated turnout for the rally, which stands at more than 190,000. Undercover reporters also filed reports of payments of HK$200–$350 ($25–45) and other gifts of food items as inducements being made to participants by various organising sub-groups.<ref name="AD2">{{cite news|url=http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20140818/18835857|script-title=zh:直擊「蛇頭」請人湊夠數 派錢送禮物 報到即可收工|work=Apple Daily|language=Chinese|accessdate=19 August 2014|location=Hong Kong}}</ref><ref name="MP1">{{cite news|url=http://news.mingpao.com/20140820/gaa1.htm|script-title=zh:社團拒認派錢 4疑點未解 記者「放蛇」遊行 獲免費午餐派錢300元|date=18 August 2014|work=Ming Pao|language=Chinese|accessdate=19 August 2014|location=Hong Kong|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6RxPB6Ya2 |archivedate=20 August 2014}}</ref><ref name="now1">{{cite news|url=http://news.now.com/home/hot/player?newsId=109808&hot=1|script-title=zh:商會為遊行人士提供膳食及車費|date=17 August 2014|publisher=now新聞台|language=Chinese|accessdate=19 August 2014|location=Hong Kong |
Chow said it had found that a subsidiary of another group, the Hong Kong Hakka Associations, had paid people to join the march. He said the 200 people involved had been deleted from the Alliance's estimated turnout for the rally, which stands at more than 190,000. Undercover reporters also filed reports of payments of HK$200–$350 ($25–45) and other gifts of food items as inducements being made to participants by various organising sub-groups.<ref name="AD2">{{cite news|url=http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20140818/18835857|script-title=zh:直擊「蛇頭」請人湊夠數 派錢送禮物 報到即可收工|work=Apple Daily|language=Chinese|accessdate=19 August 2014|location=Hong Kong}}</ref><ref name="MP1">{{cite news|url=http://news.mingpao.com/20140820/gaa1.htm |script-title=zh:社團拒認派錢 4疑點未解 記者「放蛇」遊行 獲免費午餐派錢300元 |date=18 August 2014 |work=Ming Pao |language=Chinese |accessdate=19 August 2014 |location=Hong Kong |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6RxPB6Ya2?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.mingpao.com%2F20140820%2Fgaa1.htm |archivedate=20 August 2014 |deadurl=no |df=dmy }}</ref><ref name="now1">{{cite news|url=http://news.now.com/home/hot/player?newsId=109808&hot=1|script-title=zh:商會為遊行人士提供膳食及車費|date=17 August 2014|publisher=now新聞台|language=Chinese|accessdate=19 August 2014|location=Hong Kong |
||
| archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6RxUN4FX6 |archivedate=20 August 2014}}</ref> |
| archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6RxUN4FX6 |archivedate=20 August 2014}}</ref> |
||
Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
{{POV section|date=September 2016}} |
{{POV section|date=September 2016}} |
||
{{main|2014 Hong Kong Class Boycott Campaign}} |
{{main|2014 Hong Kong Class Boycott Campaign}} |
||
In response to the Chinese authority decision, [[Hong Kong Federation of Students]] and the student pro-democracy pressure group [[Scholarism]] planned to stage a co-ordinated class boycott in Hong Kong and organise public events, including street assemblies.<ref name=globalpost>{{cite web|url=http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/kyodo-news-international/140908/snitch-line-operation-against-school-boycotters-hk|title='Snitch line' in operation against school boycotters in H.K. |work=GlobalPost|accessdate=10 September 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://online.wsj.com/articles/hong-kong-students-to-boycott-classes-if-democracy-demands-arent-met-1408621259|title=Hong Kong Students to Boycott Classes If Democracy Demands Aren't Met |authors= Yung, Chester; Ngai, Edward|date=21 August 2014|work=The Wall Street Journal|accessdate=10 September 2014}}</ref> To ward off a massive mobilisation, the APD set up a telephone hotline with the objective of collecting data on high school students who participate in the boycott to "save underaged youths from being exploited".<ref name=globalpost/> Chow said that the information would be passed on to the boycotters' schools, PTAs and the education bureau, and threatened to make the information public. |
In response to the Chinese authority decision, [[Hong Kong Federation of Students]] and the student pro-democracy pressure group [[Scholarism]] planned to stage a co-ordinated class boycott in Hong Kong and organise public events, including street assemblies.<ref name=globalpost>{{cite web|url=http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/kyodo-news-international/140908/snitch-line-operation-against-school-boycotters-hk |title='Snitch line' in operation against school boycotters in H.K. |work=GlobalPost |accessdate=10 September 2014 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6VtIpgh48?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.globalpost.com%2Fdispatch%2Fnews%2Fkyodo-news-international%2F140908%2Fsnitch-line-operation-against-school-boycotters-hk |archivedate=27 January 2014 |df=dmy }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://online.wsj.com/articles/hong-kong-students-to-boycott-classes-if-democracy-demands-arent-met-1408621259|title=Hong Kong Students to Boycott Classes If Democracy Demands Aren't Met |authors= Yung, Chester; Ngai, Edward|date=21 August 2014|work=The Wall Street Journal|accessdate=10 September 2014}}</ref> To ward off a massive mobilisation, the APD set up a telephone hotline with the objective of collecting data on high school students who participate in the boycott to "save underaged youths from being exploited".<ref name=globalpost/> Chow said that the information would be passed on to the boycotters' schools, PTAs and the education bureau, and threatened to make the information public. |
