Main page   Discussion   Members   Assessment   Open tasks Popular pages   Recognized content     Awards   Portal

Spaceflight Project‑class

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles Project This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

WikiProject Spaceflight
General information
Established (2006-09-25) 25 September 2006 (age 17) Articles under scope 9325 out of 6,818,672 articles.
Sub-projects
Active Adopt an astronaut Timeline of spaceflight
Inactive Aerospace biography ESA SpaceX Wikipedia:Constellation program
Defunct Human spaceflight Space Colonization Unmanned spaceflight
Matters of interest
Grading scheme Assessment Log Quality Featured topics Recognized content
Statistics Open tasks New articles Popular pages
Others 2007 reorganisation 2010 reorganisation Spaceflight portal
Resources
Advice Article titles Launch articles Style guide
Templates Tab headers Generic The Downlink Timeline of spaceflight Template list Template index
Newsletter (The Downlink)
Discussion Issues Mailing list
User
Awards Mailing list Members Userboxes

After a protracted argument on the Dyson sphere talk page that seemed to be going nowhere, I decided to consolidate and restate the basic issues concerning this section in general, and one particular instance that has proven especially vexing, as I see them. I hope that members of this and other related WikiProjects might weigh in and give their opinions. P Aculeius (talk) 18:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is this List of missions to Mars, and there are three lists that are mostly duplicates, List of Mars landers, List of Mars orbiters, and List of artificial objects on Mars. I think both can be safely redirected to the main list without any loss of content, with a little merge from the third article (section on garbage on Mars). What do you all think? Artem.G (talk) 12:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]