||
Federation of Students secretary general denounced the Alliance hotline as "white terror, political persecution and fear-mongering trying to pressure the parents and a violation of privacy".<ref name=globalpost/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iask.ca/news/china/2014/09/287520.html|script-title=zh:举报罢课热线被指侵私隐反占中搜师生资料「预_|trans_title=Strike hotline invasion of privacy alleged teachers and students share information|publisher=加拿大家园网|archivedate=10 September 2014 |language=zh|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6STaJtAwQ }}</ref> The denunciations hotline received strong criticism from the education sector.<ref name=mingeditorial>[http://webcitation.org/6STgJeRsD "舉報罷課介入校政 破壞信任撕裂社會" Boycott denunciations interfere with school management, destroys trust and divides society]. ''Ming Pao''. 10 September 2014. Archived from [http://news.mingpao.com/20140910/mra.htm the original] on 11 September 2014</ref> [[Ip Kin-yuen]], representing the education sector in [[Legislative Council of Hong Kong|LegCo]], condemned the alliance for pressuring the schools and as well as students, and urged educators to uphold students' rights to freedom speech.<ref name=globalpost/> Headmasters of [[Shatin Tsung Tsin Secondary School]], among others, said there was no need for the alliance to notify them of boycotters' names, saying that he knew who they were and that they had his blessing.<ref name=20140912hks-mary/><ref name=20140909mingtt>{{cite web|url=http://news2.mingpao.com/pns/%E6%B2%99%E5%B4%87%E6%A0%A1%E9%95%B7%EF%B9%95%E8%AB%8B%E5%91%A8%E8%9E%8D%E4%B8%8D%E7%94%A8%E6%89%BE%E6%88%91/web_tc/article/20140909/s00002/1410199482211|script-title=zh:沙崇校長﹕請周融不用找我 |trans_title=Tsung Chun headmaster: Please don't come looking for me, Robert Chow|work=Ming Pao|language=zh |date=9 September 2014 |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6STak6aBy|archivedate=10 September 2014}}</ref> The headmaster of [[Diocesan Boys' School]] said the affairs of its students on the school's own turf need not be the concern of others.<ref name=20140912hks-mary/><ref name=20140911scmp-excomember>"Exco member says he'd join Occupy if it would work". ''South China Morning Post'', 11 September 2014, pg. C1</ref> The school principals expressed trust in and respect for their students.<ref name=20140909mingtt/><ref>Lau, Kenneth (12 September 2014). [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=149386&sid=42970606&con_type=1&d_str=20140912&isSearch=1&sear_year=2014 "Churches divided on class boycotts"]. ''The Standard''.</ref> In its editorial, ''Ming Pao'' strongly criticised the [[Cultural Revolution]]-style intelligence-gathering on individuals for political purposes as "highly divisive".<ref name=mingeditorial/> It said that it was difficult to see from any angle how such a campaign had any benefit, the effects of this political intervention by the alliance on Hong Kong and within school campuses can only be adverse and highly destructive.<ref name=mingeditorial/> [[Secretary for Education (Hong Kong)|Secretary for Education]] said on 10 September that the [[Education Bureau]] would liaise with relevant schools upon information of boycotts, and would offer assistance as required by the schools.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E5%90%B3%E5%85%8B%E5%84%89-%E6%87%89%E5%90%91%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E8%AC%9B%E7%BD%B7%E8%AA%B2%E7%9A%84%E8%B2%A0%E9%9D%A2%E5%BD%B1%E9%9F%BF-124637293.html|title=吳克儉:應向學生講罷課的負面影響 |date=10 September 2014|publisher=Yahoo 新聞香港|archivedate=11 September 2014|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6SVEj19pv}}</ref> After receiving complaints from teaching unions, the office of the Privacy Commissioner said that there was "no evidence to suggest that the alliance has applied unlawful and misleading means" to acquire the personal data, but reminded the APD to abide by its obligations under the ordinance.<ref name=20140911scmp-excomember/> In the meantime, the alliance temporarily suspended the operation of its telephone hotline, blaming it on the deluge of prank calls, but invited the public to continue to submit their denunciations by fax or email.<ref name=20140911scmp-excomember/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://sign4peacedemocracy.hk/idea_en/index.php?r=index/detail&id=398|title=重申設立《學校家長救救孩子》熱綫目的 |publisher=Alliance for Peace and Democracy|accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref> An editorial in ''The Standard'' said the hotline was "riddled with fault", and suggested that the alliance shut down the line definitively.<ref name=20140912hks-mary/> |
Federation of Students secretary general denounced the Alliance hotline as "white terror, political persecution and fear-mongering trying to pressure the parents and a violation of privacy".<ref name=globalpost/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iask.ca/news/china/2014/09/287520.html |script-title=zh:举报罢课热线被指侵私隐反占中搜师生资料「预_ |trans_title=Strike hotline invasion of privacy alleged teachers and students share information |publisher=加拿大家园网 |archivedate=10 September 2014 |language=zh |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6STaJtAwQ?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iask.ca%2Fnews%2Fchina%2F2014%2F09%2F287520.html |deadurl=no |df=dmy }}</ref> The denunciations hotline received strong criticism from the education sector.<ref name=mingeditorial>[http://www.webcitation.org/6STgJeRsD?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.mingpao.com%2F20140910%2Fmra.htm "舉報罷課介入校政 破壞信任撕裂社會" Boycott denunciations interfere with school management, destroys trust and divides society]. ''Ming Pao''. 10 September 2014. Archived from [http://news.mingpao.com/20140910/mra.htm the original] on 11 September 2014</ref> [[Ip Kin-yuen]], representing the education sector in [[Legislative Council of Hong Kong|LegCo]], condemned the alliance for pressuring the schools and as well as students, and urged educators to uphold students' rights to freedom speech.<ref name=globalpost/> Headmasters of [[Shatin Tsung Tsin Secondary School]], among others, said there was no need for the alliance to notify them of boycotters' names, saying that he knew who they were and that they had his blessing.<ref name=20140912hks-mary/><ref name=20140909mingtt>{{cite web|url=http://news2.mingpao.com/pns/%E6%B2%99%E5%B4%87%E6%A0%A1%E9%95%B7%EF%B9%95%E8%AB%8B%E5%91%A8%E8%9E%8D%E4%B8%8D%E7%94%A8%E6%89%BE%E6%88%91/web_tc/article/20140909/s00002/1410199482211 |script-title=zh:沙崇校長﹕請周融不用找我 |trans_title=Tsung Chun headmaster: Please don't come looking for me, Robert Chow |work=Ming Pao |language=zh |date=9 September 2014 |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6STak6aBy?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnews2.mingpao.com%2Fpns%2F%25E6%25B2%2599%25E5%25B4%2587%25E6%25A0%25A1%25E9%2595%25B7%25EF%25B9%2595%25E8%25AB%258B%25E5%2591%25A8%25E8%259E%258D%25E4%25B8%258D%25E7%2594%25A8%25E6%2589%25BE%25E6%2588%2591%2Fweb_tc%2Farticle%2F20140909%2Fs00002%2F1410199482211 |archivedate=10 September 2014 |deadurl=no |df=dmy }}</ref> The headmaster of [[Diocesan Boys' School]] said the affairs of its students on the school's own turf need not be the concern of others.<ref name=20140912hks-mary/><ref name=20140911scmp-excomember>"Exco member says he'd join Occupy if it would work". ''South China Morning Post'', 11 September 2014, pg. C1</ref> The school principals expressed trust in and respect for their students.<ref name=20140909mingtt/><ref>Lau, Kenneth (12 September 2014). [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=149386&sid=42970606&con_type=1&d_str=20140912&isSearch=1&sear_year=2014 "Churches divided on class boycotts"]. ''The Standard''.</ref> In its editorial, ''Ming Pao'' strongly criticised the [[Cultural Revolution]]-style intelligence-gathering on individuals for political purposes as "highly divisive".<ref name=mingeditorial/> It said that it was difficult to see from any angle how such a campaign had any benefit, the effects of this political intervention by the alliance on Hong Kong and within school campuses can only be adverse and highly destructive.<ref name=mingeditorial/> [[Secretary for Education (Hong Kong)|Secretary for Education]] said on 10 September that the [[Education Bureau]] would liaise with relevant schools upon information of boycotts, and would offer assistance as required by the schools.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E5%90%B3%E5%85%8B%E5%84%89-%E6%87%89%E5%90%91%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E8%AC%9B%E7%BD%B7%E8%AA%B2%E7%9A%84%E8%B2%A0%E9%9D%A2%E5%BD%B1%E9%9F%BF-124637293.html |title=吳克儉:應向學生講罷課的負面影響 |date=10 September 2014 |publisher=Yahoo 新聞香港 |archivedate=11 September 2014 |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6SVEj19pv?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhk.news.yahoo.com%2F%25E5%2590%25B3%25E5%2585%258B%25E5%2584%2589-%25E6%2587%2589%25E5%2590%2591%25E5%25AD%25B8%25E7%2594%259F%25E8%25AC%259B%25E7%25BD%25B7%25E8%25AA%25B2%25E7%259A%2584%25E8%25B2%25A0%25E9%259D%25A2%25E5%25BD%25B1%25E9%259F%25BF-124637293.html |deadurl=no |df=dmy }}</ref> After receiving complaints from teaching unions, the office of the Privacy Commissioner said that there was "no evidence to suggest that the alliance has applied unlawful and misleading means" to acquire the personal data, but reminded the APD to abide by its obligations under the ordinance.<ref name=20140911scmp-excomember/> In the meantime, the alliance temporarily suspended the operation of its telephone hotline, blaming it on the deluge of prank calls, but invited the public to continue to submit their denunciations by fax or email.<ref name=20140911scmp-excomember/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://sign4peacedemocracy.hk/idea_en/index.php?r=index/detail&id=398|title=重申設立《學校家長救救孩子》熱綫目的 |publisher=Alliance for Peace and Democracy|accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref> An editorial in ''The Standard'' said the hotline was "riddled with fault", and suggested that the alliance shut down the line definitively.<ref name=20140912hks-mary/> |
||
The fact that opportunists such as Robert Chow and Wong Kwan-yu lead the anti-democratic movement says a lot about the calibre of the rest of their camp. The Alliance for Peace and Democracy had advertised a hotline to name and shame those secondary schools that allow their students to boycott classes. Its spokesman, Robert Chow Yung, claimed that the hotline would help Hong Kong's children. Some say the move is a reminder of tactics employed during the Cultural Revolution, when people were urged to betray even those closest to them in the interests of the party. The alliance's name-and-shame tactics have led to a public outcry, as they are a flagrant breach of the fundamental values in education.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.scmp.com/comment/article/1595395/champions-beijings-camp-losing-public-opinion-war-political-reform|title=Champions of Beijing's camp losing public opinion war on political reform|last=Albert|first=Cheng|date=18 September 2014|work=South China Morning Post|accessdate=19 September 2014|location=Hong Kong}}</ref> |
The fact that opportunists such as Robert Chow and Wong Kwan-yu lead the anti-democratic movement says a lot about the calibre of the rest of their camp. The Alliance for Peace and Democracy had advertised a hotline to name and shame those secondary schools that allow their students to boycott classes. Its spokesman, Robert Chow Yung, claimed that the hotline would help Hong Kong's children. Some say the move is a reminder of tactics employed during the Cultural Revolution, when people were urged to betray even those closest to them in the interests of the party. The alliance's name-and-shame tactics have led to a public outcry, as they are a flagrant breach of the fundamental values in education.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.scmp.com/comment/article/1595395/champions-beijings-camp-losing-public-opinion-war-political-reform|title=Champions of Beijing's camp losing public opinion war on political reform|last=Albert|first=Cheng|date=18 September 2014|work=South China Morning Post|accessdate=19 September 2014|location=Hong Kong}}</ref> |
Revision as of 02:29, 10 October 2016
保普選保和平大聯盟 | |
![]() | |
Formation | July 3, 2014 |
---|---|
Purpose | Conservatism Anti-Occupy Central |
Spokespersons | Robert Chow,[1] Ng Chau-pei, Brave Chan Yung[2] |
Affiliations | Pro-Beijing camp |
Website | sign4peacedemocracy |
Formerly called | 保普選反佔中大聯盟 |
Template:Contains Chinese text
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/3b/Alliance_for_peace_and_democracy.jpg/180px-Alliance_for_peace_and_democracy.jpg)
The Alliance for Peace and Democracy (Chinese: 保普選保和平大聯盟; lit. 'The Protect-Universal Suffrage and Protect-Peace Alliance',[4] formerly 保普選反佔中大聯盟, literally: "The Protect-Universal Suffrage and Anti-Occupy Central Alliance") is a pro-Beijing[5][6] political grouping in Hong Kong.[7] It was founded on 3 July 2014 by members of the pro-Beijing alliance including 40 pro-Beijing groups and scholars,[6] many of whom are also members of the pro-Beijing group Silent Majority for Hong Kong, and was backed by the pro-Beijing Parties Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong, The Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions and The New People's Party.[8]
The Alliance was established to counter the Occupy Central movement,[5][8] and it received widespread media attention when it launched a month-long signature campaign for people who oppose the Occupy Central Movement, which lasted from 19 July to 17 August 2014.[2][5][9][10] The campaign claimed it had collected over a million signatures supporting the campaign,[11] although questions were raised over credibility of the number of signatures collected.[12] Despite the Alliance's efforts, the Occupy Central movement commenced officially on 27 September 2014, giving rise to the 2014 Hong Kong protests which was severely criticised by the Alliance.[13] The Alliance also admitted that they underestimated the impact of the movement.[14]
The Alliance subsequently launched a second signature campaign after the commencement of the Occupy Central movement, demanding protesters to "free our roads" and to "restore law and order". It lasted from 25 October 2014 to 2 November 2014.[1][15] A third signature campaign was held by the alliance after the Occupy Central movement from 9 May 2015 to 17 May 2015, amassing support for the 2014–15 Hong Kong electoral reform.[16]
First Signature campaign
On 19 July 2014,[6] the Alliance launched a signature campaign for "people who support democracy and universal suffrage, but oppose violence and the Occupy Central Movement" (Chinese: 「保和平、保普選,反暴力、反佔中」簽名行動). According to the Alliance's spokesman Robert Chow, the Alliance aims to collect at least 800,000 signature, likely an attempt to top the nearly 790,000 votes cast in Occupy Central's unofficial referendum held in June 2014.[17] On 2 August 2014, the Alliance further launched an online platform to collect signatures from people who oppose Occupy Central's campaign.[18]
The authority official endorsements include chief executive CY Leung and other top Hong Kong officials, including Chief Secretary for Administration Carrie Lam, Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man, Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung, Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So and Secretary for Development Paul Chan.[11][19][20][21] The Alliance claimed it had collected over 1.5 million signatures at the end of the campaign.[21][22]
Media and individuals, especially those support the pro-democracy camp, have questioned the credibility of the signature campaign.[12] They have noted that no measures were put in place to prevent repeated signatures in the campaign,[23] as people who sign will be asked for only the letter and first four digits of their HKID cards.[12] According to some press reports, employees might have faced pressure to sign petition forms that were being circulated by department heads in some companies, including Town Gas, a major public utility.[24][25]
"Run for Peace and Democracy" before parade
The Alliance held a 3.2-km "Run for Peace and Democracy" as a prelude to the Anti-"Occupy Central" Parade[26] from Victoria Park to the Chater Road in Central.[1] The Alliance had called for 10,000 people to take part in the fun run.[27] On 17 August 2014, the organisers claimed 1,500 participants took part in the race,[28] while the police estimated 880.[29]
Anti-"Occupy Central" parade
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e2/HK_Banner_17-Aug-2014_AOC_Anti-Occupy_Central_-_committee_-_Victoria_Park_apd.jpg/250px-HK_Banner_17-Aug-2014_AOC_Anti-Occupy_Central_-_committee_-_Victoria_Park_apd.jpg)
Culminating their petition campaign, the Alliance held an anti-"Occupy Central" parade on 17 August 2014, where participants will be able to dedicate kapok flowers at Chater Garden or Statue Square to show their discontent towards the Occupy Central Movement, their desire for peace in Central as well as their support for universal suffrage. The alliance declared that over 320 organisations and groups had pledged to join the rallies, and they expected a turnout of 50,000 to 60,000.[30]
The Alliance initially claimed that 193,000 people took part in the parade,[31] but it later changed the figure to 250,000,[32] while the Hong Kong police set the figure at 111,800 and the University of Hong Kong Public Opinion Programme put the maximum number of participants at 88,000.[33][34]
Controversies
After the rally, media reports claiming that the anti-Occupy Central movement engaged in "rent-a-protester" to boost numbers at the rally, surfaced.[2] The Alliance and its allies were accused of offering people; cash, free-meals and pecuniary benefits in an attempt to boost the turnout at the Anti-Occupy Central Parade.[35] The media reported that the groups had put on cross-border transport to bring in marchers[36] and that as many as 20,000 people may have been bussed in from across the border.[34] Robert Chow, the spokesman of the Alliance, responded that he saw nothing improper in distributing lunch boxes to groups joining the parade as a token of thanks.[35][37]
Video footage showing people "being paid" to take part in the parade were captured by the media.[38]
Cable TV faces legal action over report
The Alliance for Peace and Democracy said one of its groups will take legal action against Cable TV. The station had reported some people appeared to have been paid to take part in Sunday's mass anti-Occupy Central march, which was organised by the Alliance. The Alliance said the Hong Kong Youth Association denied the claim and people filmed accepting money were not members. It also accused Cable TV of dishonest editing, a charge the broadcaster has dismissed.
Chow said it had found that a subsidiary of another group, the Hong Kong Hakka Associations, had paid people to join the march. He said the 200 people involved had been deleted from the Alliance's estimated turnout for the rally, which stands at more than 190,000. Undercover reporters also filed reports of payments of HK$200–$350 ($25–45) and other gifts of food items as inducements being made to participants by various organising sub-groups.[39][40][41]
In response to this, Hong Kong Youth Association, one of the groups filmed by reporters, threatened Cable TV News with legal action over the "dishonest editing", implying it had used imposters. The Alliance itself initially stonewalled and denied anybody had been paid, and accused media of fabricating reports.[2] Chow later admitted that Hong Kong Hakka Associations had paid people to join the march, and pledged to cross out 200 paid individuals from the estimated turnout of the parade.[42] The Alliance further admitted that a subsidiary of one of its member groups, the General Association of Hong Kong Heyuan Societies, had also paid people varying amounts of cash to join the match.[43]
Class boycott database
In response to the Chinese authority decision, Hong Kong Federation of Students and the student pro-democracy pressure group Scholarism planned to stage a co-ordinated class boycott in Hong Kong and organise public events, including street assemblies.[44][45] To ward off a massive mobilisation, the APD set up a telephone hotline with the objective of collecting data on high school students who participate in the boycott to "save underaged youths from being exploited".[44] Chow said that the information would be passed on to the boycotters' schools, PTAs and the education bureau, and threatened to make the information public.
Federation of Students secretary general denounced the Alliance hotline as "white terror, political persecution and fear-mongering trying to pressure the parents and a violation of privacy".[44][46] The denunciations hotline received strong criticism from the education sector.[47] Ip Kin-yuen, representing the education sector in LegCo, condemned the alliance for pressuring the schools and as well as students, and urged educators to uphold students' rights to freedom speech.[44] Headmasters of Shatin Tsung Tsin Secondary School, among others, said there was no need for the alliance to notify them of boycotters' names, saying that he knew who they were and that they had his blessing.[10][48] The headmaster of Diocesan Boys' School said the affairs of its students on the school's own turf need not be the concern of others.[10][49] The school principals expressed trust in and respect for their students.[48][50] In its editorial, Ming Pao strongly criticised the Cultural Revolution-style intelligence-gathering on individuals for political purposes as "highly divisive".[47] It said that it was difficult to see from any angle how such a campaign had any benefit, the effects of this political intervention by the alliance on Hong Kong and within school campuses can only be adverse and highly destructive.[47] Secretary for Education said on 10 September that the Education Bureau would liaise with relevant schools upon information of boycotts, and would offer assistance as required by the schools.[51] After receiving complaints from teaching unions, the office of the Privacy Commissioner said that there was "no evidence to suggest that the alliance has applied unlawful and misleading means" to acquire the personal data, but reminded the APD to abide by its obligations under the ordinance.[49] In the meantime, the alliance temporarily suspended the operation of its telephone hotline, blaming it on the deluge of prank calls, but invited the public to continue to submit their denunciations by fax or email.[49][52] An editorial in The Standard said the hotline was "riddled with fault", and suggested that the alliance shut down the line definitively.[10]
The fact that opportunists such as Robert Chow and Wong Kwan-yu lead the anti-democratic movement says a lot about the calibre of the rest of their camp. The Alliance for Peace and Democracy had advertised a hotline to name and shame those secondary schools that allow their students to boycott classes. Its spokesman, Robert Chow Yung, claimed that the hotline would help Hong Kong's children. Some say the move is a reminder of tactics employed during the Cultural Revolution, when people were urged to betray even those closest to them in the interests of the party. The alliance's name-and-shame tactics have led to a public outcry, as they are a flagrant breach of the fundamental values in education.[53]
Subsequent signature campaigns
The Alliance held a second signature campaign, from 25 October 2014 to 2 November 2014, for a petition that seek to "support our police, free our roads;[54] restore law and order" in Hong Kong.[55][56] Like its first signature campaign, questions were raised over the credibility of this second campaign. The alliance had claimed that there were 1.83 million signatures.[55][56]
The Alliance subsequently changed its Chinese name to 保普選反暴力大聯盟 (literally: "The Protect-Universal Suffrage and Anti-violence Alliance") on 5 May 2015 after the 2014 Hong Kong protests to reflect its change in aim from anti-Occupy Central to anti-Gau wu and anti-Hong Kong independence movement which, according to the Alliance, constituted acts of violence.[4][57] Its English name remained unchanged. The Alliance subsequently held a third signature campaign from 9 May 2015 to 17 May 2015 to amass support for democracy in Hong Kong and the 2014–15 Hong Kong electoral reform (Chinese: 保民主 撐政改) and to voice opposition to the on-going filibustering in Hong Kong (Chinese: 反拉布). The campaign also encouraged Hong Kong citizens to register as voters (Chinese: 做選民).[16] The alliance claimed that 1.21 million signatures were received.[58]
References
- ^ a b c "Alliance For Peace and Democracy". Retrieved 10 September 2014.
- ^ a b c d "March newbies pay media price". The Standard. 20 August 2014. Retrieved 19 August 2014.
- ^ "Chow doesn't want broadcasting job". The Standard. Hong Kong. 15 August 2014. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
- ^ a b "反佔中大聯盟改名 周六起設街站撐政改" (in Traditional Chinese). Hong Kong: 信報. 5 May 2015. Retrieved 3 June 2016.
- ^ a b c Siu, Beatrice (4 July 2014). "Pro-Beijing counter group born". The Standard. Hong Kong. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
- ^ a b c Chan, Samuel (14 July 2014). "Hundreds join march against Occupy Central". South China Morning Post. Hong Kong. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
- ^ Noble, Josh (29 July 2014). "HK petition denounces pro-democracy movement". Financial Times. Hong Kong. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
- ^ a b Chan, Kahon (19 July 2014). "Petition against 'Occupy' begins". Hong Kong: China Daily Asia. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
- ^ Wong, Alan (21 July 2014). "Campaign Tries Tapping into Hong Kong's 'Silent Majority'". The New York Times. Hong Kong. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
- ^ a b c d Ma, Mary (12 September 2014). "Boycott hotline opens can of worms". The Standard. Retrieved 5 October 2014.
- ^ a b Ngai, Edward (18 August 2014) "Hong Kong's Pro-Beijing Groups March to Oppose Occupy Central". The Wall Street Journal.
- ^ a b c "Questions raised over credibility of planned anti-Occupy Signatures". South China Morning Post. Hong Kong. 10 July 2014. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
- ^ 昊, 顏; 張晶 (29 September 2014). 香港各界譴責"佔領中環"非法集會 呼籲和平理性表達訴求 (in Chinese). China: International Daily News. Retrieved 29 September 2014.
- ^ 周融:佔中的影響較想像中大 (in Chinese). Hong Kong: now新聞台. 29 September 2014. Retrieved 29 September 2014.
- ^ "Alliance for Peace and Democracy to start signature campaign". China: CCTV.com. 23 October 2014. Retrieved 28 October 2014.
- ^ a b 聶, 曉輝 (5 May 2015). "大聯盟周六起大型簽名行動撐政改" (in Traditional Chinese). Hong Kong: 文匯網. Retrieved 3 June 2016.
- ^ Luk, Eddie (18 July 2014). "Firms reject anti-Occupy drive". The Standard. Hong Kong. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
- ^ "Anti-Occupy Central campaign goes online". Hong Kong: RTHK. 2 August 2014. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
- ^ 梁振英「反佔中」簽名:追求普選不可違法 (in Chinese). Hong Kong: Wenweipo. 15 August 2014. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
- ^ "CE signs petition for anti-Occupy". The Standard. Hong Kong. 15 August 2014. Retrieved 16 August 2014.
- ^ a b 香港「保普選 反佔中」簽名破150萬 總數遠超預期 (in Chinese). 鉅亨網新聞中心. 19 August 2014. Archived from the original on 20 August 2014.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ "反占中"收逾150万签名 25万人参与和平普选日. Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 19 August 2014. Retrieved 20 August 2014.
- ^ Kilpatrick, Rya (29 July 2014). "Critics call out million-strong pro-government petition in Hong Kong". Hong Kong: online.thatsmags. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
- ^ China Real Time Report (28 July 2014). "A Million Sign Hong Kong Petition as Democracy Fight Ratchets Up". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 19 August 2014.
- ^ "Towngas Backs Down After Asking Staff Sign Anti Occupy Central". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 10 September 2014.
- ^ Walker, Pete (17 August 2014). "Alliance for Peace and Democracy holds Fun Run in central Hong Kong". Hong Kong: Demotix. Retrieved 17 August 2014.
- ^ Wong, Hilary (4 August 2014). "Airport boss for anti-Occupy". The Standard. Hong Kong. Retrieved 17 August 2014.
- ^ "Hundreds join anti-Occupy Central run ahead of march". South China Morning Post. Hong Kong. 17 August 2014. Retrieved 17 August 2014.
- ^ "Anti-Occupy Central Run Joined by Hundreds ahead of March". Harbour Times. Retrieved 10 September 2014.
- ^ Chan, Kahon (5 August 2014). "Aug 17 rallies to show public opposes 'Occupy'". China Daily. Hong Kong. Retrieved 16 August 2014.
- ^ "Anti-Occupy Central alliance pledge to investigate cash handout reports". South China Morning Post. Hong Kong. 18 August 2014. Retrieved 18 August 2014.
- ^ Chan, Kahon (18 August 2014). "250,000 marched against Occupy: Alliance". China Daily. Hong Kong. Retrieved 18 August 2014.
- ^ "Police estimate more than 110,00 marchers attended Anti Occupy Central Match despite kick and controversy". South China Morning Post. Hong Kong. 18 August 2014. Retrieved 18 August 2014.
- ^ a b "More street fights' cooling effect". The Standard. 19 August 2014. Retrieved 19 August 2014.
- ^ a b Ng, Joyce (10 August 2014). "Free meals and other treats for anti-Occupy Central marchers defended". South China Morning Post. Hong Kong. Retrieved 17 August 2014.
- ^ Asia Pacific News (17 August 2014). "Thousands join anti-Occupy rally in Hong Kong". CNBC. Retrieved 5 October 2014.
- ^ 派飯誘8.17遊行 周融稱無問題. Apple Daily (in Chinese). Hong Kong. 30 July 2014. Retrieved 17 August 2014.
- ^ "Cable TV faces legal action over report". Hong Kong: RTHK. 19 August 2014. Retrieved 19 August 2014.
- ^ 直擊「蛇頭」請人湊夠數 派錢送禮物 報到即可收工. Apple Daily (in Chinese). Hong Kong. Retrieved 19 August 2014.
- ^ 社團拒認派錢 4疑點未解 記者「放蛇」遊行 獲免費午餐派錢300元. Ming Pao (in Chinese). Hong Kong. 18 August 2014. Archived from the original on 20 August 2014. Retrieved 19 August 2014.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ 商會為遊行人士提供膳食及車費 (in Chinese). Hong Kong: now新聞台. 17 August 2014. Archived from the original on 20 August 2014. Retrieved 19 August 2014.
- ^ "March organiser denies paying marchers". Hong Kong: RTHK. 18 August 2014. Retrieved 19 August 2014.
- ^ "Alliance admits more marchers were paid". The Standard. Hong Kong. 20 August 2014. Retrieved 20 August 2014.
- ^ a b c d "'Snitch line' in operation against school boycotters in H.K." GlobalPost. Archived from the original on 27 January 2014. Retrieved 10 September 2014.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Hong Kong Students to Boycott Classes If Democracy Demands Aren't Met". The Wall Street Journal. 21 August 2014. Retrieved 10 September 2014.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|authors=
ignored (help) - ^ 举报罢课热线被指侵私隐反占中搜师生资料「预_ (in Chinese). 加拿大家园网. Archived from the original on 10 September 2014.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|trans_title=
ignored (|trans-title=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b c "舉報罷課介入校政 破壞信任撕裂社會" Boycott denunciations interfere with school management, destroys trust and divides society. Ming Pao. 10 September 2014. Archived from the original on 11 September 2014
- ^ a b 沙崇校長﹕請周融不用找我. Ming Pao (in Chinese). 9 September 2014. Archived from the original on 10 September 2014.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|trans_title=
ignored (|trans-title=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b c "Exco member says he'd join Occupy if it would work". South China Morning Post, 11 September 2014, pg. C1
- ^ Lau, Kenneth (12 September 2014). "Churches divided on class boycotts". The Standard.
- ^ "吳克儉:應向學生講罷課的負面影響". Yahoo 新聞香港. 10 September 2014. Archived from the original on 11 September 2014.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ "重申設立《學校家長救救孩子》熱綫目的". Alliance for Peace and Democracy. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
- ^ Albert, Cheng (18 September 2014). "Champions of Beijing's camp losing public opinion war on political reform". South China Morning Post. Hong Kong. Retrieved 19 September 2014.
- ^ The main road in Hong Kong Island and Kowloon (Harcourt Road in Admiralty, Hennessy Road in Causeway Bay, and Nathan Road in Mong Kok, which are occupied by the 2014 Hong Kong protests, since 28 September 2014]
- ^ a b Siu, Phila (28 October 2014). "Doubts over anti-Occupy petition". Hong Kong: South China Morning Post. Retrieved 28 October 2014.
- ^ a b Ong, Larry (27 October 2014). "'C. Ronaldo' Signs Anti-Occupy Central Petition and Gets Approved". The Epoch Times. Retrieved 28 October 2014.
- ^ "反佔中大聯盟改名 周六起全港街站收簽名撐政改" (in Traditional Chinese). Hong Kong: 852郵報. 5 May 2015. Retrieved 3 June 2016.
- ^ "「撐政改反拉布做選民」完結 累計121萬人簽名支持" (in Traditional Chinese). Hong Kong: Alliance for Peace and Democracy. 18 May 2015. Retrieved 3 June 2016.